Branimal

@RepRalphNorman Subpoenas are out via trustee. You can seize the opportunity to finish work you began with the #MMTLPfiasco 822 days have passed since @FINRA seized our assets & trading opportunities via U3 halt. I hope we finish this with your support @RepRalphNorman. $MMTLP $TRCH #FINRAFRAUD

..and @FINRA's halt stripped Uncle Phil of his right to close his position on the 9th/12th. I think @AnnVandersteel and @TheRobbCarter @IsaiahAscher would find this interesting. First let me address the T+2 settlement debate. The prospectus 424b said the distribution date was CLOSE of business 12/14/22. Shares were to be cancelled AS OF THE DISTRIBUTION DATE. A trade executed to close position on the 12th would still settle before distribution/cancellation: (T) 12/12/22 = Trade (Record) Date(for longs) (+1) 12/13/22 = symbol deletion (+2) 12/14/22 = distribution/share cancellation after market clos. Executed trades do not need a ticker symbol to be settled, they just need their International Securities Identification Number "ISIN" (2nd picture below) which persisted until the shares were cancelled after market on 12/14. Phil Alderson @notwellfunded has a 1500 share short position through Charles Schwab. (Self-admitted) If Phil bought 1500 shares from a long who has shares settled, do the rights to the distribution need to be carried by that symbol? No, no they don't. A long is holding the rights, you have an obligation to return the shares you borrowed. That's it. You no longer have a position once you close your short. Phil could buy shares from a long selling to close their position / dissolve his obligation and realize his profit/loss. What he couldn't do, is then 'Buy To Open' a new long position and be eligible for the distribution. We know that because that's what the corporate action said... Yup... believe it or not, people other than yourself read. The fact that you undermine our intelligence (and the brokers) by saying that we didn't understand it is so disingenuous, it's nauseating. We were well aware that we wouldn't be able to buy any more shares, but we could sell them to a short that wanted to exit their position and dissolve any liabilities being transferred into a non-trading, publicly reporting company (private under 15(d)). Trading was moving to "Position Close Only"(PCO) That's what brokers communicated to clients would happen. "New buy orders will be routed for review and cancelled. New closing sell orders should be routed normally, though their may be liquidity issues on the 9th and 12th." -Dylan Greene, Charles Schwab EVEN IF.... a buy order somehow slipped through the cracks, FINRA has Rule 11893 "Clearly Erroneous Transactions in OTC Securities" to reverse them. That explains the "Too Late to Cancel" (executed) orders for absurd prices being reversed. FINRA used their tools. I love how they'll use FINRA Rule 6440 "Halt Provision" and FINRA Rule 11893 but won't use FINRA Rule 4140 "Audit" and perform an audit of their member firms' books and records. Seem a little shady.... but whatever, right? How do you explain Jeff Mendl (former VP of @OTCMarkets) saying on a live broadcast: "We'll see how it trades for the NEXT FEW DAYS" on 12/7/22? (clip included) The last time I checked, a "FEW" meant not just more than 1 , but more than 2(days)... EVEN IF he said "We'll see how it trades for the next couple of days", that would mean it would trade on the 9th. The next "FEW DAYS" means the 12th. (followed up by) Brendan Wickens: "That's a great point. It's going to probably do way more volume than it normally does until, uh, Monday, again end of trading on Monday, so you will have access up until Monday." *taps desk* If you truly care about what happened, cared about THE truth, and care about Uncle Phil not being able to close his position, realize his profit (I think his book value was in the $5 range) and dissolve his liability, then you will hold FINRA's feet to the fire. They caused this mess, they need to fix it. Period. If you lack the backbone to call it out, you're hiding something. Please don't sit here and use Phil as your ruse for the bigger players out there. #MMTLP #FYPM #AFMB

MMTLP - That clip is brutal. Amy couldn’t get through one clean sentence without stumbling or circling back. Producers looked as confused as the rest of us. If this is the best defense after 3½ years of listening in on our spaces… it says everything....Amy and the trolls Like @Outlier_999 @PuzzledRaccoon Manuel, Brian etc have hit rock bottom.

I’m Senator Chris Rose, a proven conservative in the State Senate, and I’m running for the Republican State Executive Committee to keep delivering results for West Virginia. I’ve fought for our values, our communities, and our future—and I’m ready to keep that fight going. Vote on May 12th—I’d be honored to have your support.

