B.

16.2K posts

B. banner
B.

B.

@RandomGadgie

Abundance exists, Scarcity is artificial.

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Katılım Haziran 2023
131 Takip Edilen201 Takipçiler
B. retweetledi
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@traveller_t3 @jaxonloid If you had to choose between three different versions of the reform party which one would you choose?
English
1
0
0
20
Drunk Lemon Boy (He/They)
Drunk Lemon Boy (He/They)@traveller_t3·
@RandomGadgie @jaxonloid That sounds crazy to me ngl, even if you just vote for the lesser of two evils that’s better than nothing. Tho that’s probably by design, make people not vote for change because they think it’s useless.
English
1
0
0
24
jaxonloid
jaxonloid@jaxonloid·
For the love of God, British leftists, please no more of this 'I'm not voting because all parties are bad' or 'I'm not voting because i disagree with one thing a party said'. We cannot afford that. You are literally letting reform win if you do not vote.
English
58
2K
11.9K
93.5K
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@traveller_t3 @jaxonloid Almost as if none of them come close to what they want and they all seem like different shades of shite to some people...
English
1
0
0
24
Drunk Lemon Boy (He/They)
Drunk Lemon Boy (He/They)@traveller_t3·
@jaxonloid I honestly don’t understand what they’re trying to achieve past trying to excuse their laziness, you won’t get better parties if you don’t vote for the ones closest to what you want…
English
2
1
30
3.2K
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@VandalHeart_ Tbf labour aren't much better, being fucked by a 4 inch red, white and blue dildo isn't much different from being fucked by a 7 inch one.
English
0
0
1
69
Josh Mathews
Josh Mathews@VandalHeart_·
Reform party is basically the Trump party. So why do people look at the clusterfuck that is the US right now and think to themselves…. You know what? I’d love a bit of that here in the UK. Morons.
English
1.1K
1.6K
11K
151.2K
B. retweetledi
Big Brother Watch
Big Brother Watch@BigBrotherWatch·
👁️Live facial recognition is an invasive, discriminatory & Orwellian surveillance technology that would make Britain less free. Without stronger safeguards, this risks becoming routine mass surveillance.  Cameras will become biometric checkpoints.  The public will become walking ID cards.  Britain will become a nation of suspects where we have to constantly prove our innocence. That is why we're leading a national campaign to #StopFacialRecognition. Read⤵️ theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Big Brother Watch tweet media
English
1
95
184
3.5K
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@muke10101 It would be nice if the greens bothered to have a candidate in my area.
English
0
0
0
234
Xexizy
Xexizy@muke10101·
Cant lie I'm actually pretty concerned over the local elections because they're basically a test of how much power british media still has over people. If Greens actually fall short of where they were only a couple weeks ago it'll confirm we haven't made any progress in 7 years.
English
54
627
9.5K
95.9K
Ellie Winters
Ellie Winters@N104AP·
apparently half of uk children have bypassed age restrictions! and i havent verified my age once as my vpn is doing a ton of heavy lifting i wonder when the dumb legislation is blamed not technology or anything else
English
10
17
277
6K
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@TheJ1ts @DAVID_FIRTH Imagine being so cucked by big daddy government you don't vote for the party that supports terrorism...
English
0
0
0
87
Ahrakeen
Ahrakeen@Ahrakeen·
@RandomGadgie @DecentraSuze It can't the problem is fundamental. The ai don't know what a human is. And we can add these things these bypasses to the trainijg set. And each time it will be more and more broken until it stops working
English
1
0
0
44
Decentra Suze
Decentra Suze@DecentraSuze·
The UK has proved something we have been pointing out for a long time. - You cannot regulate the internet into safety. - Centralisation does not equal protection. Kids are already bypassing facial age checks by drawing moustaches with eyebrow pencils… and it works. However the governments solution is mandatory biometrics and government ID. If you want a snapshot of how quickly this is being gamed, this post lays it out beautifully. Full report below: internetmatters.org/hub/research/o… This isn't working and it was never going to.
International Cyber Digest@IntCyberDigest

