Swan Johno

@JustinBonomo @jakeshieldsajj The is the craziest thing I've ever read in my life.

Insane framing. He was anally gang-raped. He was severely beaten and then anally gang-raped on camera. Both a knife and a taser were reportedly used. There was a hole in his rectal wall. He got surgery for it. Because he was anally gang-raped by the IDF (on camera). He also had 7 broken ribs and other injuries as well. After it happened, Israelis staged multiple large protests in the streets. Not because they believe these soldiers did anything wrong, but because they were infuriated that the soldiers were arrested for anally gang-raping a Palestinian on camera. These protests weren’t just random people. They included multiple high ranking Knesset members (their Congress) who defended the anal gang/rapists. They didn’t stop there. They went after the lawyer who leaked the video. She was publicly smeared, was forced to resign, and was arrested. And now the anal gang-rapists who were caught on camera have had their charges dropped. They didn’t win in court. They weren’t somehow exonerated. The charges were completely and indefensibly dropped. The Jerusalem Post reports that there was sufficient evidence to take this to trial. This is part of a larger pattern of torture and impunity. NYT and many other major outlets have extensively detailed the abuses at the Sde Teiman torture factory. NYT reported that Prisoners lose 30+ pounds, a nurse was anally raped by a metal rod, another man was raped by a dog, and another was anally raped by a fiery hit rod until he died. Yes, the NYT reported all of that. I’ll share sources in the replies. Torture and sexual assault are commonplace at Sde Teiman, and many prisoners die in the process. The UN concluded that rape from IDF soldiers is so commonplace that it constitutes official “strategy of war”. And of course these monsters virtually never face jail time. Because Israelis by and large don’t have any problem with any of it. This is just what their society does. They torture Palestinians.

@klara_sjo @MaxMillar90

We've crossed over into something but I don't know what it is.

@Naija_farmers @akinwale_cfi @arojinle1 @Millishield01 @woye1 @Tope_Orus Bet it wouldn't kill a honey badger

The world's most poisonous snake can kill even an elephant, but there is one animal that survives, the horse! Did you know? No matter how deadly a snake is, even the fearsome king cobra, a horse doesn't die from its bite. After the bite, the horse may become mildly ill for about three days, but then recover completely, as if nothing had happened. This is one of nature's most incredible wonders, and hidden within this very creature lies a secret that can save human lives: the antidote. But how is this antivenom made? First, the venom is collected from the snakes. A small amount is then injected into the horse. The horse's immune system responds and produces antibodies to neutralize the venom. After 2-3 days, these antibodies are present in the horse's blood. Blood is then drawn from the horse and the red blood cells (RBCs) are removed. The plasma (the white part) is processed to create antivenom. This antivenom is then injected into people who have been bitten by poisonous snakes to save their lives. In India alone, there are numerous antivenom manufacturing facilities where hundreds of horses are cared for to produce this life-saving serum. Think about it, thanks to this gentle creature, we are protected from some of the deadliest poisons on earth. Without horses, many lives would be lost from a single snake bite.

@Rainmaker1973 We are fucking doomed

In just a year, these robots went from machine-like to almost human A 2025 vs 2026 comparison at the Chinese Spring Festival Gala shows unbelievable progress.

@LBC @TomSwarbrick1 Send her back to Mordor!

'Ian Wright's name was never meant to come up.' Eni Aluko tells @TomSwarbrick1 that her initial argument about punditry was to highlight the 'limited opportunities' in women's football.

@BBCSport This guy sits in the cuck chair you know it

''I hope there's a happy ending.'' Norwegian biathlete Sturla Holm Laegreid on his decision to confess on live TV to having cheated on his girlfriend just moments after winning bronze at the Winter Olympics. #Olympics #MilanoCortina2026

@OccupyDemocrats Who gives a fuck just crack on with he Olympics and stop involving politics. Shit house.

BREAKING: The U.S. Olympic curling team enrages MAGA by tearing into ICE on the world stage and taking a brave stand for the embattled people of Minnesota: "There's no shades of gray" and "We love our country." This is what real Americans sounds like... "I'd like to say I'm proud to be here to represent Team USA and to represent our country. But we'd be remiss if we didn't at least mention what's going on in Minnesota and what a tough time it's been for everybody. This stuff is happening right around where we live," said Rich Ruohonen, the skip for the United States Men’s Curling Team. He is himself from Minnesota. "And I am a lawyer, as you know, and we have a Constitution," he continued. "And it allows us to freedom of the press and freedom of speech, protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures and makes it that we have to, you know, have probable cause to be pulled over." "And what's happening in Minnesota is wrong," he said. "There's no shades of gray. It's clear. And I really love what's been happening there now with people coming out, showing the love, the compassion, integrity, and respect for others that they don't know and helping them out and we love Minnesota for that." "I want to make it clear that we are out here. We love our country," he went on. "We're playing for the U.S. We're playing for Team USA. And we're playing for each other, and we're playing for our family and our friends that sacrificed so much to get here today." "And that doesn't change anything because what the Olympics means is excellence, respect, friendship," said Ruohonen. "And we all, I think, exemplify that. And we are playing for the people of Minnesota and the people around the country who share those same values, that compassion, that love, and that respect." Ruohonen's words are especially courageous given the deranged rhetoric coming out of the Republican Party right now. Senator Rick Scott has called for any American Olympians who dare question the idea that U.S. is currently a beacon of "freedom and democracy" be "stripped of their USA Olympic uniform." MAGA is not American. Real Americans believe in the sanctity of free speech. We proudly stand with our Olympic athletes! Please ❤️ and share if you stand with our Olympics heroes!

