Yechiel Levin

3.9K posts

Yechiel Levin

Yechiel Levin

@YechielLevin

Katılım Kasım 2013
178 Takip Edilen72 Takipçiler
Mark Ruffalo
Mark Ruffalo@MarkRuffalo·
This is something I have been worrying a lot about. We have psychopaths waging this war. We have seen Netanyahu gleefully carry out a genocide in Gaza reducing it to a nuclear bomb site. Why would he not go further now in Iran? There has been absolutely no consequences for his war crimes in Gaza. Trump has only assisted them. This has got to stop. As the citizens of the world we have to stop this. They can not be allowed to carry out a nuclear strike on the millions of innocent people of Iran. These are our fellow human beings, regardless of their leaders. This is insanity.
Mohamad Safa@mhdksafa

I don't think people understand the gravity of the situation as the UN is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use in Iran. This is a picture of Tehran. For you uneducated, untraveled, never-served, warhawks licking your chops at the thought of bombing it. It's not some low population desert. There are families, children, family pets. Regular working class people with dreams. You're sick to want war. Tehran is a city of nearly 10,000,000 people. Imagine nuking Washington, Berlin, Paris, London, or beyond, bombed with nuclear weapons. I gave up my diplomatic career to leak this information. I suspended my duties so as not to be part of or a witness to this crime against humanity, in an attempt to prevent a nuclear winter before it is too late. Yesterday, nearly ten million people protested “No Kings” in the United States. The possibility of the use of nuclear weapons must be taken very seriously. It's dangerous. Act now. Spread this message worldwide. Take the streets. Protest for our humanity and future. Only the people can stop it. History will remember us.

English
1.5K
6.9K
26.6K
893.5K
History Speaks
History Speaks@History__Speaks·
Israel now has the death penalty but only for Palestinians. Also the Palestinians in question - a stateless indigenous people occupied by Israel in the WB/Gaza for 59 years - will be tried under martial law with no due process. "Apartheid" is not adequate to describe this.
English
15
142
512
8.1K
Mouin Rabbani
Mouin Rabbani@MouinRabbani·
More desperate Ziobabble. To repeat: take one portion each of Gad Saad, Adam Louis-Clown, Eyal Yakoby, and Brianna Wu, blend thoroughly in a circus, and you have made a Dan Burmawi.
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy

I told you, there is no opposing both Israel and Islam at the same time. It doesn’t work. This is a binary civilizational conflict, and if you are not actively siding with Israel, then you are empowering Islamic expansion in the West. First you need to understand why Jews seek influence in America versus why Muslims seek influence in America. Jewish influence is defensive. Jewish influence in America is not about taking over, imposing Jewish law, or replacing the system. It’s about making sure Israel stays strong enough to survive in a region where every neighbor has tried to annihilate it. Yes, there are Jewish billionaires funding leftist garbage in America, but those people aren’t pushing for Israel or even for Jewish hegemony. They’re pushing the same globalist nonsense as other elites. Don’t confuse George Soros with Israel. Soros doesn’t care about Israel’s survival. He doesn’t even care about America’s. Jewish leftists and Jewish Zionists are not the same thing. Muslim influence is offensive. In Europe and America, Muslim activism is about replacing the system that built the West with Islamic governance. When Muslims gain influence, they don’t argue for defense, they argue for offense. For Islam, Israel represents the West that those "neutrals" claim to want to preserve. When you attack Israel, you’re not attacking some random Middle Eastern state. You’re attacking the symbol of the West that Islam has been trying to destroy for 80 years. The civilizational war today has collapsed into a single choice. Whether you like it or not, you either stand with Israel or you stand with Islam. There is no middle ground. Neutrality doesn’t exist, because Islam doesn’t allow neutrality. Its worldview divides the world into two camps: Dar al-Islam (the House of Islam) and Dar al-harb (the House of War), and Israel, as an extention of the West, is considered Dar al-harb. Stand against Israel, and you are supporting the rebranding of Islamic jihad, the same jihad that is plotting to bring down the West, just as it has sought to destroy Israel for 80 years, and just as it overran Christian territories in the Middle East and North Africa. Standing against Israel weakens the only state in the Middle East that shares the West’s basic values of sovereignty, democracy, and human rights. Weakening Israel automatically empowers Islam. Whether they realize it or not, the far right’s “neutral” position becomes functionally pro-Islam. You can’t oppose both because the battlefield has already been drawn: support Israel, or watch Islam advance.