Hi @TheRobbCarter. Boy was I wrong. The Amy @thatgirltrader interview basically proved out the $MMTLP issue. Everyone is stuck because @FINRA halted the reconciliation of any overages. And Regulators need to provide new settlements instructions for a market based reconciliation of overages. Please interview more shills and let them continue to prove out the issue. Transparency of the audited share counts will prove who is ultimately right and next steps towards a resolution. #FUPayMe Unlimited Risk is a bitch.

They can NOT stop what is coming... #BuckleUp #LockIn #Incoming MMTLP MMAT TRCH Image Credit: @JackStr42679640

How much longer before they’re held accountable? I think it’s just a matter of time. ⏰

"I have a friend who is short #MMTLP" -Amy She says this while trying to convince people that her "friend" should be allowed to stay short, even though there is clear evidence of fraud? Is she intentionally lying when she says it is okay that a broker doesn't have their clients shares because they lent them out without their permission, or is she incredibly ignorant? Lending customer shares without permission violates key U.S. securities regulations, primarily FINRA Rule 4330 and SEC Rule 15c3-3 (Customer Protection – Reserves and Custody of Securities). Refusing a Direct Registration System (DRS) request specifically because the shares were lent out (especially if the lending lacked permission) compounds the issue by preventing the customer from exercising basic ownership rights, potentially violating the same customer protection rules plus broader obligations to honor transfer instructions.

The problem with Amy is that when proven wrong she'll just delete her posts. (image 1) In our conversation she insisted that MMAT included the incorrect "12/13/22 Share Cancellation Date" and FINRA corrected MMAT's mistake, not by including the correct 12/14 Share Cancellation date, but instead by shifting the focus to "Symbol Deletion on 12/13". (images 2 & 3) This argument makes zero sense because in FINRA's FAQ, FINRA claimed that the Corporate Actions were created "consistent" with the information provided by MMAT and the FAQ links to a 11/23/22 MMAT PR that said the Next Bridge shares would be Distributed on 12/14/22, at which time the MMTLP shares would be automatically cancelled. (image 4) More in a post to follow... 👇🏾

Former Meta Materials CEO George Palikaras knows too much… and refuses to go away quietly. He knows the truth - and he’s proven he can’t be bought That’s a big problem for regulators. “..I had a choice. I could have taken the Board’s severance offer, roughly $700K, signed a two-year gag order, sold my shares ahead of the 100:1 reverse split, and walked away quietly with a few million in hand. That would have been the easy path. But I chose not to take it. And so did my family and my other co-founders Paul and Themos. For me, integrity is not for sale. It never has been, and it never will be….” - @palikaras TRCH MMAT MMTLP

Below is added context for the comment about @JohnBrda "not selling a share". It was said on a Sunday after the Friday close price was $2.46 a share. Drew is right that John had not sold a share up to that point. Amy has been evasive and disingenuous. For example, she cites the META PR saying the shares were exchanged and the spinout was successful. Yes, all of the shares authorized to be pieced out to the bulk certificates of the broker-dealers based on what was on record at the time of the merger in June 2021. Any overages/liabilities that existed based off the final day (after 14 months of trading) are on the books of the brokers and are what requires a forensic audit. Until that happens, there is uncertainty. There is in writing admission by Howard Meyerson of the Financial Information Forum (FIF), representing a group of broker-dealers, that FINRA's halt has prevented shares from being delivered because there are shares on loan that cannot be recovered. The fact that shares were on loan tells you that brokers were ready for trading to continue on the 9th and 12th to close positions. Otherwise brokers would not have allowed shares to be on loan on the 8th. And even if some BTO trade slipped through the cracks, FINRA's Rule 11893 would have been used. That's how they reverse the "Too late to Cancel" (executed) trades. There was no settlement concerns. They fabricated the whole thing. Also, FINRA's removal of the 14th on the revised corporate action was a violation of SEA Rule 10b-17. Their halt also forced all broker-dealers with positions in $MMTLP to violate SEA Rule 15c3-3 due to shares being on loan and unrecoverable. The shares of $MMTLP carried the rights to the NBH common stock. DTCC eligibility is not required to cure the FTDs because the shares being offered in the S1 to sell 40 million shares are of like-kind. DTCC eligibility is not required to sell and deliver these shares to accredited investors who need to cure these FTDs. @thatgirltrader is absolutely wrong. She doesn't want transparency. That speaks volumes. JOHN BRDA "HAVEN'T SOLD A SHARE" POST👇 x.com/MetaGuyMarduk/…

#MMTLP Finra has been ordered to turn over 25 million MMAT,MMTLP trading documents to a MMAT bankruptcy Judge. I suspect a data center fire with burning computers being loaded into dump trucks will hit the news any day now.

