Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness

1.5K posts

Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness banner
Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness

Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness

@PubliusVibius

Universal High Income. Amazing abundance. May all be rich and free of suffering

Katılım Eylül 2024
693 Takip Edilen408 Takipçiler
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ
ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ ᴘᴜɴᴋ@_space_punk_·
I'm calling for a complete moratorium on people saying "Buddhism" without specifying Theravada or Mahayana because holy fuck
English
30
12
159
7.1K
Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness retweetledi
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
You retards keep falling for their incrementalism. They learned a long time ago that they can get as much as they want as long as they only take a little bit at a time while accompanying each tiny bite with high-volume moralizing about how it's for our own good because the children, or because health, or because the planet, or because whatever the Good Thing du jour is that they invoke to shut down your brains. It works. Every time. It's worked for decades now. They have this down to a science. So the social engineers chew away at our freedoms piece by tiny piece. Every year we're a little less free, a little more domesticated, a little more controlled, and any time you point this process out your mentions get swarmed with idiots going on about how actually this is a good thing because the children, or because health, or because the planet, and anyhow you're overreacting because everyone knows slippery slopes aren't real and this isn't a big deal so why can't you just have a normal one, man. Almost as bad as the programmed self-righteousness of normgroids is the unseriousness of rightoids who laugh, lol look at these blue-haired libs, aren't they silly? No, they are not silly. They are deadly serious. They gave decided what is good for you and they are going to inflict it whether you like it or not, because they do not think that your life belongs to you: they think it belongs to society, and society belongs to them. They've written openly about how they intend to do it. They have roadmaps explaining each step from beginning to end. There is nothing funny about any of this. Yeah, it's just ads. Small thing, why get mad, fuck McDonald's right? Except that's part of the plan. Denormalize meat by removing it from the public eye; demonize it with public health campaigns; normalize 'healthy' plant-based alternatives. Then tax it. Make it more expensive. Harder to get. Socially punish people for eating meat. Make them apologize for being too weak to give it up. Start having meat-free Mondays, optional; then mandatory; then limit meat to weekends, or certain hours of the day. Come back in twenty years, people are saying "wow isn't it crazy that you used to be able to buy meat in restaurants and just eat it in front of people? That's so crazy, I'm really glad we don't have to smell it any more, the stink just got on everything. And it's SO bad for your heart!" These people are sick, they are evil, and they should be made to stand in front of a wall, but instead they're running everything and there's no obvious way to get rid of them.
John Carter tweet media
John Carter@martianwyrdlord

They're going to apply the same playbook to meat that they applied to tobacco. They've been saying they're going to do that for years now. This is just one step along the way. Enjoy your bugpaste.