English
5
14
135
5.1K
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@financialsource @thewebbie Of course they do. It's just that Far Left Passover is emptied of any specifically Jewish content and draped like a skinsuit over neo-Marxist dogma.
English
0
0
1
7
Mark Freedman
Mark Freedman@financialsource·
@thewebbie Nice but inaccurate. The far left don’t celebrate Passover. It involves being proud of being Jewish and honouring tradition.
English
1
0
2
241
Matthew Feinberg
Matthew Feinberg@thewebbie·
The 4 Children of Far-Left Jewish Passover - 2026 edition. The "Woke" Child asks: Why do you care so much about Israel? Isn’t Zionism just colonialism? He removes himself from the story, forgetting that Jewish people are indigenous to the land of Israel. He swallows hashtags and TikTok takes as if they were sacred texts. You respond: Because if we don’t care, no one will. And had you been in Egypt, you’d have called Moses an oppressor. The Performative Child declares: I stand with all oppressed people... but not you. He shows up to every rally, every cause, unless it involves Jews. He lights candles for strangers overseas but stays silent when synagogues are vandalized. To him you say: Your silence is not neutrality. It is consent. The Naive Child wonders: Can’t we just have peace? If both sides just stopped fighting? He thinks this is a conflict about land, not the annihilation of a people. He doesn’t understand that “peace” without justice is surrender. You gently explain: We’ve tried. We withdrew. We gave. We were met with rockets, murder, and silence. The Child Who Doesn’t Know What a Jew Is: He mumbles something about decolonization, stares blankly when you say “pogrom,” and thinks the Maccabees were a boy band. To him you say: Come sit. Let me tell you a story. It starts in Egypt, winds through exile, and ends, not in Brooklyn, but in Jerusalem.
Matthew Feinberg tweet media
English
71
320
1.4K
73K
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@DanBurmawy Beautiful article, Dan. It's funny, just a few hours before seeing this, I wrote that Israel is to the West what Trump claimed to be (possibly justifiably) for his followers. Remember this line? "They're not after me. They're after you. I'm just in the way."
English
0
0
0
45
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@PraefectusCas @MaxNordau While we're at it, does he not realize that the very God who commanded the Passover observance also forbade, in even stronger terms, the consumption of blood? And that a central teaching of the Talmud is that a commandment cannot be fulfilled by violating another one.
English
0
0
1
10
Praefectus Casmiricus
Praefectus Casmiricus@PraefectusCas·
@MaxNordau I seriously don’t understand what goes on in the heads of Christians like this. Doesn’t he accept the Old Testament? Does he not realize that the very God he believes in is the one who commanded the Passover observance?
English
5
3
54
1.1K
Max 📟
Max 📟@MaxNordau·
Mahler makes a good point: Make sure to pay close attention to your children when they ask the four questions on Passover. They grow up so fast. 🥺 (On a serious note, Mahler is saying that Jews kidnap children and bake their blood into matzo, though he is mysteriously unable to list a single example of this.)
Max 📟 tweet media
English
29
36
547
12.8K
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@KhalilJeries You should try studying Talmud sometime. You might actually learn how to properly interpret speech, words, and thought. What am I saying? You obviously lack the mental capacity.
English
0
0
0
7
Khalil Sayegh
Khalil Sayegh@KhalilJeries·
Your cheap shot accusing me of antisemitism means nothing to me; I know myself well, and I trust my Jewish friends to speak to any antisemitic language or trope I might fall into. Regarding your claim that you do not think I deserved to have been killed when I was 7 years old at school in Gaza, how do you interpret this sentence: "It is because of Israel's fundamental decency that you are alive to talk about it." Any person with basic logic and understanding of language will understand it as it is. You believe that had I been killed as a 7-year-old, that would be okay and I would have deserved it. If not, then please state that you oppose Israel’s killing of kids in Gaza, including the babies killed in the bombing of our church in Old Town Gaza.
Rabbi Yaakov Menken@ymenken

