Toman

@cyrilXBT $TRAC

$TAO $SEI or $RENDER what will you pick?

@gverdian @quantnetwork $QNT 👍👍👍

I’m delighted to announce that @quantnetwork and Murex are partnering to bring tokenised deposits and digital bond settlement into MX.3. Institutions have been asking the same question. How do we move forward with tokenisation without disrupting the trading, risk and post-trade operations we depend on? The answer is now inside the platform they already use. Tokenised RWAs just crossed $100 billion. DTCC has SEC approval to tokenise real-world assets from mid-2026 and major UK banks are already working with Quant through the Great Britain Tokenised Deposit initiative - all of which signals that the market is moving.  Users in banks, asset managers, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, corporations and energy utilities in over 65 countries now have a production-ready path into tokenisation through the systems they already run. The future of capital markets infrastructure is programmable: quant.network/press-releases… #Tokenisation #DigitalAssets #CapitalMarkets #Programmability

$QNT | People forget how fast infrastructure reprices. 🚨 Palantir $PLTR was treated like just another data company for years. Feb 2024 = 1.2B Market Cap March 2026 = 384B Market Cap Then AI hit, adoption accelerated, and the market realized it was actually core infrastructure. Not a gradual move. A full reclassification. From niche → mission-critical → $384B. That shift wasn’t about slow growth. It was about understanding what it really was. $QNT sits in a similar position today. Still viewed like a typical crypto asset… when it’s really targeting the rails between financial systems. Misunderstood → ignored → then suddenly… repriced.

🇨🇭 Swiss Federal Railways (@RailService) makes train travel safer & more sustainable, by using the @origin_trail Decentralized Knowledge Graph (DKG) – tracing critical rail parts across the country and beyond! Built on @gs1 standards, it secures interoperable data flows, keeping the rail system safe.

$IMX and $QNT are now available to trade on Robinhood Crypto, including NY.

Look at this! 🚨 $QNT is becoming the standard. Not figuratively. ISO just made it official.Standard 82098 is published. The global blockchain interoperability framework. A decade in the making through ISO Technical Committee 307. The person who started TC 307? Gilbert Verdian. Quant's CEO. He filed the world's first blockchain standard proposal in 2016, chaired Working Group 7 on interoperability, and brought together experts from 30+ countries to build it. The standard's core: multi-gateway architecture. Protocol-agnostic. No single bridge dependency. Any blockchain to any blockchain. Any blockchain to any existing system. Now look at Overledger. $QNT's product. 45+ blockchains connected through one API. No bridges. No wrapped tokens. Built on the same architecture that's now codified as a global ISO standard. The man who wrote the rulebook built the product that implements it. HSBC, Barclays, BIS, and the ECB are already running pilots through it. 14.88 million QNT total supply. Operators lock tokens for Overledger access. Demand scales directly with adoption. Standard published. Infrastructure live. Institutions piloting. The architect of the global standard built the only product that already implements it. What are you waiting for?

$ADA has been classified as a digital commodity by the SEC and CFTC. A meaningful development for the Cardano ecosystem and for the broader digital asset industry.

We’ve seen some discussions on X today about OKX and a potential $RIO delisting, but let’s focus on the positives the team is thriving and fully committed to their vision. The Team has been incredibly active in the Telegram group, sharing updates and confirming that everything is on track with exciting progress ahead!👇 • The team just hired a new engineer this week check out the website. • Freehold Wallet is live and Tokenization Studio is 98% ready tech-wise and launching soon, making it easy for anyone to tokenize real-world assets on Realio’s L1 network. • Funding is solid, token price fluctuations don’t impact Realios runway or development. Anyone equating low price to “out of money” is missing the big picture. The Team is building every day, regardless of listings or markets fluctuations. $RIO #Okx @okx @star_okx #RWA

@AltcoinDaily $ADA #Cardano

Let's settle this: Cardano or Solana?

Let’s get connected tomorrow 11AM EST. We started from @origin_trail zero. Time to become @origin_trail heroes. It's time to kick off #VibeTrail2026 $TRAC #DKG #ZeroToHero #BrickByBrick #AI

🎉 USDCx on Cardano is now available via @Circle xReserve! For the first 10 days, IOG will subsidize bridge fees for USDCx transfers to Cardano to help you get started with lower costs. All other network and DEX fees remain the responsibility of the user. See the FAQs for details. USDCx is a Cardano-native asset fully backed 1:1 by USDC held in Circle’s xReserve smart contract. It’s designed to make moving and using dollar value across supported blockchains seamless, providing streamlined access to crosschain USDC liquidity. With USDCx, users can easily engage with DeFi liquidity, lending, payments, and real-world asset settlement. Thank you! This integration was delivered through the Cardano ecosystem’s Critical Integrations program, funded by the community. Your support has helped bring tier one stablecoin infrastructure to Cardano. We would also like to thank Pentad and Midgard Labs for helping build, operate and secure the USDCx infrastructure. Why USDCx: ✅ 1:1 backed by USDC held in xReserve ✅ Simple connectivity across supported chains ✅ No third-party bridges, keeping things straightforward and secure Learn more: iog.io/news/usdcx-on-…

@AscendPerps @cryptos168 @MoneyleopardNFT

🚨 USDCx, a Tier 1 stablecoin, is now live on Cardano! To celebrate, we're giving away 100 $USDCx $USDCx will be integrated on Ascend Market from the day we launch! For a chance to win: -follow @AscendPerps -re-post -tag 2 friends Winner in 3 days 🔥

USDCx on @Cardano, a USDC-backed stablecoin with seamless access to crosschain USDC liquidity, is now available via Circle xReserve. With USDCx, enterprises and end users can power payments, lending, trading, borrowing, liquidity provision, and more using a highly liquid stablecoin. Supported at launch by Cardano DeFi apps @liqwidfinance, @MinswapDEX, and @SundaeSwap. Key benefits: ✅USDCx is 1:1 backed by USDC held in xReserve ✅Fully interoperable with USDC across supported chains ✅Trust minimized with no third-party bridges required **For the first 10 days, IOG will be covering all costs for bridging USDC to USDCx on Cardano, helping early adopters get started without fees or friction.** Learn more: circle.com/blog/usdcx-on-…

The Layer 2.5 Network of Networks @FusionLayer25 is coming together nicely! 31 Networks connected in the first hour! 🚀 Sign up and interoperate: connect.overledger.dev/quant-fusion/n…

@VitalikButerin $ADA #Cardano

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

$QNT @FusionLayer25 is now a patented technology!! There will be only 1 fusion! Read it out guys! This is important stuff