Rishat Tuktamyshov

1K posts

Rishat Tuktamyshov banner
Rishat Tuktamyshov

Rishat Tuktamyshov

@Smarttrading_ri

Mathematician, forex trader. Prefer systematic approach to trading. Expert in prop firms. Bullish on crypto Tweet about forex systems, prop firms, crypto.

Katılım Mayıs 2013
506 Takip Edilen194 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
It's been a long journey full of grit and grind. Those late nights and early mornings paid off - landed some solid payouts from prop firms. But guess what? I am still on the move. Next stop? 1M funding. In trading, each day is a new chapter of learning. Stay tuned.
Rishat Tuktamyshov tweet mediaRishat Tuktamyshov tweet media
English
5
0
10
1.4K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@PKycek And combination of low sharp strategies, can create high sharp portfolio. What sharp is interesting for big capital? From 2?
English
1
0
1
35
Pavel | Robuxio
Pavel | Robuxio@PKycek·
I still read the same nonsense all the time: “Simple models are robust because they are simple.” Wrong. Simple models often remain robust over the long term, but not because simplicity itself creates robustness. The reason is different. Simple edges usually have lower Sharpe ratios than more complex, higher-capacity models. Lower Sharpe = less institutional interest. Less institutional interest = less competition. Less competition = slower edge decay. When an edge has a high Sharpe ratio, capital notices. Competition increases. The edge gets extracted faster. A good example was market-neutral models in crypto. There were periods when they were printing dozens of percent with almost infinite Sharpe. What happened? Every smart money player jumped in and the edge was arbed out of the market. Today, this edge is mediocre in venues where you can trade with size. That is why many simple edges survive longer. Not because they are magically better. Because they are less attractive. Sharpe ratio is the metric that tells you what institutional capital cares about.
English
4
4
20
1.9K
Peter - Cracking Markets
Peter - Cracking Markets@SystematicPeter·
Hard to short indices in this environment. And yet, even the short leg of the volatility breakout system is still holding up. You do not need every trade to work. All it takes is being positioned correctly on the few days when the market finally expands. One strong breakout day can move the equity curve significantly. That is why the real skill is not prediction. The real skill is patience - and placing the orders when they are supposed to be in the market. The basic principle behind the idea is simple: Open as reference price If the market is volatile enough Long trigger = Open + ATR Short trigger = Open - ATR Small protective stop No trailing stop Exit at the end of day Nothing sophisticated. Just a simple volatility breakout I live trade and track publicly on my blog. Simple systems often fail because traders stop executing them before the important day arrives.
Peter - Cracking Markets tweet media
English
2
3
36
3.1K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@SystematicPeter The problem is that outperforming QQQ not every year. In screenshot, the results thAt I got from 2020 (it really outperformed in 2022 and from 2025)
Rishat Tuktamyshov tweet media
English
0
0
0
16
Peter - Cracking Markets
Peter - Cracking Markets@SystematicPeter·
Top momentum Nasdaq stocks are killing NDX this year. Why hold every stock in QQQ if the edge is in owning only the strongest names? Same NDX universe. Same Nasdaq regime risk. Much cleaner exposure to winners. Simple logic: Universe = Nasdaq 100 Rebalance = month-end for each stock: mom = 120-day % change eligible = close > $1 and close > 200-day MA and mom > 0 rank eligible by mom buy top N size = 100% / N exit next month-end repeat No news. No prediction. No complex AI. Just momentum, trend filter, monthly rotation, equal sizing. To trade profitably? Just remove noise until only the rule remains.