Some people still don't know that the writer of the @Forbes $MMTLP comic strip can be connected to 1 of the market makers that 1st traded MMTLP (Ari Rubenstein, GTS Securities) by JJ (Joe) Kinahan, a Senior Contributor at Forbes & an Advisor for Rubenstein's Clearlist. #MMTLPsetaDATE @SECGov @DOJCrimDiv @TheJusticeDept @SECEnfDirector @GaryGensler @HesterPeirce @The_DTCC @FBI @FBILosAngeles @NewYorkFBI @FBIWFO @SecretService @MikeCrapo @RepRalphNorman @RepMaxineWaters

Again, look at this explanation from FINRA's FAQ. (image 1) Does it read like MMAT gave FINRA the wrong 12/13 Share Cancellation Date? If this were the case, why didn't FINRA include the correct 12/14 Share Cancellation Date in the 12/8 revision? It's because the confusion helped to justify the 12/9/22 U3 halt of MMTLP... IMHO Here's further evidence that FINRA made these changes without permission from the issuer. (images 2 & 3) This probably isn't on Amy's list of topics to discuss with Mr. Carter.

@annvandersteel @TheTrndisuFrnd @808CG1 @SECPaulSAtkins @SECGov @dcexaminer Why don't you reach out to Mark Davies? Maybe he can explain Howard Meyerson FOIA. He's on the board at the the FIF..

I stand with every one of those 65,000+ investors and families who have been ignored, delayed, and dismissed. What we are witnessing is not just bureaucratic inefficiency, it is a failure of duty. Seven revisions. Thirteen rounds of comments. Over 1,200 days in limbo. Total obstruction. The American people deserve transparency. Investors deserve protection. And the SEC must be held accountable for restoring integrity to a system that has clearly broken trust. Fix the MMTLP situation. Approve the NEXT BRIDGE HYDROCARBONS S1 without further delay. Do what is right, not what is convenient. Anything less only confirms what millions already suspect. Deliver the total blue sheet tracked share count too. This is criminal and ALL OF YOU KNOW IT. @busybrands @JunkSavvy @EdMartinDOJ #MMTLP #NEXTBRIDGEHYDROCARBONS #NBH #InvestorProtection #Accountability #Integrity

Sorry to be jumping in late here, but the actual facts and research needed and completed by @elf have been excellent. If she chose to debate her knowledge of the facts, I am sure she would be great.

✅ Civil RICO

$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH In re Meta Materials Inc. Case No. 24-50792-gs (Bankr. D. Nev.) Doc 2611 — Entered February 27, 2026 ⸻ 🧾 What this document is (previously provided - this post focused on actual days): A declaration + supporting schedules (A & B) filed in opposition to motions to quash Rule 2004 subpoenas — laying out share issuances and targeted trading windows tied to potential market activity. ⸻ 🎯 The 161 Trading Days — Explained Simply 🔍👀: The Trustee identified 161 specific trading days That’s ~12.8% of ~1,255 total trading days in the 5-year repose window before the August 9, 2024 bankruptcy filing These are not random days — they are strategically selected windows tied to: Treasury share sales Offerings (ATM, RDO, CMPO) Acquisitions Key corporate events ⸻ 🔍 What the Trustee is targeting: For each of those 161 days, the request is deep, order-level trading data, including: Who traded (counterparties) Short sale activity Locate data Failures-to-deliver Market maker behavior ⸻ 📊 Why it matters: The 161 days act as: ➡️ High-value snapshots of market behavior ➡️ Timed around when the company was actively raising capital or issuing shares 🔍 ➡️ Designed to detect irregular trading patterns affecting MMAT, TRCH, and MMTLP ⸻ 🧩 Tickers Covered: MMAT (Meta Materials) TRCH (Torchlight – pre-merger activity) MMTLP (Preferred Series A / trading period) ⸻ ⚖️ Bottom Line: The Trustee is effectively saying: “Give me the most important 12.8% — the moments where the market impact actually mattered.” ⸻ ⚠️ Not Legal Advice

MMAT TRCH MMTLP NBH It’s not just the 2-year bankruptcy lookback we need to watch—there’s also a 5-year statute of repose running in parallel. And with the TRCH/MMAT merger closing in June 2021, that outer window is now right up against its limit.

@Tevern4 @SECPaulSAtkins Normal float, normal short interest, MIC codes for trading, and proper par value =) Also, this isn't evidence of the manipulation of the shares, it's the creation and listing of synthetic derivative shares, and this is the signs of it