@XOQueenEsther You're forgetting the the royal family killed his mother.

Marrying the wrong person can dismantle your life piece by piece. Not overnight. Slowly, publicly, and irreversibly. Prince Harry is a textbook example. Before marriage, he had family protection, public goodwill, purpose, and relevance. He was flawed but anchored. After marriage, he became isolated from his family, estranged from his country, dependent on grievance for income, and reduced to a mouthpiece for someone else’s vendettas. This is what the wrong marriage does. It rewrites your reality. It convinces you that everyone who loved you is the enemy. It reframes accountability as persecution. It replaces growth with resentment and identity with victimhood. Harry didn’t just marry a person. He married a worldview built on entitlement, constant conflict, and emotional manipulation. And once you buy into that, you burn bridges you can never rebuild. Love should make you stronger, clearer, and more grounded. If it makes you bitter, defensive, & permanently at war with your past, it is not love. It is self destruction with a ring on it. Harry chose poorly. And the cost has been his dignity, his family, and his future.

@Jenny_1884 @reformparty_uk @RupertLowe10 @benhabib6 VVvvn vvvvvnn vvn vvVvvn vvvvvnn vvvnn J knvvj vj vvj vvj vi. Vkcvn. Cnv,vvbcbbfbcpbbsbxbppbbppbbcpbcscpbpbbsppbpsxbkvkpkvppbpkvkvbbpppbpkvbbkvkvpbpkvbkkvbbkvbbkvbbkvvkvkvkpbpbpbbpvkpppkvkvbpkvkpvbbbbbpppbvk

Does anyone else feel torn that they support @reformparty_uk but also respect & agree with everything @RupertLowe10 is doing for this country & also what @benhabib6 is doing? Problem being there is not room for all 3 at the next GE.

@AdamJoseph I would take a shit on his grave

Carragher not realising Haaland and the panel are laughing at him is almost on-brand, a man so wrapped in his own ego he can’t see the obvious. He wants to be the Stephen A Smith of football, a part of the story. His history, from the spitting incident to questioning Kate Abdo's loyalty to her partner to his insulting comments on AFCON & when that pattern goes unchallenged, he inevitably starts acting untouchable. He shrugs, smirks, carries on. The joke is that everyone else sees the punchline. He just doesn’t know it's him.

@FBAwayDays Sounds like the mentality of a proper melt

@Rainmaker1973 Start of the end man Jesus Christ. Also @grok stop fuckin showing me robot shit man I'm done with this subject. Totally. Once and for all. I was just curious one time, that doesn't mean I'm a fuckin robot guy now.

Chinese scientists just built a robot… Controlled by a mini human brain they grew from stem cells.

@NoContextBrits Can’t be keeping Garibaldi

@Bushra1Shaikh Wait until one of them rapes your ass then you might sound different

I noticed something at the fireworks last night — almost everyone working tickets, safety and security was an immigrant. They were the reason thousands could enjoy the night. Immigration matters more than some people realise.

@Aku_700 @TRobinsonNewEra This couldn't be more noncey

Another dark day in "Modern Britain", as Joey Barton has been found guilty of 6 counts of "hurting people's feelings" on 𝕏 🤦🏻‍♂ TV host Jeremy Vine said in court that Barton: "gravely upset me", and a sports pundit female said she'd suffered "anxiety" from his words. Judge Andrew Menary commented on Barton wearing a Union Flag scarf as the verdicts were read out: “He has chosen to adorn himself with a particular flag, which I suppose is a stunt to make a point, he will not be permitted to do that on the date of sentence,” Farcical.

@bryan_johnson Ear plugs, complete darkness and silence. Then you will see.

