Reiners Project

Michael Reiners (@MCRReiners) writes, in 'Why Britain must adopt the Freedom of Speech Bill (2026)': "A party which suggests such a bill is not required accepts that they are complicit, or content, with continuing censorship & political punishment. To be charitable, some do not understand how, or why, it is occurring in the first place. Assuming the latter is true, I will break down core problems the British public face, and, how this bill remedies them." reiners.org.uk/why-britain-mu…

Excellent to see @CharlotteCGill on @joshxhowie’s show to discuss the appointments made by Burnham in No. 10, including former Hope Not Hate director Matthew McGregor. The white collar antifia - responsible for the defamation of hundreds of ordinary British people on the basis of sincerely held belief - have snuck into government using the Trojan horse of Mr Burnham. Gill’s work on @WokeWaste details how coordinated the left are, and, their capture of the charitable sector to further their aims. One vector is through gatekeeping on the basis of belief, and designating dissenters as non-persons in political life. HNH in particular has been seen to engage in this, and more. What has become known as ‘stochastic terrorism’ has been pursued against figures on the British right in this manner, appearing to justify harm done unto them for their political outlook. HNH’s page lengthily demonising Anne Widdecombe was swiftly removed following her death in suspicious circumstances. Similar HNH pages remain live for a number of centre right political figures, alongside political activists.

England; its problems so plentifal that it appears it were under attack from all sides, and from within. Those issues being: -Speech restriction & censorship -The migration influx of the 21st century -Institutional capture -The poverty of Britain, on an individual and national level, and permanence of its system of governance -The Postwar Liberal Consensus, and its consequences -The legislative and 'constitutional reform' output of the Blair years My essay "England Is Under Attack, From All Sides and Within" details the operative law giving rise to this situation and encourages readers to understand the common grievances of the Englishman as consequential matters – created by design – not a disparate laundry list of grievances. Read it in @ReinersProject: reiners.org.uk/england-is-und…

Tettenborn is correct. If you (still) believe the Oxfams of the world a harmless moral good, think again. The NGO sector is responsible for 20% of any given electoral manifesto, gains a third of their income from the taxpayer without consent, and has outsider-preference baked into everything they do. The Christian (and even the ‘Humanist’) notion of charity as a virtue has been subverted; the NGO ecosystem in Britain was designed as a complimentary asset to assist with the political pursuit of open border demographic terraformation. Even our national lottery is complicit in this. The graphic below, from @cambridgecircre's paper on the charitable sector "Breaking the Blob" is available here, and forensically looks at this problem: cambridgecircusresearch.com/publications/b…

A former Hope Not Hate director, and a current director, are now due to become key members of Burnham’s team in No.10. The only way a future government can meaningfully disable organisations like this, who delight in censorship and ruination, is by taking the legislative and regulatory tools which they wield against ordinary people away from them - this would also neutralise the activists to whom they outsource harm. That is what the @asi Freedom of Speech Bill does with aplomb, de-ranging their attacks, and rendering them meaningless (the full bill is linked below) The following extract is from my conversation on the subject of HNH, with @NewCultureForum

In Britain, we have essentially developed a form of mandatory centrism. This is by design, and ensures that every party & person is outwardly a 2000s-era blairite. Across our 90+ professional regulators which limit expression, Public Sector Equaity Duty which threatens to cost you your job, political vetting/selection, the Public Order Act (1986) and an array of criminal speech law – Britain has ringfenced political & public life to ensure only the politically milquetoast may enter it without punishment. You will be consigned to the rubbish heap if you choose to deviate from this. As a consequence, we still live in a culturally Blairite world – despite clear dissatisfaction from all walks of life. The case for our Freedom of Speech Act has never been stronger: adamsmith.org/research/the-f…

England; its problems so plentiful that it would seem to be under attack from all sides, and from within. Those issues being: -Speech restriction & censorship across criminal and regulatory law -The poverty of Britain, on an individual and national level -The legislative and 'constitutional reform' output of the Blair years -Institutional capture & the 'permanent state' -The migration influx of the 21st century -The Postwar Liberal Consensus, and its consequences My essay "England Is Under Attack, From All Sides and Within" details the operative law giving rise to this situation and encourages readers to understand the common grievances of the Englishman as consequential and contingent matters – created by design in the passing quarter century – not a disparate laundry list of grievances. Read it in @ReinersProject: reiners.org.uk/england-is-und…

Everything You Wanted to Know About Hope Not Hate* (*But Were Afraid To Ask) Hope Not Hate is an organisation which continuously flirts with criminality and appears to enjoy CPS immunity. Its exploitation of English law seeks to further the ambitions of the Labour Party by whatever means, and now, it is embedded explicitly in Burnham's government. Read it here in @ReinersProject: reiners.org.uk/everything-you…

