Sabitlenmiş Tweet
SpaceX.EduX
770 posts
SpaceX.EduX
@SpaceXEduX
Home for technical SpaceX discussion.
Launchpad #4 Katılım Ekim 2024
210 Takip Edilen230 Takipçiler
@lukedewolf @uCntHndlThyTrth @LeonidasNFT He’s right though bud, you completely tanked your reputation already among any technical bitcoiner or security professional.
Have fun with the Bitcoin philosophers.
English
@LeonidasNFT @lukedewolf Everything this dumbass @lukedewolf says is the EXACT reason BTC was created rather than arbitrary opinion to self grandeur oneself. Dude is an ABSOLUTE ass hat that gives off a wannabe somebody 😂
English
@ProjectBabbage I guess it’s hard to fund all that work when they have 5 users a week
English
Wallet compatibility is adoption work. Public reports include restored coins not showing after a BRC-100 upgrade, stale wallet state, and a cross-chain deposit delayed 12+ hours. Wallet and app teams: publish support matrices and reproducible issue paths. Reliability wins.
English
@Arthur_van_Pelt @secsovereign @Beautyon_ beautyon literally used to tell people that if said bitcoin was money the state was going to ban it 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
English
I also came across this conversation of @secsovereign and @Beautyon_. These 2 lesser known individuals intellectually debunked Adam Back being a cypherpunk. He is not.
Here they also show Adam Back is not worthy of his "Computer Scientist" title.
3/3
English
For several days I'm trying to finish my magnum opus about BIP110, debunking the nonsense that people like Adam Back and Vortex are spreading, meanwhile gathering the info that is worthwhile if not crucial to know.
Was just typing this. A sneak preview.
1/3
English
@EnjoyingBitcoin the BSV tards have had this fantasy for years, your satoshi isn't coming to save you fork boy
English
If I were Satoshi, watching this BIP-110 debate right now, I'd sure be tempted to move / sell my coins just to tank the market and wipe out the spammers lol
And yes, I do believe Satoshi is still alive
English
@DetroitMatthewD They’re liars bud, you’re either smart enough to figure that out you’ll find out next month
English
@SpaceXEduX You replied to my tweet, made a claim, and failed to back it up. You are not credible on this topic.
English
Any arguments against BIP110 should be met with the first principles: does it make Bitcoin more decentralized, and secure?
This is the point that no Core v30 respecter will be able to contend with. They would rather pearl clutch, ad hominem, gaslight et al.
English
@SpaceXEduX I see the L word (liar, lying) thrown around a lot. Care to dive deeper into a specific instance where a leader you're thinking of was dishonest? Please be as specific as possible.
English
@CedYoungelman That 10 minute between about 1:05 and 1:15 was some of the most nonsensical unhinged shit.
If my shitty soft fork doesn’t pass the government will discover how to control bitcoin 😂😂😂
English
Bitcoin Mechanic on the state's blind spot:
"The state is looking at Bitcoin like: I don't know how to control this thing. People are moving money around without permission. Someone just sent a million dollars from this address to that address — I don't know who address A was, I don't know who address B was, I couldn't stop the transaction. They paid 30 cents in fees, and now it's moving again, through a coin join. And it's just looking around like: who do I target? Who do I throw in jail? And there's no one they can target.
If you want to do anything else with money — spend 20 cents on a pack of gum — they want to know about it, throw you in jail over it, investigate you. They're control freaks who want to enslave the whole population. But with Bitcoin, they just don't know who to actually target."
@GrassFedBitcoin on The @_BitcoinMatrix #283.
Full conversation here: youtube.com/watch?v=yRjzSb…
YouTube
English
“Economic nodes matter” ah yes,
Bitcoin, the proof of stake network.
English
English
@SpaceXEduX @realricky @bramk @V4BTC It’s very possible they aren’t signaling early because they have no intention to.
