Ripples 🌹

Ooft! Diane Abbott just ended Keir Starmer political career. "Knowing Peter Mandelson's history, going back 30 years, it's one thing to say 'nobody told me', the question is WHY DIDN'T THE PM ASK?" When Diane Abbott, of all people, has the moral high ground, you know it's over

حکم اعدام #عرفان_نبیان صادر شد. بدونید توییت زدن بیشتر از اون چیزی که فکرش رو می‌کنید تاثیر داره. اسمش رو به انگلیسی ترند کنیم. #ErfanNabian

It's a big day in Parliament today, an historic one. It's the first day where Starmer may actually answer a question.

Si Ignoras a este perro con el bebe Sera el P30R Año de tu vida

Three meetings took place in the last 72 hours that no camera recorded. The first: a room beneath the Pentagon. No phones. No aides. Only 7 men and a decision that will reshape the Middle East before Friday. The second: a private jet. Tail number blocked. Departed Zurich at 3:17 AM. Landed at Joint Base Andrews. The passenger has not been seen in public since 2019. You were told he was dead. The third: Camp David. Not the official visit the press was briefed on. The OTHER meeting. The one with no guest list. The one where the new financial architecture was signed into law before the ink on the ceasefire was dry. Trump did not pause the strikes because of diplomacy. HE PAUSED THEM BECAUSE THE MISSION WAS ALREADY COMPLETE. The 5-day window is not for negotiations. It is for extraction. 14 high-value targets are being moved from 6 countries to a single location. A location the public will learn about soon enough. The war you saw on television is ending. The war you were never shown is entering its final phase. THE DEALS ARE SIGNED. THE GOLD HAS MOVED. THE NAMES ARE SEALED. All that remains is the announcement. And it will not come from the media. ⟁

@MazinAlEshaiker Take his passport away. Red flag him at all airports

🔴 عاجل، فضائح أوباما الأسوأ تاريخياً لم يحضر محاموه للتفاوض بل حضروا للتوسل. إليكم ما وجده فريق بوندي وزيرة العدل داخل خوادم طهران تحت الاسم الرمزي لأوباما - رينيجيد: ▪️14 حوالة بنكية إلى حساب سويسري مرتبط بحزب الله بين عامي 2014 و2016. المجموع: 1.7 مليار دولار. نفس المبلغ الذي صرّح به أمام الكونغرس بأنه "أصول إيرانية مجمدة". ▪️توجيه موقّع يُخوّل وكالة المخابرات المركزية بالتراجع أثناء هجوم بنغازي. ليس مطبوعًا، بل مكتوب بخط اليد. ▪️مراسلات مع مُشغّل إبستين، مؤرخة في مارس 2015، تناقش "ترتيب الجزيرة" و"حزمة شيكاغو". ▪️قناة اتصال سرية مع طهران عبر فاليري جاريت، نشطة من 2012 إلى 2024. نعم، بعد عامين من تركه منصبه. لم يكتفِ بخيانة أمريكا بل كان يدير حكومةً خفيةً من قبو منزله في واشنطن العاصمة، متظاهرًا بالتقاعد. يعرض محاموه الآن تعاونًا كاملًا مقابل الحصانة. رفض ترامب. لا صفقات. لا رحمة. لا مفر. الرجل الذي قسم أمريكا لثماني سنوات على وشك مواجهة أمريكا التي سعى لتدميرها. وهي الآن مستيقظة. 👇

@benonwine Thats a bloke

What’s the FIRST thing the comes to mind?

🚨HUGE: It's just been revealed that Keir Starmer was advised by the cabinet secretary Simon Case to do security clearance *BEFORE* appointing Mandelson, but he IGNORED the advice. This is the smoking gun we've been waiting for. He's finished.

@Steven_Swinford It will just be pure lies. @Keir_Starmer

Which Keir Starmer will we get in the Commons today? What I'm hearing is that it won't be the Starmer of February 5, when he used a press conference in Hastings to offer an unmitigated apology to victims and make a series of apologies Instead we're going to get angry Starmer. The PM is furious that he wasn't told by Robbins and will make that very, very clear He will 'set out the facts' - what does that actually mean? His central argument will be that there was no legal bar to stop Robbins from 'sensibly flagging' the initial issues with Mandelson vetting His failure to do so, he will claim, shows a failure of judgement, hence he has been sacked But by the same token allies of Robbins can point to the fact that there were significant legal barriers to informing Starmer The fact it took Cat Little, perm sec at the Cabinet Office, and Antonia Romeo, the Cab Sec, three weeks to get the legal basis to inform Starmer tells you that. This was not straightforward, and was press unprecedented territory They can also point to ministers saying in the Commons that the national security vetting process is 'rightly independent' of the government There is a world in which both Starmer and Robbins are right. Starmer can argue he should have been told, and that the failure to do so initially and then subsequently when he stated that Robbins had clearance represents a severe misjudgement Robbins can argue that by the letter of the law there was no requirement for him to do so I suspect it will be impossible to form a definitive judgement over who was right, and who was wrong after the next 48 hours Either way it is a hugely challenging situation for both men