It is typical of antisemites to characterize Jews as a threat despite the evidence to the contrary. I did not, needless to say, indicate that he "deserved to have been killed." I said it was due to Israel's fundamental decency that he was not, that no one was hurt.

English
19
13
156
13.7K
𝔼𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕥 𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕟
This is a stupid statement. Jews in particular are from the land that is today Israel, they are not from the land that is today Nepal. Both are on the Asian continent. Liberia is a specific place on the African continent where the U.S. brought people freed from slavery but did not return them to where they were actually from as a theory that freed slaves would do better with freedom in Africa. These two things are not comparable at all.
Peter Beinart@PeterBeinart

Curious how you'd apply this to Liberia

English
1
10
106
3.5K
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@History__Speaks @coldxman You know why it's directed at Israel, don't you? The Leftist/Islamist alliance isn't after Israel. It's after America / civilization. Israel's JUST IN THE WAY. They don't have a chance at conquering America while Israel still exists, since only Israel has the balls to fight.
English
0
1
2
41
History Speaks
History Speaks@History__Speaks·
"They're the #1 exporter of terror regionally and worldwide." This terrorism is directed at Israel, not Europe and the West. all directed against Israel and has nothing to do with US security. Hamas, PIJ, Hezbollah, and the Houthis are not Salafi Jihadist groups like ISIS and al Qaeda; they have no desire to do harm to the US, except insofar as the US aligns with Israel. We can object to the methods these groups use against Israel but the security/terrorism problem they pose is to Israel, not America.
English
3
0
14
909
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@Gopic @TigayBarry Just because you never learned Israel's history, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Dumbass.
English
0
0
0
1
Gopic™
Gopic™@Gopic·
@TigayBarry It belongs to Lebanon you twat. israel is a terrorist fabricated state. Get it through your think fckin skulls. israel has no fcking history.
English
11
1
10
1.4K
Barry Tigay
Barry Tigay@TigayBarry·
Israel’s stated goal in southern Lebanon is a buffer zone south of the Litani River. If it were to hold that territory, the reality is it wouldn’t be displacing meaningful Lebanese state control, Hezbollah has dominated that area for decades. Legally it was Lebanon, but in practice the state has had little sovereignty there. And that raises a question: if it is fully Lebanese territory, then does the Lebanese state bear responsibility for the decades of attacks launched from it? You can’t simultaneously insist it’s fully sovereign Lebanese territory and deny any Lebanese responsibility for what’s been launched from it. Israel should not leave the area. The danger is too great. Security demands it. History proves it. A strong, sovereign, peaceful Lebanon is a concept whose actualization has not arrived.
Barry Tigay tweet media
English
127
257
1.4K
67.9K
Apple Lamps
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple·
We're Walking Away from Candace Owens. "She built a platform on your trust. She used it to spread conspiracy theories, Holocaust denial, and hate literature to millions. We're done." 🔗ByeCandace.com
Apple Lamps tweet media
English
2
2
26
404
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Iran has a right to exist. Also, they warned they would strike which I have been reliably informed makes them the most moral army in the world. Lastly, the children harmed were used as human shields. Did I miss anything?
Israel Foreign Ministry@IsraelMFA

The Iranian regime devastated Arad and Dimona by deliberately striking civilians with missiles. Over 100 people were injured, including children. A blatant war crime. Pure terrorism.

