Priton

@o_T800_o @DomVsUnknown @PeteHegseth @POTUS Ich habe gesagt das du die Prison Pop. zwischen zwei Ländern nicht vergleichen kannst und sie stattdessen zu der Population der Länder skalieren musst, um sie zu vergleichen... So wie es bei der incarceration rate getan wurde. Ich glaube nicht das 50-60k per 100k in Knast sind

@Priton_CE @DomVsUnknown @PeteHegseth @POTUS ??? Was willste mir damit sagen es bestätigt immer noch genau meine Aussage.

@o_T800_o @DomVsUnknown @PeteHegseth @POTUS

@Priton_CE @DomVsUnknown @PeteHegseth @POTUS ??? What do you think the per 100K citizen means?🤣😂

@BruceR0dney @RepDonBacon Trump is attacking NATO diplomatically and literally wanted to Annex Greenland. And just for your own sake it does not make sense if you want to continue bombing Iran. Your logistics would be strained beyond breaking

@RepDonBacon No one is attacking NATO. They are welcome to carry on, we just don't have a dog in that hunt. It makes total sense from an America First perspective to move troops from Germany to Greenland. Greenland is in our national interests, Germany is not.

The continued attacks on NATO allies are counterproductive. The comments hurt Americans. I commanded the huge Ramstein AB in Germany. The two big airfields in Germany give us great access in three continents. We are shooting ourselves in our own feet.

@cruadin Leave Ramstein. Be my guest. You should have done it way sooner tho. Maybe then the straight would still be open cause bases like Ramstein are the way you can even project power into countries like Iran.

American troops should only be based in countries we can depend on as allies. That simple formulation precludes a good chunk of Europe.

@o_T800_o @DomVsUnknown @PeteHegseth @POTUS Dont get me wrong, you are right. But dont let chatgpt do the numbers. Things like prison population can't be compared when you dont scale them to the population like the incarceration rate.

@DomVsUnknown @PeteHegseth @POTUS 🤡🤡🤡 Land of the free 🤡🤡🤡

@___Sc0pes___ @AndrewParsonson The D in RIDER stands for Demonstrator. Its mainly there to develop the technology and not turn into a second space shuttle

@AndrewParsonson Its tiny, But id imagine it'll help evolve a new family of spacecraft, i would hope anyways

ESA has released a first look at a full-scale Space Rider model that will be used in a final series of drop tests to validate its recovery system. The tests are expected to take place later this year at the Salto di Quirra test range in Sardinia, Italy.

@larsb13 @Spreebabylon Merkste selbst wie rekursiv diese Argumentation ist ge?

@larsb13 @Spreebabylon Bin voll deiner Meinung. Die EU will Klima und Umweltschutz. Deshalb forciert sie die E-Mobilität so. Die Ölindustrie ist ja großteils US Unternehmen und die haben gefälligst vor der EU zu kriechen, so der Plan. Es ging noch nie um absolute Kontrolle über Alles und Jeden.

Verschwörungstheorie: Dieses ganze Verbrenner-Thema und E-Mobilität - meine Fresse! Es ging nie um Klimaziele und gedöns. Es geht um Kontrolle! Es geht immer um Kontrolle und die Masken fallen, mehr denn je. Du hast den Staat delegitimiert, ein Meme gepostet, wählst die falsche Partei? Dann wirst Du an der Walbox beim Ladeversuch lesen: "Ladevorgang abgebrochen!" Du möchtest mit Karte bezahlen, weil Bargeld abgeschafft wurde und die Kasse sagt: "Sorry, komm nächste Woche wieder, Dein Konto wurde eingeschränkt." Es gab die Kraftstoffe, die Klimaneutral in der Herstellung und Verbrennung sind - man will sie nicht.

@MatthewParrott @Und_sc_vered @neolatyno In that case just buy a waterproof phone. IP ratings exempt manufacturers from allowing for user replacable batteries. Instead they only need to sell battery replacements and tools to repair shops.

@Und_sc_vered @neolatyno I was all about the blackberry with the fat extended life battery feature. I would pay a premium for replaceable battery, but still oppose euro-regulatory interference in the market. American instincts.

🇪🇺| Europe will require all mobile phones to be sold with user-replaceable and longer-lasting batteries starting 2027. The regulation demands the availability of spare parts and manuals for 10 years to curb planned obsolescence. As per the USB-C ruling, Europe is a giant that can change markets to put European consumers’ needs first.

