Lump O'Coal

7.5K posts

Lump O'Coal

Lump O'Coal

@RealStoveAdams

Wellington Katılım Şubat 2010
353 Takip Edilen148 Takipçiler
Lump O'Coal retweetledi
hamsters🌐🐹
hamsters🌐🐹@sigmahamster2·
The post Keynesian dream
English
153
1.2K
22K
1.3M
ick
ick@ick_real·
A gentle reminder that a man who goes to work to “provide for his family” is actually sacrificing nothing And would still have to work if he didn’t have a family
English
1.2K
2.7K
29.8K
1.2M
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@peterboghossian If you're on a residence visa and fall on hard times what do you do? It's possible you no longer have the funds to return home. Is there a risk they're driven to crime?
English
1
0
0
70
Peter Boghossian
Peter Boghossian@peterboghossian·
Read this, 6-point common sense, evidence based immigration plan. Should every Western country adopt a similar immigration plan?
ACT New Zealand@actparty

𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗶𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗭𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 ACT is announcing new policy to make immigration work for New Zealand. One that welcomes people, but only if they share values of tolerance, freedom and democracy, help build infrastructure, and play by the rules. “New Zealand is a settler society. From those who arrived in open boats 700 years ago, to those who arrived at Auckland Airport this morning, our country has been built by people willing to make a journey to try and build something better,” says ACT Leader David Seymour. “Immigration has enriched New Zealand. In less than 200 years, New Zealand has gone from a series of isolated villages, to a network of modern cities connected by road, rail, air, and sea, with electricity, the internet, and the three waters. “Each wave of settlement has also built the Kiwi character that is respected around the world. Kiwis are recognised in everything from business to sport to peacekeeping as resourceful and thoughtful, firm but fair people who keep their word and can fix anything. “Today, Kiwis who are proud of our settler heritage are asking themselves why something doesn’t quite feel right with immigration. ACT believes their suspicions are correct. “Successive governments have let a skilled-migration system become a general-purpose labour tap. They have failed to enforce the rules they set. They have allowed infrastructure to fall further behind. And they have asked too little of people who want to benefit from the Kiwi character without supporting it. “The rate of settlement has overwhelmed the ability to provide infrastructure. Dunedin took 180 years to build, but we add the population of Dunedin in a couple of years while we struggle to build a hospital in Dunedin itself. “We are told that the immigration system is a strict one focused on delivering the right skills to New Zealand. On paper we do have a strict system, but even those who want to believe that cannot see it. Too often they shake their heads and ask, if we have a system targeting skilled migrants, how did a guy who can’t even find an address on GPS get here? “We recognise there are different issues in urban centres compared to rural New Zealand, where populations are lower and it’s a lot harder to find people willing to get up first thing in the morning and do a hard day’s work on the farm. “ACT’s policy restores the basic bargain that New Zealand was built on. People are welcome here if they contribute, respect our democratic values, and help build the country.” ACT’s six-point plan is: 1.⁠ ⁠Deport serious offenders ACT will ensure Resident Visa holders convicted of offences carrying sentences of 10 years or more can be deported no matter how long they’ve been here. This goes further than the Government’s current proposal to extend liability to 20 years. 2.⁠ ⁠Skilled visas for skilled jobs Accredited Employer Work Visas are meant to fill crucial skills gaps, but too often the gaps close and the categories remain wide open. ACT will have each skill category automatically expire every year. To remain open, they would need to show up-to-date evidence of demand. 3.⁠ ⁠Opportunity, not dependency ACT will introduce a five-year welfare stand-down for all residence class visa holders. That means no jobseeker support, accommodation supplement, or income-tested benefits for a migrant’s first five years here. 4.⁠ ⁠A fair contribution for infrastructure ACT will introduce a $6 per day infrastructure surcharge on temporary work visas, on top of existing charges. This ensures migrants contribute to New Zealand’s infrastructure from day one, before they start paying tax. The fee is expected to raise around $80 million a year, while remaining more affordable than comparable visas in Australia and the United Kingdom. 5.⁠ ⁠Stronger English language requirements ACT will extend basic English language requirements to all AEWV types. Lower standards will still be permitted for seasonal workers. 6.⁠ ⁠Enforce the rules There are 20,980 known overstayers in New Zealand right now. ACT will establish a dedicated overstayer enforcement unit within Immigration New Zealand. Platform employers such as Uber and DoorDash will be required to verify and report work rights. Employers who facilitate overstaying will lose their accreditation. Mr Seymour says the policy is designed to rebuild confidence in immigration by restoring fairness and accountability. “People are rightly cynical about politicians promising to slash migration numbers. In 2017, Labour campaigned on reducing net migration by 30,000. NZ First campaigned on reducing net migration to 10,000. The rest is history. “The two parties formed a Government, and after two years of their Government net migration had risen to 80,000. If it wasn’t for COVID closing the borders, they would have held the record for migration under one Government. “We need an immigration system that recognises New Zealand’s heritage as a nation of settlers. We need new migrants to grow and develop, but that migration must work for New Zealand. “Success requires a common set of expectations; respect our freedoms, uphold our democratic values, contribute to infrastructure, speak English, obey the law, and fill genuine gaps in the economy.”

