Ralph G. Bowles retweetledi

For the first time in decades, polling in major economies shows a majority favoring nuclear over fossil fuels.
Even coal, oil, and gas are increasingly preferred over large-scale wind and solar projects, which consume vast landscapes. After years of narrative-driven policy, the physical reality of the grid is forcing a return to reliable energy density.
The era of 'pure' renewable targets is hitting a reliability wall. In South Korea, this wasn't a choice of preference, but a mechanical necessity. In early 2026, the nation saw a significant surge in coal imports—up nearly 14% year-on-year—driven by the need for firm capacity that actually works when the sun sets or the wind fails.
During the Middle East energy shocks of early 2026, nations didn't double down on intermittent wind. Instead, they lifted coal caps, fast-tracked nuclear restarts and secured LNG (gas) for grid flexibility.
One thing is becoming clear: renewables are losing their status as the primary solution as governments realise Net Zero is a fantasy if it leads to economic collapse or blackouts. The real winners in 2026 are nuclear for baseload and gas for stability.
It is a definite shift away from Net Zero 'at all costs' and back to old-fashioned energy security. Battery storage simply cannot meet industrial demand at scale, and remains a marginal player for the heavy lifting required by modern economies.
It may be a harsh and unexpected reality check for some. But carbon targets are meaningless when the lights go out.

Bega, New South Wales 🇦🇺 English






















