
#4 - Catherine Austin Fitts, financial expert and Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during the Bush (H.W.) administration, has long warned about the dangers of CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currencies).
🇺🇸 Bob Brewer 🇺🇸🇺🇸
36.3K posts

@PoliticalBrew
First Law = God's Works & Words | 2nd = Equality at Creation & Unalienable Rights | 3rd = Consent of Governed https://t.co/hf1UYQZzRp #BlackstoneBookClub

#4 - Catherine Austin Fitts, financial expert and Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during the Bush (H.W.) administration, has long warned about the dangers of CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currencies).



TEXAS IS BREAKING ITS OWN ELECTION LAWS — RIGHT NOW During the 2026 Primary, Texas failed to follow its own Election Code. Not slightly — systemically. Texas law, Section 87.121 of the Texas Election Code, mandates that early voting clerks maintain a daily public roster of voters: In-person voting: Updated daily, published by 11:00 a.m. next day Mail-in ballots: Published by 11:00 a.m. the day after receipt This data must be posted online and include: Name Address (unless confidential) VUID Precinct Date voted During early voting, Texas released data in FOUR different formats. Only ONE met legal requirements. The other THREE were missing County or Precinct data or BOTH. Why This Matters 1. The law wasn’t followed. “Just obey the law” didn’t happen. 2. It blocks real analysis. Our 2024 data showed voters appearing in multiple precincts and counties. That pattern can only be detected with complete, consistent data. This made that far more difficult. When required data is: Incomplete Inconsistent Constantly changing …it doesn’t look accidental. It looks like obfuscation. And nothing signals wrongdoing more clearly than making verification harder. When the law requires transparency — and the State delivers confusion — that’s not compliance. Texans, and all Americans, deserve better Because without verification… there is no trust.

TEXAS IS BREAKING ITS OWN ELECTION LAWS — AND WE KNOW WHO’S RESPONSIBLE Texas Election Code 87.121 isn’t a suggestion. It requires early voting clerks to post DAILY public rosters with name, address, VUID, precinct, and date voted by 11:00 a.m. — online, and complete. In the 2026 Primary, under Gov. Greg Abbott and the Texas Secretary of State, the State pushed out FOUR different data formats. Only ONE met the law. The other THREE hid or stripped county and/or precinct — the exact data you need to detect cross‑precinct and cross‑county voting. That’s not “sloppy.” That’s engineered confusion. When you knowingly publish incomplete, inconsistent, constantly changing election data, you are not “administering” elections — you’re sabotaging verification. Greg Abbott sits on a $100M+ war chest and tells Texans to trust the system, while his own administration makes the legal audit trail unusable. I know, we are attempting to audit what we can afford to audit. One county $6K. The Secretary of State’s office knows exactly what 87.121 requires — they train counties on web-posting requirements and early voting rosters every year. So here’s the question for @GregAbbott_TX, the Texas Secretary of State, and every Republican in leadership who signed off on this data mess: If everything is clean… why are you breaking your own law and making lawful verification impossible? This isn’t “election denial.” This is election accountability. Without verification, there is no trust. Without trust, elections are theater. And the current cast of characters are the outlaws. Time for a new sheriff. ~ Doc

The UK desperately needs another William Wilberforce. I hope @Cambridge_Uni will produce one. @cambridgeunion




When the people realize exactly what the founders meant by “necessary and proper”. In article 1 section 8 of the constitution it’s gonna make them ponder all those things they have done that haven’t been . And those two words don’t mean what we think it means . They are two words with very distinct an strict meanings that offer no discretion like some of them think. Necessary and proper are two words in this provision that must be used together although many times they have tried to separate and leave out the word proper when it is not just a redundant word but used with purpose and is perhaps the most important word out of the two . However. Within the provision the grant has to fulfill both necessary and proper or it’s a no go. Ok , so what does necessary and proper mean then. “Necessary” means with a defined goal and purpose and fit between executory laws and valid governemnt ends , but this word does not mean indispensable. “Proper” means it must hold a constitutional purpose by requiring executory laws to be within congresses domain and jurisdiction. That is ,by requiring that such laws do not usurp or expand the constitutional powers of any federal institution or infringe on the retained rights of the state or of the people. Article 1 section 8 was strategically laid out with expressed grants over limited subject matter jurisdiction meaning that only those expressed things congress had the power over and only within its boundaries granted by the constitution. This article was a precursors to the 9th and 10th amendments that further declare that the enumeration of rights in the federal constitution and other unenumerated rights that were retained by the states and to the people were out of their jurisdiction giving no discretion over things that were not expressly written within the federal constitution. Likewise, in all the states the same form and jurisdiction was set and established within state constitution over what limited powers the state government had expressly written and anything not written is not a grant of jurisdiction given to them. This is why we always point people to the state constitutions. If it’s not written it’s a power they don’t have that was retained to the people. Read all 51 of your constitutions.

