OptimistLi₿

12.8K posts

OptimistLi₿

OptimistLi₿

@OptimistLib

#Bitcoin is the full stack monetary & financial system #SatsTheStandard

Katılım Haziran 2016
621 Takip Edilen469 Takipçiler
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@nailbiting4fun @user762 @SullyMichaelvan @chamath Chamath just invested passively in Bitcoin without any conviction. He said "it's schmuck insurance" Saylor is in a different league. He understood Bitcoin truly and threw his full weight behind it. They're not in the same league
English
1
0
0
13
CryptoFix
CryptoFix@CryptoFix__·
@rohanhirani @saylor @chamath @DavidSacks @Jason @friedberg Saylor is generally not a good guest, though. He doesnt like to be pushed. For example, if someone would ask the challanges Btc is facing against the looming quantum threat, he'd just say everything will be fine and if you pushed he would snap. @TheBlueMatt is the perfect guest.
English
4
0
2
1.1K
Jim Chalmers MP
Jim Chalmers MP@JEChalmers·
Today the independent Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Board increased the cash rate by 25 basis points. We already had an inflation challenge in our economy but the war in the Middle East is making this challenge worse. At a time of immense global instability, this will put even more pressure on families and businesses. Many Australians were already doing it tough and are now feeling the impact of conflict in the Middle East through higher petrol prices as well. That’s why we’re rolling out responsible cost of living relief and taking action to give consumers a fair go at the bowser, through higher penalties, more surveillance and more supply.
English
1.6K
83
449
156.1K
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
Why do some people have such a hard time accepting the immense good and millions of lives saved by vaccines over the decades? Why? What hurts them about that fact?
English
408
229
2.3K
41.8K
OptimistLi₿ retweetledi
Joe Lonsdale
Joe Lonsdale@JTLonsdale·
Balaji is a bright guy but he fled the USA and has set his mind totally against our future success. He lives in a world where US is losing and China is winning. This is his fixation. It’s dangerous, and it’s wrong. And this war has embarrassed China, destroyed their 100 cargo planes of war materials and their military ally, and frustrates them. It’s fair to disagree about the attack. But saying that its architects are guilty of any downside is childlike nonsense. They should be proud of their work and their courage to take on this evil. If you’re against the war, do you get credit for the last two decades of literal mass torture and mass rape and repression by this regime, and its terror funding and death around the region? Do you get credit for “supporting” the billions it spends on social media bots and information operations to polarize the US against ourselves, and weaken the west? Do you also get credit for what would have been the next twenty years of that? Are you, Balaji, responsible for that side of it? No? But if you are for it, you get zero credit for fixing any of that, but blamed for ALL the possible downsides? Total BS. The mullahs holding the region hostage shouldn’t get your help to blame others for the damage they do. Geopolitics and war is complex and there are risks on all sides. There is risk in acting, and in not acting. I’m really glad we are taking advantage of the massive innovation and competence gap that exists at this moment, and finally eliminating so much evil. I hope for freedom for the Iranian people and know that the situation is hard and complex, but either way it is good to stop the bad guys and eliminate so many of the worst groups, who have done so much damage, from history. Nobody should get away with what those bastards did for so long; this was long overdue.
Balaji@balajis