My article in The Salisbury Review (@thesalisbreview) on why Britain must adopt the @ASI Freedom of Speech Bill (2026). 'Martin Luther nailed his Ninety-five Theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg on 31 October 1517 – an act that set in motion the Protestant Reformation. The publication of the Freedom of Speech Bill (2026) by the Adam Smith Institute on 1 April 2026 is, I believe, a comparable moment for the fight against censorship in Britain.' salisburyreview.com/why-britain-mu…

Michael Reiners (@MCRReiners) writes, in 'Why Britain must adopt the Freedom of Speech Bill (2026)': "A party which suggests such a bill is not required accepts that they are complicit, or content, with continuing censorship & political punishment. To be charitable, some do not understand how, or why, it is occurring in the first place. Assuming the latter is true, I will break down core problems the British public face, and, how this bill remedies them." reiners.org.uk/why-britain-mu…

"Why the West is Replacing Its Historic Population: The Post-Fordist Trap" Dr Ricardo Duchesne (@dr_duchesne) argues that mass immigration in the West is driven by the fusion of liberal universalism and post-Fordist capitalism, replacing historic nations with flexible labour markets, multicultural ideology, and managed demographic transformation. Read it in @ReinersProject: reiners.org.uk/why-the-west-i…

The shadow of @kunley_drukpa is long, and dark. His 2025 essay created the byword Britain was struggling to find. It is reproduced in @ReinersProject, here. His original thread is cited also: reiners.org.uk/yookayificatio…

4chan’s refusal to comply with the Online Safety Act will outlast DSIT, it seems. It will also outlast this government, the Online Safety Act, and, if Reform gets in, possibly even Ofcom itself.

'The UK' is not just emulating China – it now exceeds it as an authoritarian state. In China, the Dui Hua Foundation (@duihua) estimated there were 7,000–7,300 current political/religious prisoners, with 1,508 new cases added in one recent year (2021). The UK records 1.2 Million expression related 'criminal incidents' each year, comparable to the number of criminal convictions (outright, for all crime) in China. The UK convicts 10,000-15,000 people under the speech and expression provisions of the Public Order Act 1986 alone each year. That single act likely leads to arrests totalling 3x that amount. This is just one legal mechanism, among many, which restricts speech in the UK. China has banned VPNs that were not 'state-approved' in 2022. The UK, under Labour, and @andyburnham, now seeks to do the same. (Clip from my interview with @Kingbingo_, on @lotuseaters_com)

Is this the End of the Evil, Anti-Freedom Hope Not Hate? Link to the full thing in the replies! @MCRReiners

The mafia is in government

Everything You Wanted to Know About Hope Not Hate* (*But Were Afraid To Ask) @MCRReiners describes the history of Hope Not Hate, an organisation which continuously flirts with criminality and appears to enjoy CPS immunity. Its exploitation of English law seeks to further the ambitions of the Labour Party by whatever means, and now, it is embedded explicitly in Burnham's government. Read it here in @ReinersProject: reiners.org.uk/everything-you…

Fighting continuous rear-guard actions against our British legislation which can (and should) be repealed is undesirable. Legislative repeals, and restraint on future state interference, is the way. When asked outright, the public do not want “unlawful speech” to invite sanction - or “financial consequences for expression” at the behest of the state. The problem laws are well known, and the solutions are already available in Bill form, @asi’s Freedom of Speech Bill for one. If only someone were willing to insert them into our parliament: adamsmith.org/research/the-f…

Reactionary Reading Law (@LawReading) offers a pleasant, but appropriately cautious review of my Oblivion Act (2026) proposal - which suggests rolling repeal of all legislation (and subordinate legislation) since 1900, with the burden on ministers & parliament to expressly retain it. His review of this proposal raises a key issue with it; lack of competency in government. I am in agreement that specialist sectors, Energy for one, would certainly need expertise not currently found within ministers or parliament at large. Comically, the weakness of having an inexperienced parliament presents the biggest problem to unravelling the sum of its past deeds. An inverted burden might be used for protected infrastructure & services, though, ministerial fiefdoms being what they are, there will be a fight to expand what is considered “essential” (in the manner Lockdown categorised labour/industries) if such a bill were enacted. The offering seeks to advance the conversation around wide-ranging repeals; the imagination of the reformer need not be a slave to caution (at least not entirely). You can read @LawReading’s review, here, for which I’m grateful; reactionaryreadinglaw.substack.com/p/bold-reform-…

I enjoy reviewing the Oblivion Act 2026 by @MCRReiners open.substack.com/pub/reactionar…

The Adam Smith Institute's Freedom of Speech Bill abolishes "grossly offensive" speech as a criminal category. These posts, whilst wildly offensive, are nonetheless nonviolent expressions of opinion and in the drafters' view should not be criminalized.