𝖅𝖆𝖈𝖍

I’m simply a man trying to discover and learn the truth and share what he’s learned with those who are also interested. I have found that actual books are usually more reliable than media, TV or internet, on average, even in their biases.

You’re welcome! You keep up those occasional posts about our tax dollars and what they actually go to and I’ll remain a loyal fan in that regard. It takes some gut and grit to say some of the things you’ve said, even if brief or simply intimations, in recent days and weeks gone by, especially given this Epstein climate. Don’t lose that— no matter how some out-of-touch-with-themselves sheep might react.

@Zach089 Awww ty friend ❤️

If you liked me before, but don't now bc I still support Trump- YOU ARE FAKE.

@GiaMMacool I actually have no clue what FAFO means. I probably do but I’ve never heard the acronym.

Everyone knows what FAFO means… But I prefer FITFO: Figure It The F* Out**. Basically, the cheat code that turned Gen X into men. 😎

I was randomly flipping through my 51-page booklet Why I Am Not A “New Age” Global Citizen by Dr. Peter Ruckman a few minutes ago and I found his third chapter’s title, “No Understanding of The Term “Liberty” to be fascinating so I decided to flip to there and found it interesting. Now I’m not being “preachy” here with this tweet but you have to understand that Dr. Ruckman was a hardcore King James Bible-teaching Baptist pastor for more than 60 years so much of how and what he taught came from an unwavering, multi-decade position that the Authorized Version of the Bible was God’s perfect word in English. This tweet isn’t a debate in that regard, I’m not asking what you think or believe about that, I’m simply telling you what he believed. At any rate, on page 20 of this booklet, Ruckman has a very interesting viewpoint on many of the terms that often get tossed around like dirty laundry in western politics. Check it out if you want to and feel free to tell me what you think. I personally agree with much (probably 80% or more) of what Ruckman says on the page in the photo below but what do you think?

@GiaMMacool One hell of a tweet! Much of what you said here regarding OkCupid (I think I spelled it correctly) is precisely why I don’t trust stats, percentages or studies, even when they agree with me. You never really know how they’ve been “fudged.”

Women are naturally selective when choosing a man. That’s a biological feature, and it’s actually good. Where this gets distorted is when men and women reject mating assortment. Meaning they are delusional about who they think they deserve. Some men argue that women have too many options, which is why they ignore “80% of average men.” This narrative comes from the OkCupid study that gets distorted online. But the way that data is shared online is misleading and leaves the nuance out. The popular claim is that “women rated 80% of men as below average,” and people use that to argue that “all women want men better than them.” That’s not factual. The study actually found something more nuanced. While women rated many men lower on the looks scale, they still talked to and messaged those men. They still gave those same men a chance. Looks are only one factor a woman considers when choosing a mate. At the same time, men tended to message the most attractive women, optimizing their own choices based on their preferences. What does that reveal? It shows that both men and women respond to attractiveness in different ways. This highlights a bigger issue: the data being shared online is cherry-picked, leaving out nuance to push narratives that divide men and women. Many people repeat the “only 20% of men are attractive to women” line without understanding the full context. This sets them on a negative trajectory with the opposite sex. Men tend to think in simple, direct solutions. That can be useful, but it can also lead to oversimplified conclusions that ignore nuance. Do men care about appearance? Of course. 
Do women care about appearance? Of course. Do men try to pursue the most attractive women they can? Yes. Men can want things like: Bigger breasts
Bigger hips
Porn-star comparisons to sex Build a bitch features The difference is that men tend to be more physical in how they optimize. While women have historically optimized more financially since traditionally women are primarily the ones having babies. But in 2026, we know women are now making their own money, which has affected how they choose men. Women are now paying attention to more than provisioning. So let’s talk nuance. On average, women are more selective before having sex with a man. (Good thing) Men, however, can sleep with multiple women with less selectivity. (Also doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing) However, when it comes to choosing to invest in a woman through commitment, this is when their selectivity compounds a hundredfold. Women look for: Ability to provide
Ability to protect Men look for: Attraction
Enthusiastic sex
Virtue
Fertility
Youth
Nurturing
Submission When you factor in what a man wants in commitment, he often has higher standards than people admit. That’s the part no one says out loud. A man just wanting sex vs. a man who wants to commit reveals a drastic difference. Men have just as high standards for a woman in marriage as a woman has for a man in marriage. Most women don’t actually have unlimited options. Most women are average at best. Let’s stop comparing hypergamy to celebrity women who are outliers. (Social media biases) The majority of people, men and women, are average in looks and lifestyle. They both don’t have the options they claim they do online, no matter what the narrative pushes. The real problem may be that both men and women overestimate their own value in the dating market and aren’t honest about their long-term intentions. Since most men and women are average successful relationships work when two people with similar value and compatibility choose each other. But many people aren’t realistic with their value due to media narratives so they keep chasing something that not real. Men and women both do this. It’s time for everyone to take this responsibility.

Calling all women evil because they’re hypergamous is like calling all men evil because they have the ability to rape. Twisting male and female nature to fit your narrative is the real evil.

@GiaMMacool The men who call women hypergamists accusatorially usually do so while ignoring that they themselves prefer women with hourglass figures.

@GiaMMacool Spot-on! This is why more should follow you!

