Ste

@Dulgrim @jakozloski

@jakozloski @Ste1010208 It's not a direct lie, it's setting a lower value in fear of missing out and keeping options open, but in the end it was never really an option. It's the classic Stated vs Revealed Preferences. It's not just public, but also subconscious.

n=366k, Keeper data for women's height preferences: Won't go below: ~5'7" Ideal floor: ~5'11" Ideal ceiling: ~6'5" Max acceptable: 'as tall as the slider lets me click' — 217,857 women pegged 7'0" There is no upper bound on tall.

@chrisJS03_ @PolitlcsUK Who does?

@PolitlcsUK Amazing that people can be this gullible even after the mess that was Brexit Nigel Farage does not care about you

🚨 BREAKING: Sky News projects the UK would have a hung parliament with Reform as the largest party if today's results were a general election

@Dulgrim @jakozloski I got the impression these are parameters set within the dating app, not some kind of survey. I don't think women would set low height filters as some kind of virtue signalling when no-one is looking. Or maybe women in this particular app do, because it seems off...

@Ste1010208 @jakozloski This is self input data, vs the older data set that were match data. You can throw out at least 20-30% of the bottom values in anything that is self input, just because of human pity. So it checks-out

@kno_1one @lizisamused Brad Pitt and Leo Di Caprio are total outliers in terms of facial attractiveness. Even so, if they were 5'5" and not famous, the girls are going for Vince every time.

@lizisamused @Ste1010208 Women have no idea what they want and just regurgitate what they've been told is popular. No woman alive is passing by <6ft Brad Pitt or Leo for a 6'5"ft Vince Vaughn.

The height requirement in dating is painfully stupid. If a woman wants a guy who's taller than her, fine. Plenty of guys also want a girl who's shorter than they are. But wanting 6'+ strikes me as a trophy thing for women. I don't buy it's an innate preference because older generations didn't focus on this nearly as much. It was *nice* if your boyfriend was tall; it wasn't a requirement. And I've heard some horror stories from men: a girl showing up to the date, saying he's too short, & RUNNING AWAY. Women asking how tall the guy is as the convo opener on an app. Women can't claim they're the less superficial sex & then reject the vast majority of their dating pool. What especially bugs me is women who say everyone's allowed preferences. Wanting a guy who treats you well? Fine. Rejecting anyone who doesn't tower over you, regardless of other positive traits? Odd. And the dehumanizing language toward short men is insane. Claiming tall guys have better personalities, short guys are dangerous or angry, etc. What's especially wild: data shows height doesn't strongly impact a man's # of sexual partners. But this may change if women won't even give the 5'9" (literally average) guy a chance. The 5'9" Gen X & millennial men I knew did just fine. But Gen Z men increasingly have to impress online as opposed to IRL, so height becomes a more important factor. Even IRL, if the trend among women is to view any guy under 6' or so as a "manlet," that impacts most men. It's odd to watch women complain about objectification...and then objectify men to the point only 15% of women would give a guy who's 5'8" a shot on a dating app. I feel for young people. It's a different world now...

@lizisamused They possibly convinced themselves they were, but if they had free reign as they do today, they'd be going after 6ft+ guys, no doubt about it.

@Ste1010208 Right but most women were probably fine with average height men. That's changed.

@JohnAnthonyLife What has this video got to do with approaching women and text game? Bizarre take.

this isn't the real black pill—it's just another excuse to avoid doing the work been coaching guys for 15+ years and the dudes crying about "the system" or "societal collapse" are the same ones who won't approach 5 women a week or fix their texting game. meanwhile my clients are pulling consistently because they treat dating like a skill game, not a rigged casino the actual pill: your results come from volume + calibration, not economic theory. i've had broke students in collapsing economies get hotter girlfriends than rich guys in booming cities because they understood the numbers game and executed daily wrote a whole breakdown on why external blame kills your results faster than bad logistics

@HotForMoot Guy on the right has no business being on Hinge or any other dating app for that matter

Type of picture the guy on the right posts on his hinge

@thereallgame So basically try to behave like someone else? Not worth it for these girls.

The worst advice you could ever listen to when it comes to combatting modern dating is become as rich as possible There are TONS of rich guys starving for women The only way to win is to be elite at psychology/game/energy They are exposed to money 24/7 via IG It means next to nothing now

@husseinhhakim @100kDiary Someone is paying for the depreciation. Hint: it's you.