🇬🇧 The first major assessment of the UK's Online Safety Act is out. Turns out kids are fooling the age checks by drawing moustaches on their faces. "I did catch my son using an eyebrow pencil to draw a moustache on his face, and it verified him as 15 years old." Mum of a 12-year-old, in a new report from Internet Matters, the UK's leading online-safety NGO. That single line tells you almost everything you need to know about how the UK's Online Safety Act is going. This is the law that: 🔴 Forced UK platforms to demand government IDs, facial scans, and credit-card checks from adults to access ordinary websites 🔴 Drove a 1,800%+ spike in VPN downloads the week the porn-site age checks went live in July 2025 🔴 Pushed millions of users into handing biometric data to private third-party verification vendors 🔴 Sits at the front of a global wave: Greece's anonymity ban, France's "VPNs are next" comments, Utah's VPN crackdown, and the EU's 27-state rollout deadline of December 2026 The headline numbers from the assessment: 🔴 46% of children say age checks are easy to bypass. Only 17% say they are difficult. 🔴 32% of children have already bypassed them in the past two months 🔴 49% of children still report experiencing harm online in the past month The bypass methods kids reported, in their own words: 🔴 Drawing on facial hair with eyebrow pencil to fool facial age estimation 🔴 Holding up a video game character's head turning during the face-scan 🔴 Submitting a video of a different person's face entirely 🔴 Using a parent's ID (often with parental consent) 🔴 Entering a fake birthday (still works on most platforms) 🔴 Using someone else's login or device 🔴 In a small minority of cases, VPNs One 12-year-old girl explained the system to researchers: "Every time I go live on TikTok, it tells me I have to be 18, but when the AI detects that I'm not 18 they ban me. But they only ban me for 10 minutes and then I can go live again." That is the entire enforcement model. A 14-year-old summed up the broader picture: "It's not practical because the more you restrict it, the more people are going to want to get past that age restriction." A 16-year-old, more bluntly: "I think it's a great idea in theory and I applaud its intentions, but I don't see how that's feasible, because kids will always find a way." Even when verification works, it works against the children. A 12-year-old boy on Roblox: "I put my face in and I got 15 when I'm 12, so I'm chatting with people older than me when I shouldn't be." A 13-year-old non-binary child: "Adults can very easily use a face they searched on the internet to trick it into thinking you're someone you're not, so there might be adults in kids' age groups trying to groom them." Recent reporting confirms exactly that. Underage Roblox accounts are now being sold online to predators precisely because they bypass the new "safety" measures. One detail in the report stops you cold. Multiple children described being unintentionally exposed through their feeds to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. A 14-year-old: "I saw it on Snapchat. I broke down into tears and then told my mum immediately." Violent content, racist content, content promoting unrealistic body types: all explicitly prohibited under the Children's Safety Codes. All still landing in feeds at scale. Parents told researchers about the day-to-day reality of trying to enforce the rules at home. A father of a 14-year-old: "What you'll find now is that the kids know more than we know in terms of how to disable [parental controls]. We've got the parental controls on, but they probably unlock them." A mother of a 13-year-old: "We do what we can, but our kids are all clever and savvy and they can get around stuff." A mother of a 12-year-old: "I can put all the checks and measures in, and I can be keeping an eye open on what she's watching, listening to, who she's chatting to. And then she could go to a house down the road and visit somebody whose parents don't care, and they've got zero checks and measures." Both children and parents expressed real concerns about handing over biometric data to verification platforms they do not trust. One father warned: "Kids don't know the difference between a genuine website and a website that isn't genuine. If all websites have facial verifications and they go on a website that is not genuine, their face and their documents could be used to do illegal stuff." The father is right. The Discord vendor breach in October 2025 already exposed roughly 70,000 government IDs uploaded purely for age verification. The EU's own age verification app was reportedly hacked within minutes of launch. The report's most uncomfortable finding sits inside the parental data. 26% of parents are not just aware their kids bypass age checks, they are actively complicit. Some logged into their child's account with their own ID to "go live" on TikTok. Others approved circumvention so their child could play a specific game. The reasoning is rarely malicious. Parents told researchers they only help when they personally judged the activity safe. But the structural problem is fatal: a verification system that treats parents as the last line of defence collapses the moment parents themselves become the bypass. Even children who follow the rules end up disadvantaged by them. A 15-year-old: "There are websites that are support websites to help with things such as eating disorders and suicide, and they've all been censored." A 12-year-old: "Before you could talk to anybody, but they added age group limits so you can only talk to people in your age group. So if my friends are younger or older than me I wouldn't be able to talk to them." The blunt instrument of age-gating breaks legitimate connection and support without measurably reducing harm.

