Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bitcoin Theory
9.8K posts

Bitcoin Theory
@TheoryBitcoin
Ph.D. in Computer Science, P&D in #Bitcoin, Ω, 🏴☠️
Katılım Mayıs 2019
2.8K Takip Edilen4.3K Takipçiler

@jackprandelli Wake up - oil went negative in 2020, stop chasing lagging signals and own asymmetry (Bitcoin), not hindsight indicators.
English

Every major market crash since 1987 was preceded by one signal.
Oil's 12 month rate of change hitting 100%.
We're at 91% right now.
The historical record:
💥 1987 Crash — Oil ROC >100%
💥 1990 Crash — Oil ROC >100%
💥 Dot Com Bust — Oil ROC >100%
💥 2008 Financial Crisis — Oil ROC >100%
💥 2022 Bear Market — Oil ROC >100%
Every Single Time.
And today?
Hormuz closed.
We're 9 % points away from the threshold that has never failed to precede a market crash.
The S&P is already down 5.4%.
When oil moves this fast economies break.
Will this time be different?
History says no.
Source: Ted @TedPillows, @marketmike

English

@saylor Bitcoin is converging toward a stable equilibrium where global capital coordination reinforces its role as digital capital, and as long as its rules remain credible and resistant to misguided changes, its growth trajectory becomes increasingly robust.
English
Bitcoin Theory retweetledi

@saylor Bitcoin is ideal money not because it is perfect, but because it minimizes the incentive to defect.
English
Bitcoin Theory retweetledi


@BTCBreadMan You belong to the 0.1 % if you hodl 2.625 Bitcoin
English

If the power-law assumption holds, your model appears internally consistent and well-structured. However, with only ~13 years of data, the statistical reliability - especially in the tails - remains limited. @JanWues

English


@azaztrader01 Top 0.1% ≈ 8 million people.
Maximum Bitcoin supply = 21 million.
21M / 8M = 2.625 Bitcoin per person.
English

@TheoryBitcoin That's a pretty specific number! How did you calculate that threshold?
English

You belong to the 0.1 % if you hodl 2.625 #bitcoin
Relai 🇨🇭@relai_app
Reminder: You belong to the 0.2 % if you hodl 1 #bitcoin
English

You’re clearly pointing to Bitcoin, but not naming it makes the argument more persuasive by letting readers reach the conclusion themselves. If you said it outright, many would dismiss the entire thesis as just "crypto advocacy" instead of engaging with the macro logic. At the same time, avoiding naming it gives you flexibility - and a bit of plausible deniability.
English
Bitcoin Theory retweetledi
Bitcoin Theory retweetledi
Bitcoin Theory retweetledi
Bitcoin Theory retweetledi

@BorisJohnson Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi requires a central operator promising returns and paying early investors with funds from later ones. Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return—just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand.
English

@cmsholdings The beauty of Bitcoin is that it can’t lie to you - it has no PR team, no roadshows in Abu Dhabi, just blocks, hashes, and the quiet brutality of math.
English

@cmsholdings Ah yes, because nothing says "high-trust civilization" like blacklisting your neighbors for optimizing tax policy instead of simply building a jurisdiction so strong that capital never wants to leave in the first place.
English