English
41
570
2.1K
44.4K
Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness retweetledi
Roman Helmet Guy
Roman Helmet Guy@romanhelmetguy·
@dwarkesh_sp @MorlockP This “consensus” thinking was completely artificial from the start. Ancient sources made it very clear what happened. But modern historians didn’t like it because it didn’t fit their worldview. So they made up elaborate theories of peaceful assimilation. DNA proved them liars.
English
69
547
9.5K
159.4K
Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness retweetledi
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker@sapinker·
When a self-proclaimed civil rights organization puts Ayaan Hirsi Ali, of all people, on a "hate watch" list, you know it has been twisted into a grotesque hate group itself. But this was only a sample of its perversions. Ayaan: The SPLC Targeted Me. Now Its Reckoning Has Come. thefp.com/p/ayaan-hirsi-…
English
0
2.7K
11.8K
582.5K
🍓🍓🍓
🍓🍓🍓@iruletheworldmo·
i’m rather excited for next week chat…
English
12
5
171
9.3K
kitze
kitze@thekitze·
both saltman and super dario equally don't give a fuck about you brother. it's codex this week, claude code next week, whatever, don't fall for it.
English
29
7
199
8.1K
Fadi Barbàra
Fadi Barbàra@disnocen·
@beffjezos Local model may help, giving the IP to Claude is like posting your products on Amazon: if they are good they'll copy Every company should have their GPUs. It's in their interest for IP ourposes
English
1
0
1
195
Amanda Askell
Amanda Askell@AmandaAskell·
I've increasingly seen content written about me that's asserted very confidently but is also completely made up. We all know it's cheap to bullshit on the internet but it's weird to experience it first hand. Anyway, I just hope internet fiction fools a few but doesn't stick 🤷🏼‍♀️
English
101
29
1.2K
89.5K
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
@johnpalmer Codex means book. Words are all just made up things. We will be fine.
English
32
7
850
16.9K
John Palmer
John Palmer@johnpalmer·
“codex is for everyone, for any task done with a computer” but the name includes “Code,” and the app icon is a command line. very curious about the product / naming strategy here. can’t tell if it’s A) a deliberate separation of 2 products where the new one is for a different, more “pro” audience, AND where OpenAI specifically does not benefit from leveraging familiarity with ChatGPT’s brand. or B) there’s a desire to pull off a sneaky rename, where Codex also reaches mainstream adoption and replaces ChatGPT for everything (which would conveniently retire both the confusing “GPT” name and the “chat” anchoring, which might feel outdated in a more agentic world that goes beyond just chatting. or more realistically, C) codex started as an experiment, and then was just a more natural place for shipping these agentic features because it doesn’t simultaneously need to support 1B users, and it’s all just moving quickly, and shipping fast is what matters most. and the name just is what it is because it started as a coding tool. which is probably the most likely scenario.
Greg Brockman@gdb

Codex is for everyone, for any task done with a computer

English
23
1
183
39.3K
Mixy Pisa
Mixy Pisa@MixyPisa·
No, the first picture was perfectly accurate. Blue voters are trying to guilt-trip red voters into voting blue to solve a problem they created for themselves by voting blue in the first place. The only difference between this and real life is that in real life the blue voters drag the red voters down with them.
Alevtine (Revised Edition)@AlevtineOnIce

I think it's more like this

English
60
116
2.7K
62.1K
Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness
@growing_daniel If there is a heaven you mean. Otherwise you are just killing yourself and you family for no reason at all in the small time you have. Also, pride in its own spiritual development is the worst sin
English
0
0
0
12
Daniel
Daniel@growing_daniel·
Blue button means you go to heaven regardless of what happens. Your time on this earth is a brief illusion
English
128
27
934
40.8K
Mike Solana
Mike Solana@micsolana·
interesting how completely the conversation has shifted to kids. initially, most people assumed we were talking about adults, not babies smashing buttons, which kind of breaks the thought experiment. that this is all we’re now discussing implies blues understand they were wrong.
notsoErudite@notsoErudite

Since everyone was very curious my answer, my answer is obviously blue. Gotta save the naive, the kids, the blue lovers, and the principally hope-pilled people. You red button pickers need therapy.

English
586
127
3.1K
171K
kalavaram
kalavaram@vimalprince7·
@PubliusVibius @MixyPisa Can you make sure 100% will choose red? Or are you willing to sacrifice the stubborn small percentage? I'm not campaigning blue. It's my personal choice and I trust more than half will choose the same. It's fine if they didn't.
English
1
0
0
11
Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness
@vimalprince7 @MixyPisa No. That is why we are campaigning for much more people to vote red. We want to save people. It is the exact the reverse in a real world scenario. Campaigning for blue kills people (thinking you are being altruist). You are actually killing people.
English
1
0
3
30
Universal 🌕 Abundance and Happiness
@vimalprince7 @MixyPisa - Morally loaded question, “selfish vs altruistic”- 5 to 20 percentage points of (of liars) - Voting turnout self-report, checked against records -around 10 to 20 percentage points (of liars) - Highly stigmatized selfish/prejudiced answer - 15 to 30+ percentage (of liars)
English
1
0
2
17