English
15
158
572
13.8K
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@IntCyberDigest is a dangerous thing to peddle. The only safe way of dealing with it is for everyone to refuse to use it, petition against it and protest it. The solution is no face ID. Not "grab a pen and draw a moustache".
English
0
0
0
22
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@IntCyberDigest these systems will never be foolproof but when providers see a new bypass (e.g heavy makeup or filters) they add it to test sets and adversarial training which gradually reduces that methods success rate. The AI will improve. This idea it's "NBD" because people can circumvent...
English
1
0
0
167
International Cyber Digest
International Cyber Digest@IntCyberDigest·
🇬🇧 The first major assessment of the UK's Online Safety Act is out. Turns out kids are fooling the age checks by drawing moustaches on their faces. "I did catch my son using an eyebrow pencil to draw a moustache on his face, and it verified him as 15 years old." Mum of a 12-year-old, in a new report from Internet Matters, the UK's leading online-safety NGO. That single line tells you almost everything you need to know about how the UK's Online Safety Act is going. This is the law that: 🔴 Forced UK platforms to demand government IDs, facial scans, and credit-card checks from adults to access ordinary websites 🔴 Drove a 1,800%+ spike in VPN downloads the week the porn-site age checks went live in July 2025 🔴 Pushed millions of users into handing biometric data to private third-party verification vendors 🔴 Sits at the front of a global wave: Greece's anonymity ban, France's "VPNs are next" comments, Utah's VPN crackdown, and the EU's 27-state rollout deadline of December 2026 The headline numbers from the assessment: 🔴 46% of children say age checks are easy to bypass. Only 17% say they are difficult. 🔴 32% of children have already bypassed them in the past two months 🔴 49% of children still report experiencing harm online in the past month The bypass methods kids reported, in their own words: 🔴 Drawing on facial hair with eyebrow pencil to fool facial age estimation 🔴 Holding up a video game character's head turning during the face-scan 🔴 Submitting a video of a different person's face entirely 🔴 Using a parent's ID (often with parental consent) 🔴 Entering a fake birthday (still works on most platforms) 🔴 Using someone else's login or device 🔴 In a small minority of cases, VPNs One 12-year-old girl explained the system to researchers: "Every time I go live on TikTok, it tells me I have to be 18, but when the AI detects that I'm not 18 they ban me. But they only ban me for 10 minutes and then I can go live again." That is the entire enforcement model. A 14-year-old summed up the broader picture: "It's not practical because the more you restrict it, the more people are going to want to get past that age restriction." A 16-year-old, more bluntly: "I think it's a great idea in theory and I applaud its intentions, but I don't see how that's feasible, because kids will always find a way." Even when verification works, it works against the children. A 12-year-old boy on Roblox: "I put my face in and I got 15 when I'm 12, so I'm chatting with people older than me when I shouldn't be." A 13-year-old non-binary child: "Adults can very easily use a face they searched on the internet to trick it into thinking you're someone you're not, so there might be adults in kids' age groups trying to groom them." Recent reporting confirms exactly that. Underage Roblox accounts are now being sold online to predators precisely because they bypass the new "safety" measures. One detail in the report stops you cold. Multiple children described being unintentionally exposed through their feeds to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. A 14-year-old: "I saw it on Snapchat. I broke down into tears and then told my mum immediately." Violent content, racist content, content promoting unrealistic body types: all explicitly prohibited under the Children's Safety Codes. All still landing in feeds at scale. Parents told researchers about the day-to-day reality of trying to enforce the rules at home. A father of a 14-year-old: "What you'll find now is that the kids know more than we know in terms of how to disable [parental controls]. We've got the parental controls on, but they probably unlock them." A mother of a 13-year-old: "We do what we can, but our kids are all clever and savvy and they can get around stuff." A mother of a 12-year-old: "I can put all the checks and measures in, and I can be keeping an eye open on what she's watching, listening to, who she's chatting to. And then she could go to a house down the road and visit somebody whose parents don't care, and they've got zero checks and measures." Both children and parents expressed real concerns about handing over biometric data to verification platforms they do not trust. One father warned: "Kids don't know the difference between a genuine website and a website that isn't genuine. If all websites have facial verifications and they go on a website that is not genuine, their face and their documents could be used to do illegal stuff." The father is right. The Discord vendor breach in October 2025 already exposed roughly 70,000 government IDs uploaded purely for age verification. The EU's own age verification app was reportedly hacked within minutes of launch. The report's most uncomfortable finding sits inside the parental data. 26% of parents are not just aware their kids bypass age checks, they are actively complicit. Some logged into their child's account with their own ID to "go live" on TikTok. Others approved circumvention so their child could play a specific game. The reasoning is rarely malicious. Parents told researchers they only help when they personally judged the activity safe. But the structural problem is fatal: a verification system that treats parents as the last line of defence collapses the moment parents themselves become the bypass. Even children who follow the rules end up disadvantaged by them. A 15-year-old: "There are websites that are support websites to help with things such as eating disorders and suicide, and they've all been censored." A 12-year-old: "Before you could talk to anybody, but they added age group limits so you can only talk to people in your age group. So if my friends are younger or older than me I wouldn't be able to talk to them." The blunt instrument of age-gating breaks legitimate connection and support without measurably reducing harm.
International Cyber Digest tweet mediaInternational Cyber Digest tweet media
English
49
133
604
58.7K
B. retweetledi
Michał Ordon
Michał Ordon@designorant·
@IntCyberDigest This, or we could simply stop pretending the Online Safety Act has anything to do with children, let alone safety.
English
0
1
18
702
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@ozsats256 @obscuravpn Until they put age verification on VPNs which Starmer is currently looking into supposedly.
English
0
0
0
14
Mutahar
Mutahar@OrdinaryGamers·
feel like this whole fight is lost. Just stay as private as you can on the net. use open source private solutions, vpn as much as you can, don't feed the machine when it asks you for your ID. All you really can do sadly, most normies don't really give a fuck.
Reclaim The Net@ReclaimTheNetHQ