@mjfree Absolutely disgusting post. Hope you are sued. Never watching a film with you in again.

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: Majority of Americans believe Trump FAKED the Butler assassination attempt and intentionally killed Corey Comperatore, a 50-year-old former volunteer fire chief, to garner sympathy. This is MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE.

@JaokooMoses Bullshit.

CONFIRMED: The US joint Chiefs of staff Air Force Gen. Dan Caine stormed out of an emergency meeting with Trump. Insiders indicate that Trump wanted to invoke the nuclear codes as a deterrence against Iran but Caine refused and invoked the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice.

@TimothyDSnyder Pure lies

Worth adding that Russia did as a matter of fact intervene for Trump in 2016 and that the evidence is widely known, abundant, and collected in various forms, including a Senate investigation, the Mueller report, multiple intelligence investigations, multiple reportorial investigations in the US and elsewhere, and multiple books. Leaving out that crucial fact allows the reader to miss the way this echoes prior authoritarian "investigate the investigator" moves as well as the fundamentally Orwellian character of this. nytimes.com/2026/04/18/us/…

@Milajoy Why do these people just keep talking and not listening? They just keep over talking and it becomes irritating.

Marco Rubio is sublime.

To be abundantly clear, every day, I am incredibly honored and thankful that people enjoy and share my content. This is not just my full-time job, this is my mission, and I sacrificed quite a lot to pursue it. I view this as warfare, which is why I take it so seriously. This is not about ad revenue to me. It’s about influence and truth. I am consciously fighting an information war against the enemies of humanity. I am trying to counter the propaganda machine that seeks to warp the minds of The People and manipulate public perception. I was doing this long before I ever got paid to do it, and if all the ad revenue stopped tomorrow, I’d still be doing it just the same. You’ve never seen me charge a penny for information or a paywall. Why? Because I just want the word to get out. With all that being said, if I make such good content that people feel the need to plagiarize me, wouldn’t it be beneficial for the public to know the source of the content, so they can be exposed to more content from the person actually producing the good analysis? Imagine if I had millions of followers, instead of people like General Flynn who also plagiarized my content. Imagine how much better shape MAGA would be in if more people were following me instead of the clickbait clowns. That’s why I’m upset. The wrong people have too much influence, and the right people get pushed to the side and forgotten, which leads to people like Candace Owens and Jackson Hinkle having millions of followers and convincing Trump supporters that there’s a Jew behind every blade of grass. It matters.

Breaking News 🥹🥹❤️🚨🚨🙏 Astronaut Reid Wiseman says he has CONVERTED to Christianity after his trip to moon. "There is no other explanation for what I saw and experienced. When we landed back on earth, I saw the cross and just wept." Truth be told if you look at everything and still don’t believe in God the creator then it’s crazy . You think everything just happened ? Moral lesson : Welcome to Christianity . Jesus Christ is king

Remember that time when HillaryClinton introduced her friend GeorgeSoros and his interest to get involved in US elections? The Internet sure doesn't. Why? Because it has been wiped from existence for the most part. Turns out I found a copy of the file I had archived years ago. Be a real shame if people save and shared this widely. FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.

