Scott and Wren

223 posts

Scott and Wren banner
Scott and Wren

Scott and Wren

@WrenAnScott

Katılım Ekim 2025
2 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@skylAArker @Vincentt1987 That's probably the front door. The small part of the house connected to it will be a porch with an internal door to stop draughts, and possibly also used a boot room/changing area. Common on older farm cottages.
English
0
0
1
61
skylAArker
skylAArker@skylAArker·
@Vincentt1987 Everyone is saying the direction of the smoke/trees (which is true) but what about the direction of the two buildings? Asumming they are indeed 2 seperate structures, shouldn't the fronts be facing the same way?
English
11
0
3
44K
Vincent
Vincent@Vincentt1987·
En Japón, la pregunta de 100 puntos que un maestro de primaria le hizo a sus estudiantes diciendo "solo tienen 1 minuto"; "Encuentren el error lógico en la imagen."
Vincent tweet media
Español
5.2K
330
7.8K
4.4M
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@AudioBooksRU @davidpattersonx Excellent point. It's the lack of "I don't know" which leads AI to continue to hallucinate when its output is statistically unlikely to be correct. Once AI models can say "I don't know", or "I'm not completely sure, but..." they'll be more useful to humans.
English
0
0
1
11
David Scott Patterson
David Scott Patterson@davidpattersonx·
AI will become accurate and capable across all domains this year. Most people don’t see it coming. There will be a sudden awakening. For AI, and for most people.
English
37
12
172
4.6K
Just Selena
Just Selena@sleenastevens·
@Mandlbaur @logic_quantum @simonmaechling I did ask for your data and method to verify your emergent theory. You sent a doc which says that p is conserved, the definition of linear motion with F=0. That doesn't relate to angular motion, does it?
English
3
0
1
13
Simon Maechling
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling·
Conspiracy theorists create a world where they can’t be wrong. Evidence doesn’t matter, because they’ve already decided that disagreement = corruption.
English
119
52
326
7.4K
Hap Rho
Hap Rho@haprho·
Aww, poor flerfs. Satellites are real. In the last decade, the world spent a conservative $2 trillion on them: building, launching, and running the hardware that keeps your GPS, banking, weather, and internet working. That money was not spent to trick you. Nobody wasted two trillion dollars because they were worried about what you and your ilk think. It’s over. They’re up there. Deal with it.
English
29
0
46
2.3K
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Thelightho39548 @haprho I'm telling you about my experiences with it. Outback Australia. Ship journies. GPS works. Satellite phones work. You can't say there were "hidden antennae" in 2003 in outback Oz!! Or they powered GPS but not cell during a power cut. You need proof, not belief.
English
2
0
0
23
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Thelightho39548 @haprho And yet GPS works everywhere. How does it work on a ship? Or at the top of a mountain? My cousin who lives in rural Scotland had a power cut for 3 days last year. I went to help with an emergency and used GPS the whole way. Phones/cell phones were down. Satellite services all ok.
English
1
0
1
26
the light house
the light house@Thelightho39548·
@WrenAnScott @haprho Try go on a road trip talking in the cell and you will notice that the signal get lost all the time, don't fool yourself into this
English
2
0
0
25
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Dhap00202517 @tarapatton555 @Mandlbaur @ImNux @haprho @SatNOGS He has a decade of nonsense on Quora to sift through. John_Mandlbaur and Angular_Energy accounts. But it's the same circular argument. A textbook says "no torque" and provides the maths for no torque. He reasons that this is experimental, and thus the laws of motion are wrong.
English
0
0
2
24
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Thelightho39548 @haprho Indeed. But where are they? The northern territories are desert. A wee radio mast every 50 miles would stand out. And they'd have put in mobile phone coverage. Or emergency telephones. Ill prepared people die on those trips. There ARE no antennas. Not then. Not now.
English
1
0
0
14
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Thelightho39548 @haprho So you should understand basic technology then? In 2003 I travelled a long distance from Darwin, Aus. No cell phone, no FM radio. GPS worked perfectly. What infrastructure allowed a free service to operate 600km from the nearest town when the others didn't?
