David H Windsor

@ClarkeMicah @DailyMail You thick twat Hitchens - we can’t even build a Trainline to ‘the norf’ 🙄

Britain must build its own Bomb, as France has done, not rely on US help which may also be a hindrance. . mol.im/a/15660465 via @DailyMail

@PeterStefanovi2 Peace talks that last 50 years ain’t peace talks you thick fuckwit 🙄

“This was a war of choice, there was a peace process under way” Wes Streeting says while he has “no doubt” about the “threat” the Iranian regime posed, the gov’t “evidently” thinks US strikes on Iran are a mistake & peace talks “needed more time” #bbcqt

@TRobinsonNewEra Where & when can we watch this?

From the streets of Luton to addressing members of congress in the United States of America. This time last year I was in solitary confinement, in a maximum security prison full of Islamic extremists - for the crime of exposing the UK's corrupt government, judiciary, and media in a now deleted documentary called SILENCED. Well @Keir_Starmer your attempt to destroy me hasn't worked, I'm in the USA to give a presentation that will expose every failure of consecutive British governments that have been either unwilling or too cowardly to deal with the civilisational problems we now face. I am here to warn all those in congress, the time is now! People must be politically engaged and prepared to fight the battle that is already here - to save the land of the free. #OpenBorders #Immigration

@DavidLammy @louistheroux Hmn, ‘majority’ mixed race/ethnic boys from fatherless households - maybe don’t make it so easy for young ethnic girls who have sex to have kids, to get a house on benefits, without knowing who the father is 🤷‍♂️

Inside the Manosphere by @louistheroux illustrates the need to support boys and young men in Britain with a more positive vision for their future. As Deputy PM and as a dad, I’m committed to making sure they have the role models, opportunities and support they need to thrive.

@Osint613 At least their white flag was predictable 🙄

Macron says France will “never” join operations to secure the Strait of Hormuz: “We are not a party to the conflict.”

@RoyalFamily @jackmrankin @officialABAT Any Christians massacred at the chateau ce soir, your Maj?

🇳🇬 🇬🇧 This evening, The King and Queen hosted a State Banquet at Windsor Castle, in honour of The President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Mr. Bola Ahmed Tinubu, and First Lady, Mrs. Oluremi Tinubu.

@jonsopel @GreenblattJD @maitlis @TheNewsAgents @realDonaldTrump Have you interviewed your ‘bestie’ Huw yet? 🙄

@GreenblattJD @maitlis @TheNewsAgents @realDonaldTrump We appreciated too. Thanks, and come back again.

Tough questions. No softballs. Appreciated the conversation with @jonsopel & @maitlis on @TheNewsAgents where they’re clearly no fans of @realdonaldtrump, and that’s ok. The most important conversations happen across disagreement. I shared my perspective on President Trump and the war against the Iranian regime. Watch. Decide for yourself. (interview starts at 4:18) youtu.be/EQ76a8Yg7jY?si… via @YouTube

@implausibleblog @campbellclaret Just to bail out you fucking left wing Eurocrats again???

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, "Let us say to our British friends" "If they stand ready to return to the EU Single Market with all associated privileges and duties" "They will be be met with open arms" Sounds like a plan. Who's in?

@dominicgrieve_ @CarolineLucas @NJ_Timothy Prayer is for a fucking church or mosque - not in secular public spaces you thick cnut

I am very happy to engage with you on the substance. We have never discussed your views on Islam. But you made them clear when introducing your ten minute rule bill in the Commons very recently, as you were perfectly entitled to do. I agree that mass prayer in public by large groups without prior permission, that aims to disrupt the activities of others, can be an act of 'domination' just as a sit down on Westminster Bridge or the M25 can be or any other illegal demonstration or one accompanied by threats or harassment. This did not apply to this gathering in Trafalgar Square. It was done with permission. It comprised short prayers followed by an Iftar to break the Ramadan fast. It threatened no one any more than the Palm Sunday procession ( with permission) in which I shall participate shortly where I live and where there will be hymns to the effect that Jesus Christ is Lord. Your original post says that this event 'should not happen again'. You are the Shadow Justice Secretary, perhaps one day the person who will take an oath to uphold the rule of law. As I put to you in my last post, stopping such an event would be unlawful and discriminatory unless you intend to advocate changing the law to discriminate against Muslims. Is that what you are saying? So far you have not attempted to answer this question. Lots of replies to your original post highlight that freedom of religious expression does not exist in many countries and that some of these countries have Muslim majorities and persecute minority faiths. We will, I am sure, have a shared revulsion at this. But this is surely all the more reason why we should stand up for the values of freedom under law which our forefathers have given to us. Finally you suggest that my 'world'' is falling apart'. I am not sure what world vision you are referring to. As a long standing Conservative I am a pragmatic realist about the world and its shortcomings as I might expect you to be too. I also believe that in times when there are challenges to the values of freedom and democratic pluralism there is a need for all people of goodwill to be voices of assertive moderation. Your original post comes across as entirely contrary to this and as a call to confrontation on no valid basis.

