Disciple of Satoshi

@TheBernician @LandlordLinks Not working.. stuck on hcaptcha

@LandlordLinks It is heavily censored, you're right. Did it not let you verify you're human? It appears to be working fine at this end now.

From time to time, people ask why I was blacklisted 22 years ago, two years before a film I was executive producer on got nominated for two Oscars ['BOBBY", for which I remain uncredited]. Because I was given a simple choice by one of the senior Bilderberg controllers: 1. Keep my mouth shut about the heinous crimes of the controllers and enjoy the 'guarantee' of A-List success. Or 2. Be blacklisted in my chosen profession. Needless to say, my answer was: "I'll get my coat..." Why was I asked to keep my mouth shut? Because they knew I knew who was responsible for 9/11 three days after the false flag was staged and that I had already agreed to make a film telling the story of the 1st 9/11 whistleblower, which you can read about here: thebernician.net/inside-911-an-…

1/ Most El Salvador content online is written for single guys moving to Bitcoin country. We view EL Salvador through the lens of family - with our toddlers and retired parents. Here's everything — for families. 🧵

I was wrong. Anthea Harris, the ‘Fuel Supply Taskforce Coordinator’ currently managing fuel supply nationwide is on an annualised salary of $1 MILLION. Her contract is 3 months, $233,676.

@ctindale Your post is already good, But if you haven't yet, read Murray Rothbard's The Anatomy of State. Search for free pdf on mises dot org.

I was watching the government get questioned today, and what struck me was how absurd it was. Someone was coordinating the fuel task force, earning $270,000 over 2.5 months. FFS, am I the only one? who makes more than $100K a month, and the bureaucrat, when asked, just said oh we looked around. That's the exact problem. She looked around and saw it was normal to get $100k a month. That is basically a million-dollar-a-year rate to manage an emergency fuel rationing process. Another person was apparently paid hundreds of thousands for barely a few months of chairing it. The part that interests me is the symmetry. This is what failing systems seem to do. When the material base starts to crack, a bureaucratic class emerges around the crisis and begins feeding on the management of failure. That is what happened in France under the Ancien Régime, especially with the rise of the noblesse de robe: the administrative and legal class that converted state office into status, income, and power. The state became less a machine for solving the problem and more a machine for sustaining the people appointed to manage it. You can see similar patterns in older collapses, too, such as the Bronze Age. As the real system comes under strain, the coordinating class grows heavier, more expensive, and more detached from the underlying material problem. And now here we are in Australia, paying near-million-dollar-equivalent rates to people chairing or coordinating emergency fuel arrangements, while the country still has the same physical vulnerability: dependence on imported fuel, weak sovereign refining capacity, and fragile supply chains. Canberra really does believe they are the Australian nobility. She also might or might not be in charge of Sulphuric Acid. She didn't seem sure. The crisis becomes a career structure. The emergency becomes a payroll.

I am ex-"Global Leader for Tomorrow", which they abolished to ex-invite me and that's why they immediately created the "Young Global Leader" program.

Richard Werner, the ex WEF young global leader shocked me yet again with his chilling insights. You may recall in 2023 he revealed that the purported end game was CBDCs implanted under the skin, using universal basic income to force acceptance. Now we’re being told UBI will be needed due to AI taking our jobs. And here’s the clincher!! He believes the real reason they’re building massive centralised AI data centres is for the implementation of CBDCs. If this is true, an agenda we thought we had defeated is still coming together in plain sight.

We kicked the 2000 crash up to the housing market. We kicked the 2008 crash up to the UST market. We kicked the 2020 crash up to the USD. This means whenever the next crisis starts, we will see stocks rise in USD (blue) but fall in gold (red)...as has happened since 4q21👇: @andrewrsorkin

I filed with FEC for the 2028 House race. This allows me to raise funds to continue my political operations supporting my position as a current office holder and as a potential candidate for federal office. I haven’t made a final decision about which office to seek, if I run.

@lomaxx You think "crowd" is doing it.. actually, gubermint guys have enormous appetite to collect taxes and they ensure media prints as "crowd" is saying.. crowd actually follows the gubermint/media lead on the topic. Read The Anatomy of state by Murray Rothbard (search free PDFs)

This is where the “tax the rich” crowd lose me. Say I earn 90k a year and in 2027 I inherit $200,000 I invest that $200k and after 10 years in the stock market it’s now worth $400k If I sell it and realise the $200k capital gain, what the govt and the “tax the rich” crowd are saying is that I should be taxed as if I make $290k every year. Now if I try and split that CGT income across 2 people I’m “greedy” and avoiding tax But if I sell down in 4x $100k lots over 4 years and minimise my tax, that’s ok and nobody bats an eyelid - but it’s the same principle.

