Sebastian

284 posts

Sebastian

Sebastian

@Sebastian121461

Indonesia Katılım Eylül 2023
178 Takip Edilen26 Takipçiler
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@OriZilbershtein @YoungbloodJoe "mods won't be able to know what is made by bots and what is made by users" That perspective is pretty skewed as You only detect the bad bots. The good ones are already indistinguishable. Same goes with AI-generated content in general. Only the bad one stands out as AI.
English
1
0
0
8
Ori Silver
Ori Silver@OriSilver·
@YoungbloodJoe Well if we dive into the future a bit, 3-5 years, mods won't be able to know what is made by bots and what is made by users, also the sheer amount of it, some if not most will go through. The internet will become useless.
English
1
0
0
59
Ori Silver
Ori Silver@OriSilver·
Announcing the latest spam automation marketed as marketing. Not surprising, this is just the beginning and these sort of AI based users will flood every platform where human eyeballs exists within 2-5 years. 3 words for you. Dead Internet Theory
Savannah@SavannahFeder

Announcing Astral - an AI marketer that works 24/7 to grow your startup. Astral navigates websites, creates content, and runs marketing across socials. Watch Astral automate Reddit in real-time:

English
11
3
43
4K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@OriZilbershtein Great. So the fake reddit users can interact with a marketing bot now too.
English
0
0
1
14
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@CyrusShepard I agree, the HCU a few months ago was just too chaotic and Google will surely fix it shortly.
English
0
0
1
382
Cyrus Maxx
Cyrus Maxx@CyrusShepard·
Late to the party, but here are my predictions for 2024...
English
5
0
24
5.1K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@suganthan "DR70 link for $29.99 is a steal though." I wouldn't even take this shitty link for free. That's what will mark Your website as spam.
English
0
0
2
29
Suganthan Mohanadasan
Suganthan Mohanadasan@suganthan·
What’s an ‘AI SEO backlink’? 👀😳 DR70 link for $29.99 is a steal though.
Suganthan Mohanadasan tweet media
English
6
0
5
1.2K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@CyrusShepard But supporting smaller publishers isn't increasing their quarterly revenue😕
English
0
0
1
178
Cyrus Maxx
Cyrus Maxx@CyrusShepard·
A worthy read Google has a chance to support blogging, journalism, and human creativity But at almost every turn, they take an easier route. I know it's a tough job, but hope they keep trying
ViaTravelers | Destination Travel Blog@viatravelers

After a year of silence, I'm finally sharing how our travel publication lost 97% of its traffic - from 1M to 30K monthly readers. But this isn't about numbers. 🧵 Here's what happens when Google kills authentic travel content...

English
11
21
121
12.3K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@glenngabe On one hand, Google tells us to not do anything to manipulate search, on the other hand we have to "align" 40 signals just to make sure Google understands the correct canonization.
English
0
0
0
12
Glenn Gabe
Glenn Gabe@glenngabe·
40 signals. And, Google has always explained to align those signals the best you can. i.e. Don't send weird canonical signals to Google. By aligning those signals, you have a greater chance of Google selecting the correct url as the canonical. Allan also had an interesting note that one criteria, "Redirect to shorter" was recently nuked. Allan noticed some problems when Google was canonicalizing https to http when it shouldn't due to that criteria. Also, he explains there are some older features still being used by Google's canonicalization systems... Some might be clunky but they are still being used. :)
Barry Schwartz@rustybrick

Google Search uses about 40 signals for canonization including redirects, canonicals, x-default and got rid of Redirect to Shortner seroundtable.com/google-search-…