The wilful misunderstanding in this post says everything about the people behind the “Islamophobia” definition. The point is not that Sikhs have danced on Trafalgar Square. Or that the Passion Play has been hosted there. Neither is the point that Muslims gathered on Trafalgar Square. The point is that mass ritual prayer in public - in this case next to a church - is an act of domination. So is the public call of the Adhan, which explicitly denies other religions including Christianity. That is the difference. And yet neither Dominic - nor the Labour MPs who were instructed by No10 to attack me last night - will engage with the substance. Instead he claims he knows my personal views when we haven’t talked, and incorrectly describes me as a spokesman for the Free Speech Union. People like Dominic can’t work out why the ideological world they built is falling apart. They never pause to wonder if perhaps they might have got things very badly wrong.

@kevlondon4 I look forward to hearing those security guards lost their jobs for attacking members of the free press/public and a publicly accessible road. Power trip security don’t have special dispensation to break the law and should be charged accordingly

It's All Hands On With DJ & PJ Auditors & Security At Wrens Kitchens Falkland Way Barton-Upon-Humber.

@BishopDewar @danwootton As an atheist, I find this wholly compelling and highly articulate 👏

As a Bishop, I cannot stay silent. I have today drafted and sent an open letter to His Majesty King Charles III, the text of which reads as follows: To: His Majesty, Charles III, King of the United Kingdom and the Realms, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Bearer of the ancient title Defender of the Faith. Your Majesty, I write to you neither as a politician nor as a commentator, but as one of your loyal subjects who, as a bishop of Christ’s Church, cannot remain silent while the Christian foundations of this kingdom are steadily dismantled. Sir, there are moments in the life of a nation when silence becomes a form of betrayal. If I refused to speak to Your Majesty now, this would be such a moment. For more than a thousand years the Crown of this realm has stood in solemn covenant with the Christian faith. The laws of this land were shaped by it. The liberties of our people were nurtured by it. The conscience of our civilisation was formed by it. From the abbeys of medieval England to the parish churches of our villages, from the preaching of the Reformers to the missionary zeal that carried the Gospel to the ends of the earth, the Christian faith has not merely influenced Britain — it has defined her. Yet today that inheritance is being quietly but deliberately eroded. Across the institutions of this nation there is a growing hostility toward the faith that built them. Christian belief is mocked in the public square. Christian morality is dismissed as intolerance. Christian institutions are pressured to surrender doctrine in order to conform to the ideology of the age. Within the very Church that bears the name of England, voices have arisen that appear more eager to mirror the spirit of the age than to proclaim the eternal truth of the Gospel. Meanwhile, beyond the walls of our churches, powerful political movements openly speak of removing Christianity from its historic place within the life of this nation. What would once have been whispered is now proclaimed openly: that Britain must become a post-Christian state. It is in this context that I write to you, Your Majesty. For the British Crown does not stand apart from this crisis. The Sovereign of this realm bears a title that is not merely historic but sacred in its origin and meaning: Defender of the Faith. Those words are not decorative. They are a charge. They speak of a monarch whose duty is not merely to preside over the ceremonies of the Church, but to stand as a guardian of the Christian inheritance of the nation. Yet many among your subjects now ask, with increasing anxiety: “Who will defend that inheritance today?” They see a nation drifting from its foundations. And they ask whether the Crown will remain silent while that inheritance is dismantled. Your Majesty, may I be so bold as to observe that your coronation oath was not a poetic formality. It was a solemn vow made before Almighty God to maintain and preserve the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law. Those words bind the conscience of the sovereign. They remind the Crown that its authority is not merely constitutional but moral. The monarch is not merely a symbol of national continuity, but a custodian of the spiritual inheritance that shaped this realm. History records moments when kings and emperors were confronted by the Church and reminded that their authority was accountable before God. In the fourth century Ambrose of Milan stood before the Emperor Theodosius I and reminded him that even the ruler of an empire must bow before the moral law of Christ. That tradition of prophetic witness has never disappeared. Nor should it. For when rulers forget the foundations upon which their authority rests, the Church must speak — not with hostility, but with holy clarity. And so, I write to say this, Your Majesty: The Christian character of this nation is under profound and accelerating assault. If the Crown does not stand visibly and courageously in defence of that inheritance, history will record that the guardians of Britain’s institutions watched in silence as the foundations were removed. The issue before us is not nostalgia. It is civilisation. Remove Christianity from the story of Britain and you do not create a neutral society — you create a moral vacuum. And history teaches us that moral vacuums are never left empty for long. Your Majesty now stands at a crossroads that few monarchs in modern history have faced. For the erosion of Britain’s Christian inheritance will not ultimately be judged by speeches made in Parliament or debates in the press. It will be judged by whether those entrusted with the guardianship of our ancient institutions chose to defend them — or merely preside over their quiet surrender. You may preside over the quiet dissolution of Britain’s Christian identity. Or you may rise to the ancient responsibility entrusted to the Crown and speak with clarity about the faith that built this kingdom. The first path requires little courage. The second will require a great deal. But it is the path that history honours. Your Majesty’s subjects are not asking for religious coercion. They are asking for leadership. They are asking that the sovereign who bears the title Defender of the Faith remember what that title means. They are asking that the Crown hear the growing cry of anguish from Christians across this land who feel that the spiritual inheritance of their nation is being surrendered without resistance. And they are asking whether the Crown will stand with them. For the faith that shaped Britain is not merely a cultural ornament. It is the wellspring from which our laws, our liberties, and our moral imagination have flowed. If it is cast aside, the nation will discover — too late — that it has severed itself from the very roots that sustained it. Your Majesty, to many the Crown is a symbol of authority. But before God it is also a symbol of stewardship. And stewardship carries with it the duty to defend what has been entrusted. May Almighty God grant Your Majesty the wisdom to discern this hour, and the courage to fulfil the sacred duty entrusted to the Crown. Yours faithfully, Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC Missionary Bishop Diocese of Providence Confessing Anglican Church @PhilHs10 @RevBrettMurphy @revwickland @BishopRobert1 @GBNews @TalkTV @danwootton @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @LozzaFox @BackBrexitBen @RupertLowe10 @KemiBadenoch @JohnCleese