@100kDiary Well no, leasing means you don’t own it. So why does depreciation matter? Its going back regardless

Unpopular opinion: Leasing a brand new car is the most financially illiterate thing normalised in the UK. You're paying £500/month for something that loses 40% of its value by the time you hand it back. Then you sign up for another one. A £5,000 used car does the exact same job. Gets you from A to B. Doesn't care about your ego. The difference over 10 years? Roughly £60k. Your car isn't a flex. It's a monthly donation to a dealership. Agree or disagree? 👇

@LW1307 @permabulla Girls love that shit

@permabulla The dude literally uses crystal meth. He's a train wreck. He's a broke poor version of King Solomon, minus the wisdom as well.

Foid INSTANTLY folds for Clavicular Clav: I had sex with another girl last night, so now I’m moving onto you Foid: oh, I’m not like in the lineup, I’m either ONE or NONE Clav: oh definitely NONE then Foid: I’m jk you can add me to the lineup

@Mercian_Man Brutal but 100% correct. No gym for the face. You either have it or you don't.

“I see you’ve been looking at my Insta stories so you must’ve seen my progress haha” “…” “Im on a brutal cut, trying to get sub 10% bf before June. Lean is law! Haha” “Oh I’ll be away in Santorini in June”

@PelopeAl41549 They'll have done things far, far worse than this...

How do these women go about their lives knowing they’ve reduced themselves to an accessory to some drugged up autist on a twitch stream

@elonmusk He's also pretty good at pointing out your own hypocrisy to be fair

Bernie Sanders’s hypocrisy explained by his own posts 😂

@WeBackbhyw @FrenchOG3 100% correct. There isn't always a solution. Just like there wasn't a solution for an average woman 50/60 years ago; they had to marry the regular guy from their town or face a life of destitution. The average guy now has to marry a past whore who doesn't genuinely like them.

@FrenchOG3 Reality: most men are going to marry washed up retired 304’s bc that’s their only option if they wanna get married. We live in a society where most women are looking for tall, handsome and rich.. most of these men get snatched up early or are players. It’s the sad reality

Solutions for the Average Man. Long-Term: Use Them as Clean Up Women because they decided to take the role of the provider - just wait for the post 40yo mark when their value curve goes below par - give her that emotional support in exchange for the infrastructure set-up she had whilst you fuck other women on the side. Short-Term: Enjoy Short-Term opportunistic set-ups where both agendas align but don’t expect much long-term as you are a placeholder. This can be fun, and does not need to be with lower value or older girls.

@FrenchOG3 Agree with almost everything he says, apart from 2 things: 1. The idea that he himself is having success is laughable 2. I'm sure his solution is a course on game and "high value" nonsense. The sad fact is that there is no solution for average guys. We're pretty much screwed.

Reality check.

@thekitze Not getting stabbed

i'm really curious dafuq are people doing over here

@freedombill3 Why do you presume the cars are leased? No rich person I know leases their car.

Walking past a David Lloyd car park on a Saturday afternoon looks like an absolute parade of pure wealth. You see endless rows of brand new Porsche 911s and Range Rovers sitting outside the premium gym and spa. It looks like the ultimate definition of success, but the reality behind the dashboard is completely different. Let us look at the actual numbers keeping that illusion alive. To put a brand new Porsche 911 por Range Rover on your driveway, you are easily handing over £1,200 - £1,500 every single month on a PCP finance deal. Then you are paying another two hundred quid a month just for the premium gym membership so you have somewhere flash to park it. That is nearly £1,700 pounds leaving the current account every single month, to rent an aesthetic. Over a single year, that is a full £20,000 Stocks and Shares ISA allowance completely wiped out. They are literally going broke just to look rich to people they do not even know. If the monthly salary stops, the car gets repossessed and the membership gets cancelled almost instantly. Real wealth is not driving a rented supercar to a premium treadmill. Real wealth is driving a standard car that you own outright, while your cash buys slices of the S&P 500 $VUSA or Vanguard Global $VWRL in the background. Are you funding a car dealership's profit margin? Or are you building freedom? Please don't rent the illusion.

@historyrock_ Day 2 by a long way and it doesn't even include the best UK live act...The Who