RussianBot14☦️

@Jackson0073h @knightcore77 @Pat_Stedman Did it ever occur to you that he found a good woman because he actually lives out the worldview he preaches? Your comment is dripping with contempt.

He’s a married husband with several children, who is church oriented, chiming in on the what the Red pill means for other men. Let’s see him go through a divorce, custody battle, child support, alimony, and let’s see how his sentiment changes. Easy to talk your shit when everything in paradise is going swimmingly. Perhaps he considers himself a genius for choosing such a good one for himself, and “bringing the best out of her”. Maybe. But time will tell. So many a man felt the same hubris Pat currently feels, and so many a man has been humbled. A rude awakening often awaits.

And this is why the red pill is ultimately a feminizing influence. Because one of the cornerstones of healthy masculinity is the attitude that it is always your fault. This is how men handle challenges and grow, by taking responsibility for their outcomes. If you married the wrong woman, it was a choice you made. If you got burned or rejected for being a "nice guy", it was downstream of your behavior. If you didn't know better, it was ignorance. To be fair, early red pill discussed the burden of performance and at least masqueraded as a vehicle for self-improvement; a way to understand and get girls. But within it was always the seed of contempt, and that has grown to become the predominant energy in the movement today. Now the only thing you get called out for is being a fool or a simp because you trusted women or treated them well. Men are mostly just considered victims of women, who are inherently evil and lack humanity. Because to the red pill, women are all the same. There is no focus on character assessments of women because to the red pill this doesn't matter. Women are not capable of possessing integrity in their twisted worldview. A man doesn't have a healthy & high trust relationship with a woman because he gauged a woman's soul and brought out the best in her, stability is reduced to "he is chad and settled for her" or if he is perceived as providing "she settled and is using him." It is zero sum thinking. Inspid, izzat-coded, third world slop.

@Pat_Stedman One of the few accounts in this space with integrity

I want to make something clear: I am not on the side of "men" A lot of men suck. They are self-absorbed scum who use people. Since I could care less if they get hit by a car, it would be bizarre for me to defend the bullshit they do to women I am on the side of good faith people, both men and women I am anti-feminist because feminists operate in bad faith. They are untrustworthy, entitled, and seek win-lose dynamics with the opposite sex This is why I always call out bad female behavior But if you are a man who wants the same extractive dynamics except for men, we're not allies I consider you as much a part of the problem our society faces as them

@AngieMillions @jamie_marie000 @Pray2EndAbtn @0riettaRose

@RussianBot_14 @jamie_marie000 @Pray2EndAbtn @0riettaRose A swat on the butt is not “hitting!”

Problematic parenting alert. Being bullied by your 3yo is wild! Pick her up, kicking & screaming, and take her out. The second she starts, y'all are done & leaving. And you are not leaving to go do something else, you are going home where she'll be bored & have to find something to do by herself. I do not understand these parents who are scared of their very young children.

@NoRandomWords @JoforOregon @0riettaRose You can (and should) discipline with empathy. They are not mutually exclusive. Permissiveness with a child leads to enablement, not empathy.

I’ve raised 5 children. All of them are productive. None of them are selfish disrespectful shit heads. Why? Discipline. Consistent discipline. My children knew the rules. Still do. Giving your child discipline is best love there is. As far as I am concerned, empathy with a child leads to enablement. A structured loving disciplined environment is what children need. If I was wrong - my children would be drug addicted pieces of shit. Look to Portland to see what non-disciplined children look like in their 20s and 30s.

@AngieMillions @jamie_marie000 @Pray2EndAbtn @0riettaRose The child is out of control because the parents are not being authoritative. This is a parent issue first and foremost. Hitting the child isn’t going to actually address the core issue.

@jamie_marie000 @Pray2EndAbtn @0riettaRose Did you NOT listen to the video?? This “3 year old” is OUT OF CONTROL! CLEARLY…a lil chitchat ain’t cutting it! JEEZ! Relax….we aren’t suggesting they beat the shit out of her. A tap on the ass could do wonders.

@watch_rome_burn @Slatzism @hinata__yuna I keep getting geriatric dachshunds

@Slatzism @hinata__yuna Huh. I mostly get food and guns and random jokes/humor.

@C0l3c @DanielP1973235 @bad_takes So many older doctors just prescribe these daily and don’t update their prescribing guidelines. I was told to take one every single morning for anxiety, not “as needed.” I trusted my doctor unfortunately.

@DanielP1973235 @bad_takes They aren't meant to be used as a cure. They are meant to be taken only once or twice per month only when the anxiety is unbearable. But the problem is when the patient has severe anxiety constantly. Then he will need benzos constantly. Then he get addicted and life becomes hell.

is there any chance that the “psych med induced neurological injury” was caused by taking him to russia so he can cold turkey benzos while in a medically induced coma? Or are you gonna run with “mold did this” forever

@katyusharocket1 @bad_takes Reinstating after years is unlikely to help. He should’ve done it like that the first time around.

