Oneleet

204 posts

Oneleet banner
Oneleet

Oneleet

@oneleet

Cybersecurity Compliance Without Security Theater — The all-in-one security and compliance platform for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CIS, and more.

San Francisco Katılım Nisan 2015
125 Takip Edilen889 Takipçiler
Oneleet
Oneleet@oneleet·
Oneleet and @simdotai are entering into an exclusive partnership to launch the first AI-native GRC workflow solution. This is a big step toward replacing slow, manual compliance work with intelligent workflows built for enterprise scale.
Oneleet tweet media
English
5
2
20
30.8K
Oneleet retweetledi
Mani Batra
Mani Batra@manibatra·
Use @oneleet. Actually up your security and sleep soundly. Such a great team!
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
0
1
5
4.7K
Oneleet retweetledi
Sebastian Mellen
Sebastian Mellen@sebmellen·
This Delve drama is hilarious. Use @oneleet or @TrustVanta and not a 'compliance diploma mill.' But, we're at it, I love getting to talk about my team and the cool stuff we're building! If you use Prisma, look at using our "@cerebruminc/yates" library! RLS + @prisma ❤️!
Sebastian Mellen@sebmellen

Find me a security hole and we will pay you: cerebrum.com/security. Look at this open-source lib our CTO built that is the backbone of all of our RLS-based security infra github.com/cerebruminc/ya…. Honestly dude we have the best pentesting program, best CTO, best CISO, and best internal security approach I could ask for. We also have audits that I'm proud of because our controls are well scoped. Your view that audits and security are somehow orthogonal is uninformed but also stupid. There is a lot of value to a good audit process and a good auditor, and I'm sorry you haven't found it yet. Eventually, if you keep growing, you will work with an auditor that helps your business deliver more value and do so securely. I'm also sorry that you feel the need to drag people down. It seems like you're trying to help people with your app, and that is wonderful. Defrauding people is not wonderful. And... you haven't fundamentally refuted any of the allegations about Delve, you've just handwaved them away and said "oh everyone is selling dogshit" and I'm telling you that's not true. What is your position here? Nothing you're saying is coherent. If you're an angel investor in Delve I can understand the defensiveness but otherwise ???

English
0
1
8
4.3K
Oneleet retweetledi
Atiyu
Atiyu@AtiyuM·
If you want to get (actually) compliant. There’s always @oneleet : )
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
0
1
3
891
Oneleet
Oneleet@oneleet·
It didn't take long for this to become painfully obvious to all of tech.
Viraj Acharya@_virajacharya

"There was almost an inverse correlation. The more certifications a company would have, the more obvious their shortcomings would be to me." @oneleet CEO, @BryanOnel86 explains: "When companies are asked to prove to their partners whether they're secure or not, it's not about a weird paper dance that everybody loves to do." "Nobody cares about the actual piece of paper. I mean, in some way they do because it has become theater to some extent." "But the real question that underlies these other questions is, can I trust you with my data? Can I give you the keys to my kingdom and trust you to protect it as well as I would?" "An industry that revolves around providing rubber stamps and fake paper certifications that don't prove anything completely eliminates that ability to trust each other."

English
0
0
0
653
Oneleet
Oneleet@oneleet·
Sorry to be so strict. We just don't want anyone to question your security and compliance.
Loren@lorenforeal

@pk_iv Never been more grateful to be on @oneleet, it’s stressful keeping up with the strict monitors but I have the confidence our report is dialed

English
1
0
3
629
Oneleet retweetledi
Albert Lam
Albert Lam@albert_·
Back when we were evaluating solutions @BryanOnel86 was the only vendor who expressed a genuine interest in security, not just speed Glad we went with @oneleet for our SOC2
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
0
2
27
2.6K
Oneleet retweetledi
Tim Suchanek
Tim Suchanek@TimSuchanek·
I'm glad we're working with @oneleet 🙏
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
0
1
6
569
Oneleet retweetledi
Fred Dogan
Fred Dogan@firatcand·
Seeing what’s happening with Delve, as a someone who tried build a similar product before: SOC 2 is mostly security theater! Most people in tech already know this. They just pretend not to... Credit to once a competitor: As far as I know from other founders, @oneleet do a good job on actually making you secure.
English
0
1
4
430
Oneleet retweetledi
hari raghavan
hari raghavan@haridigresses·
@LeoDuquesnel I haven’t used them for soc-2 yet, only pentesting, but I like @oneleet’s approach. They specifically talk about customized control design, and philosophically dislike the “theater” involved.
English
1
1
4
546
Oneleet retweetledi
usrnk1
usrnk1@usrnk1·
some WIP pixels from today 🍿
usrnk1 tweet mediausrnk1 tweet mediausrnk1 tweet media
English
3
9
173
15.3K
Oneleet retweetledi
Y Combinator
Y Combinator@ycombinator·
Congrats to @oneleet on their $33M Series A! Oneleet helps companies become secure and compliant — bringing penetration testing, code scanning, CSPM, attack surface monitoring, MDM, and security training all into one integrated platform. techcrunch.com/2025/10/02/one…
English
9
4
91
20.2K
Oneleet retweetledi
usrnk1
usrnk1@usrnk1·
friday's pixel delivery 🚚
usrnk1 tweet mediausrnk1 tweet mediausrnk1 tweet media
English
4
9
200
15.8K
Oneleet retweetledi
Xavier Pladevall
Xavier Pladevall@pladevall·
Nights like the one we had yesterday is what make San Francisco so special. Yesterday we got to host @bryanonel86 from @oneleet who was in San Francisco for the week. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗱𝘂𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 → Why “this isn’t working” feels personal and how to separate ego from experiments → Needing to convince investors even when your numbers sparkle → The parts of go-to-market that really move the needle for a technical founder 𝗠𝘆 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 1. Vision sets the ceiling → Solid execution is table stakes, but a small vision caps the upside before you start. 2. Pain beats polish → If you solve a burning problem, buyers forgive rough edges in your GTM. Huge thanks to Bryan for the candor and to @michaelfester, @marieschneegans, @upekabee, @iAligator, @raghavp, @skeptrune, @TimSuchanek for joining us and pushing the conversation forward! We will definitely be hosting more of these so if you'd like to join please comment below and I will add you to our list.
English
1
1
11
3.1K
Oneleet retweetledi
usrnk1
usrnk1@usrnk1·
a little before & after form 🔄
usrnk1 tweet mediausrnk1 tweet media
English
0
3
101
7.6K
Oneleet retweetledi
Alexander Belanger
Alexander Belanger@abelanger5·
@konstiwohlwend @oneleet This is all true, but what makes it even better is that the platform is almost entirely focused on security (disclaimer: used to work at Oneleet + we use them @hatchet_dev) completely different experience from most SOC2 vendors.
English
0
2
9
2.2K
Oneleet retweetledi
Findly
Findly@findlyai·
From “where do we even start?” to achieving SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance, all thanks to @oneleet. They made the process clear, structured, and answered every question along the way.
Findly tweet media
English
1
4
9
1.9K
Oneleet retweetledi
Spot
Spot@talk2spot·
Talk to Spot is now SOC 2 Type 2 compliant! Thanks to @oneleet for helping us raise the bar on data security. If your team handles sensitive HR and compliance cases, we've got you covered.
Spot tweet media
English
0
2
4
918