@Sykodelic_ I think we may see a HL on the Weekly RSI with price going to FVG on the weekly around 69-70k
English
Sa〽 Ƒisher
6.7K posts
Sa〽 Ƒisher
@Sam_Fish3er
𝕀 𝕒𝕝𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 𝕥𝕖𝕝𝕝 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕥𝕣𝕦𝕥𝕙 𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕟 𝕨𝕙𝕖𝕟 𝕚 𝕝𝕚𝕖
Blacklist Katılım Ağustos 2017
40 Takip Edilen289 Takipçiler
Really strong weekly close here.
Not only did it close above the 2025 yearly low wick of $74,400...
It also closed above the candle body of $78,330.
To me, with my system, this has now confirmed that the bottom is in with higher than 90%.
Bitcoin has fully reclaimed HTF Bullish structure and my thesis of an expanded flat has been confirmed.
Every single time it has done this, the bottom has been in.
All eyes on the $80k - $90k level for May.
New highs this year.
Sykodelic 🔪@Sykodelic_
This is a very important weekly close. And so far, its looking good for the bulls. But lets cover the 360 degree picture here. On the HTF Bitcoin has now: - Reclaimed HTF structure and the 2025 yearly low - Broken out on the 1W RSI - Ticked bullish on the 1W MACD - Broken above the 100D SMA On the bearish side we have: - Below the 1W 50EMA - Below the 200D EMA - Short term holders average cost & true market mean at $79,000 There are some very key levels for BTC to work through here before you could begin to confirm a new uptrend. However, every previous time Bitcoin has reclaimed HTF structure, it has marked the cycle low. In addition, with the RSI and MACD so strong, I am, every day that passes, expecting this to mark our low and move higher. On the LTF we have: - Price stabilising at this key level - Funding on its longest negative streak in years - Spot leading the rally - Coinbase premium consistently positive In short, there has been a strong bid for Bitcoin and its holding it. My thoughts as we head into next week/month are that a rejection here to a retest of the $74k level could be next, retest the HTF structure breakout... But then a move towards $86,000, breaking through STH cost basis and true market mean this time, to have a go at the 1W 50 and 1D 200 EMA's. They will bring another challenge. Overall though, I am of the view that we have very likely bottomed here and the breaking above $74,400 on the weekly confirms the expanded flat correction for me. Both the RSI, MACD and weekly structure show positive signs. If we lose this level again on a next weekly close, that would be bearish and I would then be looking for lower targets in the range again. Let's see how it goes!
English
$BTC has now broken out of the macro downtrend on both Linear and Log.
The linear breakout is clean, showing clear short-term strength.
But the log breakout is still unproven, only one daily close outside so far.
A move to mid $80k's would confirm the trend shift and make dips much more desirable.
English
I will have no reason to be bearish on $BTC once we breakout from the log trend and reclaim the $74k range.
But for now, this is no place to get excited at the macro resistance.
The first scenario is more probable since we are under the trend.
Many altcoins have a very good bullish structure. I'd rather play them than to diddle with BTC here.
English
"Fat doesn't make you fat."
Sugar makes you fat.
Eating good fats can actually help you stay healthy. So, eat good quality fats and real, whole, fresh food.
➡️Good fats consist of:
🔸Ghee
🔸Coconut oil
🔸Olive oil
🔸Nuts & seeds
🔸Full fat dairy
🔸Egg yolk
🔸Fatty fish
Sugar not healthy fat, is the real villain.
Good fats can heal
English
@brightafia Who made the 3 minute rule? Why can't it be 5 minutes?
English
Normalize resting 3 minutes between sets. The people staring can wait.
English
Most will move like $RAVE (42X),
But you ain't ready for that talk yet.
5.0 INVERTED.BULL 🙃@5_0Trading
Most altcoins will move like $RAVE, but most won't enjoy the pumps
English
@9mmsmg I would never use steroids but you are right with this statement. If alcohol is "legal" so should be other things like steroids, cocaine etc.
English
A 21 year old can walk into a liquor store and purchase Alcohol and cigarettes, drive across the street, and purchase 10000 calories of McDonald's and spend his remaining money on lottery tickets. Perfectly legal.
