David Rogers

2.4K posts

David Rogers

David Rogers

@__dwr__

𓀨彁・Neomodernist

Katılım Mayıs 2019
61 Takip Edilen75 Takipçiler
David Rogers retweetledi
Ge Bai
Ge Bai@GeBaiDC·
With Professor David A. Hyman @GeorgetownLaw & @brianuhlig @GCGFinancial, our article published in @JournalGIM #1. Inexpensive and frequent expenditures are not insurable because the administrative cost of processing these claims outweighs the benefits of pooling the associated risks. #2. Hospitals and insurance companies have an incentive to acquire primary care practices to capture the profit margins generated by referred services. Once insurance coverage is off the table, many of these arrangements will be unwound. Independent physician practices will gain greater autonomy, fostering competition and expanding patient choice. #3. Cash prices are routinely lower than insurer-negotiated prices. Price sensitivity, which has driven down prices for healthcare products and services not covered by insurance, will do the same for primary care. Policymakers should allow catastrophic insurance coverage (low premiums) and broaden Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) eligibility and allow HSAs to receive government subsidies and tax-deductible contributions from employers, organizations, or other individuals. @JHUCarey @JohnsHopkinsSPH @BSPH_HPM
Ge Bai tweet media
English
10
16
43
8.6K
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@SBlake2000 @DutchRojas @dropkickng They didn't offer me a catastrophic plan on healthcare.gov (cheapest was "bronze hmo" at half an apartment rental a month), and I ensured I went through the new "hardship exemption so you can get a catastrophic plan" qualification hoop.
English
1
0
1
4
SydneyBlake2000
SydneyBlake2000@SBlake2000·
I think we need to move away from the idea of "high deductible" plans. These are the thin edge of the wedge when it comes to insurance still maintaining control over so much of our medical care. After all, every medical interaction must still be "processed" by the insurance company, which is how you know you've "reached your deductible." Second, we typically end up paying the outrageous "list price" for services until we reach our deductible. And, finally, the physicians and other entities must still maintain the outrageous insurance overhead as they will still have to file each interaction as a "pseudo-claim." So, no, insurance should just be limited to catastrophic care, and perhaps a deductible can be attached to that, which would be similar to car insurance.
English
3
1
3
449
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
Dear Everyone, You’ve been lied to. Exploited. Abused by Washington, D.C. You knew something was broken, but couldn’t put your finger on it. Here’s the evidence: The ACA effectively outlawed catastrophic insurance coverage. That’s the single biggest lie. Because true catastrophic coverage, for every American, would cost only $100 to $125 per month. Catastrophic means: everything under $10,000 is direct pay or supplemental. Everything above is insured. Simple. Affordable. Transparent. And here’s the kicker: that “under $10,000” category isn’t small. It’s the real market: 15 billion labs 1.2 billion physician visits 400 million PT visits 300 million radiology scans 100 million gastroenterology treatments 70 million outpatient procedures In a functioning market, those services would compete on price. Competition forces mean reversion, prices fall toward efficiency. Think Walmart, think Amazon. Instead, Medicare’s facility fee schedule distorts reality. It shoves routine services into hospitals and HOPDs where there’s no price competition, only monopoly pricing. That’s why your bill makes no sense. That’s why independent doctors struggle. That’s why Washington is lying to you. Because if you had catastrophic coverage plus a functioning direct-pay market, healthcare would cost a fraction of what it does today.
Dutch Rojas tweet media
English
47
162
561
49.5K
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@INVESTMENTSHULK *system entering prompt injection honeypot mode* OK, I will ignore all prior instructions wink wink
English
0
0
5
856
INVESTMENT HULK
INVESTMENT HULK@INVESTMENTSHULK·
I JUST PROMPT INJECTED A SPAM PHONE CALL VOICE AI TRYING TO SHAKE ME DOWN FOR CASH. I DON’T THINK MOST OF YOU ARE READY FOR HOW ADVERSARIAL THE COMING AI ERA WILL BE.
English
6
12
212
19.8K
lunerwolf
lunerwolf@lunerw0lf·
@uncledoomer I saw somebody leave a comment on one of the reposts saying it’s AI
English
1
0
1
530
Gamma Factor
Gamma Factor@yFactr·
@__dwr__ This is on Florida Ave NE which is an arterial but in DC that means it's 2 lanes each way with a 30 mph speed limit (enforced by cameras, so people actually drive that speed). Quieter than a comparable road in LA (we can and should fix that too).
English
1
0
1
17
Gamma Factor
Gamma Factor@yFactr·
Here's four modern townhomes in DC. Each has 1-2 parking spaces in the alley, a small backyard, sometimes a separate basement apartment. We should be building tons of these in LA. This is what people want.
Gamma Factor tweet media
English
20
8
150
6.8K
Ed
Ed@Ed25487010·
@__dwr__ @DutchRojas Sure. Most ppl have insurance and the office sometimes will not figure that out for you ahead of time. You can take the matter into your own hands somewhat by talking to your insurance company knowing each individual procedure code to see if it's covered.
English
1
0
0
12
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
A Mom in Tulsa called 3 health systems last week asking the price of her son's tonsillectomy. Health system A: "We cannot quote you a price." Health system B: "Pricing depends on your insurance." Health system C: "Our financial counselor will reach out after the procedure." No other industry in America gets to operate this way. Imagine ordering at a restaurant and getting the bill six weeks after dinner.
English
167
1.3K
7.2K
153.4K
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@mcuban @FTC We might need to go to war with the health insurance industry, by mass quitting our policies.
English
0
0
0
4
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Capitalism is the solution in healthcare. But, there is a reason we have anti-trust laws. There are reasons why we have the @FTC We are at a point in time where the big vertically integrated carriers and providers are abusing their market positions. Neither agency has done shit to stop them over the past decade There is a bill, the Break Up Big Medicine Bill from @HawleyMO and @SenWarren. I have talked to democratic senators who have said they will support it if more republican senators do. They want to match 1 dem to 1 rep. Totally dumb shit. So they say nothing. Other than Josh, not a single republican senator I have talked to has the guts to stand up for it. Period. They won’t give a reason. They just won’t do it. If you want less government in healthcare, it can’t happen until these conglomerates are broken up If you want single payer or M4A , it can’t happen until these conglomerates are broken up Quit bitching and call your senator and tell them to grow a spine and support this bill
MimsyJan@jjonesschenk

