𝕽𝖊𝖋𝖔𝖗𝖒𝖊𝖉 𝕽𝖊𝖙𝖗𝖎𝖊𝖛𝖆𝖑 🕊️

Tony (@_TheoMed) and I have significantly updated the file on Charnock’s Hypothetical Universalism. It now appears more like a small book, with a table of contents and chapters with an expanded section of Charnock’s Two-fold reconciliation view. Link in the comments.

@DordtyHylemorph @PerkinsGhost @glpinkston Why did I read that thread…? 😵‍💫😭 It’s like they need “Decree/Ordain” to mean cause/coerce/absolutely necessitates etc.

@RefRetrieval @PerkinsGhost @glpinkston x.com/dordtyhylemorp…

The Introduction to the Minutes of Wesminster cite this from Thomas J. Crawford as being representative of the thought of Westminster divines behind the topic of God’s decree/ordination, specifically on WCF 3.1 and God not being the author of sin. @glpinkston

@graywithin Was he a molinist?

Everyone should read Erath on this.

@thefifthhead $25 plus shipping? Or take all that I have left for $50.

@RefRetrieval How much do you want for it?

Trying to clear up some space so I’m getting rid of my old books from my pre-Presbyterian days for cheap. If anyone is interested in anything, lmk and I’ll DM you.

I still have the following books not marked out available. $50 plus shipping they’re all yours. Saved by Grace by Bavinck Reformed Dogmatics by Bavinck Morning by Morning devotionals by Spurgeon Modernized 1689 LBC Traditional Theology & the SBC by Ascol The Reformation & its relevance Five Points by John Piper How Sanctification Works by David Powlison

@Toneskeee Universal Satisfaction 😎

Definite atonement or Limited Atonement? Why?

@Reformed_WA @_TheoMed x.com/refretrieval/s…

@RefRetrieval @_TheoMed Charnock is well-known for connecting the "oblation of Christ" with His "intercessory” or “high priestly” prayer. His exposition of John 17 clearly demonstrates his rejection of hypothetical universalism. But, where is the PDF you mentioned? You only posted a picture.

Tony (@_TheoMed) and I have significantly updated the file on Charnock’s Hypothetical Universalism. It now appears more like a small book, with a table of contents and chapters with an expanded section of Charnock’s Two-fold reconciliation view. Link in the comments.

@Reformed_WA @_TheoMed Okay. Show me the proof to back up your claims. A link to his discourse on knowledge doesn’t help your case. Did you read the PDF we provided?

@RefRetrieval @_TheoMed digitalpuritan.net/Digital%20Puri…

@Reformed_WA @_TheoMed Is this your opinion or do you have actual explicit evidence, because the actual evidence provided here suggests otherwise. And the universal/conditional decree is often misunderstood. See Jean Daillé for that.

@RefRetrieval @_TheoMed Although Stephen Charnock did not judge Hypothetical Universalism (HU) as heresy, he clearly rejected its central doctrine of a universal and conditional decree. He viewed the Amyraldians as "misguided friends,” but he never regarded HU as biblical doctrine.

@RevReads289 x.com/_dhds/status/2…

Me: Calvinists teach that God controls us when we sin. Calvinists: You don't understand Calvinism.

@J17apologetics @MikeWingerii @pastorlocke @thechurchsplit Mike:

@MikeWingerii @pastorlocke How long have you, @thechurchsplit been asking for this regarding PSA? @MikeWingerii bruh.

I challenge @MikeWingerii to a Live sit down. Like actually together in the same room. We can use both of our platforms to stream it. YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, X, Rumble, all of them. Uncut, raw and nothing off limits. Straight Bible. What about it Mike? You’ve purposely tried to destroy lives, ministries and reputations, including my own with situations you know nothing about. You act cute and calm behind all of your heavily edited videos. Have a real conversation. Ball’s in your court.

First Head of Doctrine: Of Divine Predestination, Article 17: Since we are to judge of the will of God from His Word which testifies that the children of believers are holy, not by nature, but in virtue of the covenant of grace, in which they, together with the parents, are comprehended, godly parents have no reason to doubt of the election and salvation of their children whom it pleaseth God to call out of this life in their infancy. —Canons of Dort

@CherylSchatz You can't actually live this way. I don't know of any Christian family who has lost a child can live with the reality that child is very possibly burning in hell

James White takes issue with John MacArthur's position that all infants and unborn children who die go to heaven. White argues that the same election that applies to adults applies to infants, meaning there are elect infants and non-elect infants. In his view, God makes no exception for the unborn or the very young when it comes to election and its consequences.

@thefifthhead It’s available

@RefRetrieval Interested in Reformed Dogmatics if available.

@DracoReformans A baptist, and then a paedobaptist at a Calvary Chapel.

@RefRetrieval What were you before Presbyterian

@ProvisionistP @tomascol Yes lol.

@RefRetrieval Isn’t that @tomascol book a response to the Prov/Trads?

@Ayo_Oyekan24 @_TheoMed I’d redownload the file. The original had some formatting errors that have now been taken care of.

@RefRetrieval @_TheoMed It works. Thanks a lot

A while back I wrote an article on Charnock’s Hypothetical Universalism. I’ve since expanded it with three additional excerpts and added a section by @_TheoMed, who addresses two cited objections to the HU reading. If you’d like a copy of the PDF, comment below.

@KnoxianBaptist @_TheoMed I’d redownload the file. The original had some formatting errors that have now been taken care of.

@RefRetrieval @_TheoMed It worked. Thanks!

@And_McGl @_TheoMed I’d redownload the file. The original had some formatting errors that have now been taken care of.

@RefRetrieval @_TheoMed Thank you, Sir