Stan

167 posts

Stan

Stan

@Stan116547

Katılım Ağustos 2025
125 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
Stan
Stan@Stan116547·
@Firisis_ Sharp analysis 🫡
Lietuvių
1
0
2
14
Stan retweetledi
Firisis
Firisis@Firisis_·
C'est un raccourci. L'optique est indéniablement dans un super-cycle porté par le scale-up des clusters IA, et ces entreprises vont voir leur benefice exploser entre 2026 et 2030, mais investir dans ces entreprises en pensant qu'elles jouissent de la même protection oligopolistique et de la même résilience IP que la HBM de $SNDK, $MU Sk Hynix etc.. est une erreur d'analyse fondamentale. Le fait même que les valeurs de la photonique explosent dans tous les sens montre bien que ce marché est un écosystème fortement fragmenté. La plupart de ces acteurs n'ont pas de véritable IP et participent simplement à l'assemblage, sans réel moat technologique fort. La HBM est un écosystème fermé avec une intégration verticale extrême. SK Hynix ou Micron conçoivent la puce DRAM, gèrent le packaging 3D ultra-comple. Le client achète un produit fini indissociable. Historiquement, chaque nouvelle génération de transceivers offre des marges insolentes pendant 18 à 24 mois. Mais une fois que le process d'assemblage est maîtrisé, la concurrence chinoise scale massivement, inonde le marché, et l'ASP s'effondre. Le moat d'un fabricant de transceivers n'est donc qu'une simple prime de vitesse. Le cycle actuel est particulièrement porteur parce que la photonique, avec le passage aux 800G, 1.6T puis 3.2T, résout le problème de surchauffe et de consommation énergétique des puces dans les datacenters en pleine course à l'armement des hyperscalers pour l'IA. Mais une fois l'innovation digérée par l'industrie, le risque de commoditisation à terme reste bien réel. L'HBM c'est une tout autre histoire. Le moat ici n'est pas une question de timing, mais un mur infranchissable de CapEx (des dizaines de milliards d'investissements) et une IP ultra-complexe autour du packaging 3D et des TSV. La barrière à l'entrée est structurelle. Je suis bullish photonique, mais c'est un trade contenu dans le temps dans une industrie hautement cyclique. Il faut éviter les comparaisons trompeuses.
mark@cherryPayment

给大家说个恐怖的故事,大家都觉得光学很猛对吧 来看一下市值: $LITE 780亿美金 $COHR 792亿美金 $aaoi 163亿美金 $GLW 1792 亿美金 这些加起来3527 亿美金,都比不上 $MU 的一半市值,然后全在说光学是泡沫……… $SNDK 一家都2千亿市值……… 所以说, 光学真的很早………太早期了

Français
2
2
32
6.6K
AviHo
AviHo@Sharvul·
@InTheAssembly Am I the only one who still wonders how Mr. schwarzenegger here had $225m to begin with?
English
3
0
38
6.7K
The Assembly
The Assembly@InTheAssembly·
Leopold Aschenbrenner’s Situational Awareness 13F drops TODAY. This is the 24-year-old who turned $225M into $5.5 BILLION in 12 months. We expect every name he traded to move on the news. Turn on notifications and pay attention.
The Assembly tweet media
The Assembly@InTheAssembly

The 25 year old who turned $225 million into $5.5 billion in 12 months is quietly building a position in a stock almost NOBODY is talking about. Leopold Aschenbrenner is the former OpenAI researcher who launched Situational Awareness LP in September 2024. His fund returned 47% after fees in the first half of 2025. His thesis is simple: AI will be the largest infrastructure buildout in human history, and the market has not priced it in. In his most recent 13F he kept adding to one specific name quarter after quarter. Hut 8. He increased his position by 43% in Q4 2025 alone. This is one of his most asymmetric setups right now. Hut 8 has quietly locked in two of the largest AI infrastructure contracts in the country. A 15 year, $7 billion lease at its Louisiana campus with Anthropic as the end customer and Google as the financial backstop. A second 15 year, $9.8 billion lease just announced this week at its Texas campus with an investment grade tenant. Combined base term contracts: $16.8 billion. If all renewal options are exercised: over $42 billion. The entire market cap of Hut 8 today is a fraction of that. The company also holds over 16,000 Bitcoin and a $200 million credit facility at a fixed 7% rate. That’s rare optionality on the side. When he discloses his new trades, we will share them here. Turn on notifications so you don’t miss our alert, this is VERY important. If you don’t follow us, you might regret it.