English
3
0
9
2.3K
Shaun Anderson
Shaun Anderson@Hobo_Web·
Google's (HCU) "classifier" wiped out loads of small publishers who didn't differentiate themselves enough from spam aparently. Comment "SEO Checklist" for my latest beginner version.
Shaun Anderson tweet media
English
13
3
15
2.6K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@garethaboyd Depends - Are You a high authority site like Forbes or a niche site 🤷‍♂️
English
1
0
0
13
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@EllardKing There wasn't an average yoy inflation increase of 3% from 2000 to 2020. The inflation was pretty stable, which means prices increased by the given percentage.
English
0
0
0
5
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@mountainweekly Just publish the exact same article on one of these bigger outlets and see it rank at #1 again 🤡
English
0
0
2
83
MIKE Hardaker
MIKE Hardaker@mountainweekly·
This is a photo of me in avalanche terrain remotely triggering a cornice. I have Level 3 avalanche certification the highest in the country... and hardest to get, yet. my article on "Best splitboards" which always ranked #1 is now outranked by Outside Magazine, Outdoor Gear Lab, Gear Junkie. All full of SEO jargan, graphs with NO E-E-A-T. Zero photos of the boards in action!!!! Let me repeat!!!! Zero photos of the boards in action. These people did NOT actually test these boards. Where is the proof? @searchliaison sad to see Google so easily manipulated and how Google favors larger sites over better content. This is shameful at best.
MIKE Hardaker tweet media
English
9
7
49
3.8K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@lilyraynyc Google literally has the whole web stored. Why does it take them 9 months to figure out the websites the authors wrote for?
English
0
0
0
8
Lily Ray 😏
Lily Ray 😏@lilyraynyc·
I'm going down the rabbit hole of looking at the authors of penalized site sections & their bios, the other publications they wrote for, etc. Must have been quite the scavenger hunt for Google's web spam team. And took ~9 months 😅
English
3
1
35
6K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@NewsFromGoogle Sounds like a nice feature, when will the choice screens go live?
English
0
0
1
59
News from Google
News from Google@NewsFromGoogle·
2/ As just one example: It would literally require us to install not 1 but 2 separate choice screens before you could access Google Search on a Pixel phone you bought. And the design of those choice screens would have to be approved by the Technical Committee.
English
7
2
89
9.2K
News from Google
News from Google@NewsFromGoogle·
DOJ’s extreme proposal would mandate government micromanagement of Google Search and other technologies by appointing a “Technical Committee” with enormous power over your online experience. 1/ goo.gle/3YVvyux
English
51
38
414
96.4K
News from Google
News from Google@NewsFromGoogle·
DOJ’s approach would hurt American consumers, developers, and small businesses — and jeopardize America’s global economic and technological leadership when it’s needed most. It would break a range of Google products — even beyond Search — that people love. goo.gle/3YVvyux
English
188
124
591
152.9K
Taleb Kabbara
Taleb Kabbara@TalebKabbara·
A site owned by a very popular SEO (guess who they are) who patronisingly dunks on small publisher sites hit by the HCU. You can't make this up.
Taleb Kabbara tweet media
English
14
3
106
19.8K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@CyrusShepard reddit, as UGC is by definition 3rd party also one can hope 🤞
English
0
0
1
76
Cyrus Maxx
Cyrus Maxx@CyrusShepard·
Google's original Site Reputation Abuse policy wiped out 3rd-party coupon subdomains CNN CNET USA Today Business Insider What do you think the newly updated policy will target?
Cyrus Maxx tweet mediaCyrus Maxx tweet mediaCyrus Maxx tweet mediaCyrus Maxx tweet media
English
17
18
99
11.9K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@Goog_Enough The problem is that these authors don't have an expertise in the field they are writing about. If You look at their bios they often have an educational background in writing and zero about finances etc. They just regurgitate other sources without adding anything themselves.
English
1
0
3
192
Goog Enough
Goog Enough@Goog_Enough·
Google says: create unique content. Google does: tolerate a surprising lack of originality from CNN, Forbes, Fox, US News, USA TODAY, Wall Street Journal, NerdWallet, Investopedia, Bankrate, Experian & more. They all have content by the SAME AUTHORS from around the SAME TIME!
Goog Enough tweet mediaGoog Enough tweet mediaGoog Enough tweet mediaGoog Enough tweet media
English
10
20
114
8.4K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@natejhake If You need tips growing Your site, go to someone who is running a successful site. No one goes to a morbidly obese person asking for tips on how to maintain a healthy diet. Yet people throw money at marketers, claiming to understand it all without any proven track record.
English
1
0
11
525
Nate Hake
Nate Hake@natejhake·
SEOs, this is disgusting and shameful behavior by Marie here -- and, frankly, a declaration of war against small sites everywhere. Morgan shared her experience at the summit -- she did NOT ask to be critiqued like this. Marie, Google ITSELF said that the site owners in that room do NOT need more SEO advice from folks like you. Google ITSELF said Morgan's site was helpful. You should be ashamed. Marie, you've now made yourself fair game for criticism. I look forward to digging into your urls and projects and sharing what I find :)
English
28
9
166
42.3K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@KorayGubur If anyone believes that what Google publishes is not primarily in their interest and to raise their profits, doesn't know the purpose of a commercial company. Google doesn't care about anyone else but themselves.
English
1
0
3
86
Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR
Koray Tuğberk GÜBÜR@KorayGubur·
Kremlinology. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kremlinol… PS: I never used Google Spokespersons’ statements for any case study, or project. I always analyze them as a CIA member is skeptic about what Kremlin says. If you expect honesty, and clarity about what they say, there are two possibilities. - You are naive. - You are new. Another possibility is, you might be a Google Parrot (someone who tries to get clients by being seen approved by Googlers) or Google Sheep (someone who never questions authoritative companies). As a last word: I miss Matt Cutts even more after seeing Google Search Relations Team’s constant failure on clear communication. I hope they can have spokespersons as actual Engineers, rather than old journalists. #seo
Google SearchLiaison@searchliaison

