

The Bitcoin Matrix Podcast ⚡️
27.9K posts

@_BitcoinMatrix
Where Critical Thinkers Meet. Bitcoin, philosophy, and the long view. 🎙️ @CedYoungelman · 🌐 https://t.co/8iEZHia3X4





Bitcoin Mechanic on the state's blind spot: "The state is looking at Bitcoin like: I don't know how to control this thing. People are moving money around without permission. Someone just sent a million dollars from this address to that address — I don't know who address A was, I don't know who address B was, I couldn't stop the transaction. They paid 30 cents in fees, and now it's moving again, through a coin join. And it's just looking around like: who do I target? Who do I throw in jail? And there's no one they can target. If you want to do anything else with money — spend 20 cents on a pack of gum — they want to know about it, throw you in jail over it, investigate you. They're control freaks who want to enslave the whole population. But with Bitcoin, they just don't know who to actually target." @GrassFedBitcoin on The @_BitcoinMatrix #283. Full conversation here: youtube.com/watch?v=yRjzSb…



















Tomorrow.

🔁 REPOST, from November 2025. Everything Jimmy Song flagged about Bitcoin Core is now impossible to ignore. Jimmy Song - Is Bitcoin Under Attack From Within? One company asked for 144 bytes. Core didn't raise OP_RETURN from 80 to 160. They went all the way to 100,000 — over hundreds of objections, breaking the precedent that contested changes don't get merged. Then an "inner circle" published a letter speaking for Bitcoin Core. Jimmy has contributed to Core. Nobody even asked him to sign. The author of five Bitcoin books came on to explain who actually funds Core, why the tactics feel like COVID all over again, and why he now says taproot was a mistake. @jimmysong, Bitcoin developer, educator, Core contributor, and author of five books on Bitcoin, joins me for the fourth time to lay out the knots vs. core fight in plain English: relay policy vs. consensus and why policy quietly decides what gets into blocks, the node experiment where Core v30 peers used 200MB of bandwidth in 10 hours while every other client used 6, how five or six pools build the block templates for ~90% of hash rate, the OP_RETURN saga from 40 bytes to 100,000, who funds Core — Chaincode, Spiral, localhost — and why ex-Wall Street traders quietly bankrolling devs deserves scrutiny, the "trust the experts" playbook we all remember from COVID, why taproot was not a wise decision ("90% of the outputs are spam"), and why he wants ossification. "There's a whole bunch of anonymous contributors to Bitcoin Core. You have no idea what their motivations are. Zero. They could be a member of the NSA. You don't know." Send this to anyone who thinks the OP_RETURN debate is just about spam filters. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 01:06 Jimmy Song's Background 08:58 Relay policy vs. consensus, dust limits, and sub-sat fee relay 09:46 Why uniform relay policy matters 11:00 Compact block relay and stale-block risk explained 17:09 Miner templates, pool concentration, and censorship worries 36:28 "The Core letter": precedent, pushback, and an inner circle? 52:56 Is the fight healthy? 59:41 Who funds Core? Chaincode, Spiral, low-profile funders & incentives 1:05:36 Is Core v30 an existential threat? 1:14:50 Wallets, mempool.space, and sovereignty myths 1:18:35 Bitcoin governance lessons from history 1:23:00 Jimmy's long view: cultural decay, builders vs. complainers 📺youtube.com/watch?v=2zEWPM… Then watch the rest of the trilogy: @LukeDashjr, The @_BitcoinMatrix #196:- "Is Bitcoin In A Civil War?" 📺youtube.com/watch?v=9lmr4W… @mattkratter, The @_BitcoinMatrix #279: "Bitcoin Core Has Gone Rogue." 📺youtube.com/watch?v=xsOjcw…



