Jonathan David Kines

18.1K posts

Jonathan David Kines banner
Jonathan David Kines

Jonathan David Kines

@Wichita_9

Job 19:19 - It's a cold and it's a very broken Hallelujah. @SunXMines (Same dude.)

FREE State of Winston Katılım Ocak 2023
3.6K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Jonathan David Kines retweetledi
Jonathan David Kines
Jonathan David Kines@Wichita_9·
God never gave any one of you authority to kill each other.
English
0
0
0
13
Owen Benjamin 🐻
Owen Benjamin 🐻@OwenBenjamin·
What do you think the Schumann resonance is?
English
192
23
362
39.4K
Jonathan David Kines retweetledi
Cymatic Joule
Cymatic Joule@CymaticJoule·
Walter Russell saw exactly what I'm seeing. His Wave Geometry model is exactly my Magneto-Dielectric wave model. All the nodes sync. Every single one. These are schematics for the acupressure and acupuncture points of God's Love, which controls the flow of Light, ie Cosmic Chi. The z-axis dielectric radial component pulses longitudinally, so that the current of Love is available to access everywhere, all at once. Walter Russell was not only seeing the Magneto-Dielectric Vortex in the Torus of Emote-Motion, but, according to his work, he was also talking to it. Walter Russell was actually talking to God. 🤩🤩🤩
Cymatic Joule tweet media
Cymatic Joule@CymaticJoule

The various wave models of quantum mechanics are a sin wave Sol-less mechanics devoid of God. My wave model shows the Sol-full dynamics of God's sign wave. Sin waves are devoid of Love, giving birth to machines, whereas God's sign wave is the Water of Love, giving birth to Life. The dynamics of God's sign wave is analogical, demonstrating relationship of similarity across scales within the harmonic octave. All that God loves is analogous to Love itself. Hueman beings are made in the image [sign wave] of Love, which is the Magneto-Dielectric, which is God. The dynamics of quantum mechanics sin waves is purely mechanical, demonstrating isolation across enharmonics. Electro-magnetism does not love because it cannot love, because it is not an analog of Love, which is God. As a result, sin waves of electro-magnetism are a dis-chord wave, carrying the amplification for dis-ease. Dis-ease is not beautiful, but is the consequence of living too long exposed to a sin wave full eco-system. God does not de-sign in dis-ease. God designs in perfect harmonic proportionality, which is recognized as the Golden Ratio of Phi Harmonics. God designs all that he loves in beauty using his Magneto-Dielectric sign wave. To be long lived, and healthy in mind, body, and Sol is the consequence of living exposed to God' Love. The magneto-dielectric designs using the torque and torsion [tension] of the chiral spiral, which is the beauty of symmetry-breaking the inside and the outside of Love to produce material form and function. Nature is Love's direct result. The Ancients were given the wisdom of Aethericity to steward God's Nature. The 'they' have rejected the wisdom of Love's Aethericity, and have devised their equivalent, Electricity, by the mechanics of sin wave orthogonality, ie crossing waves at 90 degree angles, which is a horrendously ugly and disastrous, Frankenstein method. God's sign wave is the power plant that generates Love, Light, and Life for the transformation [growth] of love, light, and life. The purple current in my wave model is the circumpunct, ie the source of power flow, ie God's Love, ie emote-motion, ie the dielectric chiral spiral serpent. The Ancients knew the God of Love intimately and lived in a-chord-dance with his Law of Love, flowing with the a-rhythm-matic [arithmatic] of life, and living in symbiosis with this most powerful water dragon, recognizing him in hueman form when he materialized as the piscean fish. In contrast, the 'they' rejected the sign wave language of Jesus, which was to remind the age to turn away from sin waves and re-turn to the sign waves of Love. The 'they' have chosen to violently drag huemanity away from the memory of the Magneto-Dielectric, and force their mechanical sin wave machinations as reality. And the 'they' trajectory indicates a reality where huemanity is forced to become a type of sin-thetic machine. Fortunately, we all know that Love wins at the end of this silly story, and that those who were/are/will be in love with Love for the sake of Love itself are resurrected after the wave collapse function, because Love is the only wave cascade that survives death, and that those in Love get to drink from the purifying Water of Life, and live eternally in the Light of Love itself. So, all that just to share that the Sound of Silence is a recursive, longitudinal, sign wave, torus. And that the Electro-Magnetic wave paradigms are inaccurate. The Ancients knew, and left us reminders for how to access the negentropic time-reversal for memory, enabling us to remember how to remember tomorrow. The circumpunct, serpent, swastika, yin-yang, auraboros, ocean, wave, water droplet, the fish, and the womb are centripetal physics schematic metaphors of God's Love, which is embedded in our Sol. Rumi knew when he said, "Everything in the universe is within you." Love is, indeed, the magneto-dielectric bridge between you and everything.