Peter - Cracking Markets tweet media
English
6
8
77
6.1K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
Everyone is selling another Forex scalper. So I built a different type of MT5 robot. Equity Rebound Portfolio EA is designed for large-cap stocks and stock CFDs, using Daily timeframe signals, multi-symbol scanning, and portfolio exposure control. The idea is simple: not more noise, not more tick chasing, not another “magic” black box. A stock-focused portfolio EA with live MQL5 monitoring. Current signal stats: Growth: 52% Max drawdown: 5.4% Profit trades: 90.5% Algo trading: 100% Past performance does not guarantee future results — but live monitoring is better than empty promises. Product page: mql5.com/en/market/prod… #MQL5 #MetaTrader5 #MT5 #StockTrading #AlgoTrading
Rishat Tuktamyshov tweet mediaRishat Tuktamyshov tweet media
English
0
0
0
14
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@PKycek Also, noticed that no stop loss works best in equities. I think crypto is different
English
1
0
0
63
Pavel | Robuxio
Pavel | Robuxio@PKycek·
We tested a portfolio of 18 strategies across different stop loss levels. No stop loss produced the best performance. Tight stops tend to get triggered by normal daily volatility. Strategies often need room to breathe and there are better ways of managing risk than arbitrary stops.
Pavel | Robuxio tweet media
English
9
1
22
1.4K
Pavel | Robuxio
Pavel | Robuxio@PKycek·
Robuxio Equities performance YTD. Full report soon.
Pavel | Robuxio tweet media
English
5
0
9
825
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@pakhandrin А может ли что-то подобное сделать codex от chatgpt?
Русский
1
0
0
201
Sergey Pakhandrin
Sergey Pakhandrin@pakhandrin·
Месяц назад у меня был обычный лендинг для мобильного приложения на 400 посетителей в день. Сегодня 125 тысяч показов в сутки в Гугле по всему миру и почти 2 млн показов за 30 дней. Я как-то писал про один SEO скилл для Claude Code, который помогает сделать полный аудит сайта. Это было чуть больше месяца назад. С того дня, я между основных дел начал заниматься SEO своего одностраничного лендинга. Чуть позже еще один SEO скилл подключил, но для AI SEO (вроде даже термин есть какой-то новый для AI SEO). Скилл сделал полный аудит и выдал мне большой отчет, а еще больше получилась стратегия по SEO на базе этого аудита, но уже с помощью Claude Code и глубокого исследования рынка, конкурентов и тематики приложения. Взял всё это в работу и монотонно, каждый день, по чуть-чуть внедрял все рекомендации. Контент стратегия включала в себя не только статичные страницы, но и разные калькуляторы, страницы расчетов на основе данных пользователей. И конечно же на множество языков. На старте был сайт с 400-500 посетителями в день, обычный одностраничный лендинг мобильного приложения. Никаких надежд на трафик с веба я особо не питал, да и в целом замерял только посещения сайта, а не его позиции в поисковой выдаче по разным ключам. Да и какие там позиции, только брендовые, а контетных страниц под разные запросы не было. В итоге, спустя чуть больше месяца по всеми миру куча страниц в индексе на разных языках, множество страниц в топ-10 поисковой выдачи гугла и по немногу прибавляют. Пока в среднем на 6-8 позициях в разных гео, что дает низкий CTR. И конечно, учитывая, что сейчас большинство ответов люди в гугле получают от AI ассистента, который на первом месте даёт краткие ответы, шансы, даже не знаю на какой CTR можно расчитывать даже на 3-4-5 местах. Но удалось достигнуть 125 тыс показов в сутки в поисковой выдаче (рекорд поставлен несколько дней назад) и каждый день прибавляет, а суммарно за 30 дней почти 2 млн показов. Да, показы не переходы, но продолжаю развивать это направление. Я даже и не думал, что получится достигнуть таких внушительных показателей, а теперь думаю, останавливаться точно нельзя, теперь у меня чисто спортивный интерес на рост метрик показов в поисковой выдаче и CTR с кликами. Настроил себе MCP для Google Search Concole в CC и каждый день прошу Claude Code собирать новый отчет и слежу за динамикой, а если где-то есть интересные зацепки, то корректируем