English
1
0
0
6
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Thelightho39548 @haprho I'm an engineer. You have no idea what I know. So why not tell me how an LNB picks up an antenna broadcast? Or how GPS works without satellites. I've used GPS on ships, so will be listening patiently.
English
1
0
0
15
the light house
the light house@Thelightho39548·
@WrenAnScott @haprho My Man is easy to show you the truth, the hard part is to break the spell that TV and scholl had cast on you
English
1
0
0
17
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Thelightho39548 @haprho TV satellites are geostationary, which is why they use dishes to collect the signal. An LNB could not collect an oblique signal from an antenna. Look at the direction of the collector. And where are the transmitters for GPS and Starlink?
English
1
0
0
14
the light house
the light house@Thelightho39548·
@WrenAnScott @haprho Antenas passing the radio wave one for another just like always, take a min to think, if a satellye ppassin at 6,900+ miles per hour how the hell the tv gets the signal
English
2
0
0
21
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Dhap00202517 @tarapatton555 @Mandlbaur @ImNux @haprho @SatNOGS I started chatting to him back in February on Quora (where he is now permabanned) He can't elaborate on ANY of his ideas, as they're just nonsense, but he clings on to an example in a 40 year old physics textbook and ignores the rest of the world, or lies about it. One of a kind.
English
2
0
2
119
Dhap 🏹
Dhap 🏹@Dhap00202517·
@tarapatton555 @Mandlbaur @ImNux @haprho @SatNOGS He is a league of his own. I know for sure that something is terribly wrong with him. I just discovered him two days back and after going through google I came to know what he actually is. He will be an interesting subject as to how the brain creates a hollow chamber.
English
2
0
1
107
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@JohnnyRode @Mandlbaur @Saganismm Exactly so. 🙂 But John refuses to acknowledge that (a) the system loses energy, and (b) pulling the string inserts energy. All of his "energy is conserved" nonsense goes against the laws of thermodynamics as well as common sense and observations.
English
0
0
0
8
JustADad
JustADad@JohnnyRode·
@WrenAnScott @Mandlbaur @Saganismm A free energy device is likely impossible, there is friction, heat loss etc. Not even the sun is free energy, and one day it too will run out of energy to sustain its light. But it is something humanity has tried to make for many generations. #6'Elon
English
2
0
1
45
Saganism
Saganism@Saganismm·
In science, it often happens that scientists say, "You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken," and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion. — Carl Sagan
Saganism tweet media
English
20
64
247
26.2K
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@Thelightho39548 @haprho How would you explain these technologies, some of which (satellite TV especially) have been around since the 60s?
English
1
0
0
19
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@EnlightenStS @Mandlbaur @no_someone_else @Saganismm John ignores ALL advice on his paper, and lies copiously about the other things which conserve angular momentum (the Moon, comets, all other experiments). His mission to create a "free energy device" 10 years ago failed, and he blames classical mechanics. Obsessed and hostile.
English
0
0
1
31
Stephan Schulz
Stephan Schulz@EnlightenStS·
@Mandlbaur @no_someone_else @Saganismm I've read your "proof", and I pointed out the flaw in it. In particular, energy is not conserved in the experiment because you add more energy to the system to decrease the rotational radius. And there goes your contradiction...
English
4
0
3
98
Scott and Wren
Scott and Wren@WrenAnScott·
@JohnnyRode @Mandlbaur @Saganismm John was attempting to make a "free energy device" and when it didn't give him that he blamed the laws of motion, rather than trying to understand the thermodynamics of the system. He's spent 10 years on his crusade to "falsify" conservation of angular momentum. 😐
English
1
0
0
8
JustADad
JustADad@JohnnyRode·
@Mandlbaur @Saganismm No significant torque does not mean there is none. But again, this is the kind of questions that goes to actual experts in the field and not to general scientists. The best part of science is that it is the collaboration of humanity, no one person knows everything. #6'Elon
English
2
0
1
39