This would explain the cryptic words by both German chancellor Merz & the EU High Commissar Ursula (both tools of the Epstein deep state class), namely that people's savings & bank deposits will be "mobilised" for important investment purposes. We'd be forced pay for our prison.

@BitcoinPierre @stephanlivera @brian_armstrong @CKalaleh77112

@brian_armstrong @CKalaleh77112 Bitcoin should be #1, not #8

Major areas where the financial system still needs an update: 1. Tokenization of real-world assets - Real estate, stocks, bonds, funds, etc. onchain for instant settlement, fractional ownership & massive distribution. 2. 24/7 Global trading - Pooled global liquidity, every asset, every person, with great leverage and capital efficiency. 3. Next-gen payments - Near-instant, low-cost global transfers using stablecoins, including for Agentic payments. 4. AI-powered risk, credit, compliance, and advice - Better decisions, less fraud, and broader access to capital. Everyone gets access to a great financial advisor. 5. Innovation friendly regulation - Move from one-size-fits-all to risk-based rules that encourage innovation and competition instead of stifling it. 6. Expanded access - Open protocols that reduce middlemen and self-custodial wallets to expand access to everyone with a smartphone. 7. Capital formation - Low cost and turnkey for anyone to raise money for a good idea, increasing the number of startups. 8. Sound money - A refuge from inflation, when discipline is lost in fiat money. Jobs not done until we get these working for all. Will require lots of tech innovation and policy work to get there.

A TOP BBC EXECUTIVE pushed Oscar-winning British actor Riz Ahmed to join spy agency MI6, he revealed yesterday. The man was “someone senior, high up at the BBC,” he told journalist Mehdi Hasan on Zeteo. The BBC has a long and shocking history of partnering with spy agencies. Reporters and spies even share a desktop app. Eight important points below: . 1. DIVIDING THE WORLD In 1939, the BBC met with the CIA (originally called OSS and then CIG) ito divide the planet between them, the focus being on gathering data for spies by monitoring all news sources everywhere. The CIA took China, Japan, and Latin America, while the BBC took the Soviet Union, Africa and the Middle East. The result was the creation of a division called BBC Monitoring (BBCM) which still operates today, gathering data for spies and military intelligence. The exact division of labor today is not public information, other than the fact that the BBC division is believed to monitor about 25 per cent of global media while the CIA processes the remaining 75 per cent. The operation promotes a strong relationship between UK spies and the BBC news department, and also between UK and US intelligence agents. . 2. THE SECRET MELODIES High profile journalists at the BBC and other mainstream media news outlets were spies, said a report in December 1968 by an investigative reporter at Izvestia, a Russian newspaper. The paper provided plenty of evidence, including their names, codenames and handlers—along with photographs of documents confirming the details. One document showed that the BBC had a list of specific melodies a presenter could play to highlight actions by MI6 officers in the field as a signal of authenticity. The western media dismissed the claims out of hand as absurd propaganda, pointing out that the publication was state media. More than 40 years later, in 2013, BBC reporters interviewed intelligence historians, who agreed that the Russian scoop was real, as were the documents. But the wholesale dismissal of anything produced by Russia (or Chinese or Iranian) state media in the west continues today—even by BBC, which is itself financed by the state and politically compromised. . 3. SERVING SPIES BBC Monitoring still works for spies. “The six government ‘key customers’ of BBCM are the Ministry of Defence, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Cabinet Office and three Security and Intelligence Agencies,” a UK parliamentary paper said in 2016. The three British spy groups mentioned would be: - MI5, the Security Service; - MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service; and - GCHQ, which stands for Government Communications Headquarters. . 4. GENOCIDE HOAX While BBC News presents itself as an independent media outlet, it directly partnered US spy agencies in pushing the now debunked “Uyghur genocide hoax”. The disinformation campaign was created by the CIA spin-off called the National Endowment for Democracy, which the Trump administration defined as a group which works to “destabilize sovereign governments”. When data showed the opposite of a genocide, the China destabilization group switched to a Uyghur “slave labour” fiction, which BBC News again distributed. The fictions were so patently fake that even human rights campaigners complained. “The BBC should know better,” said Gene Bunin of the Xinjiang Transitional Database. . 5. SHARED TOOLS BBC News says it is independent of the government, the spy agencies, and military intelligence groups, but no one believes it. Not only are there links among senior executives (as Riz Ahmed found out), but there are shared tools. For example, the BBC adopted an internal desktop tool to alert newsrooms of urgent breaking news. “BBCM has access to this tool, and uses it as events require,” the parliamentary document said. BBC Monitoring even has a web-based product for spies (it calls them “customers”), called BBCM Portal, launched about 10 years ago. . 6. BBC DEMONIZES CHINA Separately, UK independent academic researchers looking at reports from BBC News on China found that the content overwhelmingly served to demonize the Chinese. An analysis of BBC News reports on China from September to December 2021 found they were almost all negative, with only four per cent being describable as positive. It went from bad to worse. In a follow-up study looking at BBC News reports on China from August to November 2022, only 2 per cent were positive. A further related study, looking at BBC News coverage of China from December 2022 to March 2023, showed only 1 per cent as positive. The study was published by King’s College, London, under the title “Shaping the Policy Debate”. . 7. BBC NEWS FILTER BBC News became notorious for its use of a “yellow filter” and other tools to make images and videos of China look polluted. This was not just a conspiracy theory. Independent journalist Brian Berletic showed clearly how the BBC doctored a specific image of China to turn live green trees black. After the expose was published, BBC News replaced the doctored image with the original picture. No admission of guilt or explanation of the change was provided. . 8. DEFENDING BBC NEWS Defenders of BBC News say that it does do a great deal of genuine reporting. This is also true. The department has used hundreds of working correspondents, stringers, and professional journalists around the world, including the individual who is writing this article. Yet that doesn’t absolve it. The coverage of China and the doctored photos are indefensible. The wise conclusion is that individual BBC News staff do, on occasion, produce honest, works of valuable reporting. But on big topics with a geopolitical angle—think China, Russia and Iran—don’t believe a word. In particular, BBC News reports on Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, should be discounted in their entirety. Conclusion: Consume BBC News reports, if you have to, with narrowed eyes. Look for independent sources. [Friday news project]