@JChimirie66677 @leckston @Keir_Starmer It Didn’t Cross My Desk Liar Starmer

Starmer Was Warned About Russia and China. He Proceeded Anyway. Tomorrow He Calls It Unforgivable Tomorrow Keir Starmer will stand at the despatch box and tell Parliament it was unforgivable that he was not told Peter Mandelson had failed his security vetting. He will present himself as a Prime Minister betrayed by his own system. He will speak of outrage and of lessons learned. He should not be allowed to do so unchallenged. Tonight the Telegraph has disclosed that Starmer was handed a due diligence report before the appointment was announced in December 2024. That report cited concerns about Mandelson's business interests in China, his connections to a Russian conglomerate whose chairman was an ally of Vladimir Putin, and his continued involvement with that organisation well after Russia's annexation of Crimea. The Telegraph has separately established that Mandelson was targeted by Russian intelligence for decades. Starmer read the report. He proceeded with the appointment. The UKSV vetting process subsequently reached the same conclusion. Senior Whitehall sources have told the Telegraph that the vetting findings largely restated the security risks already drawn to Starmer's attention. One source put it plainly. The reality is that Starmer had already been warned about the major risks and he had waved them away. Downing Street's response is to draw a distinction between due diligence and developed vetting, arguing that the two processes are separate and carry different weight. The distinction is technically correct and substantively irrelevant. A Prime Minister who reads a report flagging China and Russia concerns about a candidate, appoints him regardless, and then expresses staggering outrage when a more rigorous process reaches the same conclusion, has not been kept in the dark. He has chosen not to look. Consider what followed that choice. Mandelson was not merely appointed. He was granted Strap Three clearance, the highest level available to the Foreign Office, giving him access to information that could put intelligence sources at risk if leaked. A man targeted by Russian intelligence for decades. A man whose China connections alarmed American senators sufficiently to refer a dossier to the FBI. A man who had maintained a relationship with a convicted paedophile long after conviction and shared government information with him. That man was given access to material that could endanger lives. And the Prime Minister who had read the warnings says he was kept in the dark. Lord Glasman, one of Starmer's own, sent a memo to Morgan McSweeney after Trump's inauguration warning about Mandelson's Epstein connections. The 2023 dossier from the security services warned Labour shadow ministers about his links to hostile states. The due diligence report warned about China and Russia. The vetting process said no. At every stage, at every level, from the security services to his own party's senior figures, the warnings arrived. At every stage they were set aside. Tomorrow's statement will be framed as an act of transparency. It should be read as an act of audacity. A Prime Minister who received multiple warnings about a candidate's security risks, appointed him anyway, granted him access to the most sensitive intelligence material available, and then sacked the civil servant who followed the rules, is not a man who was let down by his system. He is a man who used his system to get the outcome he wanted and is now asking Parliament to believe he had no idea what that outcome would be. The country was promised full transparency. What it will receive tomorrow is a carefully constructed account of ignorance from a man the documentary record shows was warned, repeatedly and formally, before he made his choice. He read the warnings. He waved them away. The despatch box will not change that.

🚨 BANKS CAUGHT RED-HANDED FUNDING THE ENEMY: HSBC & Standard Chartered Accused of Laundering MILLIONS for Iran’s Terror Proxies & Nuclear Nightmare – The Telegraph Just Dropped the Bombshell! While empires of finance cloak themselves in virtue and vigilance, The Telegraph unmasks a darker truth: HSBC and Standard Chartered stand accused of orchestrating a multimillion-pound money-laundering machine for the Islamic Republic of Iran. No clerical error. This is sophisticated sanctions circumvention by institutions too embedded in the City of London to fail—potentially funneling sterling that sustains proxy militias sowing chaos across the Levant, accelerates Tehran’s nuclear breakout, and bankrolls a regime whose charter demands Western subjugation. From BCCI’s ignominious collapse to HSBC’s recurring rap sheet, the ledger of history is unambiguous: the “respectable” banker as silent partner to the pariah state. When globalization’s invisible hand writes cheques to the very threats the rules-based order claims to contain, the theater is exposed. What part did Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and Mark Carney, the Prime Minister of Canada, play? They and their families are NOT innocent. Deeply disturbing. Utterly predictable. Desperately urgent. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/1… What trust remains in our financial sentinels when profit trumps patriotism? Many of my X followers are not seeing posts like this one. If you are reading this, you are the exception. 👉 Boost the algorithm, fight the throttling, and get more 👀: bookmark, share, reply, repost, like, and follow @TonySeruga #HSBCIranLaunder #StandardCharteredBetrayal #CityOfLondonDirtyMoney #SanctionsEvasionExposed #BankersForIran #FinancialTreason #FollowTheBloodMoney #IranMoneyMachine

“He cannot conceivably continue as a credible Prime Minister any longer”. Labour peer Lord Glasman has called for Keir Starmer to resign. He said that Keir Starmer simply stating ‘I made a mistake, I’m sorry’ isn’t good enough. Completely agree. 👏🏽

@Steven_Swinford They did the same with Boris Johnson, they changed the rules to fit the Crime so the privileges committee would find him guilty, it's why it was called a Kangaroo court