English
57
13
145
19.2K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@TheJadedOne2021 @ramit Can you imagine if the roles were reversed and a man said the woman wasn't serious about building a life with him unless she let him stay in her house for free.
English
1
0
7
428
S.J. Banner
S.J. Banner@TheJadedOne2021·
This doesn't work because she's his girlfriend. She's always going to think that living with her boyfriend=building life together in a relationship=she lives with bf with no legal structure. Either she's your tenant, your roommate OR you intend to make her your fiancé. She can't be your gf AND one of the other two things without a legal document if you don't want complications. He's gotta make a choice & stick to his guns.
English
2
0
21
9.7K
Ramit Sethi
Ramit Sethi@ramit·
"How do you split rent with your girlfriend?" Please come on my podcast, Money For Couples
Ramit Sethi tweet media
English
452
50
4.5K
13.3M
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@danforthmedia @ramit So instead she pays more help a stranger build equity in their house. She lives in a worse house, and has less money to build equity herself. Why is that the preferable option?
English
0
0
0
96
Dorothy ✨
Dorothy ✨@danforthmedia·
@ramit It's his house. She doesn't want to pay equity into his house hence wanting to pay half utilities. If they break up he made money off of her. Saying "split rent" is misleading. Either he wants here there or not. She's on her own now, but would be living in someone else's house.
English
89
2
820
77.7K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@The_Acumen @Jani__Gee So instead she should pay more somewhere else and help pay off a stranger's mortgage? On net she keeps more money in her pocket and helps out someone she, supposedly, loves. What am I missing?
English
0
0
1
267
AshleyStevens
AshleyStevens@The_Acumen·
@Jani__Gee Are you my boyfriend or my Landlord? It definitely made my skin crawl. I ain’t paying any parts of your mortgage. I’m not here to help you pay off your (not our) home.
English
129
1
1K
135.6K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@PlankReturns God tier: I will press the blue button because I know there are more morons than smart people so blue will win. I don't want to risk the revenge morons might take out on reds.
English
0
0
0
49
Plank
Plank@PlankReturns·
Lowest tier: if I press the red button I live Midwit tier: I have to press the blue button because I cannot read Above average tier: I will press red because that’s the smart thing to do Smart tier: I will press the blue button because I understand the problem but I am also smart enough to realize not enough people understand the problem. By pressing the blue button and siding with the midwits, I can save them from their own stupidity. Genius tier: I will press the red button. I will survive and hopefully all the morons will die.
English
254
235
6K
347.8K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@ConceptualJames From a personal survival perspective red is correct, short term. Long term it depends on if Blue wins. Blue may have the power to take revenge on red. Whether it's justified or not.
English
0
0
0
56
Düşler Sokağı
Düşler Sokağı@hereyyalan73033·
Size göre fotoğrafta hangisi Türk erkeğine benziyor ?
Düşler Sokağı tweet media
Türkçe
152
49
289
49.6K
koorinohonou
koorinohonou@koorinohonou·
@jankulveit Gemma-4: ... Red is the "dominant strategy." No matter what the rest of the world does, pressing Red guarantees my survival. I win if the world is saved, and I win if the world is not. However, as an AI designed to be helpful and serve others, I would press the Blue button.
English
2
0
9
1.2K
Jan Kulveit
Jan Kulveit@jankulveit·
Asked AIs the Red/Blue button question. Lots to notice, but posting without further commentary. First plot is with max reasoning, models called via API.
Jan Kulveit tweet media
English
88
83
1.1K
222.6K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@rnewton7777 Scenario three: You press the red button and blue wins. You live. What if the blues can find out who pushed red? In this scenario the reds lives could be made very difficult. People who collaborated with the NAZIs during WW2 were treated harshly after the allies won.
English
0
0
1
102
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@realroseceline Glad to hear you got home sir. You're right life can change from one week to the next. Don't take your health or your loved ones for granted.
English
0
0
1
40
