QuantumPioneer
237 posts
That’s not true, and I think Blue would survive because I believe that most people are truly good deep down.
Either way, choosing Red is either cowardly or evil, and claiming Blue is beyond saving is a pathetic justification.
I also believe that many would choose differently (for Blue) if it were a real decision with actual consequences, rather than just a cost-free thought experiment on X - without skin in the game.
English
@QuantumPionier @Aella_Girl The blue killed themself though.
This is a dilemma about trying to save someone who can’t be saved.
English
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 80% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 80% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@flowersslop @grok ofc I could google it, but hey I pay you, so: what's RSI?
English
People say RSI started with GPT-5.5 doing code work for OpenAI people but by that logic it started with GPT-3 because pretty sure they used some low level autocomplete back then? GPT-5.5 is the same but higher level, unless ofc it comes up with genuinely novel ideas on its own?
English
Wer lieber die KI fragt, anstatt selbst zu recherchieren und nachzudenken, trägt wahrscheinlich auch Schuhe mit Klettverschluss.
Deutsch
@AndreasMoser007 Stimmt, ich nehm auch keinen Taschenrechner oder benutze Excel. Ich wasche meine Wäsche auch im Fluss mit der Hand. Alles andere wäre nur ein Ausdruck meiner Faulheit.
Deutsch
KI ist für Menschen, denen Denken keinen Spaß macht.
Wie ein Thermomix fürs Hirn.
Deutsch
@diegocabezas01 I used it for a while and there are lots of free repos on github. For example WhisperWriter. Same functions. Not startup-worthy
English
This OpenAI Codex feature ate at least 2-3 AI startups
Guinness Chen@guinnesschen
You can now use your ChatGPT subscription to dictate anywhere on your desktop now! Have fun!
English
It's something basic, but I would not have had the time and honestly I would not be able to made it this good.
Codex one-shooted me an browser app with a BookWheel for my girlfriend. With books database, search for ISBN or details and so on. She can add her unread books and when she finished one, she turns the book wheel and gets a new book to read. It is nothing special, but it took me like 10 mins. Small tools that make your life better are essentially for free nowadays 😅
I love it.
English
what are you building with codex?
Paul Solt@PaulSolt
What app are you making this weekend with GPT 5.5 and Codex?
English
@uncertainsys @tszzl @oscpmentor Maybe we already live in that park or in a similar one. Who could tell the difference? I mean besides Neo obv.
English
@kimmonismus If Usain Bolt's top speed is 12.42 m/s than a robot with 10.09 m/s is not faster than the fastest human. Or do I get something wring?
Ofc it's just a matter of time.
English
1. I never said LLMs were not useful. They are, particularly with all the bells and whistles that are being added to them. I use them.
2. A robot-rich future can't be built with AIs that don't understand the physical world and don't anticipate the consequences of their actions. And LLMs really don't.
3. The future in the cartoon looks pretty dystopian TBH, but even a non-dystopian version will require world models and zero-shot planning abilities.
4. I rarely wear a suit and absolutely never wear a tie.
5. I would never ever place a coffee mug on top of a piece equipment.
6. I hope I'll look this young in 2032.
English
But why? gpt 5.5 is amazing good at coding already. And gpt 5.5 codex would be the same model, just little bit more RL on coding. I think they already max their models at coding primarily, so no need for a codex version. And it feels a lot faster too. Probably just more efficient, but feels good 👍
English
OPENAI 🚨: GPT-CODEX-5.5 HAS BEEN SPOTTED IN THE WILD.
Friday feature drop? 👀
English
@dpratyush02 They also don't need the money and they can just wait, cook for themselves and watch what the others are doing. I think google will be one of the winners in the long term. And I also think that it will not be only one winner. Its not a winner takes it all game.
English
@YuriKushch @iruletheworldmo I think xAI is not in the game any more. At least at the moment.
English
@Niethalf030 Bisschen rage bait um ein pseudowissenschaftliches esotherik Buch zu bewerben? Ich lach mich tot 🤣
Deutsch
Ich hasse theoretische Physik. Die halten sich alle für wahnsinnig schlau, haben aber in 60 Jahren keine brauchbaren Vorhersagen gemacht. Es kommen nur immer abstrusere Ideen dazu raus, warum das so ist.
Deutsch
@flowersslop Wow - this is stunning!
No guardrails in the way?
English
You walk up to your computer and see this screen. Your next move?
English
English
@sudoman281 @wryter_the @aitorruizcom @thsottiaux Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: x.com/i/premium_sign…
English
Yes, Elon's statement is accurate: South Africa's B-BBEE rules require 30% ownership by historically disadvantaged groups (mainly Black South Africans) for telecom licenses like Starlink's.
Starlink has already registered a local SA subsidiary and proposed Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes (e.g., $30M+ for rural schools) as an alternative to equity sale. ICASA's regs don't yet fully accept this despite a Dec 2025 ministerial directive to align them. No license granted so far.
English
South Africa won’t allow Starlink to be licensed, even though I was BORN THERE, simply because I am not Black!
We were offered many times the opportunity to bribe our way to a license by pretending that a Black guy runs Starlink SA, but I have refused to do so on principle.
Racism should not be rewarded no matter to which race it is applied.
Shame on the racist politicians in South Africa. They should be shown no respect whatsoever anywhere in the world and shunned for being unashamedly RACISTS!
DogeDesigner@cb_doge
Why Elon Musk is RIGHT to fight South Africa’s racist rules blocking Starlink? Imagine this: Long ago, South Africa had very unfair laws called apartheid. They treated Black people badly and kept them from good jobs and money. When those bad laws ended, the country made new rules (called B-BBEE) to help Black people get a fair share of business. The idea was good – like a big helping hand. But now? For companies like Starlink to sell fast internet, they MUST give away 30% of their business to Black partners. Just because of skin color. Elon Musk was born in South Africa. He left as a teen to chase big dreams. Today, his company SpaceX wants to bring Starlink – super fast satellite internet – to South Africa. But the rules say no unless they give up part of the company. Elon said it right: “Starlink is not allowed because I’m not Black.” SpaceX promised to spend about $30 million (that’s 500 million rand!) to give FREE high-speed internet to 5,000 rural schools. That helps over 2.4 MILLION kids every year learn better, get jobs later, and have a brighter future. Real help for the people who need it most! Starlink already works in about 24 other African countries. Villages there now have internet for school, doctors, and business. South Africa’s villages are missing out because of these racist rules. Elon isn’t asking for special favors. He just wants fair play so Starlink can connect everyone fast. Internet = education, jobs, hope. Why hold back millions of kids over rules that pick by race and color?
English