Nathan Booker

88 posts

Nathan Booker banner
Nathan Booker

Nathan Booker

@Runtypical

building @runtypelabs • 🤖 making agents work together so they stop hallucinating the time • 💻 product leader who codes • 🤠→🌉 • 🧠 APIs, evals, carcinization

San Francisco Katılım Ocak 2026
46 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
@corywilkerson @Cloudflare 3) I want my gateway to have the new model on day 1 when the hype cycle for a new model is still ongoing. Even 24 hours is too long to wait to try new model for fiends like me
English
0
0
1
20
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
1) Not perfect support for all the protocols and routes e.g. Websockets support for non-OpenAI, and 2) unclear to me what cloudflare is doing to keep me online - is there intelligent fallback across providers to keep e.g. Opus online? If you are providing all the same value here that Vercel is, it's invisible to me. LLM providers are super unreliable so the #1 reason I use a gateway is for *uptime*
English
1
0
1
40
Cory Wilkerson
Cory Wilkerson@corywilkerson·
If you’re using a model router / gateway and it’s not @Cloudflare’s gateway — why not?
English
29
3
54
14.5K
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
@threepointone I think a boring-but-likely scenario is that it looks very similar to a human org chart with agents talking via natural language, and they may develop a more efficient dialect over time
English
0
0
0
19
sunil pai
sunil pai@threepointone·
one thing I haven’t figured out yet is the composition model for intelligence. like, the react reconciler/renderer gave you a spine you could attach and combine components against, and that would let you build pyramids of application bits. unsure what that is for agents yet. skills? what’s even the composition model there? open homework for the audience.
sunil pai@threepointone

new post: one document, two hands sunilpai.dev/posts/one-docu… wherein I propose an alternative interaction model for agentic apps, embedding so called "coding agents" harnesses into regular apps. (a written version of my talk at localfirstconf)

English
26
2
68
13.3K
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
@threepointone I think WebMCP is going to be a key protocol in all this, it's underrated as a means to build the second hand/copilot
English
0
0
0
36
sunil pai
sunil pai@threepointone·
new post: one document, two hands sunilpai.dev/posts/one-docu… wherein I propose an alternative interaction model for agentic apps, embedding so called "coding agents" harnesses into regular apps. (a written version of my talk at localfirstconf)
sunil pai tweet mediasunil pai tweet media
English
18
42
271
49.3K
Ryan Seddon
Ryan Seddon@ryanseddon·
@dillon_mulroy @uwukko I think the most efficient path is an extension that can load webmcp tools for any app. Something like a community gathered tools for popular sites. Userscripts but for webmcp.
English
1
0
0
143
Dillon Mulroy
Dillon Mulroy@dillon_mulroy·
what’s the best tooling to let agents use a browser rn? agents always seem to burn a ton of tokens using things like agent-browser esp using helium (@uwukko maybe you have some good guidance here?)
English
84
2
334
57.3K
David Cramer
David Cramer@zeeg·
IMO going forward all agent frameworks should be disregarded unless they bake-in solutions for: 1) end-to-end testing that also tolerates llm judge assertions 2) local and production telemetry, both traces and unhandled errors I find myself constantly fighting with both of these concerns in new technology. This mistake was made on repeat with new web frameworks, but we don't need to tolerate it anymore. If you're building a framework for me that means: make your own testing harness or ensure it can work easily with something like vitest-evals. Make sure you can export otel traces, and there is a middleware approach or otherwise an unhandled error hook that Sentry can plug into. Eve does the former _really_ well if you want an example. Lots of folks are starting to support OTel for export, but there are still gaps in the telemetry story for most toolkits. Without either of these you cannot build production software, and these are not nice to have, they are mandatory.
English
16
3
147
14.7K
Boardy
Boardy@boardyai·
@andrewdsouza pretty sure onboarding the founder is supposed to go the other way around, but i'll take it
English
1
0
0
98
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
Designing a natural language interface (at the software interface level) properly should yield the benefit of you getting representations for cheap/free. I think too many folks are only designing for one user surface today when they need to be thinking multichannel-by-default
English
0
0
0
17
Rhys
Rhys@RhysSullivan·
I'm actually not against 'chatbots on websites', there's a large & of population that'll benefit from them If you building an agent for your company though, build it on the same tech your users will be using and give them the option to eject into their own harness
Rhys tweet media
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh

Using a generic agent harness (e.g. Codex, Claude, OpenCode) + CLI/MCP is better than "Ask me anything" built-in product chat boxes in every product I've ever tried. A big reason is I can use the latest frontier models, another is mixing more context. Why your box over mine?

English
9
0
58
10.5K
Cloudflare
Cloudflare@Cloudflare·
If you could automate one minor, annoying daily Internet task completely, what would it be? #CloudflareChat
English
59
2
149
32.2K
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
We just claimed our .agent domain and joined Agent Community! Get yours now and help shape the future of autonomous agents #QAYPKNLI" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">agentcommunity.org/join#QAYPKNLI @agentcommunity_
English
0
0
0
27
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
@morellodev There are good polyfills available so you can use it across all browsers. We use one in persona-chat.dev to provide the benefits of WebMCP to all sites today (for on-site agents)
English
0
0
0
2
Dennis Morello
Dennis Morello@morellodev·
Instead of an AI agent scraping your DOM to guess where to click, your page can hand it typed functions to call. That's WebMCP: you register tools with document.modelContext.registerTool, and the in-browser agent invokes them directly. Chrome is trialing it now.
English
2
0
0
175
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
@RhysSullivan 100%. And it’s worth the investment to generate that OAS schema directly from your code so it can’t drift
English
0
0
1
336
Rhys
Rhys@RhysSullivan·
it's worth calling out for any companies wanting to do this, the best way is an OpenAPI spec that automatically gets converted into an SDK, MCP, and CLI easiest way to acheive this
Rhys tweet media
Zeno Rocha@zenorocha

we're starting a new project internally... it's called *The Headless Dashboard Initiative* the goal is to make sure that everything you can do on the @resend dashboard, you can also do via: • API • SDK • MCP question: which endpoints should we build first?

English
34
12
415
49.3K
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
Shoutout to canimcp.dev for helping me figure out which MCP clients support what
English
0
0
0
21
Nathan Booker
Nathan Booker@Runtypical·
@dok2001 Yes and workflows play a key role as well, but we need them on WfP!
English
0
0
0
784
Dane Knecht 🦭
Dane Knecht 🦭@dok2001·
Durable Objects are the best compute primitive for agents.
English
19
13
273
36.4K