English
86
177
2.9K
1.4M
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
$SIVE 2025 annual report analysis. TLDR: Extremely Bullish. Sivers main growth vector is CPO, but they've TAM expansioned to pluggable transcivers + multiple new qualifications/development. 1. "We are currently seeing great interest... testing our DFB lasers across multiple manufacturers in pluggable transceivers" For pluggable angle, we've seen this with $JBL 1.6T LRO already, but annual report hinted they're developing/qualifying with more hyperscaler suppliers. "Our serviceable markets have now been expanded to include pluggable optical interconnects as well as scale-up and scale-out architectures for co-packaged" (TAM expansion) 2. "Discussions with hyperscalers and pluggable transceiver suppliers indicate a shortage of CW lasers in the coming years" $LITE already signaled CW laser bottlenecks, and they had to buy externally from competitors. So we kinda guessed CW Laser was a bottleneck. And this confirmed it, so was wondering about Win semi. "The partnership announced with high-volume supplier Win Semiconductor in March 2025 now gives us a strong position to meet growing demand" $SIVE likely has capacity locked in with Win from this nuance, which is exactly what I wanted to know. This positions Sivers in the CW laser as both a bottleneck and CPO laser architectural leader. VOLUME PRODUCTION H2 INDICATIONS (BULLISH): 3. "The collaboration positions both companies to address the rapidly growing market for optical AI connectivity, with prototypes to be demonstrated to customers during the first half of 2026 and with the goal of scaling up production by the end of 2026" H1 is more preproduction, H2 production signaled starting with names like $POET. 4. "We are pleased that our largest LIDAR customer will increase production starting in the fourth quarter of 2026" $AEVA start of volume production Q4 with $SIVE = bullish for both. Revenue floor from LIDAR as their CPO scales. 5. Sivers announced a partnership with LIGHTIUM AG to integrate their CW lasers directly onto TFLN wafers. 3.2T+ cycle. (future proofing) FYI no decent investor cares about last year's 2025 financials from development contracts aside from Swedish Media/Locals. Especially when you're forward looking for the 2027-2028 CPO supercycle. But the hint from you can take away from financials + geography that is $NOK is now the high confidence customer of $SIVE. TLDR: -> Win Semi implied capacity lock in during CW laser bottleneck -> Hints of new group of hyperscaler suppliers testing/qualification for pluggable transcivers, which is massive TAM expansion. -> New customers for CW lasers -> Volume production scaling starting H2 for both photonics and lidar.
Serenity tweet media
English
151
182
2K
607.4K
Stan
Stan@Stan116547·
@Sofigoodboy With the earnings report it may not be so bullish huh?
English
1
0
2
1.6K
SoFire
SoFire@Sofigoodboy·
$sive Can't wait to see the market open on Friday.
SoFire tweet media
English
20
2
143
40.2K
Frenchie
Frenchie@Frenchie_·
Ce post a surperformé 3 ans de CAC40 en 9 heures
Frenchie tweet media
Frenchie@Frenchie_