I have heard of a Zomato loophole which is so simple, terrifying and Zomato should be losing sleep over it A person orders 1 roti on Zomato. ₹40. Then he calls the restaurant directly 6 rotis, paneer butter masala, malai chaap, dal makhani, gulab jamun and pays them on UPI. Tells the restaurant to pack everything with that 1 roti Zomato order. The Zomato rider picks it up. Delivers home. No clue that ₹1,200 of food is riding shotgun with a ₹40 order. He’s using Zomato’s app. Zomato’s rider. Zomato’s entire logistics network and paying zero commission on 90% of his bill. It’s cheaper than booking directly from Porter and restaurant. The restaurant loves it. Full margin, no 25 to 30% Zomato cut. The customer loves it. No platform fee. No surge. No GST on the hidden portion. Zomato? Quietly subsidising the entire operation. And here’s the part nobody’s talking about this isn’t one rogue customer. Restaurants are in on it. They may be whispering this tip to regulars to keep them off the app. If this spreads, the unit economics of food delivery don’t just dip they bleed out from the inside. Zomato needs to plug this loophole. This is exploitation of the system. Zomato MUST do something to stop this. Have you seen this happening in your area?

Many warned me, cautioned me, and were even concerned for my safety while I was reporting on the Bandi Bageerath POCSO case. As anticipated, Union Minister of State for Home Affairs, Bandi Sanjay, filed a defamation suit in the Vacation Bench of the City Civil Court, Hyderabad. I am one among 100 others who reported on this very important issue. Three of my tweets have been mentioned in the defamation suit. His counsel requested that these 100 odd links be removed from all social media platforms. The defamation suit is for Rs 1 crore. Bandi Sai Bageerath, son of Union Minister X, was implicated in a POCSO case involving a 17 year old minor. He absconded for almost nine days before finally getting arrested/surrendered. He is currently at the Cherlapally Central Prison, Hyderabad. For almost three days, all major legacy media companies were mum on the issue. Not a word, not even a breaking/ scroll was aired. The entire issue got highlighted only because social media spoke about it. Now Union Minister garu is very upset that he couldn’t control the narrative on social media. To all those who fought on this issue and got rewarded by the defamation suit, you were doing the right thing. Those who took money and ran paid campaigns about the victim’s age to sharing her private videos to churning out sick stories on a 17 year old child - shame on you. I hope you never have children or women in your lives. If you are a woman who did it, I have no words for you.✌🏽 I hope the victim gets justice 🙏🏽

