Dog is love

@PsychBeaulogy @RupertLowe10 @ThatAlexWoman A classic case of projection! Restore and the sane people of the Uk and the West are the rationale ones driven by evidence and pattern recognition. The Left are the hysterical delusionalists. They have been found out but continue with their lies…..

I’ve just read @ThatAlexWoman’s latest piece, in which she describes Restore supporters as “conspiracy theorists” who are being “emotionally manipulated” among other diabolical assumptions. She talks about “hysteria”, yet she appears to be the only one losing her composure. She also introduces various psychological theories into the mix. The irony is that she’s applying her own heuristics and displaying many of the behaviours she accuses others of exhibiting. The “extreme emotional investment exhibited publicly” she describes reads more like projection than analysis. Most interesting of all, she claims there will be no mass deportations; something Reform supporters, in particular, may want to take note of.

The establishment meltdown is reaching new heights.

France, the UK, Canada, and 11 others banned kids from social media at nearly the same time, with nearly the same law. If your government actually answered to you, its laws wouldn't arrive on the same schedule as thirteen others.

🚨Just a reminder that before Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry Report was released Piers Morgan said my claim of 250,000 girls being raped by Pakistani Muslim men in Britain was “utterly ridiculous.” Cenk Uygur said that I was “making it up.”

The politicians imprison people to hide their crimes

When You Can't Beat Reform, Change The Rules. Labour Just Did. There is a line in a democracy that, once crossed, changes everything. When those in power begin adjusting the rules of the game to determine its outcome, the game is no longer democracy. It is managed succession. That line was crossed again on Tuesday night. Two days before the Makerfield by-election, Labour rushed a change to the mayoral voting system through the House of Lords. Regional mayors will now be elected using the supplementary vote system rather than first past the post. The change applies immediately. It will govern whoever replaces Andy Burnham as Mayor of Greater Manchester if he wins on Thursday and stands down. The government's defence is that it is simply restoring the system used before Boris Johnson changed it in 2021. That argument requires the public to believe that a change Labour could have introduced at any point in two years of government became urgent on Tuesday evening, forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect. Lord Hayward, a Conservative peer and experienced pollster, was precise in the Lords. There is no other justification for the haste, he said, other than that it solves the Labour Party's problems and prevents Reform winning a mayoralty. Not clumsy. Not rushed. Designed. The mechanics explain why. Under first past the post, Reform could win the Greater Manchester mayoralty on a plurality of votes in a fragmented field, precisely as it won all eight council wards in May's local elections with around fifty percent of the vote. Under the supplementary vote system, voters express a first and second preference. Lib Dem and Green voters, given a second preference, will direct those votes to Labour overwhelmingly. The change does not affect Thursday's by-election. It affects the mayoral contest that follows it, constructing an anti-Reform coalition from the second preferences of smaller parties that Reform itself cannot access. Lord Jackson identified the wider implication. This is potentially a strategy for a progressive alliance being rolled out ahead of a general election, he said, with the aim of locking out the Conservatives and Reform from power. Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation. The supplementary vote is the local pilot for a national project. Pool second preferences, lock out the right, govern indefinitely on a minority of first preference votes. This is not the first time. Earlier this year Labour delayed local elections after the Electoral Commission stated explicitly that the justification was not legitimate, that extending mandates damages public confidence and creates a conflict of interest by allowing those in power to decide how long they may remain there without consent. The Commission's objection was noted and ignored. Reform demolished Labour anyway. Now the same instinct has been applied to a different mechanism. Not cancellation this time. Electoral system change, deployed with surgical precision forty eight hours before the vote that triggers the election it is designed to affect. Governments confident in their mandate do not need to change the rules two days before the ballot. They face the electorate and take their chances. The timing of Tuesday night's Lords motion is not a coincidence. It is a confession. The voters of Makerfield vote on Thursday. The question of who governs Greater Manchester after that, and under what rules, was settled in the Lords on Tuesday. Nobody voted for that. "Burnham's allies have already confirmed he would scrap first past the post nationally in favour of proportional representation."

Oh this is precious. David Lammy. Foreign Secretary. The man who compared Brexit to the Nazis. Who demanded Trump be banned from Britain. Who embarrassed the nation on the world stage with his pompous lectures. Here he is claiming "the biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation." Workers' rights, David? You mean the right to pay more tax? The right to be replaced by cheaper imported labour? The right to join the 100,000 who lost their jobs in April alone, the biggest fall since records began? Those rights? "Biggest boost to defence spending since the Cold War." After your party spent years cutting the military to the bone. After you hollowed out the armed forces. After you made Britain a laughing stock on the global stage. Now you claim credit for partially reversing the damage you caused. "Lifting children out of poverty." While you stripped winter fuel payments from pensioners. While energy bills soar. While inflation eats wages. While you vote against inquiries into the rape of 250,000 working-class girls. The comment section is already doing the work. "You're delivering a shit-show." 84 likes. "Raping Gang Enquiry David." 80 likes. "Talking out of your arse." 48 likes. You are Foreign Secretary, David. You are supposed to represent Britain abroad. Instead you represent everything the world laughs at. The pompous lectures. The historical ignorance. The desperate need to be seen as morally superior while your government covers up mass rape. Stick to the podiums, David. The ones abroad, where you cannot see the country you are failing. The workers know their rights. The right to vote for someone else. The right to call you out. The right to remember every embarrassing speech you gave while Rome burned. You are not building a stronger Britain. You are building a stronger case for your own irrelevance. You Silly Fat Wanker.

