Obscure Moderator

It breaks my heart to think about what was going through Charlie's mind the night before he was killed. He knew "they" were going to kill him, he said it to at least two people, neither of them were Erika. Yet, he doesn't sleep with his wife, he doesn't even tell her goodbye.

It is 💯 morally inappropriate for a married woman, who is not Charlie’s wife, to publicly discuss intimate details about him, particularly when he is dead and his widow is still alive and raising their children. There is a line between commentary and exploitation, and this crosses it. Discussing politics, public statements, or even disagreements is one thing. Sitting around dissecting a dead man’s marriage, hinting at improprieties, implying betrayal, and turning deeply personal family matters into entertainment for clicks and engagement is something entirely different. What makes it worse is the self righteousness attached to it all. You cannot claim to stand for family values, morality, Christianity, decency, or protecting children while simultaneously feeding millions of people intimate gossip about a husband and wife whose children will one day read every word of it online. Those children did not ask for this. His widow did not ask for this. A grieving widow should not have to wake up every day wondering what new insinuation, rumor, or “just asking questions” segment is going to be blasted out to millions of viewers next. There is nothing brave about it. There is nothing journalistic about it. It is gossip packaged as righteousness. At some point people need to ask themselves what they are actually consuming and supporting. Because when someone profits from tearing apart the intimate details of a dead man’s marriage while his family is still trying to survive unimaginable loss, that is not truth seeking. That is cruelty for the sake of cruelty! And since when did “journalism” become gossiping about whether Charlie was a virgin or claiming he only dated Erika to make another girl jealous? That is not investigative reporting. That is middle school gossip with a microphone. It’s morally bankrupt. A man was murdered, children lost their father, and somehow people turned the conversation into psychoanalyzing his dating life for clicks and engagement. It’s so grotesque.

This “Elizabeth Lane” chick is completely manufactured in Moscow for the US market. She appeared out of nowhere—a Georgian fan of Putin’s who (unsurprisingly!) was running a shady conspiracy media operation until she began popping up on Tucker Carlson’s show and elsewhere in the pro-Kremlin network. She had no audience until a very particular group of people in media began propping her up. Seeing her on Owens’ show is just what I’d expect.

“Erika Kirk was not at or near Fort Huachuca on September 8, 2025 or September 9, 2025. Neither Mrs. Kirk nor Andrew Kolvet was in Utah on September 10, 2025 until after the assassination took place.” Erika WAS NOT at Fort Hauchuca 9/8, 9/9 or 9/10! Source: Collin Campbell cease and desist letter from Erika’s attorney.