TheGob

@DaddyCoffee73 @Keir_Starmer

NOBODY born this century voted for Brexit. More than 1 in 10 Brexit voters have died since 2016. The population has changed; Britain wants to #Rejoin! @Keir_Starmer, just do it 👍

@ShChildBoxing Same as Oscar against Manchester DeLaHoya got robbed

De La Hoya won pretty convincingly. Whitaker didn't land enough punches.

@MaxCalendrillo Crawford and his close association with Victor Conte points to steroids PED's abuse his entire career is based on fighting low-level fighters, a car crash victim and a shot' former great fighter.

Terence Crawford is the only 3 weight undisputed champion in the 4 belt era. GREATNESS.

Dynamic alignment with the EU is not good for Britain. It is bad and the Government is creating fake or misleading economic reasons to justify it. Ultimately, this is about taking Britain back into the EU step by step. There is no way in which a country of our size and wealth would benefit from following regulations designed and set by Brussels. Everything a Minister briefs about trade barriers and market access is a distraction. Britain has a free trade agreement with the EU, tariff-free and quota-free. We have market access and the latest trade figures show a healthy trading relationship between Britain and Europe, with British services exports performing very well. Dynamic alignment means the entire British economy must follow EU rules, whether British businesses trade with the EU or not. Once again, the EU will be able to dictate the terms on which a British business trades with a British consumer. When it comes to SPS rules, this means that the EU will be able to inspect British farms to see if they meet EU standards, even if those farms sell to the British market and not into Europe. This is a form of economic subjugation that should be beneath any sort of sovereign, democratic nation. The EU Reset is a dead end for Britain, a road to nowhere. prosperity.com/media-publicat…

@ianrich15813274 I'm a old age pensioner and 2016 was the only time in my lifetime I got a vote on it

Increasingly, the claim 'we voted for Brexit' is misleading, at best. Take my son & elder daughter, 27 & 24, they didn't get a vote in the 2016 Referendum. Their gran & grandad did, but as is the way with these things, they are both dead. How many more years to be asked again?

Farage is a misogynistic prick. Yet again he's rude and patronising to a female journalist in a way he never talks to male ones. No woman should ever vote for Reform.

@andrewhesselden 75-25 leave

63% of Brits would now vote to rejoin the EU. That’s not a marginal shift. That’s a country that’s changed its mind. The question isn’t “why talk about rejoining?” It’s: why are we still pretending this hasn’t happened? Source 👇 leftfootforward.org/2026/02/brits-…

Reform UK are standing in 99.9% of wards. The Monster Raving Loonies are standing in 0.4% of wards. And … someone called Restore are standing in 0.3% of wards. Britain does not have time for anything other than a serious alternative. Vote Reform, Get Starmer Out.