But this possibility is generally hand-waived away by this statement that they don’t have an incentive to without a providing the reasoning that supports that statement.
English
Some will flame me but whatever.
I put BIP110 in Claude and am asking it to answer my questions and help me understand it.
2 important findings:
1. It basically agrees with it technically. And when I read it I am ok with a temporary (this is important) period of this soft fork to have time to "figure out something sustainable" (against spam).
Ok I am on board conceptually.
2. Spammers will adapt. There are other technical ways to spam. This starts an arms race, cat/mouse game. Visible/invisible spam makes it harder and harder to detect... the blockchain size keeps rising despite these efforts. We stay in a perpetual trap and discussion and strife that asks for an extension of the "temporary" soft fork.
Hold up.
Bitcoin's whole value proposition rests on the idea that its rules are extraordinarily hard to change. Not impossible, but hard enough that you can build a hundred-year savings plan on top of them.
So every activation mechanism is implicitly answering the question: how hard should it be to change Bitcoin
And 95% versus 55% are two very different answers.
It said:
"the activation mechanics (55%, mandatory signaling) are where I'd expect the fiercest fight, because that's not just about spam anymore. That's about how Bitcoin changes itself."
...
"The justification given (for 55% signaling) is that it's temporary and urgent. But you can see why this is the part people fight about, right? The threshold isn't just a technical parameter, it's a statement about how much agreement you need before changing Bitcoin's rules."
2 things I see:
55% is not 51% (attack), but boy is that close?
What happens to an emergent money that is engineered truth of which it's most important task is to stay consistent, constant, predictable, immutable, and thus trustworthy when it is in a perpetual fight?
Is that positive?
Many wanted me to think. Here's my thinking.
Maybe I am too rational. Maybe I am an idiot.
I have another positive/negative read attached.
"imagine the same playbook used for something else: a "temporary emergency" fork for compliance reasons, or transaction filtering that a slim majority supports under regulatory pressure. "It's temporary, it's urgent, we only need 55%, non-signalers get orphaned" is a template, and templates get reused."
Please share your thoughts. Thank you.
English
@realricky @ts_hodl @bramk @V4BTC The incentive would be to minimize disruption and uncertainty on the asset they mine and have significantly invested in capital costs.
Why would you not signal once you’ve decided?
Perhaps they have decided and are already signaling.
English
@SpaceXEduX @ts_hodl @bramk @V4BTC There isn't really an incentive to. BIP-110 observers may find it suspenseful but miners don't really care until it's nearing mandatory activation time
English
English
@ts_hodl @realricky @bramk @V4BTC I think it’s after the mandatory signaling period ends , during that period no fork is possible.
English
@realricky @bramk @V4BTC Well the chain split happens as soon as the mandatory signaling period starts and a non-compliant block is mined.
So the hash power needs to be there within a few blocks of the mandatory signaling period or it’s DOA.
English
@BitcoinJed1 @BitcoinCarl_ Sunk cost fallacy sorry you wasted so much time on this
English
@BitcoinCarl_ Yeah naw. I was fighting this fight when it was just us trying to convince Core not to merge the op_return change & switching to Knots to signal our disagreement with them. Then when it was called BIP-444 before being renamed BIP-110...
English
If you are a Bitcoin pleb that fell into the BIP110 mess it’s okay say i was wrong. It’s more respectable than doubling down. I will forgive you.
English
It is pretty funny it 8000 people bought start 9s and half them couldn’t even figure out how to virtue signal properly
English
@KovStew @JuanSGalt Do you have any idea how many dick pics are going to be on bcash Jr 🤣🤣🤣
English
"If we win, Bitcoin wins,
If we lose, Bitcoin loses"
Setting the stage to fail gracefully.
Hijacking Bitcoin 2.0 tour incoming.
Matteo Pellegrini | Club Orange@matteopelleg
The plebs want BIP110 to succeed The elites want BIP110 to fail In one month we’re gonna find out who control Bitcoin
English