Who? Me?

3.9K posts

Who? Me?

Who? Me?

@PanGenesis

Katılım Ağustos 2017
25 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@Anabasi80862948 @CuriousMrFox101 @Mike_from_PA Update: "KaMaLa WoUlD hAvE iNvAdEd IrAn" is the kind of cope you have to believe in at this point. Enjoy more brown people getting needlessly killed and gas prices inflated by over a dollar.
English
0
0
0
8
ian bremmer
ian bremmer@ianbremmer·
brexit: who knew?
ian bremmer tweet media
English
118
535
2.5K
397.2K
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@weatherelated @BianchiWeather 2/2 Perhaps other areas of Denver got lower measurements, but it's hard to imagine they were so much lower that it didn't set a record.
English
0
0
0
27
EstesParkWx
EstesParkWx@weatherelated·
@BianchiWeather Wait did Denver not cash in at all in the 2014 and 2017 snow events? I seem to remember CSU graduation getting over a foot back in 2017 (Estes got like 2 or 3 feet)
English
2
0
0
537
Chris Bianchi
Chris Bianchi@BianchiWeather·
If Denver receives over 4" from this week's storm, it'd be our biggest May snowstorm in 23 years. Last 4"+ May snowstorm: May 10, 2003 (23 years) Last 6"+ May snowstorm: May 3-5, 2001 (25 years) Last 8"+ May snowstorm: May 5-6, 1978 (48 years) #COwx
English
13
12
206
38.9K
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@weatherelated @BianchiWeather 1/2 Downtown Denver got well over 6 inches of snow (perhaps close to a foot) in about 10 minutes back on May 8th, 2017, then stopped just as suddenly. I made sure to note the date because it was the most insane weather event I have witnessed in person.
English
0
0
1
70
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@sentientist I would love to see Diana's critics go after Freddie deBoer, a bonafide leftist who nonetheless shares many of her views. Maybe, just maybe certain truths transcend politics.
English
0
0
0
68
Diana S. Fleischman
Diana S. Fleischman@sentientist·
I listened to a segment on the left-wing podcast Ill Conceived about me. They did something almost impressive: they managed to talk about me for minutes based purely on article titles and people I’m associated with. They hadn’t even clicked through to read the first paragraph. This is how most podcasts are.
Colin Wright@SwipeWright

Podcasting lets people speak vaguely about a topic while creating the impression of thorough treatment. I’ve often pushed back on something a podcaster posted on X, only to be told by their fans that it was “thoroughly addressed” somewhere in a three-hour podcast. But when I listen to the relevant section, it doesn’t deliver. It’s often just more vagueness and dancing around the issue, avoiding making direct, falsifiable claims they can be held to. There’s a reason many podcasters don’t write articles about the topics they discuss. Writing forces them to make coherent arguments without fluff. It forces them to connect every link between premise and conclusion. It forces them to cite sources accurately instead of speaking vaguely off the cuff. It’s also easier to be misled by smooth-talking podcasters. People like listening to podcasts because spoken language is the more natural way humans have received information throughout our evolutionary history. But that doesn’t mean it’s the best way to communicate with precision. It’s not. Podcasters also form relationships with their audiences. They speak to them like friends, even like family. None of this is necessarily a bad thing, but it can lead people to lower their standards for accepting the claims they make. A statement communicated verbally by a skilled orator can sound convincing, when the same statement written down plainly would seem absurd. This is why people who both write well and speak eloquently—think Douglass Murray and Christopher Hitchens—are so influential. Podcasting also puts a moat around claims due to the effort required to extract the relevant information. Fewer people are willing to wade through long episodes, constantly hitting ⏩ to find the segment in question, and then transcribe the audio into text. Podcasters can also more easily claim they were taken out of context, whether due to clipping or failing to have watched the previous week’s 3-hour episode that supposedly laid all the groundwork. It’s more difficult to claim this when your arguments are stated clearly and succinctly in writing. Podcasts are great. But anyone presenting themselves as a public intellectual and making serious, high-stakes claims about the world needs to do more than talk. They need to write.

English
7
2
91
8.7K
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@chasinbrains @sentientist I'll distill it down to far less than 1.5 hours. Before 2019 Peterson had some clearly sketchy tendencies, but he was very much worth listening to. After that, he went maximally right-wing r***rd. The induced coma may have damaged his brain, but he's done worse to his audience.
English
0
0
0
7
Brian 😏
Brian 😏@chasinbrains·
@sentientist Decoding The Guru's was super disappointing. I get it, trying to represent thousands of hours of Jordan Peterson in 1.5hrs is tough, but man they didn't do a great job.
English
1
0
1
157
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@Mucculenc3 @AceHarlem299840 @DomainDead Indeed, identity politics is feces all the way down. Whether it's MAGA white supremacism or the haunting leftist fear that some white cishet male somewhere might be happy.
English
0
1
1
11
dead domain
dead domain@DomainDead·
Is there an evolutionary reason why room temperature intelligence dipshits are drawn to the most simian, half measure gaps in evolution like Von and Rogan? Is there a reason so many people see these stupid, shit covered monkeys and go “they seem like they know ideas good!”?
Headquarters@HQNewsNow

Theo Von: It feels like there's this war machine, and our soldiers are put into these spaces and they're just there to serve an America they believe in. It just feels like it's causing a lot of pain and fear

English
63
163
2.1K
62.2K
J FROSTY
J FROSTY@AceHarlem299840·
@DomainDead White America has been conditioned to listen and adore ego driven spite
English
2
0
1
290
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@DomainDead "Same goes for OTK." I'm not sure I understand the connection. I believe she was a fan of the right-wing stooge Asmongold, who used to be part of OTK. However, I'm not aware of any official association.
English
0
0
0
44
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@DomainDead Even though Fuentes is being wildly disingenuous, I am all for it. The practical effect of his rhetoric is helping the Democrats. Which is more than I can say for so many dips**t leftists like Hasan Piker.
English
0
0
0
69
dead domain
dead domain@DomainDead·
No he’s not. He says this shit to bait the most credulous rubes so they share his stream clips and go “well look how bad Trump is doing even THIS GUY is turning on him!” And he’s doing it so you all keep normalizing his presence so he stays relevant.
yeet@Awk20000

Nick Fuentes is thinking about becoming a liberal “I just have to become liberal at this point..I can’t do it anymore..this is what it’s become..everything’s fake, everything’s a conspiracy..bro science, schizo nonsense..I’m just so so beyond that”

English
48
1.2K
10.3K
122.4K
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@DomainDead 2/2 Then he went real fast from endorsing Bernie to exclusively surrounding himself with a right-wing bubble and worshipping the figures within it. Nothing more than a vague anti-establishment streak without any real thought behind it.
English
0
0
0
7
Who? Me?
Who? Me?@PanGenesis·
@DomainDead 1/2 I liked Rogan back when he a) would have anybody on, even if that included a lot of charlatans and b) would provide at least some pushback against them (Rubin, Owens, and Yiannopolous come to mind).
English
0
0
0
12