🚨The BBC have been caught RED-HANDED

🚨 URGENT: Gen. Mike Flynn just dropped the hammer — Keir Starmer MUST be REMOVED IMMEDIATELY 🇺🇸🇬🇧 “Complete INSANITY destroying the UK. This nation is being flushed down the toilet. The calls to boot Keir Starmer NOW aren’t just right — they’re essential!” Trump called it. Elon called it. Flynn’s calling it. Farage & Rupert Lowe are calling it. TIME TO REMOVE KEIR STARMER FROM OFFICE 🚫 @GenFlynn Real leaders speak the truth while the fake ones destroy countries. Britain is DONE with this disaster. Share if you want real change! 🔥

"I have never felt as unsafe in this Parliament as after voting on the return regulation." Cry more.

The first Pakistani lord was a convicted grooming gang member.

I am in tears, I have never felt so seen and heard. Thank you so much everyone and a huge thank you to @officialsammyuk for giving me the courage to speak up after 15 years. 🤍

The Free Speech Union has serious concerns about the Government’s proposal to ban under-16s from some social media platforms (but not others). When the proposal was first announced, ministers cited supposedly 'harmful' platforms such as X, Facebook and YouTube, but made no mention of the left-leaning Bluesky. A selective ban, rather than a blanket one, means Ofcom will be tasked with enforcing the political preferences of whichever government happens to be in power. If there's a change of government, will X be taken off the banned list and Bluesky put in its place? Another concern is enforcement. How exactly does the Government intend to make the ban work in practice? In Australia — the model ministers appear keen to follow — many under-16s continue to access social media through VPNs. Will the Government’s next step be to ban VPNs as well? That would put the UK in the same company as Turkmenistan, Iran and North Korea. The Government has also failed to explain how this proposal can be reconciled with its duties under the Online Safety Act to protect content of democratic importance and journalistic content — duties that are due to come into force next month. This is particularly important given the Government’s intention to extend some social media restrictions to 16 and 17 year-olds and at the same time lower the voting age to 16. How can 16 and 17 year-olds be expected to participate meaningfully in the democratic process if the Government is restricting the content of democratic importance and the journalistic content they're able to access? The Free Speech Union will be keeping a wary eye on the Government’s plans 👇

@run_stickman @TheRedbaiter I have router based controls & previously had these on kids phones when they were younger….. It is a parents job not the states. All the mental health problems I have seen via my daughter’s school- gender crises, and furries came from the woke left and education system!

@TheRedbaiter Well parental controls exist on all platforms else I would see this as having merit, but it appears to be a state ploy now given youth access can already be managed by parents. We are not the EU.

"Every minute that we waste, another young girl is being fed awful information about her weight.... and using beauty products" National MP Erica Stanford gives her reasons as to why her social media ban needs to be urgently implemented. IMHO its pretty weak justification for implementing a process that will lead to some of the most draconian & authoritarian measures ever seen in the West & New Zealand in particular. Not once does Ms Stanford display the slightest concern for impacts on freedom of expression. She and Mr Luxon clearly regard this as an archaic concept. So much for National's small govt principles. The votes of weak minded parents unable to discipline their children are obviously worth much more to Luxon & Stanford.

@benonwine Undoubtedly yes. He is complicit is covering crime against humanity and arguably enabling it by letting off 13,000 convicted rapist and torturer paedophiles

Should Keir Starmer be in Prison?

Support me and help me keep fighting 🙏🏻 patreon.com/cw/ThaisdEscuf…

@ThaisEscufon @elonmusk This is worth your attention.

Europeans and American patriots! Tomorrow, the courts of my country, France, may decide to send me to prison for daring to say on television that “the main danger to women in France is Black African and Arab immigrant men.” Meanwhile, my own attacker, a Tunisian migrant, is still at large. I need your help to generate media pressure and hope to be acquitted. They cannot silence the truth! Thank you for your support 💪🏻🇫🇷

The politicians who turned a blind eye to the Rape of Britain must go to prison

NOBODY needs Keir Starmer's "permission" to post anything to the internet! People need to read Article 19 of the Human Rights act! Starmer is a human rights lawyer. He is more than aware of this @Keir_Starmer