English
6.7K
20.6K
102.8K
3.4M
Manuel Fernandez
Manuel Fernandez@FernandezManu81·
@MouinRabbani If states had a right to exist, we in Western Europe would still be living in the Roman Empire, Eastern Europe in the Soviet Union, Israel would still be part of the Ottoman Empire, and if we also consider the Mongol Empire, it becomes very complicated.
Saanen, Switzerland 🇨🇭 English
2
0
12
730
Mouin Rabbani
Mouin Rabbani@MouinRabbani·
The "right to exist" of a state has no basis in international law and no precedent in diplomatic practice. Simply put, a state's right to exist does not exist. If Israel nevertheless proclaims a "right to exist", the only reasonable basis for the existence of such a right is that it is a universal one, equally applicable to every other state at the time it was first raised, and particularly applicable to those whose legitimacy, like that of Israel, was also challenged. If it is a right that applies to Israel alone, it is not and cannot be a right. It bears recalling that there were at least two other states that had a similar claim to a "right to exist" when Israel first invented it, on the grounds that their legitimacy and continued existence were also challenged: Rhodesia and the USSR. Yet neither the Soviet Union nor Rhodesia claimed a "right to exist". Nobody and no other state ever claimed either of them had an inherent right to exist, or claimed any fundamental rights would be violated if these states ceased to exist and disappeared from the map. In the case of Rhodesia, there was in fact an international consensus that it cease to exist. This succeeded and Rhodesia was replaced by Zimbabwe, to universal acclaim. It is also important to recognize that Israel's claims of a "right to exist" have nothing to do with achieving a peaceful resolution of the Question of Palestine, and are fundamentally about preventing one. Israel's "right to exist" was first raised precisely because the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), recognized by the international community as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, appeared to be amenable to accepting earlier demands by the United States in exchange for recognition of its mere existence: PLO acceptance of United Nations Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, renunciation of armed force, and recognition of Israel. The demand of a "right to exist" was proclaimed by Israel precisely in order to prevent Western recognition of the PLO, and in the expectation that the PLO would reject it out of hand as an unacceptable absurdity. Needless to say, Washington and its Western partners eagerly embraced the Israeli innovation, and never required Israel to define the borders within which the entity was supposed to enjoy a right to exist. When the PLO formally accepted Israel's "right to exist" in the context of the 1993 Oslo Accords, it was careful not to formulate it as an absolute right: "The PLO recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security". Palestinian negotiators had wanted to add "within the 5 June 1967 borders", but this was categorically rejected by Israel. It was made unambiguously clear that addition of this clause would have made agreement impossible. Israel demanded and the PLO accepted the above formulation, but it changed absolutely nothing. Several years later, Israel began demanding that the Palestinian not only recognize its "right to exist" but recognize "Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state". It once again did so on the presumption that this would be embraced by its Western sponsors and allies but that the Palestinians would reject the absurdity of this innovation. Israel's objective was to make negotiations and thus a diplomatic settlement impossible, and to ensure that the Palestinians rather than Israel were held responsible for the stalemate. It largely worked, as Western leaders and "mediators" once again embraced the Israeli demand and tried to pressure the Palestinians to accept it. I would not expect Tucker Carlson to be aware of this history. I would however expect Zanny Minton Beddoes, the Editor-in-Chief of The Economist, to be at least generally familiar with the issue, particularly since she made a point of interrogating Carlson about it. Yet, once again, when it comes to Israel, journalists believe themselves perfectly entitled to be zany, and virtually always get away with it.
English
67
710
2.2K
115.3K
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@sfrantzman You don't understand this? Let me explain it to you like you're 5 years old. This is the inevitable lesson learned by the fact that THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD supported and cheered HAMAS on October 7th and thereafter. Violent rampages = GOOD.
English
0
0
0
2
Seth Frantzman
Seth Frantzman@sfrantzman·
I don't understand this...while Israel is under bombardment by ballistic missiles with many casualties..in this area in the West Bank the decision is made by extremists to go out and attack civilians...it's deeply troubling. Why would anyone do this? They could be volunteering to help in Arad or Dimona instead. Such a disconnect and horror
Ihab Hassan@IhabHassane