I wouldn't recommend people start adding carts because it "shows Google" any more than I would recommend anyone do anything they think "shows Google" something. You want to do things that make sense for your visitors, because what "shows Google" you have a great site is to be ... a great site for your visitors not to add things you assume are just for Google. Also Lily, I don't mean this toward you in particular or negatively. It's just shorthand common thinking that so many understandably deal with. Doing things you think are just for Google is falling behind what our ranking systems are trying to reward rather than being in front of them. Everything I said here: x.com/searchliaison/… Stop trying to "show Google" things. I have been through so many sites at this point (and I appreciate the feedback), and the patterns are often like this: - Something saying an "expert" reviewed the content because someone mistakenly believes that ranks them better - Weird table-of-content things shoved at the top because who knows, along the way, somehow that became a thing I'm guessing people assume ranks you better - The page has been updated within a few days, or even is fresh on the exact day, even though the content isn't particularly needing anything fresh and probably someone did some really light rewrite and fresh date because they think that "shows Google" you have fresh content and will rank better. - The page end with a series of "hey, here are some frequently asked questions" because someone used a tool or other method to just add things they think people search for specifically because they heard if you add a bunch of popular searches to the page, that ranks you better not because anyone coming to your page wants that - I can barely read through the main content of pages because I keep getting interrupted by things shoved in the middle of it. Which isn't so much a "show Google" think as much as it is just an unsatisfying experience And yes. A million times yes. You will find pages that are still ranking, both from big sites and small sites, that do these things. Because our ranking systems aren't perfect, and after this current update, we'll continue to keep working at it, which I also covered before: x.com/searchliaison/… And I very much hope our guidance will get better to help people understand that what Google wants is what people want. I'm pushing for us to have an entire new help page that maybe makes this point better. Part of the current draft says things like: "The most important key to success with Google Search is to have content that’s meant to please people, rather than to be whatever you might have heard that 'Google wants.' For example, people sometimes write content longer than is helpful to their readers because they’ve heard somewhere that 'Google wants' long content. What Google wants is content that people will like, content that your own readers and visitors find helpful and satisfying. This is the foundation of your potential success with Google. Any question you have about making content for Google will come back to this principle. 'Is this content that my visitors would find satisfying?' If the answer is yes, then do that, because that’s what Google wants." Some expectation setting. I'm not @googlesearchc and I don't work primarily on creator issues. So I can't guarantee what pages we will have, what gets approved and so on. My primary role is to communicate feedback back about search quality into the search quality team and communicate back. And so much of the feedback people have been sharing, I have taken that back. "But what about big sites!" Yes, taken back. Sites that I can see are diligently working on real quality content and don't seem as rewarded as they should, taken that back. Will continue to do so. You are heard. Those providing quality experiences, I personally want you to succeed. But please. If you want to succeed, stop doing a lot of the things you've heard second, third, whatever that are supposed to "show Google" something and show your visitors a great, satisfying experience. That's how you show Google's ranking systems that you should do well.

English
6
10
77
15.5K
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@Marie_Haynes It doesn't matter if it is technically page or sitewide. Since websites use the same template/structure for posts, they all look identically to Google. So if one page fails the test, there is a high chance all of them do. No publisher uses a unique framework for each post.
English
0
0
5
938
Sebastian
Sebastian@Sebastian121461·
@mikefutia Since the updates are based on ML, the question has never been if there are patterns in play. The question is how the training data looked like and what, as a result, the models have deemed to be a negative quality signal in a website.
English
0
0
0
171
Mike Futia
Mike Futia@mikefutia·
It's not the engagement signals (IMO). It's the "does it have the common characteristics of a low-effort niche site?" Say what you will about niche sites, but: The content was *actually* pretty damn helpful. Niche sites were built to answer the questions—quickly and succinctly—right at the top of the content. Anyone else remember Income School's "answer targets"? The "problem" was that the content was—quite literally—"made for search". Targeting hundreds of random, long-tail keywords. That's what Google is penalizing. The patterns. Not the so-called helpfulness or lack thereof. IMO x.com/Marie_Haynes/s…
English
7
1
21
2.8K