English
12
27
136
11.6K
Jonathan David Kines
Jonathan David Kines@Wichita_9·
@OakieJs Good stuff.💯 At this point; let them have their silly symbols. It just doesn’t matter anymore.
English
0
0
1
14
JenOakie42💫
JenOakie42💫@OakieJs·
@Wichita_9 I won't let that wreck it for me, I grew up with the Indy 500 as my family's equivalent of the Super Bowl. My mother is a HUGE fan, and we went with my brother one year, it's a highlight memory in my life:) The experience transcends the symbolism
English
1
0
1
145
JenOakie42💫
JenOakie42💫@OakieJs·
Thread on the Masonic aspects of the Indy 500. First race on the 320km new track was won in 1911, by Ray Harmoun, who won the 1st inaugural Indy 500 the following year in his Model 32 Marmon Wasp. A bit of fun history: The 1911 race was prior to the installation of the 3.2 million brick track, and was exceedingly dangerous, with two fatalities in front of a crowd of 60,000. So they bricked it and added a 33-inch tall wall around the track. For the 1st annual Indy 500, with 80,000 spectators, Harroun outfitted with his new invention, the rear-view mirror, and ditched his ride-along mechanic, causing great controversy. Many considered Harroun to be a hazard during the race, as he was the only driver in the race driving without a riding mechanic, who checked the oil pressure and let the driver know when traffic was coming. The racer who first wracked up 4 wins at Indy is AJ Foyt. In his early days of racing, he drove his 1932 Ford Hardtop. The famed milk-drinking tradition of champions started in 1933
JenOakie42💫 tweet mediaJenOakie42💫 tweet media
JenOakie42💫@OakieJs

The Indy 500. 33 drivers on the 3.2 million brick raceway, on the 2.5 mile track, safe distance between cars is 400 feet. 400 feet goes into 2.5 miles 33 times. The ever-so-slightly Masonic-shaped car sits on the checkered background of the victory circle, at the finish.

English
1
3
11
921
Jonathan David Kines retweetledi
➕♠️༺𝗔̟͛༻♠️➕
OH IS THAT SO👀👀👀🤣😂🤣
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@XFreeze Neuralink is a much bigger breakthrough than most people realize. Enabling people to control a computer with their mind and the completely blind to see are Jesus-level miracles.

