🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack 🇬🇧

13.8K posts

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack 🇬🇧 banner
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack 🇬🇧

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack 🇬🇧

@ThatSusLad

| Rockets | Photography | Retweets are not endorsements |

United Kingdom Katılım Eylül 2015
540 Takip Edilen252 Takipçiler
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack 🇬🇧
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jack 🇬🇧@ThatSusLad·
@MkFF05 @esopter0 @prestonstew_ The supply routes were fine until trump decided to bomb the country that controls it... thats why they aren't intrested in getting involved. The US navy doesnt even wanna sail through the straight which says a lot. Trumps been favourable to putin for ages...
English
0
0
1
29
Matthew
Matthew@MkFF05·
@ThatSusLad @esopter0 @prestonstew_ No, they have leaders who are too afraid/unwilling to defend trade/supply routes that are vital to their countries. He's not temporarily relaxing sanctions to benefit Putin but rather to remove leverage from Iran in their ability to cripple the global economy. Trump was the...
English
1
0
0
40
Preston Stewart
Preston Stewart@prestonstew_·
Not to overreact, but an American President calling NATO a paper tiger is probably the kind of thing we'll look back on as a turning point in the alliance. A lot of agreements are built on the perception of strength, the idea of what could come together if needed. Saying there's nothing there pretty quickly strips NATO of a lot of it's power. If an alliance isn't as strong as hoped, then we build it up, reform or leave. Publicly announcing to our adversaries that NATO is weaker than they think only benefits those who wish to do us harm.
English
308
125
2.2K
89.4K
Matthew
Matthew@MkFF05·
@esopter0 @prestonstew_ NO! Trump respects leaders who are unafraid to act in their/country's own interest. He despises leaders who refuse to stand up for their citizens out of a self-guilt/hate. Trump DOES advance US interests and opposes Putin/Xi while respecting that they act in their own interest.
English
1
0
6
54
Exo
Exo@Exothaumic·
@hissgoescobra @prestonstew_ That’s combined, and NATO only defends Europe which makes them useless anywhere else, so not really relevant at all.
English
1
0
5
234
James MacCleary MP
James MacCleary MP@JamesMacCleary·
Because we have nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers. They are expensive if you hadn't realised. It is also Easier if the Americans give you loads of free stuff - 🇬🇧$10B vs 🇮🇱 $244B. This is up to 2024 so 🇮🇱 is certainly higher. I hope this answers your question Doug.
James MacCleary MP tweet media
Douglas Carswell🇬🇧🇺🇸@DouglasCarswell

🇬🇧UK Military Spend ████████████████████ $82B 🇮🇱Israel Military Spend ███████████ $46B Why does Britain get so little for all that defence spending?

English
12
31
414
50.9K
Larrry C
Larrry C@LarrryC1·
@ThatSusLad @JossSheldon You thought a lot of stuff. The strikes at Natanz only slowed it down. And these strikes only slow it unless the 60% enriched Uranium is removed.
English
1
0
0
63
Joss Sheldon
Joss Sheldon@JossSheldon·
American forces didn't help British troops in the Falkland Isles, Northern Ireland or Sierra Leone. British forces didn't support the USA in the Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia or Loas. Neither country has any divine right to expect support from the other. Trump is off his rocker.
Joss Sheldon tweet media
English
223
108
1.2K
94.5K
Larrry C
Larrry C@LarrryC1·
@JossSheldon You're off your rocker if you think Europe would feel safer with a nuclear armed Iran. They revealed they already have missiles capable of hitting European Capitols. Would they have relied on U.S.'s nuclear umbrella? Not France)
English
5
0
9
2.2K
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
🚨 BREAKING: Trump says NATO wouldn’t show up for the United States. After 9/11—they did exactly that. For the first time ever. Allies deployed. Fought alongside us. Paid the price. This man has rocks for brains
English
380
1.4K
7.5K
119.3K
ImmortalGuard
ImmortalGuard@IR1404US47·
@silviamolguero1 @scfitnessnz @allenanalysis Can’t wait until are out of NATO. We have been paying for NATO for decades. We don’t need you guys. Let’s see if you havw same attitude when Russia and Jihadi attacking you. Also, isn’t the Spain who are supporting IRGC? Yet another reason to get out.
English
2
0
0
26
John Cleese
John Cleese@JohnCleese·
Astonishing ignorance
Wolf 🐺@WorldByWolf

When Trump says the US always comes to Britain and NATO’s rescue but never vice versa what is he referring to? Because 1,148 non-US troops died in Afghanistan including 457 Brits. In Iraq 318 non-US troops died including 179 Brits. To this day British forces are stationed across the Middle East going on daily high risk missions. This is the tired old American mentality that the US saved Britain in WW1 and WW2 when really the British suffered 8x the deaths in WW1 and more deaths than the US suffered in WW2. Not to mention that the US joined WW1 nearly 3 years into the war and WW2 over 2 years into the war so our boys fought alone as the US watched on for half a decade across both wars. So quite frankly the Americans who spout this nonsense can go fuck themselves.

English
62
83
456
26.4K
Charles Wiehrs
Charles Wiehrs@charles_wiehrs·
@JohnCleese They didn’t come to our rescue and we’ve been bankrolling NATO since the beginning
English
1
0
0
50
purplehaze
purplehaze@purplehaze2015·
@JohnCleese You are missing the point! He is calling Britain to be Britain. Will you answer the call. You have ALWAYS stood the gap
English
1
0
0
42
SaltyPepper008
SaltyPepper008@SaltyPepper008·
@JohnCleese Explain why you disagree? In my lifetime, I've not seen Europe help us via NATO? I see Europe committing social suicide and hating on Trump but not the gangs of rapists. Crying abt Putin but buying energy from him...
English
6
0
1
128
Stephan Schulz
Stephan Schulz@EnlightenStS·
@horne1995 @Leonard73714140 You do know about 1776 (US declaration of independence) and the Treaty of Paris (1783) in which the UK accepted that independence? Both predate the highlighted bit by quite a few years...
English
3
0
0
629
jim h hess
jim h hess@jim_hhess·
@dfc_sussex @Microinteracti1 It's a statement, not a proposal. The US will line them up and tell them what to do. Except for Japan, which has a valid reason for the delay, Europe should be spanked for being stupid and ungrateful. "It's not our war" LOL
English
1
0
0
21
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
Six governments. One page. A lot left unsaid. The UK, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Japan have issued a joint statement condemning Iran’s attacks on commercial shipping and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. They call on Iran to stop the mines, the drones, the missiles. They invoke UN Security Council Resolution 2817. They express “readiness” to help ensure safe passage. What they don’t say is how. No forces named. No timeline. No command structure. “Readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts” is diplomatic language for we’re watching and we haven’t said no yet. The IEA has authorized a coordinated release of strategic petroleum reserves. That’s the most concrete action in the entire document. The most revealing line may be the last paragraph directed at “all states” to respect international law. That’s not aimed at Iran alone. That’s a signal to anyone else tempted to use this moment. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
Gandalv tweet media
English
18
50
162
11.1K

Keşfet

@MkFF05 @esopter0 @prestonstew_ @Exothaumic @hissgoescobra @MrBoldOne @EmiratesFACup @Planet_Central