BREAKING: Israeli settlers are now burning down Palestinian homes in the village of Silat ad-Dhahr in the West Bank and attempting to burn families alive. People are pleading for help to put out the fires, as many families remain trapped inside their homes.

English
300
313
1.3K
135.7K
Yechiel Levin
Yechiel Levin@YechielLevin·
@SaweedTurangzai @HilzFuld Scuse me, aren't you lot the ones who celebrate martyrdom as the highest form of Allah worship? You should be fucking THANKING Israel for helping do many Muslims fulfill their dreams.
English
1
0
1
11
Saweed Khan Abdali
Saweed Khan Abdali@SaweedTurangzai·
@HilzFuld Why are you crying now? (You started this). Why are you killing Gazans, Lebanese and Iranians. Do you think they should die by your bombs and should not retaliate? Just because you are the so called chosen people of God (by the way the chosen people should be happy to meet God)
English
10
0
6
1.1K
Hillel Fuld
Hillel Fuld@HilzFuld·
Ya know what’s crazy about this war? That Israel is under constant bombardment including right now as I write these words and Israel has the military strength to make Hezbollah and the IRGC (and Hamas) disappear in 30 minutes. I mean, if Israel was weak and had no choice but to tolerate this situation, that would be one thing. But Israel isn’t weak and Israel doesn’t have to tolerate this insanity. And yet, even though literally any other country would have eliminated these threats long ago, Israelis are still living in these impossible conditions and the world accepts this as if it’s normal. Cluster bombs landing in Israeli cities multiple times a day, deadly rockets and suicide drones flying over our heads, and Israel still won’t do what it needs to do and what any other country would do. It’s mind boggling and not in a good way. Israel should do what the US would do and turn the territory from where these flying bombs are launched into a football field. Every rocket, missile, or suicide drone fired at Israel immediately leads to Israel flattening a mile. 10 missiles. 10 miles flattened. 100 missiles? 100 miles. Lebanon. Gaza. Iran. Yemen. Anyone that tries to murder Israelis will learn the painful lesson that you don’t mess with the Jews. It either stops or the entire area becomes prime real estate for the best golf course in the Middle East. Does that offend you? You must have confused me for someone who cares what you think. This must stop and it must stop now. And the cherry on top? Even though Israel doesn’t eliminate the existential threats like any country would and like it could, Israel is still accused of genocide and indiscriminately killing innocent civilians. You couldn’t make this up if you tried. This has to stop. As Golda Meir said “If we have to have a choice between being dead and pitied, and being alive with a bad image, we’d rather be alive and have the bad image.” Let’s do what we need to do and whoever doesn’t like it will have to get over it. Or not. That’s not my concern. My concern is not dying. I know, such an extremist… 🤦‍♂️
Hillel Fuld tweet media
English
92
126
616
23K
StarPlatinum
StarPlatinum@StarPlatinum_·
Netanyahu is not alive. It took 8 years to confirm the death of Ariel Sharon, former Prime Minister of Israel. It’s also known that on March 11 at 5:45am, a USAF C-17 departed from Tel Nof. It’s a “flying hospital.” Destination: Germany. The timing matches an emergency evacuation after a bombing that radar couldn’t fully hide. The C-17 landed in Ramstein at 10:15am. Landstuhl hospital activated VIP protocols, closed the maternity ward, and cleared entire floors. Either he’s in critical condition or he’s already buried.
StarPlatinum tweet mediaStarPlatinum tweet media
English
1.2K
7.2K
58K
5.2M