VoidsAdvocate

@Sentdex That face is unsettling

We have robots that supposedly can do home tasks. But we need bots that do the other oldschool skills too. Something like this where you can just tell by looking this dude will grind. Need to chop that maple tree? Done. Fish some lobster? On it. Mine coal? He'll do it 24/7.

@kazumafan46 @GolerGkA No

@VoidsAdvocate @GolerGkA "as would a human" is a huge assumption lol

I finally realised what would be human equivalent of the strawberry question. Assume you’re not a trained musician. If somebody tapped some rhythm, you could repeat it easily. But now imagine they asked what time signature was it, or how many eight notes did it contain.

@JustinBleuel @ChatGPTapp On the mobile app, it keeps not loading the generated image even when it's done. I have to click on another thread then come back to see the finished image.

Every bug in @ChatGPTapp is getting fixed With the help of codex (and the rest of the lovely team and their codexes) along with a 7pm iced americano there will be zero bugs This is a formal request for tiny nits, error states, broken ui, etc The tinier the better!

@evisdrenova After decades...

One fascinating consequence of GLP-1s/Ozempic: For decades, people said that big pharma would never release actually effective obesity drugs because they’d lose too much money from downstream chronic disease treatment. We’re seeing almost the exact opposite.

@OfficialLoganK @harjtaggar And never looking at it again?

@harjtaggar framing this and putting it in my office

@wylfcen Snackhouse and it's all good

DON’T say “restaurant,” which is from French. The native English word is SNEEDINGHOUSE.

@signulll You need bigger dreams

my dream has always been to do 100% of my work from my iphone. with things like codex, dispatch, & the broader agent layer, we’re now slowly getting there. if done well, you’ll likely only need one device + ambient screens everywhere that come alive as soon as you walk in the room, for personal & business. these screens will have context & prescence awareness with multiple input layers to interact with computers in a totally natural way (think xbox kinect ++ but for ai).

@localghost @tszzl Just pick the shorter one

@tszzl sometimes thumbs up thumbs down and not really sure why, swiping to other options in the multi-option and just picking one without really reading either first

Watched a normal person use ChatGPT and I am pretty confident everybody is picking from the RLHF options at random

@figma Cringe

We’re Gridmaxxing → Drag to reorder columns/rows → Automatic positioning → Automatic rows

@yacineMTB Is there a comparison how much compute each lab has available?

"here's how Hillary Clinton can still win"

@Akuicia Should be moebius stripper

more concepts for my math dating sim - topological objects #dateMATH #oc

@luusssso That black one is epic.

Credenzas with inlaid floral designs in resin by artist Marcin Rusak

@0xCharlota Figaro is fun, not gonna lie

great news, but imo a missed naming opportunity. instead of Figma Agent, Figgy - small eager intern energy FigsThis - fix this, fix that Figaro - figaro figaro figaro, does everything for you Figpilot - copilot but fig Figure - just figure it out for me, thx FigMom - knows where everything is in your file, judges your layer naming, will absolutely rename "Frame 247" without asking

@BjarturTomas Time loop where the Mc goes insane because they never feel like they sleep

Cozy time loop story where protag just chills, drinks coffee. doesn't get particularly good at anything.

At work we are at a state where we point out if Ai was heavily involved in the creation of an artifact. But it's becoming so common now, that any moment now, we will just take it as given that Ai was used. Not enough hype.

@demiurgently It's the substance. Ai is horrible at creating actual substance. It's all fluff. It usually make a single sentence that matter and then 3 paragraphs of fluff

weird to notice that i simultaneously - believe chatGPT is much, much smarter than the average person - immediately stop reading something after realizing it’s written by chatGPT

@dieworkwear It's so 3d printable too

people out here paying $3,800 for a plastic pocket watch

@thsottiaux Testing workflows!

For those of you living inside the codex app, what should we prioritize among features, reliability or performance?

People freaking out over my AI spend. What nobody sees: Part of what excites me so much about working on OpenClaw is that I'm trying to answer the question: How would we build software in the future if tokens don't matter? We constant run ~100 codex in the cloud, reviewing every PR, every issue. If a fix on main lands, @clawsweeper will eventually find that 6 month old issue and close it with an exact reference. We run codex on every commit to review for security issues (as it's far too easy to miss). We run codex to de-duplicate issues and find clusters and send reports for the most pressing issues. We have agents that can recreate complex setups, spin up ephemeral crabbox.sh machines, log into e.g. Telegram, make a video and post before/after fix on the PR. There's codex that watch new issues and - if it fits our documented vision well, automatically create a PR of it. (that then another codex reviews) We have codex running that scans comments for spam and blocks people. We have codex instances running that verify performance benchmarks and report regressions into Discord. We have agents that listen on our meetings and proactively start work, e.g. create PRs when we discuss new features while we discuss them. We build clawpatch.ai to split all our projects into functional units to review and find bugs and regresssions. We do the same split for security with Vercel's deepsec and Codex Security to find regressions and vulnerabilities. All that automation allows us to run this project extremely lean.