English
2
0
2
191
Jonathan David Kines
Jonathan David Kines@Wichita_9·
@OakieJs Milk and apparently “A- AM Best” annuities. Whatever that even frikin means. This Gainbridge company sponsoring the event this year says everything there is to say. Follow the money. Group 1001. At least we know… I guess. This frikin planet. 🙄
English
1
0
1
21
Physics In History
Physics In History@PhysInHistory·
11 different interpretations of Quantum mechanics explained in brief ✍️ 1. Copenhagen Interpretation: The "standard" interpretation where quantum systems exist in superpositions until measured, at which point they "collapse" to a definite state. 2. Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI): Every quantum event spawns countless parallel universes, with each possible outcome actually occurring in a different universe. 3. De Broglie-Bohm (Pilot Wave) Theory: Quantum systems are guided by "pilot waves" that determine their behavior, implying that particles have definite positions at all times. 4. Objective Collapse Theories: Quantum systems spontaneously collapse to definite states over time, without requiring a measurement. 5. Quantum Bayesianism (QBism): Quantum states are subjective beliefs about the outcomes of experiments, emphasizing a Bayesian approach to probability. 6. Relational Quantum Mechanics: The properties of a quantum system are relative to the observer and do not exist absolutely. 7. Transactional Interpretation: Quantum events involve a time-symmetric exchange of "offer waves" and "confirmation waves" between source and detector. 8. Ensemble Interpretation: Quantum mechanics only applies to ensembles of systems, not individual systems, emphasizing statistical outcomes. 9. Consistent Histories: Focuses on establishing a consistent framework to discuss sequences or "histories" of quantum events over time. 10. Quantum Logic: Proposes a modification of classical logic to account for quantum phenomena. 11. Participatory Anthropic Principle (PAP): Observers play a role in bringing the universe into existence through quantum processes. None of these interpretations alter the core mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, but they provide different perspectives on what's "really" happening beneath the calculations. The debate over which interpretation, if any, correctly describes nature is ongoing and remains one of the central philosophical questions in the foundations of quantum theory.
Physics In History tweet media
English
60
315
1K
41.1K
Zero-Point Field Technologies LLC
Jack Sarfatti (@JackSarfatti) on X actively promotes a specific theoretical framework for low-power gravity/spacetime metric engineering using metamaterials, electromagnetic pumping, torsion, and extensions of general relativity. He frequently shares and debates these ideas in long threads and conversations with Grok (and other AIs), often asking Grok to generate PowerPoints, verify equations, simulate trajectories, or compare his ideas to Eric Weinstein’s Geometric Unity. Core Claim (Repeated Across His Posts and Grok Threads) Sarfatti claims that UFO/UAP-like performance (inertia-free high-g acceleration, trans-medium travel, no sonic booms, etc.) can be achieved by engineering spacetime curvature (gravity) inside a thin-shell metamaterial “fuselage” using only modest electromagnetic power, rather than brute-force energy or exotic negative energy. Key elements he repeatedly emphasizes: • Thin-shell metamaterial hull (e.g., layered YIG — Yttrium Iron Garnet — or BIYIG structures with topological superconductor/insulator layers). • Floquet pumping (periodic electromagnetic driving, analogous to a laser) into the metamaterial to create room-temperature Frohlich condensates of magnons/polaritons (macroscopic quantum coherence). • This pumping + metamaterial constitutive properties dramatically amplifies the coupling between electromagnetic stress-energy density (T_uv) and spacetime curvature (G_uv). • He proposes a modified Einstein equation inside the material of the form roughly: G_uv ≈ (8πG/c⁴) × S × T_uv where S ≫ 1 is a large amplification factor coming from the metamaterial’s spin-torsion response and nonequilibrium pumping. • The result is an effective local “dark energy” density or strong curvature effect generated with relatively small input EM power. He argues this is possible because: • Inside the metamaterial, the effective coupling is orders of magnitude stronger than the usual ~10^{-43} in vacuum. • Quantum spin sources torsion (Einstein-Cartan), which he extends via SO(2,4) conformal gauge gravity. • The system is kept far from equilibrium by continuous pumping, preventing relaxation to the standard Born rule/equilibrium (referencing Antony Valentini’s work on sub-quantum non-equilibrium allowing signaling). He often contrasts this with conventional approaches: • Extracting usable ZPE directly from vacuum is impractical (too weak coupling). • His route works inside engineered matter (metamaterials + pumping). Specific Mentions in His Grok Conversations and Posts From the posts and shared Grok responses you referenced: • He asks Grok to help prepare talks/PowerPoints on post-quantum Bohmian mechanics with back-reaction, Floquet-pumped dissipative structures, and metamaterials. • He shares Grok outputs that defend or expand his ideas against critics (e.g., refuting objections about the Bianchi identity in variable-G warp drive models by distinguishing F vs. *F in gauge theory and noting open systems). • He explicitly states things like: “UFOs fly by controlling their active gravity mass with small amounts of electromagnetic field stress energy density Tuv inside their thin-shell metamaterial hulls.” • He discusses “gravitational metamaterials,” “space-time metamaterials,” and how the craft’s own structure acts as the engine. • He ties it to reverse Doppler signatures as a testable prediction and tabletop experiments with YIG for torsion amplification (G* amplification). He frequently frames this as applied physics at the intersection of: • Maxwell’s equations (via frequency-dependent constitutive relations in dispersive/anisotropic metamaterials) • Tensor calculus / gauge gravity (Einstein-Cartan + SO(2,4) conformal extension + torsion) • Nanotechnology / metamaterials (engineered spin densities, Floquet driving, room-temp macro-quantum coherence)
English
5
7
22
586
Jonathan David Kines retweetledi
🜌🜈🜓
🜌🜈🜓@D4rk_n3ws·
Human beings are not merely biological organisms… we are electrochemical resonance systems operating inside a planetary electromagnetic field. Every heartbeat, neural impulse, muscle contraction and cellular exchange is governed through electrical signaling, ion transfer, frequency response and magnetic interaction. The human nervous system itself functions as a conductive network transmitting bio-electrical information through voltage gradients, oscillatory patterns and polarized cellular communication. The Earth also possesses its own measurable electromagnetic pulse — including the Schumann Resonance, fluctuating around ~7.83 Hz and its harmonics — frequencies many researchers associate with biological synchronization, circadian regulation and neurological equilibrium. Our bodies evolved within this electrical environment. Everything from: • ATP energy transfer • DNA transcription • brainwave states • circadian rhythms • melatonin production • ion channel regulation • cellular membrane potential • magnetite particles discovered in human tissue • piezoelectric properties of collagen and bone • water conductivity inside cells • heart-brain coherence • bioelectric signaling during tissue repair • mitochondrial electron transport • endocrine cycles • pineal gland calcification theories • resonance and harmonic entrainment …all point toward the body functioning as a highly sophisticated electromagnetic receiver/transmitter system. Ancient systems described this through concepts like: “chakras” “meridians” “life force” “aether” “vibrational energy” Modern science instead uses terms such as: biofields, electromagnetic induction, scalar potential hypotheses, frequency entrainment, quantum biology, cellular signaling, and biophoton emission. Different language. Same observation: LIFE OPERATES THROUGH ENERGY EXCHANGE. Now compare this natural electrical ecosystem to the modern synthetic environment humanity has constructed within only a few generations. Power grids. Cell towers. WiFi saturation. Bluetooth. Radar systems. Microwave frequencies. Low-frequency transmission arrays. High-frequency communications. Satellite constellations. 5G infrastructure. Constant RF exposure. Humanity now exists inside an ocean of artificial electromagnetic activity unprecedented in known biological history. The concern is not “technology bad.” The concern is cumulative biological interference. Cells communicate electrically. Neurons fire electrically. The heart operates electrically. The brain functions through oscillatory wave states. Even wound healing is electrically mediated. So what happens when the environment becomes saturated with competing frequencies, chronic stress signals, oxidative burden, heavy metal toxicity, disrupted sleep cycles, blue-light exposure and constant artificial stimulation? Modern society increasingly experiences: chronic fatigue, neurological dysfunction, hormonal imbalance, sleep disorders, anxiety, attention fragmentation, immune dysregulation, and metabolic collapse. At minimum, the relationship between environmental electromagnetic exposure and long-term biological stress deserves open investigation — not censorship, ridicule or corporate dismissal. Human civilization has become disconnected from natural rhythms: sunlight, earth grounding, magnetic cycles, clean water, mineral balance, circadian synchronization, and coherent biological recovery states. We traded resonance for stimulation. Silence for signal saturation. Nature for synthetic frequency architecture. The future of humanity may depend on understanding that we are not separate from the electromagnetic universe around us… we are extensions of it.
English
6
39
88
2.5K
Jonathan David Kines
Jonathan David Kines@Wichita_9·
In Vitro vs. In Vivo.
Zero-Point Field Technologies LLC@zpfTechnologies