@AndyBurnhamGM @pambrose33 So those that don’t use the service still have to pay?

@pambrose33 It supports the £2 fare for the whole of 2026 so, yes, that’s exactly what I’m doing 👍🏻

Tameside Coucil tax increase 5% ( @AndyBurnhamGM 's Mayoral General Precept increase is 19.4%!). Cheers, Andy. Looking out for the little guy, as ever. 🧐

@mog_russEN Gorillas in the Mist

🚨⚡️ $1.7 MILLION in jewelry stolen in UNDER 1 MINUTE in Fremont, California — 30+ thieves, 75% of inventory gone, most still at large.

@Heccles94 Iranians want him as their Supreme Leader you thicko 🙄

I think you should know how Netanyahu is seen in Britain. He is the most evil man on the planet guilty of leading a genocide.

@NileGardiner Ed Davey is to Starmer, wot Lord Halifax was to Churchill

Churchill would have viewed you as a useless appeaser of evil, Ed. And as a complete clown too.

@jruddy99 Try reading properly - ‘Starmer’ not Britain 🤡🙄

This is an excellent point. Trump ALWAYS attacks Britain after he's had a meeting with Farage. He goes there to talk our country down.

@DPJHodges Straight from the Marxist ideology playbook - inherently all cowards

I just don’t understand how anyone can think the UK can adopt a moral, strategic or diplomatic position that says “We’ll let our allies fly missions from UK soil to risk their servicemen and women’s lives to defend British citizens. But we will refuse to do it ourselves”.

@marlene4719 You’d rather worship at the feet of an Islamist Mullah you thick lefty ideologist

Just when I think I could not loathe this sick demented fuck more.

@almurray Put the sherry down son 🙄

"If you refuse these fair offers, I must with profound regret require you to sink your ships within six hours. Finally, failing the above, I have the orders of His Majesty's Government to use whatever force may be necessary to prevent your ships falling into German or Italian hands."

@Always_Boots @almurray @OzKaterji Seems you’re more interested in kissing the ass of a terrorist mullah. No doubt why you got kicked out of the uniform. They eventually caught up with your views 👀

@TheCastleView @almurray @OzKaterji Be quiet lad, kissing Trump's ass should get you an instant section for mental instability.

The way Trump views Kurdish people as freelance mercenaries for hire is appalling