Hawley's GUARD Act just passed committee 22-0. Every American would have to upload a government ID or submit to a face scan to use an AI chatbot. Even for asking for algebra help or fixing a billing issue. The framing is child safety but the result is a national ID system for talking to a computer. reclaimthenet.org/senate-panel-b…

English
120
332
2.4K
183.9K
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@N104AP It's great that works for now and these systems will never be foolproof but when providers see a new bypass (e.g heavy makeup or filters) they add it to test sets and adversarial training which gradually reduces that methods success rate. The AI will improve.
English
0
0
0
135
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@GSpellchecker 1. I'm not a "corbynite". I've never voted for him in my life. 2. Whether you want to acknowledge them as smears or not doesn't really matter. You claimed the voting results were a reflection of not liking his policies as if all these other factors played no part.
English
0
0
0
8
Stephen Knight 🎙️
Stephen Knight 🎙️@GSpellchecker·
@RandomGadgie These things were entirely justified though. That's not 'smears'. It's facts. You Corbynites just think the Dear Leader is above criticism
English
1
0
0
29
Stephen Knight 🎙️
Stephen Knight 🎙️@GSpellchecker·
No, Corbyn's policies were not 'popular' outside of his obnoxious little personality cult. They were put to a literal vote. And it was not good news for him...
TegMiles@NewheyVermont

@GSpellchecker Corbyn’s policies were popular and would have changed the lives of working people for the better. He would have won in 2017 if he hadn’t been slandered by a deeply dishonest and hysterical media and spineless members of the PLP.

English
25
9
189
12.2K
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@GSpellchecker Or more to the point, you're feigning naivety because it helps your grift.
English
1
0
0
59
B.
B.@RandomGadgie·
@GSpellchecker This is all besides the point. If you sincerely believe the hamas controversy, the constant negative reporting in msm, the undermining of his leadership by other Labour colleagues etc didn't play any part at all on the voting and it was purely policy based, you're naive.
English
1
0
0
25