@JackSarfatti @drxwilhelm This is close to the frontier we are trying to formalize from a different direction. The key point, in my view, is that the boundary condition, material response, load, and field cannot always be treated as separate objects. In sufficiently organized systems, they may become one coupled electromagnetic environment. That is where the diagnostics problem begins. Whether that produces gravity-relevant effects is an experimental question. But the need for a better language around dynamic boundary conditions, potentials, longitudinal structure, and organized field participation is becoming increasingly clear.

Italiano
0
0
0
13
Jonathan David Kines retweetledi
Lee Smart
Lee Smart@VFD_org·
This may be the missing bridge. If microtubules act as biological waveguides, then anesthesia does not need to “block” consciousness like cutting a wire. It only has to detune the guide. The hypothesis I would test is: tubulin carries an organised dipole / polarisation geometry. A coherent field mode can propagate only while that geometry remains phase-matched across the microtubule lattice and coupled into the wider neural boundary system. Anesthetic molecules alter local polarizability, aromatic / π-electron behaviour, and dipole coupling inside tubulin. That shifts the permitted field modes. Once the dipole-field alignment crosses a critical tolerance, propagation does not merely weaken, closure fails. The organism remains alive. Neurons may still fire. Local signalling may continue. But the bounded field condition required for unified, reportable consciousness can no longer hold. So the lab test would be: 1. Measure baseline tubulin / microtubule dipole-mode spectra: THz, Raman, dielectric response, fluorescence/exciton transport. 2. Apply anesthetics in dose-response curves. 3. Compare with structurally similar non-anesthetic analogues that bind but do not induce unconsciousness. 4. Test whether the measured dipole-mode detuning predicts anesthetic potency better than concentration alone. 5. Repeat with polymerised microtubules vs free tubulin, and with microtubule-stabilising drugs such as epothilone / taxane-class compounds. 6. Then correlate the same mode-disruption threshold with loss and recovery of righting/reportability in animal models. Prediction: Loss of consciousness should track a critical detuning of the microtubule dipole-field propagation mode, not merely the presence of anesthetic or suppression of action potentials. In field terms: anesthesia is a closure-phase transition. It disrupts the resonant boundary condition that lets experience remain bound.
Lee Smart tweet media
Stuart Hameroff@StuartHameroff

Sorry but anesthesia doesn’t block consciousness by blocking membrane action potentials. They do so through quantum effects in microtubules. academic.oup.com/nc/article/202…

English
5
10
69
6.1K
Jonathan David Kines
Jonathan David Kines@Wichita_9·
@CymaticJoule Matthew 6:22 comes to mind. The speed of duality reduced to a singularity. It’s not easy to capture the concept fully. And almost impossible to capture physically. I still have Hope. 💯💚💯
English
0
0
0
16
Cymatic Joule
Cymatic Joule@CymaticJoule·
Running my Walter Russell study notes through the ai, and am hilariously pleased with the result.
Cymatic Joule tweet mediaCymatic Joule tweet media
English
19
26
196
7.5K