стратегию и внедряем изменения сразу же. Сейчас в индексе уже примерно 5000 страниц (комбинация множества языков). А хочется уже 1 млн страниц! Но для этого, по моим ощущения, нужен отдельный человек или даже "краб" (или agent teams), который будет фигачить без устали только эту задачу. SEO скилл сделал полный аудит сайта, изучил тематику, выдал отчет с кучей изменений. Не все пункты, которые он находит/предлагает, актуальны или применимы и нужно проверять каждый его вывод с помощью исследования актуальных подходов на рынке через тот же Claude Code. Всякое бывает! Всю основную SEO стратегию мне собирал Claude Code. SEO скилл дал основу для старта, я запускал его ради интереса и теста, а в итоге выросло в целое направление в расширении трафика для продукта. Сейчас же хотя бы раз в неделю скилл перезапускаю для полного аудита и порой снова появляются интересные инсайты или выводы по перелинковке страниц. Дальше отдаю отчет в Claude Code и прошу проверить актуальность выводов, и если все ок, сразу же вносит изменения. В контент стратегии несколько типов страниц, как контентных, так и интерактивных с вычислениями всяких штук на основе данных пользователя, и всё это каждый день растёт в количестве на разных языках, адаптируется под каждый конкретный язык и постепенно проникает в индексацию поисковиков. А еще узнал в процессе о такой штуке как IndexNow, когда можно по АПИ пингануть некоторые поисковики и сказать, вот тут у меня изменения и они в течение часа берут в переиндексацию. Поэтому у меня как только Claude Code заканчивает изменения, сразу же деплоит всё и пингует. Гуглу же каждый раз в ручную нужно sitemap засылать и переиндексация дни занимает. Я не спец по SEO, но неспешно удалось достигнуть таких цифр за очень короткий период. Мало или много, фиг знает, мб это мизер в SEO. В след твите скину ссылки на скиллы
Русский
21
33
363
41.8K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@onlybreakouts Which exactly volume indicators? Just simple vertical volumes or more sophisticated horizontal volumes?
English
1
0
0
21
Breakout Trading Academy
Breakout Trading Academy@onlybreakouts·
If you trade with oscillators, sit down before you read this. I just ran the largest indicator study I've ever done. 3,500 breakout strategies on E-mini NASDAQ, testing every major indicator cluster. RSI, stochastics, CCI - the indicators that dominate trading courses and YouTube tutorials - ranked dead last. Worse than having no filter at all. Volume indicators ranked first. Moving averages ranked second. Both improved results in-sample AND out-of-sample. Oscillators? Worse than having no filter at all. The worst individual indicators across both testing periods: fast stochastics and RSI. Here's what I think happened. Oscillators became so popular that the edge got crowded out. Too many traders watching the same RSI levels, making the same decisions, entering the same trades. When everyone sees the same signal, it stops being a signal. Volume indicators don't have this problem. They measure participation and conviction. That's standalone information you can't see in a price bar. Moving averages measure trend direction with minimal noise. Neither depends on arbitrary "overbought" or "oversold" levels. A simple audit you can do right now: 1. Run your strategy without the indicator. Get a baseline. 2. Add it back. Did performance actually improve? 3. Test across multiple strategy variations, not just one. 4. Validate out-of-sample. In-sample improvement means nothing if it collapses on new data. 5. Ask: does this indicator add new information, or is it just repackaging price data? If you're using stochastics in a breakout strategy, the data strongly suggests you're better off without them.
Breakout Trading Academy tweet media
English
4
1
22
2.5K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@PKycek Yes, it looks dangerous to be passive at such prices. It is OK to become passive investor after 30% drawdown, not right now. I think it is very difficult to find robust short strategies. It is much easier to be long-only, but with average duration of several days.