Ambition Before Duty. The Minister Who Put Her Career Ahead of the Law. Next Wednesday marks one year since the Supreme Court ruled, unanimously and without ambiguity, that sex under the Equality Act means biological sex. One year since the law was settled. One year since the Equality and Human Rights Commission drafted its code of practice setting out what that ruling requires of hospitals, schools, gyms and public bodies. One year since Bridget Phillipson received that code and chose to sit on it. What has changed in twelve months is not the law. The judgment stands. The code is ready. What has changed is the credibility of the minister charged with implementing it. Baroness Falkner, who led the EHRC until November and oversaw the drafting of that code, has now said plainly what many had suspected: Phillipson is withholding guidance not because it requires further work, but because publishing it would cost her politically. The activist MPs whose votes she needs for promotion would not forgive her. So women wait, and the minister keeps her powder dry (Martin, 2026). That is a specific accusation, made by a specific person with direct knowledge of the process. It is not a political opponent guessing at motive. Falkner submitted the code. She watched it stall. She knows what ready looks like, and she knows the guidance is ready. Her conclusion, that personal ambition is the operative factor, carries weight that no government spokesman can easily dismiss. The Labour response, that Falkner had demeaned the office she once held, did not address the substance. It attacked the witness. Which leaves the charge unanswered. Consider what the title Secretary of State for Women and Equalities actually represents. Not a departmental portfolio in the ordinary sense, but a stated commitment, a promise woven into the office itself. To hold that title while deliberately withholding the legal protections owed to the women you nominally represent is a contradiction so stark it requires no elaboration. The office makes the accusation. Falkner supplies the motive. The anniversary provides the measure. Falkner went further still, and her wider observation deserves to be heard. She drew a parallel with the grooming gangs scandal, noting that this government has a pattern of institutional inaction driven by fear of upsetting particular constituencies. The comparison is uncomfortable precisely because it is not new. The structure is familiar: a known problem, a clear remedy, a minister unwilling to act because the political cost of action outweighs, in their private calculation, the human cost of delay. Those doing the waiting are never the ministers. Starmer's position is untenable on its own terms. He told Parliament the ruling must be implemented in full. His minister is arguing for a case-by-case approach that restores the incoherence the court rejected. He is a lawyer. He knows what a unanimous Supreme Court judgment means. He also knows what his backbenchers want. The gap between those two things is where women's rights currently reside. The government's rebuttal speaks of sober leadership and treating everyone with dignity. Fine words. But dignity is not delivered by a code of practice that lives in a ministerial drawer. Protection is not real if it exists only in statute while the guidance that would make it operational is suppressed for career reasons. The court has done its work. The EHRC has done its work. One minister has not done hers. "Phillipson is withholding guidance not because it requires further work, but because publishing it would cost her politically."

@SimonDanczuk The next government should bring criminal charges against him

Make no mistake about it, Starmer is insistent on taking Britain back into the EU, even though he doesn’t have a mandate for it. Worst, most devious, weird PM we’ve ever had.

This is going to be the best right wing meltdown EVER 🍿 joe.co.uk/news/governmen…

🚨 NEVER EVER FORGET 🚨 This is what Keir Starmer said after Axel Rudakabana SLAUGHTERED 3 young girls in Southport. He didn’t condemn the attack, no - He condemned YOU for being angry. Disgusting vile little traitor

I don't care which party you support. If you believe in the principle of democracy, in the laws of this country being written and decided upon by those people elected to do so by the British people, then you *MUST* stand up and be counted, and show you are against the EU Reset.

Watching Starmer in the House. It takes a strong stomach. The nonsense, the lies, the fudging of figures. What a disaster it was to give this fathead such a majority. Nodding dogs (one term Labour MPs) cheering him on. Absolute morons.

@MichelleDewbs @ZiaYusufUK @BarryGardiner @GBNEWS I've switched off. I'm sick of seeing these same old faces. A wider pool please - Ben Habib was a regular - who booted him out? Rupert Lowe? - why is he being ignored??? Up yor game Dewbs, or lose your audience.

@FellowshipofUK @MichelleDewbs @ZiaYusufUK @BarryGardiner @GBNEWS Because they are all named Muhammad it's the equivalent of calling someone Mr

@MichelleDewbs @ZiaYusufUK @BarryGardiner @GBNEWS Why doesn't Zia use his first name, which is Muhammad? 🤔

I’m back! And boy, is there a lot to debate… Come and join me @ZiaYusufUK and @BarryGardiner Live now @GBNEWS

Can you answer a simple question Dr martin? Just a simple question Who elected von der leyen? Did she stand against anyone? Please answer

@Trinacria13 Why should Fury fight Kabayel ? Not on Furys radar. Agit Kabayel is the official No1 contender for Usyk's world title and Usyk is running scared of the guy and that's a fact!

Look how Agit finished Makhmudov compared with Fury. If Usyk finishes his career and avoids Kabayel that’s a huge stain on his legacy imo. Inoue is fighting the absolute top challenger Usyk should do the same.

This guy is utterly delusional… incredible that the charlatan Johnson put such a clown in charge of such an important negotiation. It will take years to undo the damage done.

Tories and Reform are shitting themselves as Starmer moves ever closer to rejoining the EU with the support of the majority of UK population.