Peter Todd

419 posts

Peter Todd banner
Peter Todd

Peter Todd

@Petertodd

brand things @palantirtech | born on the internet

Katılım Nisan 2015
257 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@Petertodd·
My political party is Palantir.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
147
186
4.6K
889.4K
Alexander McCoy
Alexander McCoy@AlexanderMcCoy4·
When I was in college Palantir did a recruitment presentation for students, and at one point a student asked about civil liberties and the Palantir guys said “oh don’t worry we have a Civil Liberties Team that takes care of that” and another student asked “so what happens if that team finds something the company is doing is violating civil liberties” and the lead Palantir guy just laughed out loud.
Peter Todd@Petertodd

One day, all the Palantir haters will have to come to grips with the reality that the disinformation surrounding the company was deliberately created by our adversaries who feared its potential to strengthen and embolden the ability of free and democratic societies.

English
31
1K
10.8K
646.2K
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@Petertodd·
My political party is Palantir.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
147
186
4.6K
889.4K
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@Petertodd·
Pretty crazy, considering all the good we are delivering for the NHS. 110,078 additional patients undergoing procedures in hospital theatres. 297,943 patients safely discharged from hospital using the software, with a 15.3% reduction in delays to discharge for patients who spend more than a week in hospital. 6.8% increase in the number of patients with cancer concerns getting answers within 28 days. 797,728 patients safely removed from NHS waiting lists.
English
3
0
2
1.3K
DV
DV@dv_htdcanbf·
@Petertodd We should arrest whoever makes this statement
English
2
1
135
2.4K
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@Petertodd·
One day, all the Palantir haters will have to come to grips with the reality that the disinformation surrounding the company was deliberately created by our adversaries who feared its potential to strengthen and embolden the ability of free and democratic societies.
English
597
99
1.1K
830.6K
Michael
Michael@MacroMicroNMike·
@Petertodd @PalantirHotline That means you’re a Republican. Democrats like @DemSocialists actively protests against Palantir and ran Palantir and all future AI companies out of Denver, Colorado.
English
3
1
8
4.5K
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@Petertodd·
@o7laurence Everyone’s entitled to their own opinion. We aren’t for everyone.
English
26
0
13
2.6K
laurence
laurence@o7laurence·
I don't have the energy to go into a full blown back and forth here, but: 22 points about power, duty, and national security with zero mention of civil liberties, surveillance overreach, or individual rights. From the company that sells predictive policing tools to law enforcement. The fact that you work in branding there and don't seem to clock how the average person perceives Palantir, which is not as a noble defender of democracy, but as the dystopian surveillance company, kind of says it all.
English
7
10
219
3.9K
laurence
laurence@o7laurence·
@Petertodd deeply troubling summary of a deeply troubling piece of literature.
English
2
1
228
8.3K
Peter Todd retweetledi
Eliano A Younes
Eliano A Younes@eliano·
Please help me. I’m torn 😰 should I listen to the guy who spent years building on Palantir’s software, or some annon account with 6 followers and a Chris Farley profile picture? “For three and a half years I led a team of 150 engineers at NHS England, building the Federated Data Platform… For the past two years I have watched people who have never logged into the system confidently explain what is wrong with it. I have read articles describing the platform as dangerous, useless, or both, written by people who could not tell you what it actually does.” bartlettdata.co.uk/post/blog-comi…
English
13
17
184
18.5K
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@Petertodd·
Everyone’s out here posting about how there is a growing premium on marketing roles in tech. I disagree. This is the wrong read. We are entering the era of anti marketing. People are tired of hype. Only thing that will matter is if your product does what it says it will do.
English
1
0
7
1.9K
Peter Todd retweetledi
Ted Mabrey
Ted Mabrey@MabreyTed·
Rare to read an article about Palantir that is both incisive and accurate. "Per Mabrey: “I remember [Alex] Karp telling me, ‘What justifies a good product thesis?’ And him saying, ‘You have a really critical societal problem that is defined by irreconcilable trade-offs, where if you can make any progress against those trade-offs, you’ve created intrinsic value in the world.” Believing that tech can matter that much requires a certain disposition. Which is why optimism, sitting downstream of the courage and capacity to “care and be able to see past something,” is probably Palantir’s number one recruiting filter, Mabrey said: “Before we get into what you believe, it’s like, can you believe? How cynical are you?” “You can build a product that matters more,” Mabrey said, adding: “And if that’s not true, then what the fuck are we doing here?”
Pirate Wires@PirateWires

EXCLUSIVE: How the Military Uses Palantir, and AI, for War. The military has wanted war AI since Vietnam. Since then, between 60-70 programs attempting to make it have failed. Palantir was, arguably, the first to enter this environment with a new approach: actually identifying the problems by going out into the field. Here, the first substantial report on how Palantir built AI for the military, and exactly how they’re using it, including: • How the outdated targeting tech that Palantir is replacing — including PowerPoint — may have contributed to the accidental bombing of an Iranian school in February. • New details on the conflict between the Pentagon and Anthropic, Palantir’s former AI partner, concerning an update that crippled the CDC’s AI systems and heightened the administration’s fears over who controls this powerful tech. This piece includes sourcing from military case studies, private and public demos of Palantir’s tech, and interviews with Palantir’s Akshay Krishnaswamy, chief architect; Ted Mabrey, head of commercial business; various vertical leaders and engineers at Palantir; Emil Michael, the under secretary of war for research and engineering; as well as sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Essentially, despite fears that the Pentagon is using AI to drop missiles “quicker than the speed of thought,” sidelining human judgment entirely, mainly what it’s doing is replacing spreadsheets, calls, chats, and PowerPoint — to plan targets faster and more carefully. Read the full piece from @dodgeblake 👇

English
10
62
511
92K
Soon
Soon@soontechnology·
In our latest documentary, we traveled to the town of Abilene, Texas to see how 130,000 people are adjusting to OpenAI's biggest data center being built in their community. Texas is projected to be the data center capital of the world by 2030, and Abilene is now home to "the big one."
English
12
14
160
42K
Peter Todd
Peter Todd@Petertodd·
@eliano I’m horrible at tennis, but I play with intensity.
English
1
0
1
318
Eliano A Younes
Eliano A Younes@eliano·
Palantir Tennis Club [Miami 2026]
Eliano A Younes tweet media
Lietuvių
21
4
248
10.3K
Peter Todd retweetledi
Kevin Mark
Kevin Mark@KevinMark·
Witnessing DoorDash drivers soullessly interact with restaurant workers is such a blackpill. Nary a smile or pleasantry exchanged.
English
2
1
17
1.6K