@bad_takes Will all his multi millions, he needs to go away to a treatment center for 1-2yrs where he has zero stress and a provider puts him on a super slow blind klonopin taper where he doesn’t know when the dose drops by 0.05mg.

@BostonConvert Scrupulosity can be a form of OCD - have you considered any mental health resources to develop coping mechanisms? Neuroticism is not a fixed state that you’re sentenced to.

I have faith, and I don’t do these religious things as if I’m trying to complete a “get to heaven checklist” I do them for the love of God, and for my spiritual health. My priest says I’m overly scrupulous, and neurotic. And it’s my cross to bear.

How do you guys go about finding joy in Christ? I often only feel a deep sadness, and terror. I confess, I commune, I pray, I attend services. I want the childlike joy and faith my wife has. Or my godson. Or my soon to be second godson has.

@SychinLegacy @cowincrisis All the right wingers I know want to exterminate pit bulls (correct position)

@cowincrisis Golden retriever, a family dog, is in no way a leftist dog. And pitbull as a rightist dog? Absolutely wrong.

this will not be up for discussion left: golden retriever border colli st. bernard dachshund springer spaniel beagle english sheepdog komondor irish setter great dane italian greyhound french bulldog australian shepherd sharpei centralist: labrador retriever right: german shepherd chinese crested pitbull corgi boxer poodle doberman pomeranian bernese mountain dog jack russel chow chow airedale terrier husky yorkshire terrier dalmation rottweiler any of those crusty white rat dogs fascist: chihuahua

@JLatifF @RRR0BYN I think you’re in the wrong neighborhood lady

@RRR0BYN None of you cared about the children abused in the Epstein files but a healthy baby with two loving parents is causing this much outrage? You are all hypocrites.

The worst part of this video is that it appears the baby is almost holding back his tears, this signifies severe trauma, pain too intense to fully allow oneself feel. Even as an infant there is an instinctive awareness of what has been denied to him. Hell isn’t hot enough for these bastards. Please pray for this child.

@CountingTh84404 @PJfromAustralia @o4america @FurkanGozukara Seems bizarre, like why not just be a prot? You can even make your own denomination.

@RussianBot_14 @PJfromAustralia @o4america @FurkanGozukara For the unrooted it’s simply another badge to collect (& ultimately make meaningless). Many are jumping on the Orthodox-without-orthodoxy bandwagon, it’s easier & faster. (Offline evangelism is slow but nets steadier results.) But the gates of hell will not prevail… Matt 16-:18

Famous pastor Father Josiah Trenham shares a profound theological truth. He confirms that Zionism has absolutely no historical basis in the Christian faith. He explains that true Christianity rejects ethnic superiority, rendering the Zionist ideology entirely incompatible.

@PJfromAustralia @o4america @FurkanGozukara So you’re not Orthodox, got it.

@RussianBot_14 @o4america @FurkanGozukara Read the above

@PJfromAustralia @o4america @FurkanGozukara Why do you have an Orthodox cross in your name if you reject what the Orthodox Church teaches? We don’t get to pick and choose, we’re not Protestants.

@o4america @FurkanGozukara Well since you don’t know me, and you don’t know my theology and how I got here and over what timeframe and specifically the way God worked on me to get here - telling me what I need with a language thats highly reductive… well this is how we got here…

@KlKESLAMMER88_ @Slunkrangler Yes Bannon has aligned himself with the Tucker faction. Poso is a special kind of kíkeslave

@AppyOrtho We use an Appalachian Orthodox chant during Pascha vigil

“wHy aRe yOU Orthodox? WhY dOn’T yOu hOnOr yOuR Appalachian aNcEstOrs?” I’m literally the 30th granddaughter of St. Olga of Kiev. Should I honor my 12th g-grandfather, the German mystic who had visions in a sunbeam instead? Why? What’s the logic? My ancestors WERE Orthodox

@milkisgood4you_ @BlackBoneTory You don’t actually *have* to defend yourself. Choosing to simply disengage is often the less ego-driven path.

@BlackBoneTory I never even bother arguing tbh but i had to "defend" myself earlier which is what inspired the post. I 100% agree with you though

Getting baptized and immidiately arguing with catechumens on Twitter

@ManhattanT00 @PerryALPHA If you believe the first schism that occurred was in 1054, you don’t know church history.

@PerryALPHA It's your own fault. You had to break away from the Roman Catholic Church. Greek orthodox was the first schism against the Church. 😌

@LeonDidia @ryanburge The Gospel is read during every single Divine Liturgy.

@ryanburge Growing up E. Orthodox you hear a lot of "overcame death by death" chanting but don't hear the gospel until you look into what this Protestantism is all about and then you are mindblown

"In the Christian tradition, which of the following is commemorated on Easter Sunday?" This is the share of each group that answered: Resurrection of Jesus.