If that same adult wants to try anabolic steroids or HGH, he better have a prescription, though. Because they're "unhealthy."
It has nothing to do with health. I should be able to walk into a pharmacy and purchase pharmaceutical grade Human Growth Hormone, and as much testosterone as I choose to as an adult, no prescription needed. Just an ID showing I'm an adult.
English
It’s true that calories are calories in terms of pure energy, but the way the body processes and utilizes them can vary depending on the type of food. Different foods have different effects on digestion, nutrient absorption, hormonal responses, and overall metabolic efficiency.
For example, the body generally digests and absorbs certain foods more easily than others. Highly fibrous foods like large amounts of salad, broccoli, and other vegetables can be harder to digest in very high quantities. Consuming 1,500 kcal solely from these sources could potentially lead to bloating, gas, or digestive discomfort due to their high fiber content and fermentable carbohydrates.
English
@louisvttnn @Sam_Fish3er @MetabolicFactor Cool I'm glad you can admit that an equal amount of calories is an equal amount of calories.
You said protein gives you more energy which isn't true.
No interest in discussing macros or satiety because that's dependent on the person. I eat high protein/high carb FWIW
English
Svenska
Yeah and you know what your body can take for fuel ? Ever heard of proteins and fats ? energy efficiency ? You can stuff your gut with 1k salad, good luck absorbing energy from that. Both sides arent the way, balance is everything but if i had to choose after a hard workout i would rather eat left than right
English
@KekDickus @MetabolicFactor Thats totally true. Protein and fats are missing and thats what i meant. If you have to choose your body has more fuel from the left then right. Esp if you worked out. As you say balanced. Both isnt
English
@Sam_Fish3er @MetabolicFactor It's literally the same amount of energy. Energy is measured in kcal. Yes, it does need more protein and fats on the right side - the OP just took the lowest calorie density foods for effect, but the point remains that with a balanced diet, you can eat high volumes of food.
English
@Clinodactyly @MetabolicFactor Dont you say. So who need protein and fats anyway
English
@Sam_Fish3er @MetabolicFactor 1500cal=6276000Joule its the same energy
English
@kungfu_stew @MetabolicFactor Yeah thats true. One the body can work with the other is just unusable
English
@Sam_Fish3er @MetabolicFactor 1. Yes, he’s a fucking animal. 2. It’s the exact same energy you fucknuckle, that’s what calories are a measure of.
English
I´m using the Garmin Venu® Sq 2 - had the redmi watch 5 recently and had to sent back. Active calorie tracking was unaccurate and had software bugs so i switched back to my old venu sq 2. Yeah gramin is more expensive but its worth it imo. For tracking my runs and workouts, tracking sleep it works great. Battery life for me around 10days. You dont have to take the most expensive ones. The cheaper ones also are very good.
English
@Sam_Fish3er @MoroseEngineer @CoachDanGo which watch do you recommend? thinking of getting one for running and sleep tracking
English
Your treadmill and smartwatch are lying to you about how many calories you burn.
A Stanford study tested 7 popular fitness devices and found every single one overestimated calorie burn.
The most accurate was still off by 27%. The worst? 93% off.
They use generic formulas based on speed and weight not taking into account your fitness level, body composition, or how efficiently you move.
Most people don't know that the fitter and more skilled you are at the activity the less calories you burn. Machines don't know that.
The worst part isn't the bad data but what people do with it.
They eat back those exercise calories and justify eating more because their screen said they earned it.
Personally, I'd take the numbers your devices give you with a grain of salt while tracking your food intake and activity level.
Do the math on your own as it will be more accurate.
Yes, But@_yesbut_
English
@Doc_Red_ Yeah maybe if you run 20min with avarage puls of 110 - A 45min run with avarage puls of around 140 i burn around 600kcal (90kg) Calcluate it for yourself and not only believe what a watch is saying you. Gramin is very accurate
English
Everyone would be less depressed knowing that jogging or sprinting is a TERRIBLE way to burn fat since your “smart” watch says “500 calories burnt”, when in reality it’s more like “300 calories burnt 🥵
Musculoskeletal Mitochondrial Adaptation
Yes, But@_yesbut_
English