@ZacksJerryRig @elonmusk Instead of democratic socialism this sounds more like social democracy. (Assuming democracy will still be in the picture. I doubt Elon would want to get rid of a capitalist market.)

@elonmusk .... socialism?

Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.

@MrAndroPC @AmphetaminesLOL @AlexanderPayton @FissionPhil It literally needs to land differently to avoid digging a crater for starters.

@AmphetaminesLOL @AlexanderPayton @FissionPhil Starship splashed down like 5 times out of 11 ift launches, and even more before. If that's not hls hardware - how different should hls be from normal starship then?

@SBetschinger ESA ist primär ein Verlustgeschäft. ESA forscht primär und versucht nicht aktiv Kapital zu gewinnen. SpaceX forscht nicht sondern verkauft zwei Produkte.

ESA vs SpaceX Elon Musk gründete SpaceX im Mai 2002. Sein privates Startkapital betrug etwa 100 Millionen US-Dollar. Zum Börsengang wird die Firma mit etwa 1,75 Billionen USD bewertet. Elon Musk hat sein Kapital um den Faktor 17.500 vervielfacht. Die Europäische Weltraumorganisation (ESA) wurde seit dem Jahr 2000 von Steuerzahlern mit etwa 130 Mrd. € finanziert. Es wurden keine bedeutsamen Werte erschaffen. Die Raketentechnologie gilt als veraltet und überteuert. Warum so viele Deutsche auf staatliche Strukturen schwören, ist mir ein Rätsel.

@Nils1926726 @Tozl10 @isaraerospace You can either scrub 5 times or bang your head against the wall 5 times, every time burning money and materials building a new vehicle.

@Tozl10 @isaraerospace I'm not talking about failures, I'm talking about the amount of scrub for just one flight

We are standing down from today’s launch attempt to evaluate a suspected leak in a composite overwrapped pressure vessel (COPV). The teams are assessing and will determine next steps.

@AmirMaj16115767 @yass_winz @MAGANEWS_X Mate... thats footage of a video game

@yass_winz @MAGANEWS_X yak 141 is excellent vertical landing and takeoff from aircraft carrier

@VarlaneFR @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes I did. I showed you cannot find a value since the values directly next to x=0 do not converge to a value. Hence you may not find a value that is logical. Yet you want to tell me you may infer (0,0)? HOW? Based on what?

@Priton_CE @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes Exactly, just like you didn't provide any work relative to the reason why it's undefined at 0 for starters. The reason being : the definition.

@VarlaneFR @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes > why can't I? Because at that point you are just drawing a point on a visual aid without ever showing your work how you got (0,0) and without showing why it would be a logical continuation of the function in x=0

@Priton_CE @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes I create a point at (0,0) : why can't I ? Ha I must be continuous ? WHY ? That's why the visual proof is useless. It opens up so many ways to add bullshit.

@VarlaneFR @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes You want to introduce an arbitrary point into the function 1/x based on nothing but vibes. Yet I can prove by taking the limit of 1/x in either direction that neither limit would be approaching 0. Hence there is no way 1/0 = 0 when its direct neighbors in R are not even near 0

@Priton_CE @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes Exactly. That's the point. The visual argument holds no value. You're starting to understand.

@VarlaneFR @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes If you did that I would ask you to prove how you could assume x=0 with 1/x to be 0. If saying its symmetrical and pretty is valid proof I would say there is nothing preventing me from mirroring sqrt{x} at (0,0). After all it would make the graph pretty and symmetrical

@Priton_CE @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes The main issue being that I could totally put a dot at (0 , 0) and you'd have no counter to that. It'd be a nice symmetrical, with (0 , 0) serving as a "natural" transition from (0-, -inf) to (0+, +inf). This is why you correct the flawless logic itself.

@VarlaneFR @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes I chose this approach since mor3 attempted to deduce a value by flawed logic.

@VarlaneFR @mor3idscream @nocontextmemes I'm not trying to provide a flawless argument. I am trying to convey a visual example to people that think 1/0 equals 0. I could also just say A/B=C <=> A=B*C but that is more abstract than showing the consequence of this gap and how deducing a value for 1/0 leads you nowhere.