Mes 5 plus grosses convictions actuellement sur le stock : $STMPA - MCAP ~$51.5B / ~€43.8B Semi européen sous-valorisé. Exposition auto, industriel, Datacenter, power semis. Le marché price surtout le cycle faible, mais pas assez le levier en cas de reprise industrielle + électrification. $GOOGL - MCAP ~$4.69T Le meilleur mix qualité/prix du Mag 7 selon moi. Search, YouTube, Cloud, TPUs, Gemini, Waymo. Le marché à tendance sous-estimer la capacité de Google à monétiser l’IA tout en gardant une rentabilité massive. $AMD - MCAP ~$740B Le principal challenger crédible de $NVDA sur l’IA. MI300/MI350/MI400, CPUs EPYC, custom silicon, hyperscalers. Exposition à la demande de compute énorme de l'agentic au travers des CPU. $VPG - MCAP ~$1.13B Petit dossier industriel sous le radar. Capteurs de précision, measurement, industrial automation, défense, aviation, weighing systems. Si le cycle des robots humanoïdes commence, rerating massif (contrats avec 4 fabricants). $AAOI - MCAP ~$14.3B Pure play optique/datacenter avec levier direct sur la demande de networking. Si les volumes 800G/1.6T continuent d’accélérer, AAOI peut bénéficier d’un effet opérationnel violent. Plus risqué qu'un $LITE , $COHR , mais upside asymétrique. En bref, ça donne une exposition à 5 thèmes : >Souveraineté sur les semi EU + MCU >Chaine de valeur IA + rentabilité de cette dernière >Challenger CPU/GPU >Robotique et capteurs de précision >Supercycle Optique Et ceci sont il me semble les acteurs les plus intéressants.

Français
25
22
648
94.6K
Stan retweetledi
Moody
Moody@MoodyWriter13·
@aleabitoreddit is probably the biggest money-printing machine on X right now. The problem is: in the long run, mostly for him. That’s how markets have always worked. You only need to be spectacularly right once, and people will call you the GOAT for decades. Germany’s biggest financial newspaper still writes about every trade Cathie Wood makes, despite the fact that very few fund managers have destroyed as much capital over recent years. But she was once spectacularly right. Similar story with Burry. Serenity deserves respect for spotting some trades early and having the right instinct before the crowd. But most of what came after feels like AI running at full speed: endless short posts touching anything remotely connected to previous winners or meme narratives, without building a real falsifiable thesis. It’s mostly pattern recognition. Everyone deserves to make money if they publish a genuine and well-supported thesis on companies they own. A proper Substack article is evidence of that work. People love him because they are making money quickly following him. But in one or two years, I suspect at least 80% of those followers will sit on losses. What worries me most is not even the speculation itself. It’s what easy money does to people’s minds. Fast gains soften discipline. Once this exceptional phase of the market ends, many won’t be able to detach from the dopamine of quick profits. They will keep chasing the next easy trade long after the easy trades are gone. That’s when the destructive years begin. I’ve experienced this myself. It is incredibly important to build a real long-term investment framework. And once you have one, you must protect it. That’s what I try to do: participate in phases like this, but also step away early, maybe too early sometimes. But preserving discipline is part of long-term survival. Honestly, I don’t understand why the SEC hasn’t at least issued a warning here. Sweden’s Economic Crime Authority opened an investigation on 10 May 2026 in connection with Sivers. The name Serenity will almost certainly come up multiple times in that investigation. Before the hate comments start accusing me of trying to crash the party just because I apparently sold too early: I regret nothing. I know my strategy will succeed over the long run.
English
7
3
174
24.7K
Stan retweetledi
Oliver Burdick
Oliver Burdick@oliverburdick·
Amen
Oliver Burdick tweet media
English
25
420
6.2K
142K
Stan
Stan@Stan116547·
@aleabitoreddit You gotta thank them for the buy the dip opportunities 🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪
English
15
0
6
1.9K
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
I'm still laughing how much Swedish hate their own frontier companies so much. That they write hit pieces every day on $SIVE. This one was entertaining: Local journalists show up to an empty $SIVE administrative building uninvited. Because they can't fathom the CEO is in Silicon Valley or design team is working on US Gov CHIPS act dev in the US. And because there weren't many cars parked outside + CFO wouldn't take questions about secretive hyperscaler deal financials. They wrote a random negative hit piece. By repeating "There are several who make lasers like these and Sivers are far from alone". Several like $LITE, $COHR, $60B+ companies. and reported earlier that "CPO is nothing special, it's been around for years." While GS projects CPO going from $1B -> $91B TAM over the next two years. Even put "Plans" in quotation marks because they didn't think Sivers is supplying lasers to $JBL 1.6T LRO. IMO, $SIVE ends up as a $10B+ company next year, especially if they follow what $LITE / $COHR did with downstream IP integration to capture more of CPO module BOM. Just don't think Swedish people understand hyperscaler supply chains, concept of forward growth, or the fact that employee count doesn't equate to revenue. Transfer of control from local Swedish -> West is always appreciated, as this was a majority owned local retail company before.
Serenity tweet mediaSerenity tweet media
English
175
107
1.6K
529.3K
Stan retweetledi
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
We’ve agreed to a partnership with @SpaceX that will substantially increase our compute capacity. This, along with our other recent compute deals, means that we’ve been able to increase our usage limits for Claude Code and the Claude API.
English
4.8K
12.1K
131K
23.7M
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
Still think $AXTI was my most legendary thesis. Don’t think this will get beat by anything, now that it’s near ~$5.3B MC.
Serenity tweet media
Serenity@aleabitoreddit

Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies: 1. $AXTI ($700M) 2. $SMTOY ($31.7B) Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates. Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers. $AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra. Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters. After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics. And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of: - Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc) - Optical transceivers (5g, data) - LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military) -Optical Modules (interconnect clusters) - Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.) Since these companies make up majority of the market supply: -AXTI (est. ~30–35%) -Sumitomo (est.~30%) - JX Nippon (est. 10-15%) That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market") Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile. If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all. InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.

English
160
74
2K
423.3K
Stan retweetledi
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
“A man is what he thinks about all day.”—Emerson
English
434
765
9.2K
431.3K
Stan retweetledi
Asymmetric Bets
Asymmetric Bets@UncleAlpha007·
Typically when it feels like everyone is going to get rich, it’s time to sell. Life doesn’t work that way. Per Goldman’s data center report, I do think this is a once and a lifetime window to get insanely rich during this $7.6T build out. The best strategy, in my opinion, is to stick with a concentrated group of names that are destined to win. That’s why $SOI $SLOIF is my largest position. Sales go to $3B by 2029-2030, ebitda to $1.2B (25x multiple common) = $30B enterprise value. That’s 5x-6x from here.
Ren@Ren_aramb

Goldman just put a number on the AI buildout: $7.6T from 2026-2031. They explicitly flag optics as the next “buy out the store” chokepoint after memory. The numbers behind the thesis: +Compute alone is $5.1T of the $7.6T total +Annual AI capex grows from $765B in 2026 to $1.6T in 2031 +Data center cost per MW jumped from $10M (cloud era) to $15-20M (AI era) +A single $50K accelerator depreciates $10K/yr but goes economically obsolete faster than the schedule +NVIDIA’s GB300 NVL72 packs 72 processors per rack, linked by hundreds of thousands of km of cabling In the repot they state: similar episodes of intense, short-term pricing pressure are likely to recur across other critical components such as interconnect, optics, storage, and packaging.” Meaning the same dynamic that just sent memory parabolic is queued up across the entire physical layer of AI infrastructure. The “AI factory of the future” data center will pack 576 GPUs per rack at 500+ kW, requiring liquid-only cooling and millions of GPUs deployed at the >1 GW scale. None of that scales without optics. Memory just ran (still going). Photonics is just warming up. Full disclosure: Goldman is confirming what’s been playing since the late last year. A lot is already priced in. The alpha is front-running institutions, not reading their reports. But $7.6T over 6 years doesn’t get fully priced in 6 months. Plenty of runaway left.