Where has dating gone wrong? People have forgotten that great relationships are built, not found. Everyone looks for what the other can provide them. Instead of looking inward first. Everyone wants the perfect man/woman. Yet they aren’t striving to become that person themselves. Your significant other is a reflection of yourself. That’s where dating goes wrong today. People have a “take,take,take mentality.” Sounds obvious, yet so few seem to realize it.

@tyromper @elonmusk @ZubyMusic @GiaMMacool @NewEmergingKing @ModernDad @zachhomol_ @Jungle__Jay @Vas_526 @GiaMMacool definitely deserves a follow!

Hey @elonmusk I know you're busy, But the people would love a POSITIVITY Tab! The outrage is draining!! People: you can make your TL more positive by following: @ZubyMusic @tyromper @GiaMMacool @NewEmergingKing @ModernDad @zachhomol_ @Jungle__Jay @Vas_526 @NicoJamesBCN @DavidFischer @PaternalLegacy @TimelessTrvlr @theryanjamesmil To name a few!!

@Real___iTamara More like run from

Fellas, This woMAN is tired of yall whistling at hEr. Please stop ✋️

I’m not sure how you figure Gia’s a radical anything, except maybe bringing awareness to male needs and marginalization. She does try to help other women but sometimes help looks like tough love. As far as “… not just both sides & blame others.”…???… not sure what that even means? And no, people did have a say, and they chose not to rise up against the men who largely funded feminism and the sexual liberation. You should look into E. Michael Jones and his intellectual work on Cultural Marxism and Libido Dominandi and how feminism, pop culture, sexual liberation, sexual clothing fashion, abortion, Planned Parenthood, the pill, the condom, and entertainment in general, all largely funded, organized, propagated, pioneered and influenced by men, destroyed western civilization.

@Zach089 @GiaMMacool Wrong. If Gia wasn't a radical feminist, she would actually help other women. Practical advice, not just both sides & blame others. Nobody had any say, the mercantile banking cartel started in the 1820's.

@Robin_Hood1555 @GiaMMacool Men had a lot of say in a lot of it. And frankly, Gia has gone over these historical topics ad nauseam in different ways that she shouldn’t have to re-explain it everytime she takes the risk of upsetting her usual cheerleaders.

@GiaMMacool Men had zero say in anything. The coalition of useless people is elites, women, illegals/minorities banning together to oppress useful men. What percentage of men use OF again? It's like pointing out there are schizophrenics & generalizing to all men.

@GiaMMacool Men aren’t just part of sexual liberation, we’re the ones who engineered it.

One of the biggest issues in society right now is that men don’t take responsibility for much of anything anymore. I know they think they do but they don’t. I work in retail and I see firsthand, everyday how men are just as wasteful with money as women and they’re just as scapegoating as women. If men would start accepting accountability more, women would also start doing the same thing.

This post brought out all the angry men who only want “women bad” content. Because I didn’t play by their rules, the attacks start 🤣 Because of you, I’ll be posting more about positive female traits going forward. Too many men online just wallow in resentment and revenge fantasies. There are plenty of creators who will sell you slop, I’m not one of them. I deal in facts… I want truth. Simple.

I don’t blame you for saying you’re going to start posting more positive female traits. For an account like yours who has done almost nothing but uplift, encourage and praise men, the good women deserve some recognition too. Just please don’t forget about the few folks who’ve usually always seen you through, even when we actually disagreed at the start of your posts and then read them thoroughly and ended up agreeing after all. To the men who pushed Gia to this point, “thanks.”

@RBerestka @GiaMMacool I’ve followed Gia off-and-on for a few years and I’ve never seen her tear men down. I have seen her hold a mirror to men’s faces when needed but that’s not tearing them down.

@GiaMMacool You can’t claim to support women while tearing down men.

9 out of 10 posts on your timeline are fake outrage designed to keep you mad at the opposite sex • “Marriage ended because of a prenup.” Fake news. • “She divorced him because he was too nice.” Fake news. • Celebrity outliers used to explain “all women” Fake news. If this is what fills your feed, you’re being black-pilled on purpose.  And it’s no different than the girl addicted to dopamine from attention on OF.  Black-pilling is just defeatism disguised as wisdom. Posts that say: 
“women bad”
“men good” are comfort content for men who don’t want to look inward.  Because blaming women is easier than admitting you’ve got work to do. And the more you consume it,
the further it pulls you from the courage required to build a real life. Unfollow these content creators they are lining their pockets off your anger  Watch how fast your timeline and your mindset improves.

@Real___iTamara 😂😂😂😂

You think AI is bad? I once watered a plastic plant for almost 2 years.

@ampHatchhermit @GiaMMacool The connecting line between our pfps in this thread says otherwise. If you weren’t responding to me, then who?

@Zach089 @GiaMMacool I wasn't responding to you Zach.

Men encouraged sexual liberation let’s not forget that. Now that women are being rewarded for sexual freedom, men are mad. They’re mad because the dog got off the leash and men aren’t in control anymore. Blaming women for everything is a cope and just outsourcing personal responsibility.

@Matt5Tan @Real___iTamara @grok Don’t ask Grok questions like that. I’ve found that Grok can’t even quote half the information that’s in my books on my shelf— even when it insists it knows what the books are about.

@Real___iTamara @grok was pizzagate real?

Pizzagate was real, yet people listened to the guys like this who said it was a hoax.