Robin Hanson

70K posts

Robin Hanson banner
Robin Hanson

Robin Hanson

@robinhanson

Let’s skip witty banter & talk deep Qs. Books: https://t.co/hpZgEm55Ma https://t.co/iFs9C3IuOM Chief Scientist @_futarchy Advisor @MetaDAOProject @butterygg

Fairfax, VA Katılım Temmuz 2007
754 Takip Edilen118.6K Takipçiler
Agustin Lebron
Agustin Lebron@AgustinLebron3·
In case everyon'e missed it, @robinhanson has been advocating on X and on CNBC recently for the position that "maybe insider trading on prediction markets ain't so bad".
English
6
4
88
32.5K
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
@AgustinLebron3 @robinhanson insider trading is bad for prediction markets because noise traders will become discouraged and desert markets they see as structurally unfair
English
2
0
22
1.7K
eventwaves
eventwaves@EventWavesIO·
@robinhanson Fwiw, I got curious and this is what my pipeline output All models anchored around this paper from Patel and Putniņš, which estimates it around 5%
eventwaves tweet mediaeventwaves tweet media
English
1
0
0
37
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
«Be kind. Always»
Massimo tweet media
English
122
2.5K
12.4K
199.5K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
On average, ~20-40% of stock price change happens before official firm announcements. Thus insider trading in stocks is rampant; yet our stock markets function fine. To consider re prediction market insider trading.
English
44
17
219
43.6K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
@Leishman Should we also make sure to have distinct media apps for serious vs fun media topics?
English
2
0
13
1K
Alexander Leishman 🇺🇸
Sports betting is not good for society, but it's going to exist and it's fun sometimes. However, it absolutely does not belong in financial apps where people are building their savings. This unholy marriage of gambling and banking is going to end badly.
English
38
47
635
24.4K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
@jack_whitcomb_ For the purpose of this discussion, I'm happy to accept a substantial prior odds.
English
0
1
1
109
Jack Whitcomb
Jack Whitcomb@jack_whitcomb_·
@robinhanson Depends on the interpretation of your question. I'd say a world with god is infinitely more likely to have awe and beauty, and a lot more of it, but using awe and beauty as evidence requires some "prior odds for God" that are greater than zero. Not clear why that would be true.
English
1
0
1
107
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
“route to durable faith in God often runs not through logical proofs or the sciences, but through awe, wonder, and an attunement to the beauty and poetry of the world, natural and otherwise” theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/…
English
7
6
35
6.4K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
And why exactly is a world with awe and beauty more likely to have a God?
English
23
2
32
5.3K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
At a rate of ~300 glints per sky per hour.
English
0
0
0
1.4K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
@jonathanpassey The court has distinguished degrees of closeness to the ideal protected speech. So we should see such degrees here too.
English
1
0
2
70
Jonathan Passey
Jonathan Passey@jonathanpassey·
@robinhanson Your argument extends to all markets and prices. Should market prices be protected as speech? Price gouging ought to be protected speech under the first amendment?
English
1
0
0
131
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
Compared to plane seats, every train and car seat is first class.
English
9
1
129
7.3K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
@PlastiqSoldier There's a whole field of study of cultural evolution. Not easily summarized in an X post.
English
0
0
0
109
Plastic Soldier
Plastic Soldier@PlastiqSoldier·
@robinhanson So, what's your argument that culture change happens on it own and not largely due to 1/2/3. And how is 3 separate from culture change?
English
1
0
1
121
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
I used to love sf, for big civ-scale stories. But now I realize that sf sees change as mainly driven by (1) new tech, (2) war & political conflict, & (3) moral fervor. Culture changes are due to these. SF just doesn't see culture as changing internally, causing other stuff.
English
6
0
63
5.2K
DYJ
DYJ@davidyjeong·
seems like @MetaDAOProject doubled down and justify supporting @P2Pdotme by saying there is rampant insider trading everywhere, so it’s ok for teams to trade against retail with MNPI regardless, having worked in equities trading for 7 years, i can tell you this stat is false
Robin Hanson@robinhanson

On average, ~20-40% of stock price change happens before official firm announcements. Thus insider trading in stocks is rampant; yet our stock markets function fine. To consider re prediction market insider trading.

English
10
0
57
6.3K
Robin Hanson
Robin Hanson@robinhanson·
Heard a panel of 4 star @Kalshi traders, who were detail-oriented, young, nerdy, & rational, and thought "I'm glad to have contributed in my small way to these folks rising in status, & finding meaning in their lives."
English
12
13
275
21.1K
Daniel Colascione
Daniel Colascione@dcolascione·
@robinhanson Another example is Haldeman's Forever War, which involves the protagonist experiencing repeated culture shocks as he samples earth culture between long episodes of relativistic travel. The random walk of moral (and sexual) mores is a major theme.
English
1
0
1
818