Sabitlenmiş Tweet
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police)
8.5K posts

SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police)
@Snow__Ape
aka dumbbeard Chewing on snow. Ashy. Dumb. Bearded. In my lane. Focused. Flourishing. alteri huic nunquam iterum
Hyperborea Katılım Ağustos 2023
1.3K Takip Edilen263 Takipçiler
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi

The Inver Grove Heights City Council will consider a resolution on Monday to take down Minnesota's new flag and fly the old state flag. fox9.com/news/inver-gro…
English

@BlackwoodBrief @atrupar It's not politically inconvenient. It's entirely irrelevant.
We don't need gun control, we need commie control.
English

That exchange said everything.
A reporter asked a basic factual question:
how does someone cross multiple state lines with multiple weapons and still end up in DC?
And instead of answering, he immediately ran for the usual script about “not changing the law.”
That is the tell.
When officials dodge the logistics and retreat into slogans, it usually means the real answer is politically inconvenient.
English

BRENNAN: The alleged shooter had multiple weapons. In DC, open carry is not permitted. You just said he traveled from California across the country by train. How did he do that?
BLANCHE: This isn't about in my mind changing the law, or making the laws more restrictive around firearms
BRENNAN: I'm asking about crossing state lines with firearms
BLANCHE: I don't think that's something we should be focused on
English

@JackPosobiec You can leave out the "stockpiling firearms" part. That's something globalhomo commies and leftist media bitch about.
English
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi

@0hour1 Commies don't have any good ideas and they're louder than they are numerous. They're collectively like a cornered animal perpetually going through deathrattles because nobody will just finish them.
English

SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi

@SomeBitchIIKnow Teach them how to fish.
English

I've had people ask me how I find things, so I'm going to try to do so more. Warning: A lot of my most common methods are extremely underwhelming once you know how. xD

L@SomeBitchIIKnow
@MayorToddGloria Demolished a historic building to build a shitbox.
English

@GBPolitcs Public execution is the only way out
English

@vizual__ @GBPolitcs Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaasaaaaa
Filipino

@GBPolitcs Not laughing, very clearly crying and distraught. There’s no knowing the full story and with the justice system guilty does not always mean guilty.
English
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi

@lporiginalg >When the MacDonalds didn't make your tea sweet enough and doesn't want to give you your McReparation fries

English

We can't update on auto thefts, overdoses, or any other crimes that may have occurred today because @MinneapolisPD still has not updated the 911 dashboard since before 11 a.m., and encryption renders public safety info non-transparent.
Completely unacceptable.
@MinneapolisOCS
English

@JamesOKeefeIII Someone abusing the TRO shit? It's basically setup to be abusive.
English
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi
SnowApe (wanted by WEF secret police) retweetledi

Texas voter IDs are integers. Whole numbers. No decimals, ever.
The Bexar County primary poll book contained 4,110 IDs like this:
1,253,115,467.79993
That alone proves something fishy. But the math goes further — and it’s airtight.
When those 4,110 records are sorted in order, the spacing between every consecutive pair is 22,084.82189 — the same non-integer value, repeating 4,109 times. That uniformity is already impossible by accident. Then:
90,746,533.16339 ÷ 22,084.82189 = 4,109.0000
The total span of the sequence, divided by the gap, returns a perfect integer with zero remainder. A randomly generated or accidentally corrupted sequence cannot do that. Only deliberate computation produces that result.
Every one of these fractional IDs was created after polls closed — and we can prove it from the IDs themselves. The gap value of 22,084.82189 was derived from the alphabetical positions of specific voters within the completed check-in list. Those positions cannot be known until every voter has checked in and the full list is in hand. The fractional IDs could not have existed before the genuine list existed. They are timestamped by their own construction.
The records were not random fabrications. Each was anchored to a real registered voter. 735 real people each had 5 or 6 synthetic duplicates generated in their name — up to 4,110 fraudulent ballot opportunities in a single county primary, executed by someone with back-end write access to the poll book system.
The attack vector was an internet-accessible poll book platform reachable from anywhere in the world with a valid username and password. No VPN. No hardware credential. No cryptographic verification on the export that produces the official check-in record. The post-election export workflow contains no hash check and no independent audit mechanism. Anyone with valid credentials could alter the official record for any participating jurisdiction remotely, at any time.
That access was used.
The fractional ID components functioned as a precise machine-executable deletion key — invisible to poll workers under normal display settings, but recoverable by a single database query after the fact. The injection itself broke the chain of custody. The file was then replaced before formal examination could occur, compounding an evidentiary void that was already irreversible.
Officials attributed the anomalies to an export error or electronic glitch. Neither explanation survives contact with the data. A glitch does not solve a two-equation integer system, sort 735 voters alphabetically, derive sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and optimize its output for numerical elegance. Glitches do not have specifications. This one did. The fraud in this election is proven. The scale of its impact cannot be determined from any currently available record. An election whose outcome cannot be separated from an unknown quantity of fraudulent ballots cannot be legally certified
The same platform operates across 29 states.
The Bexar County file was caught only because it was captured during the active window before deletion. A more careful cleanup leaves nothing. The absence of detected anomalies in other jurisdictions is not evidence of integrity — it is evidence that no one was looking at the right moment.
This is not a software reliability problem. Unreliable software fails randomly. This algorithm solved a two-equation integer system, sorted 735 names alphabetically, derived its sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and deliberately discarded six real voter records in order to produce output whose internal quantities share a common factor of 15. That is a specification. Glitches do not optimize for numerical elegance.
The conclusion is the same whether you approach it from this specific case or from my multi-state database analysis published in the Journal of Information Warfare earlier this week: electronic poll book and voter registration systems built on internet-accessible architectures with no cryptographic audit trail cannot be trusted. Not this platform. Not any platform built on the same design. Partial fixes and software patches do not solve the problem when the attack surface is the architecture itself.
The only remedy that eliminates rather than mitigates the risk is full replacement — paper poll books, hand counts conducted publicly at the precinct, results posted before anything leaves the building. A paper system cannot be altered from a laptop at 11pm by someone with a stolen password.
Peer-reviewed multi-state analysis: Journal of Information Warfare, 2026, 25.2
If you are in one of the 29 states, this concerns you.

English
