English
10
23
455
91.8K
Stan
Stan@Stan116547·
@aleabitoreddit What is your view on Achilles Capital restructuring process where they could sell $SIVE stock? Would this give a huge blow to the stock in your opinion?
English
6
0
2
500
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
From the reference... it does look like Lightmatter uses $SIVE lasers? Which is brand new information discovery and extremely positive for Sivers. Lightmatter is a massive private leader (~$4.4B valuation back in 2024), with $TSM, $GFS, $TSEM, $AMKR, and $ASX scaling their optical program. And Lightmatter does require a light source... $SIVE also happens to be on the $GFS laser source suppliers alongside $LITE, so starting to put the dots together? End users are likely your hyperscalers like $MSFT, $GOOGL (they invested), $META, etc through Lightmatter-GUC and others. I don't think markets have priced all of this in, since all the supply chain BOM is very confidential + speculative. But when CPO and next-gen photonic architectures scale up, volume ramp revenue will appear out of nowhere on the balance sheet.
Serenity tweet media
Serenity@aleabitoreddit

Great find. Basically from old investor deck + fundraising amounts: Looks like Celestial has been direct customers of $SIVE. So: $MRVL is likely buying lasers direct from $SIVE now instead of through Poet (which bought Sivers lasers to package them). Since Celestial is designed around Sivers lasers originally. Marvell probably prepared to vertically integrate away packaging IP + assembly for higher margins anyway. Going direct to $MRVL is very bullish for $SIVE.

English
31
49
628
167.2K
Stan retweetledi
Zak Kukoff
Zak Kukoff@zck·
In 1953, George and Barbara Bush lost their daughter Robin to leukemia. She was three years old. Barbara's hair turned white that year — she was 28. By anyone's expectation, mine included, their grief should have defined the rest of their lives. Instead they made a decision: they would wake up every morning and be happy. It's an almost astounding level of mental discipline. The ability not to ignore your horrible loss but to say life is not over. I can choose how I feel. It's not a coincidence that he became president and she raised one. More importantly, they stayed married 73 years. "You have two choices," she said decades later. "You can be happy or you can be unhappy. Just choose to be happy." This is what's key: that mindset wasn't influencing the outcome. The mindset was the outcome. We tend to think of resilience as a trait people have, but it looks more like a series of small decisions, made unglamorously, that become habitual. Eventually, you'll even forget you're making them. The Bushes figured this out 70 years before the placebo sleep researchers did. Worth taking seriously.
Brandon Luu, MD@BrandonLuuMD

Literally just having a delusional golden retriever mindset measurably changes outcomes and physiology. Sleep badly? Convince yourself you're well rested. Stressful day? Convince yourself it's fuel. Failed? Convince yourself it's useful data.

English
30
348
4.3K
667.5K
Stan
Stan@Stan116547·
@Frenchie_ Meme sur SIVE qui est en amont de la chaîne?
Français
0
0
0
290
Frenchie
Frenchie@Frenchie_·
Ca touche absolument rien à mes convictions long termes
Français
4
0
8
3.2K
Frenchie
Frenchie@Frenchie_·
Gros coup sur la photonique $POET s’effondre de -45% en pré-marché La raison : Marvell a annulé toutes les commandes liées à Celestial AI, y compris celles de 2023, invoquant des violations de confidentialité. C’est un coup dur, parce que c’est précisément ce contrat (confirmé par le CFO la semaine dernière) qui a propulsé le titre de +185 % sur 30 jours avec aussi des promesse de rotations de capitaux vers cette boîte qui avait peu profité de la vague photonique. $POET dit conserver d’autres clients dont une commande séparée de 5 M$, mais le narratif “Marvell/Nvidia” qui justifiait la valorisation vient de s’envoler
Frenchie tweet media
Wall St Engine@wallstengine

$POET said Marvell canceled all purchase orders tied to Celestial AI, including initial production orders first disclosed in 2023. The cancellation was tied to alleged confidentiality breaches, while POET said it is still serving other customers, including a separate $5M order.

Français
29
4
120
43.1K
Stan
Stan@Stan116547·
@UncleAlpha007 What LT consequence for SIVE from your pov?
English
2
0
0
1.3K
Asymmetric Bets
Asymmetric Bets@UncleAlpha007·
$poet is the most obvious short here imho, even down 50%. NFA DYOD Violating an NDA with $mrvl? You dont come back from that. I bet $poet used the $mrvl contract to do their huge $300m+ raise. They are gunna get sued. Investors will want money back while its still there. This can spiral FAST. $MRVL $AAOI $LITE $COHR $SIVE
English
26
4
148
24K