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

English
289
246
3.2K
482K
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@TFTC21 You think the US will have difficulty in sinking the ships that pass through the strait? Will china be able to protect the ships? Don't be delusional
English
0
0
0
55
TFTC
TFTC@TFTC21·
An Indian oil tanker just crossed the Strait of Hormuz safely by paying for its cargo in Chinese yuan. Iran let it through. Ships paying in dollars get nothing. The world's most critical energy chokepoint is now being used to enforce a parallel payment system. Pay in yuan, you get safe passage. Pay in dollars, good luck. The Strait has been closed for 19 days. Twenty percent of global oil supply flows through that 21-mile gap. Dubai crude hit $152 a barrel. WTI in the US sits at $94. That is a $55 spread for the same commodity. In February it was 75 cents. SAS canceled 1,000 flights. Gas stations in Bangkok are dry. The IEA authorized the largest emergency oil release in history: 400 million barrels. JPMorgan says that buys weeks, not months. The Fed meets today boxed in. Oil-driven inflation means they cannot cut. A weakening economy means they cannot hike. The US national debt is at $39 trillion. The strategic reserves are draining. The petrodollar is not dying in a boardroom. It is dying in a shipping lane.
TFTC tweet media
English
20
44
274
15.9K
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@chamath @saylor Making Bitcoin quantum resistant is simple. It's a small piece of software, the solution is well known and there is already consensus that the change is needed. Quantum is basically FUD
English
0
0
0
33
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@osbourne1504 @Oxandrolonely @ValerieAnne1970 What are the main reasons for elevated LDL ? I know it's diet. Is it high because of high cholesterol content in food or is it certain foods trigger your liver to produce higher levels of cholesterol
English
0
0
1
23
Dr Nicole Osbourne
Dr Nicole Osbourne@osbourne1504·
Cholesterol isn’t a disease, atherosclerosis is. And LDL cholesterol is one of the main causal drivers of it. The ‘goalposts moved’ because science improved. Early medicine didn’t even understand lipoproteins properly. Once large epidemiological studies, genetics, and randomized statin trials accumulated, the relationship became crystal clear. • People with genetically high LDL develop premature heart disease. • People with genetically low LDL rarely do. • Lowering LDL with statins, PCSK9 inhibitors, or diet reduces heart attacks and strokes in randomized trials. That’s not a conspiracy, that’s causality demonstrated from multiple independent lines of evidence. Also, cholesterol is so “essential” that your liver makes 80% of it already. You don’t need to eat piles of it to survive. Claiming cardiology invented LDL targets to sell statins is like claiming gravity was invented to sell parachutes.
English
17
1
17
957
Valerie Anne Smith
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970·
Cholesterol is not a disease...Cholesterol is a nutrient.
Valerie Anne Smith tweet media
English
63
727
2.1K
29.5K
Pius the Banker
Pius the Banker@PiusSprenger·
I don’t consider it a healthy sign if the rate on $STRC keeps increasing in order to keep the price close to par. Many people view STRC as a highly innovative product with the potential to revolutionize capital markets. Personally, I’m less convinced. I experienced firsthand the great wave of innovation in the credit derivatives space in the early 2000s. Some of those products had built-in mechanisms—not dissimilar to the STRC feature. Most of them ultimately turned out to be disasters for investors. I’m not suggesting that the same outcome will occur with STRC. But it’s important to be cautious around this type of financial innovation. In my view, Bitcoin doesn’t need financial engineering to succeed—just as credit markets didn’t require complex derivatives to finance great companies.
Pius the Banker tweet media
English
84
5
142
21.3K
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@AlenaNazarova_ Body uses carbohydrates first because there's is no way the body can store it and it's toxic to keep it around
English
1
0
10
525
Alena
Alena@AlenaNazarova_·
Carbohydrates don’t cause weight gain. We are high-carbohydrate creatures, which is why the body uses glucose first for energy. Our brains also run primarily on carbohydrates.
English
149
21
527
125.6K
Martin Bans
Martin Bans@cardinal4ever·
@AlenaNazarova_ Carbohydrates are sugars, how do they not contribute to weight gain? Please advise
English
2
0
4
911
Boris Johnson
Boris Johnson@BorisJohnson·
I've long suspected Bitcoin is a giant Ponzi scheme and now I'm hearing tales of woe that make me fear I'm right. mol.im/a/15643681
English
6.4K
739
4.9K
4.4M
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@SGBarbour What if someone bought all of gold or silver? Why is it any different?
English
0
0
2
252
Steve Barbour
Steve Barbour@SGBarbour·
Thought experiment. If Strategy bought all of the bitcoin in existence, what would the total network value be? Zero. Networks are valued based on their *distribution*. Strategy accumulating bitcoin is neutral at best, but likely bearish. :)
English
148
3
153
22.5K
Bit Paine ⚡️
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaine·
1000 $BTC within ~30 mins of market open. Unbelievable. $STRC Congratulations @phongle @saylor and team.
Bit Paine ⚡️ tweet media
English
30
70
916
21.6K
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@paoloardoino The biggest driver for Bitcoin adoption is price. How can Tether help it? MSTR is helping the price by buying up $ billions every week
English
1
0
0
647
Paolo Ardoino 🤖
Paolo Ardoino 🤖@paoloardoino·
Tether built an internal Bitcoin dedicated dashboard to help our teams to support Bitcoin adoption and education across the globe 🍊🌍
Paolo Ardoino 🤖 tweet media
English
42
69
772
90.5K
Derrick Evans
Derrick Evans@DerrickEvans4WV·
🚨 Gavin Newsom: "Trump wants to put America in reverse. To bring us back to a pre-1960s world."
English
141
5
25
14.1K
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@meglio @saylor I'm from Australia using Interactive Brokers. It worked just fine for me
English
1
0
0
18
meglio
meglio@meglio·
@saylor Not true, Interactive Brokers disabled me from buying it from Australia because I'm not a wholesale trader. @saylor
English
2
0
4
611
Michael Saylor
Michael Saylor@saylor·
Stretch is for everyone. $STRC
English
597
1K
8.2K
757.6K
OptimistLi₿
OptimistLi₿@OptimistLib·
@CrisReed We're approaching a hockey stick 🏒 moment. This will take off vertically
English
0
0
1
13
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
Conservatives understand liberals a lot better than liberals understand conservatives. That's because conservatives have most of the guns, trucks, and farms, while liberals have most of the cameras and microphones. So every time a conservative turns on a television, tunes the radio, or watches a film, he's hearing what liberals think, from liberals. Where does a liberal go to hear what conservatives think? All the radio, film and television version of conservatives are strawmen written by his fellow liberals. To hear what a conservative thinks from a conservative, he'd have to deliberately go and have a non-shouting conversation with someone he wouldn't normally talk to.
Sandy Petersen 🪔@SandyofCthulhu

Even in shows like The West Wing, when they’d have a token “good conservative” character, it drove me crazy because their fake conservative never spoke like actual conservatives. Their arguments weren’t the same, nor were their positions. They spewed watered-down leftist stuff.

English
146
653
7.4K
240.4K