@Pat_Stedman Good post.

I know what Will is trying to say, but this doesn't sell marriage well. Men are tired of hearing about responsibility and sacrifice when they are not explicitly guaranteed authority and reward. However he is right that marriage is not about "you." The catch is it's not about her either. Marriage is something above the two of you that you are both working for. It is its own entity - something you build together because when it does well, it pays dividends to both of you: regular sex, economies of scale, emotional intimacy / companionship, personal growth, and legacy. This requires duty and service towards her, but likewise does it require this of her to you, in her own way and form. The challenge of course is that very few people understand what this really entails going in. They want romantic love and its idealized promises of passion and perfect union. They expect some troubles, but for things to mostly be easy and exciting. They expect by committing they will get their needs met by the other person. So when the honeymoon phase (and it's sexual peaks) fades and the fights start, they start to feel gypped. This was not how marriage was marketed, and they wonder what the point of it was. It feels like you came all this way and invested so much only to get frustration in return. Why bother? The criticism is understandable on the surface, but the problem with it is it lacks perspective. Although these fights and frustrations are virtually guaranteed to some degree, they are a feature not a bug. Marital disillusionment is a gateway to becoming a more developed and self-validated person. The issues you have to face with your spouse aren't permanent; at least, they don't have to be. Because the problems in your marriage are really problems with yourself. Your spouse is pissing you off because she is showing you things about yourself that you don't like; she is revealing your dysfunction. Even if you are "the victim" who is "doing everything right," the abuse or lack of appreciation you are receiving is a signal you lack boundaries. You and her are in a reactive pattern with each other; you might feel disconnected, but you are actually co-dependent. You are fighting because you are each trying to reassert your individuality. People online grasp this "loss of self" is a common phenomenon in marriage, which is a major reason they tell you not to bother with the institution. If you can't have control and get what you want from a wife, it ostensibly makes more sense to be single and romantically transactional. So long as you are desirable enough, when you are uncommitted you never have to compromise or sacrifice. This is why the red pill has gone through such lengths to tell men their sexual market value always increases, and why feminism has similarly told women they can wait forever and "have it all." But the reality is if you struggle to be an individual in a relationship, then you probably struggle to maintain your individuality in general. To put it more simple terms, the people who avoid marriage because they consider it too hard are typically the most psychologically fragile people. They have the worst attachment issues, the greatest anxiety, the starkest avoidant tendencies. They are emotionally akin to the out-of-shape person who won't work out. They think they are avoiding pain, but they are really just operating at a lower level - and as they age, their lack of fitness will eventually catch up to them. How someone treats the people they are closest to is how they treat themselves. Avoiding getting close to others doesn't evade this internal reality, it just avoids the challenge of self-confrontation. People deceive themselves about this because all of your wounds and issues can be successfully covered up in your interactions, intermediated by the persona. You can come across put together and successful to others. Indeed, you can use the sense of self that they reflect onto you to even feel better. It's an easy and common source of validation. But whatever you want to tell yourself, the loneliness is still there - the simultaneous wanting and fear of wanting. These are the wounds and developmental tasks you were supposed to work through with someone but that you've escaped from to protect your ego. I've seen people do this for years, burying themselves into work, hook ups, and substances - putting off or sabotaging any relationship that might make them emotionally vulnerable. They chase the highs to avoid the lows; they numb and distract themselves. But all drugs lose their edge over time, and the work on yourself you didn't do gradually and then suddenly becomes an existential plight. This is not even a problem many divorced people have, who at least went through the gauntlet, and often made the choice to leave from their own agency. This is the dread only possessed by those who never went into the arena or who bailed early. You can tell which ones are going through it the most, because they are possessed by a bitterness even the men who loved and lost never have. So we need to put marriage in proper perspective. No, it does not exist to simply gratify you, but it is also not some pointless exercise in being a pack mule. It is there to transform you. Love is easy at first because it is a dream; then it becomes hard because you realize that's all it was - it wasn't real. Too many people give up or get stuck here. But it becomes easy again once you put aside those childish fantasies and get honest with yourself about who you are and why you do the things you do. It becomes easy once you can validate yourself rather than require your woman to do it for you - and when you can shift your attitude from need to desire, and from obligation to choice. So yes, there is responsibility and sacrifice in a marriage, but in healthy marriages this is not parasitic. Healthy marriages are win-win dynamics built on high trust and mutual respect. But the respect, ironically, only comes when you are strong enough to stand up to each other's bullshit - and through that, transcend your own. This is the crucible marriage creates. But it is not a torture chamber - it is a vehicle towards individuation and higher levels of consciousness. You can have it all with your woman, but only when you're sovereign enough that you don't need her to give you it. The only way out is through.