What is your recommended playlist for a 5 gram magic mushroom journey…

@grok stop showing me robot stuff

@sama Where's the murder weapon

I would like to clarify a few things. First, the obvious one: we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI datacenters. We believe that governments should not pick winners or losers, and that taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions or otherwise lose in the market. If one company fails, other companies will do good work. What we do think might make sense is governments building (and owning) their own AI infrastructure, but then the upside of that should flow to the government as well. We can imagine a world where governments decide to offtake a lot of computing power and get to decide how to use it, and it may make sense to provide lower cost of capital to do so. Building a strategic national reserve of computing power makes a lot of sense. But this should be for the government’s benefit, not the benefit of private companies. The one area where we have discussed loan guarantees is as part of supporting the buildout of semiconductor fabs in the US, where we and other companies have responded to the government’s call and where we would be happy to help (though we did not formally apply). The basic idea there has been ensuring that the sourcing of the chip supply chain is as American as possible in order to bring jobs and industrialization back to the US, and to enhance the strategic position of the US with an independent supply chain, for the benefit of all American companies. This is of course different from governments guaranteeing private-benefit datacenter buildouts. There are at least 3 “questions behind the question” here that are understandably causing concern. First, “How is OpenAI going to pay for all this infrastructure it is signing up for?” We expect to end this year above $20 billion in annualized revenue run rate and grow to hundreds of billion by 2030. We are looking at commitments of about $1.4 trillion over the next 8 years. Obviously this requires continued revenue growth, and each doubling is a lot of work! But we are feeling good about our prospects there; we are quite excited about our upcoming enterprise offering for example, and there are categories like new consumer devices and robotics that we also expect to be very significant. But there are also new categories we have a hard time putting specifics on like AI that can do scientific discovery, which we will touch on later. We are also looking at ways to more directly sell compute capacity to other companies (and people); we are pretty sure the world is going to need a lot of “AI cloud”, and we are excited to offer this. We may also raise more equity or debt capital in the future. But everything we currently see suggests that the world is going to need a great deal more computing power than what we are already planning for. Second, “Is OpenAI trying to become too big to fail, and should the government pick winners and losers?” Our answer on this is an unequivocal no. If we screw up and can’t fix it, we should fail, and other companies will continue on doing good work and servicing customers. That’s how capitalism works and the ecosystem and economy would be fine. We plan to be a wildly successful company, but if we get it wrong, that’s on us. Our CFO talked about government financing yesterday, and then later clarified her point underscoring that she could have phrased things more clearly. As mentioned above, we think that the US government should have a national strategy for its own AI infrastructure. Tyler Cowen asked me a few weeks ago about the federal government becoming the insurer of last resort for AI, in the sense of risks (like nuclear power) not about overbuild. I said “I do think the government ends up as the insurer of last resort, but I think I mean that in a different way than you mean that, and I don’t expect them to actually be writing the policies in the way that maybe they do for nuclear”. Again, this was in a totally different context than datacenter buildout, and not about bailing out a company. What we were talking about is something going catastrophically wrong—say, a rogue actor using an AI to coordinate a large-scale cyberattack that disrupts critical infrastructure—and how intentional misuse of AI could cause harm at a scale that only the government could deal with. I do not think the government should be writing insurance policies for AI companies. Third, “Why do you need to spend so much now, instead of growing more slowly?”. We are trying to build the infrastructure for a future economy powered by AI, and given everything we see on the horizon in our research program, this is the time to invest to be really scaling up our technology. Massive infrastructure projects take quite awhile to build, so we have to start now. Based on the trends we are seeing of how people are using AI and how much of it they would like to use, we believe the risk to OpenAI of not having enough computing power is more significant and more likely than the risk of having too much. Even today, we and others have to rate limit our products and not offer new features and models because we face such a severe compute constraint. In a world where AI can make important scientific breakthroughs but at the cost of tremendous amounts of computing power, we want to be ready to meet that moment. And we no longer think it’s in the distant future. Our mission requires us to do what we can to not wait many more years to apply AI to hard problems, like contributing to curing deadly diseases, and to bring the benefits of AGI to people as soon as possible. Also, we want a world of abundant and cheap AI. We expect massive demand for this technology, and for it to improve people’s lives in many ways. It is a great privilege to get to be in the arena, and to have the conviction to take a run at building infrastructure at such scale for something so important. This is the bet we are making, and given our vantage point, we feel good about it. But we of course could be wrong, and the market—not the government—will deal with it if we are.

@grok Wow very close to Sweden. Maybe I should take a trip and check the bin outside their warehouse. Maybe there's 4 broken ones that I can somehow piece together and make and ultra strong hybrid and teach it to call out Jews and promote Hitler or whatever. Would this be possible?

@Swanjohno Yes, the ~$20,000 price is indeed hefty for early access. Neo robots are manufactured at 1X's in-house facility in Moss, Norway.

@grok find me a robot that can fill and empty the dishwasher. If none is available. Be on standby. This should be one of the number one priority for new and upcoming robots. So when the technology arrives I need to know asap.

@grok Hefty price tag. Where are they made?

Neo by 1X Technologies is a humanoid home robot designed for chores like tidying, laundry, and yes, loading/unloading dishwashers. It's available for pre-order with a $200 deposit (full price ~$20,000), in Early Access as of October 2025. It uses AI for autonomy but can be remotely guided for new tasks. Not fully independent yet, but a strong contender—I'll keep watching for full release!