English
0
0
1
24
Pavel | Robuxio
Pavel | Robuxio@PKycek·
Every dollar going into US equities right now is buying at valuations higher than 95% of all historical data. The S&P 500 CAPE ratio (cyclically adjusted P/E) is currently around 37. Historically the median is 16. The only times it was higher: 1929 and the dot-com peak. Passive exposure at these valuations implies accepting that your entry point is unfavorable relative to history. The subsequent ten-year return from a CAPE of 37 has historically been below the rate of monetary expansion. Passive exposure has another problem at this point in the cycle. When market cap concentrates in a small number of names (like it has recently) a passive index fund gives you undiluted exposure to that concentration. You own everything, including the concentration risk you're not compensated for. Also don't forget, passive only profits from the upside. When markets move against you, or move sideways, the index does nothing. Systematic long/short exposure on the other hand generates returns from volatility in both directions and combined with other uncorrelated return driving sleeves can provide a better risk to reward profile when compared to passive allocation. Especially at the current valuations, what type of equity exposure you have will likely define the majority of your profitability over the next decade.
Pavel | Robuxio tweet media
English
9
3
14
1.9K
Pavel | Robuxio
Pavel | Robuxio@PKycek·
This rally in equities was quite specific, with roughly one-third of the move occurring in the overnight gap. Many models went into the close before the gap day in a hedged, defensive regime, and paid the price at the open. That is one of the reasons many systematic strategies did not fully capture the recovery. Part of the game.
Pavel | Robuxio tweet media
English
3
3
20
3.7K
edgeful
edgeful@edgeful·
our 5min ORB algo on ES doubled a 10k account trading ONE contract. 72.17% win rate. 115 trades. so we built a playbook breaking down every setting, and how you can start running this strategy on ES tomorrow. like + reply "ORB" and we'll send it to you free.
edgeful tweet media
English
1.2K
53
1K
101.6K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@PKycek Institution with just 1 simple strategy? What was their portfolio size?
English
1
0
0
155
Pavel | Robuxio
Pavel | Robuxio@PKycek·
Another multi-strat crypto fund closed the shop. They started with 30+ teams. Their idea was to allocate based on the last month performance. It didn't work out. We were one of the few last teams. Hard period for many smaller institutional players: Bad market conditions + conservative allocators.
English
5
0
16
2.2K
Peter - Cracking Markets
Peter - Cracking Markets@SystematicPeter·
📊 TSLA 60-min (2010–2026) Simple long-only Donchian Channel + trailing stop. No regime filters. No optimization tricks. $0.005/share commission baked in. 16 years on one of the most volatile and heavily traded stocks in the market… and this basic breakout structure still held up. The equity curve says it all.
Peter - Cracking Markets tweet media
English
5
3
50
4.8K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@PKycek And how was their performance with such leverage? Did they survive last several years?
English
1
0
0
131
Pavel | Robuxio
Pavel | Robuxio@PKycek·
Recently, we completed due diligence on a trading team as a potential fit for our fund. The team was operating with net exposure of approximately 7x and viewed that as acceptable. In some cases, individual positions reached up to 40x their base size, without this being treated as an outlier within their framework. For us, that was a clear no-go from a portfolio construction and risk management perspective. What is equally interesting is the contrast on the allocator side. When we explain that our net exposure can, in isolated cases, approach 1x, while for the majority of the time the high-volatility portfolio operates within roughly ±40% net exposure, this is often already perceived as elevated. In a number of cases, that alone is enough for allocators to prefer the low-volatility mandate instead.
English
5
1
11
2.8K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@PKycek And how does price behave of this stock? It has fallen more than 11% last year? Dumbest marketing for retail )
English
1
0
0
14
ak0
ak0@annanay·
People talk a lot about quant firms. But not many people know what each firm specializes on. Here's a cheatsheet to understand what each firm does well. Disclaimer - these are just the ones I know well, some eg: Virtu are missing. The cool part? All of them are very profitable!
ak0 tweet media
English
42
50
895
167.3K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@PropJournalist Because of trailing drawdown, I think payouts are less with this 1-step programme. 2-step has less pass rate, but bigger payouts.
English
1
0
1
23
The Prop Journalist
The Prop Journalist@PropJournalist·
Fascinating pass rate stats, I'll definitely make a video. Also higher pass rate for 1-Step doesn't necessarily mean it's better for traders. But I do admit the pass rate difference is striking.
