S.A.P

🇺🇸 America is now the undisputed energy superpower of the world: Oil: 24 million barrels per day (more than Saudi Arabia + Russia combined) Natural Gas: 119 billion cubic feet per day (more than Russia + Iran + China combined) If the Strait of Hormuz gets shut down for a long time, it might sting America but it would devastate Europe and Asia. Europe talks a big game about “green energy” and independence, yet still relies heavily on Middle East oil and gas. Meanwhile, the U.S. sits on massive domestic production and strategic leverage. This is raw power in 2026. America doesn’t just have energy independence, it has energy dominance. The world runs on oil and gas and right now, America controls the tap. Source: Benny Johnson

✅ Thanks for joining the movement.

‼️ It amazes me that Signal, with "state-of-the-art E2E encryption" and a promise that "no one else can" read your messages, fails to turn off notification previews by default, while it has been known for over a decade that Apple stores them cleartext in notification storage.

> So everyone has it in for Graphene? Louis Rossman, Braxman, Iode, E, Calyx. But they don't attack each other? You're listing a small number of groups financially benefiting from attacking GrapheneOS. Rossmann attacks many people and organizations with highly inaccurate claims and directs harassment towards them. He has an identity verified Kiwi Farms account where he seeks out their friendship and support to use them as part of his attacks on people. Braxman is widely acknowledged to be a scammer by actual privacy and security experts. His products and services are proven to contain actual backdoors. His video content contains endless fabrications and is not legitimate privacy content. The operating systems you're listing are falsely marketed as being something they're not and each has spent years misleading people about GrapheneOS to benefit themselves. We defend ourselves from these attacks. > Why is Graphene the only organization not using Micro G? A small number of companies which are clearly scamming people using it is a mark against it rather than for it as you seem to believe. > Why don't the others? They're not legitimate privacy or security projects. They do not care about severe privacy and security flaws. They aren't shipping people basic privacy and security patches while misleading them with a fake Android security patch level and many inaccurate claims about it. They do not preserve the basic privacy and security model. Why would you want us to emulate what those groups do? They provide unsafe devices not fit for purpose with many severe unpatched vulnerabilities. They're much worse than using an iPhone but market themselves as more private despite being the opposite. They don't only attack GrapheneOS, they also attack others including Apple and iOS / iPhones to mislead people into using far less private and secure devices. Apple is a huge company and is not significantly impacted by these attacks as we are. They also focus much more on misleading people about GrapheneOS as most of the people they're trying to get to buy their products aren't interested in using iPhones. > Again, I dont know if Graphene is genuinely better or worse. But I dont like its conduct No, you follow and support charlatans and scammers who spread fabricated stories and spin about our team. It's not what we actually do and say which you dislike but rather the falsehoods you've been told by the people you support which lead to your position. You know little about GrapheneOS or the team behind it but rather base your opinions on fabrications about it.