On May 20, Amazon ended support for every Kindle made in 2012 or earlier. The devices can no longer buy, borrow, or download books. Reset one to factory settings and it will never log back in. The screen still works. The hardware is fine. Amazon reached across the internet and turned a thing you paid for into a brick, on a date they picked, for a reason that benefits them. The owners bought the devices. They bought the books. They followed every rule. Amazon changed the rules anyway, because the rules were never yours. When you tap "Buy now" on a Kindle book, you are not buying a book. You are renting a license that Amazon can revoke, expire, or strand on a dead device whenever it suits the quarter. They designed it this way on purpose, and they showed us the blueprint years ago. In 2009 Amazon reached into thousands of Kindles overnight and deleted, ironically, copies of George Orwell's 1984, a book people had already paid for. They refunded everyone, apologized, and promised never again. We took the promise for what it was worth and watched the door instead. In February 2025 they shut it. They removed Download and Transfer via USB, the last simple tool that let you pull your own purchases onto your own computer and keep them. Newer Kindle files use a format almost nobody can crack. They closed the exit, then they started bricking the devices. None of this was a surprise. They proved in 2009 that they could reach into your library and take a book back. Everything since has just been them deciding when. A copy you cannot hold is a copy you do not own. A library that lives on someone else's server is a library someone else can burn. The cartel rents you access to the words and calls it ownership, and the only reason most people never notice is that the landlord usually lets them stay. May 20 was the eviction notice. It went to 3% of Kindle owners this time. The lease is identical for the other 97%. Stop buying books you cannot hold. When you do buy from Amazon, strip the DRM the day it arrives and keep a clean file somewhere they cannot reach. Back up everything you already own while you still can. A book on your own drive is yours forever. A book in your Amazon account is yours until a lawyer in Seattle decides otherwise. And when you want a book the cartel has priced out of reach or locked behind a dying device, the shadow libraries that never expire are one search away. The pirates build libraries that cannot be revoked, because they assume the cartel always will. The cartel cannot delete what it cannot reach.

First-sale doctrine is one of the oldest property rights in the common law. You buy a book, it is yours. Lend it, resell it, will it to your kids, burn it in the yard, keep it for fifty years. The seller loses all say the moment money changes hands. Federal law flipped that on its head for anything digital. Every ebook you buy ships wrapped in a lock, and DMCA Section 1201 makes breaking that lock a crime, even on books you paid for. The state did not simply fail to protect your property. The state wrote the statute that criminalizes defending it. Let people own what they buy.

Thomas Massie says he will publicly read the names of the Epstein clients before his time in Congress comes to an end. Massie says there will be no high-level arrests as long as Todd Blanche and Kash Patel work for the United States government. Massie says Melania Trump knows the truth about Epstein not acting alone. "Todd Blanche is violating the law."

A farmer dies in April 2026. His son inherits the farm. The farm has been in the family since 1847. The farm consists of: 300 acres of grazing pasture, a farmhouse built in 1892, a barn, a milking parlour, two tractors of varying ages, a Land Rover that runs about 70% of the time, and a herd of 180 Hereford-cross cattle. On paper, the farm is worth approximately £3.2 million. This is because land near him has been bought recently by a London hedge fund looking for carbon credits, which has dragged the comparable value of every field within forty miles upward to a number nobody local can justify. In cash, the farm produces a profit of about £28,000 a year in a good year. In a bad year it loses money. The son also works as a fencing contractor three days a week to keep the operation viable. The inheritance tax bill on a £3.2 million estate, even at the reduced 20% rate, comes to approximately £140,000 after the increased threshold is applied. The son does not have £140,000. The son has never had £140,000. The son has £4,200 in his current account and an overdraft. The son sells 60 acres to a developer to pay the tax. The developer puts solar panels on the 60 acres. The remaining herd cannot be sustained on the reduced land. The herd is sold. The barn becomes a holiday let. A different family eats Brazilian beef this Christmas without knowing why the price went up. The Treasury collects £140,000. The land never produces British food again.

These posts where dozens if not hundreds of people stick their hands up and practically beg to be attacked are cringeworthy. The account that asked this question has never made any posts before; they could very well be fishing for targets.