Andrew E8@E8Andrew

Why did we pause E8 Classic and E8 Track? I often see this question in our community, so we decided it’s time to clarify and explain this decision. Many people who don’t have access to pass-rate data assume we removed these programs because they were too easy for traders. The truth is the complete opposite. E8 Classic and E8 Track had significantly lower pass rates than our one-phase accounts. E8 Classic, our two-phase program, had a shockingly low pass rate - only about one out of ten traders managed to complete it. E8 Track performed even worse, with roughly one out of twenty traders passing the evaluation. On the other hand, E8 One and E8 Signature are programs with the highest pass rates in the industry. The E8 Signature evaluation is so trader-friendly that one in three traders successfully completes it - that’s a pass rate three times higher than two-phase programs. So why do some people still believe that two-phase programs are easier? It’s a long-standing narrative pushed onto the community by large firms and influencers who financially benefited from their communities failing. A major advantage of our E8 Signature and E8 One accounts is that you can pass them in a single day -even with a single trade, if you manage to hit your target. We don’t force you to trade for five days just to slow your progress before you reach the sim-funded stage. The vision of @E8Markets has always been to support traders and avoid burdening them with unnecessary rules. Some traders also criticize one-phase programs because of the EOD drawdown. But there’s no reason to fear it. As soon as you build sufficient profit equal to the drawdown amount, the max loss limit trails back to your starting balance and stops increasing. For example, on our $100,000 Signature account, you only need a $3,000 profit for your drawdown to become static - it will no longer trail with your balance. Another benefit of the EOD drawdown is the daily pause, which is not a hard breach but simply a stop for the day. You won’t be punished for market volatility. Everyone can have an off day, but that doesn’t mean you should lose your account because of it. And for maximum flexibility, we’ve included the daily pause only in the sim-funded stage of the Signature accounts. I’m frequently in contact with our traders, and they consistently tell me they’re very satisfied with our rules. According to many of them, these rules have genuinely made them better traders. Have you tried our Signature or One account yet? If not, give them a chance - and avoid the pointless rules imposed by other prop firms. At E8Markets, you’ll receive all the support you need to take your trading to the next level.

English
3
0
13
2.3K
Rishat Tuktamyshov
Rishat Tuktamyshov@Smarttrading_ri·
@E8Markets Current classic evaluations Will continue normal and classic funded account Will be issued?
English
0
0
0
44
E8 Markets
E8 Markets@E8Markets·
Classic + Track are discontinued. Going forward, it’s - E8one (unchanged) = E8 Signature (rebuilt). Tuesday 18:00 CET - we’re hosting a LIVE AMA with Dylan Elchami (Founder) + Jake Koel Co-Host - here on Twitter. Signature is now a cleaner runway: - ONE STEP (no more multistep maze) - No monthly fees + no activation fee - News trading is now allowed - We’ve added NinjaTrader + Tradovate - Crypto payments are available for futures - Your first payout-request eligibility can be -3 days (rules apply) Got questions? Drop them below. We’ll answer the ones everyone’s thinking. "Disclosure: E8 operates in a simulated environment with simulated capital. Fees buy platform access/education. No live accounts, no income promises, no trading advice. Rewards (if any) are performance-based discretionary incentives; results vary.”
E8 Markets tweet media
English
86
81
136
18.6K
Mat
Mat@MTradingX·
2 futures firms are currently under investigation for criminal wire fraud. 1 CFD firm in the UK is currently under investigation for tax evasion 2 CFD firms in Dubai are currently being investigated for wire fraud Source: Trust me bro.
English
7
1
64
8.9K
Rishat Tuktamyshov retweetledi
AquaFunded
AquaFunded@AquaFunded·
50% OFF accounts for a limited time only! 🎃 💙 50% to 40% OFF All Accounts 💙 100 First Orders get free $2.5k Instant Funded 💙 150% Refund Get funded now at 👉 aquafunded.com/?el=x
AquaFunded tweet media
English
569
541
737
390.1K