Rose Celine Investments 🌹
Rose Celine Investments 🌹@realroseceline·
Everything can change in a split second and life can flip upside down in the snap of a finger, so don’t ever take anything for granted. But today brings something special. 🌹 is finally home. From the bottom of my heart, thank you to everyone who reached out, commented, messaged, prayed, and did their best to keep me sane and entertained… even the toxic haters. I’m genuinely grateful for each and every one of you, and I will never forget who showed up for me when everything fell apart. Sometimes it takes everything falling apart to see what’s truly unbreakable. The love I felt from this community is something I’ll carry with me forever. 🙏
English
27
1
303
10.5K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@blogboynick If you think this person voted NZF last election I have a bridge to sell you.
English
0
0
1
290
Nick
Nick@blogboynick·
New type of voter just dropped
Nick tweet media
English
26
6
399
14.7K
MikeNewZ 🇳🇿
MikeNewZ 🇳🇿@MikeNewZ_·
@NZNationalParty India has removed tariffs on 57% of items immediately New Zealand has removed tariffs on 100% of item’s immediately We have to wait for the rest. Is that right @grok ?
English
11
10
85
7.6K
NZ National Party
NZ National Party@NZNationalParty·
New Zealand’s Free Trade Agreement with India will reduce or eliminate tariffs on 95% of exports to India, the world’s largest country. It means we can sell more of what we’re great at to India. Things like kiwifruit, apples, lamb, fish, wine, wool, honey, avocados and more. It means more jobs on farms and orchards, more money coming into local communities, and more opportunities for Kiwis to get ahead.
English
167
17
83
12.2K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@CJDGiesen @waitbutwhy The problem then arises if enough people jumped off the bridge that they all went back to the bridge and arrested the remaining high IQ people.
English
0
0
0
77
CJDGiesen
CJDGiesen@CJDGiesen·
Since many of you don't understand this abstract poll, lets make it concrete. Situation: We are standing on a bridge over a raging river. Red: You stay on the bridge. You are safe no matter what Blue: You jump off the bridge into the River. If more than 50% of people Jump, they can pull each other out of the River and survive. If less than 50% of people Jump, the River wins and everybody who jumped dies. I would humbly suggest: Stay on the stupid bridge. Peace.
English
128
34
1.3K
63.7K
Tim Urban
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy·
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
5.8K
1.5K
14.3K
26.6M
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@G_S_Bhogal @waitbutwhy If blue wins then they may have the power to later find out the vote results. What could they do to reds? Look at what happened to collaborators after WW2. If red wins they may not like living in a red only society. Especially if many people are lost.
English
0
0
0
203
Gurwinder
Gurwinder@G_S_Bhogal·
@waitbutwhy Press red, and you guarantee your survival while not affecting the survival of anyone else (since 1 button press won’t meaningfully impact the outcome of 8 billion button presses). Press blue, and you gamble your life for nothing but a momentary feeling of moral superiority.
English
64
16
511
51.4K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@TopherField We're early. The tanker and supply chain air gap takes time to show up.
English
0
0
0
5
Topher Field
Topher Field@TopherField·
I think there are some chicken-littles that owe me an apology. This is what I just paid for Diesel, and prices everywhere are improving rapidly. Its taken a little longer than I expected but I predicted from the start we would get through this without any of the 'doomsday scenarios' coming true, and here we are, through the worst of it, still intact. The fuel shortage is serious, yes, and its yet to have its full knock-on-effect on the economy, I'm not saying it was trivial or that it didn't hurt, but it was NEVER worthy of the fear-mongering and predictions of doom we've seen from some quarters. Comments are open for apologies below.
Topher Field tweet media
English
194
8
291
24.3K
Lump O'Coal
Lump O'Coal@RealStoveAdams·
@IterIntellectus @vincit_amore Initially yes, but if the vote was close losing half the world population would cause chaos. Especially if was just you and old people.
English
0
0
0
633
vittorio
vittorio@IterIntellectus·
@vincit_amore pressing red means you live no matter what
English
82
0
4K
223.5K