@gdaughtermorris This is so timely. Great post, esp. as I've been looking deeper into the Learning Resources decision. This helps answer a question and gives direction to what I'm working on. God knows and helps those who seek Truth. Praise Him.

I support Thomas Massie! 🫡🇺🇸👏🏽 Thank you sir, for hosting my husband and I in your office this morning, and for supporting us, Catholics! Your courage and bravery to stand for what is right no matter the pressure is admirable! I am hopeful one day you will be our President! God Bless you!

I support Thomas Massie! 🫡🇺🇸👏🏽 Thank you sir, for hosting my husband and I in your office this morning, and for supporting us, Catholics! Your courage and bravery to stand for what is right no matter the pressure is admirable! I am hopeful one day you will be our President! God Bless you!


Joe Kent notes the eerie timing of the FBI arresting Asif Merchant hours before the Butler, PA attempt on Trump’s life The FBI manufactured Merchant’s supposed plot to kill Trump, and blamed it on Iran Trump justified killing Khamenei as revenge for this






TEXAS IS BREAKING ITS OWN ELECTION LAWS — AND WE KNOW WHO’S RESPONSIBLE Texas Election Code 87.121 isn’t a suggestion. It requires early voting clerks to post DAILY public rosters with name, address, VUID, precinct, and date voted by 11:00 a.m. — online, and complete. In the 2026 Primary, under Gov. Greg Abbott and the Texas Secretary of State, the State pushed out FOUR different data formats. Only ONE met the law. The other THREE hid or stripped county and/or precinct — the exact data you need to detect cross‑precinct and cross‑county voting. That’s not “sloppy.” That’s engineered confusion. When you knowingly publish incomplete, inconsistent, constantly changing election data, you are not “administering” elections — you’re sabotaging verification. Greg Abbott sits on a $100M+ war chest and tells Texans to trust the system, while his own administration makes the legal audit trail unusable. I know, we are attempting to audit what we can afford to audit. One county $6K. The Secretary of State’s office knows exactly what 87.121 requires — they train counties on web-posting requirements and early voting rosters every year. So here’s the question for @GregAbbott_TX, the Texas Secretary of State, and every Republican in leadership who signed off on this data mess: If everything is clean… why are you breaking your own law and making lawful verification impossible? This isn’t “election denial.” This is election accountability. Without verification, there is no trust. Without trust, elections are theater. And the current cast of characters are the outlaws. Time for a new sheriff. ~ Doc


🚨 I am demanding Speaker Burrows remove James Talarico from the House leadership positions he (indefensibly) appointed him to. Voters elected Republicans to lead the Texas House... not radical Democrats! Full letter: Speaker Burrows, Shocking statements and videos of Representative James Talarico have made national headlines, including him declaring there are “six genders,” asserting that God is “non-binary,” and using the Biblical narrative of Joseph and Mary to justify elective abortions. While his holding these liberal positions is shocking to Americans newly acclimated with him, you have been well aware for years that he holds these extremist positions and that he has pushed to legislatively enact them, such as his efforts to force public schools to teach DEI and hire DEI officers at taxpayer expense. Many of his radical statements were made prior to the start of the 89th legislative session, when Rep. Talarico helped elect you as Speaker. Indefensibly, you rewarded Rep. Talarico by appointing him to multiple positions in House leadership: making him Vice Chair of the Committee on Trade, Workforce, and Economic Development and Vice Chair of the Public Education Subcommittee on Academic and Career Oriented Education (especially indefensible given his leftist views on education). With these Vice Chairmanships, he has significant power to shape upcoming interim hearings, and he receives additional taxpayer funds to spend at his discretion. By placing Rep. Talarico in House leadership, you gave him a platform that aided his rise to national prominence and helped lead him to the Democrat nomination for the U.S. Senate. While these appointments were inappropriate at the time, they are untenable now. Conservative leaders across America are rightfully rebuking Rep. Talarico’s extremist views, but, as Speaker, you are uniquely able to take action. On behalf of my constituents and the millions of voters who gave Republicans the majority in the Texas House, please consider this to be my formal request that Rep. Talarico be stripped of his Vice Chairmanships and removed from the Education Committee. Immediately. If you believe it’s not within your power under the House Rules to do this, then I ask you stand up select committees with the same jurisdiction and membership (but without Rep. Talarico) where you’ll send all interim charges and official responsibilities for the remainder of the 89th session. We’re in a battle for the future of Texas and America. It’s past time that the Texas House acts like it. For liberty, Brian Harrison