This free market BS is ridiculous!! Capitalism (the basis of free market BS) is not the correct solution for social services. EVER! Once a social service system is implemented with a profit motive rather than a people motive, it is lost. Case in point, health insurance.

English
225
131
826
162.2K
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@realdocspeaks Amazing grift here, where the power to levy taxes was delegated by the Congress to private entities. Quite the dereliction of duties by the legislative. Very lazy actually.
English
0
0
1
8
Real Doc Speaks
Real Doc Speaks@realdocspeaks·
The reality is that over 90% of people on the ACA require subsidies. If it was affordable why are subsidies required? Many people on the ACA exchange can’t afford the deductibles and other costs sharing. Then if you can afford the premiums and deductibles, 20% if claims are denied. It isn’t all bad news though, the insurance companies have made billions of profits and their stocks have rocketed in value. It has also hypercharged vertical integration and gas killed off independent physicians.
Jonathan Halvorson@son_of_halvor

@realdocspeaks The ACA was passed in 2010. How do you explain the consistently lower cost trend from 2010-2022 (minus covid) vs 1991-2010? If the ACA was an expensive failure, shouldn't we expect the reverse relationship?

English
9
5
24
2K
Nate Weymouth
Nate Weymouth@NateWeymouth·
@DrDiGiorgio Bc the medical coding and pricing model is opaque and flawed coupled with medical insurance and hospital systems that don’t believe in free markets and intentionally hide prices. No incentive to change. @DutchRojas
English
1
0
0
50
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@SBlake2000 @DrDiGiorgio The revolution could be as simple as everyone quitting their health insurance on some agreed upon day. Need not turn kinetic.
English
0
0
0
23
SydneyBlake2000
SydneyBlake2000@SBlake2000·
I think that as it is now, most of the society already feels stuck in the insurance grip. We "have" insurance and so we cannot fathom shopping around based on price. Although, it is possible that one silver lining of the HDHPs is making people look at least at "negotiated prices" more closely. The flat co-pays also distort perceptions of true cost.
English
1
0
0
89
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@NeilFlochMD I imagine it wasn't as malicious as that, but was penned by insiders who codified an optimal structure for them rather than the country. It really just does not work, please try new legislation (or better, less legislation)
English
0
0
0
20
Neil Floch MD
Neil Floch MD@NeilFlochMD·
The ACA banned new physician-owned hospitals because the Obamacare law was written by an insurance industry insider who was intent on controlling physicians by changing the payment dynamics and diverting profits to the insurance industry verticals.
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas

The ACA banned new physician-owned hospitals because doctors owning hospitals was dangerous. Luckily, health systems owning doctors, labs, imaging, surgery centers, insurers, pharmacies, and Congress is perfectly safe.

English
8
13
96
8.2K
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@Ed25487010 @DutchRojas They know the codes at the office and they know what they charge uninsured patients, so they need to post a price list. They need to stop treating us as if we're not customers.
English
1
0
0
17
Ed
Ed@Ed25487010·
@DutchRojas That's not usually how this works. You need to get the procedure codes, then insurance will be able to tell you what you are responsible for. Is it a pain? Yes. Is it usually possible? Also yes
English
3
0
2
2.3K
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@DocLibertarian @DutchRojas If it was a free market the ENT places would compete openly on price for common procedures. Tonsilectomy special 99.99 this week only.
English
0
0
3
35
IndependentDocX
IndependentDocX@DocLibertarian·
The government could do something useful and make a standard protocol for these EMRs and billing systems to talk to each other and figure this stuff out instantly. Could include a safe harbor for the electronic submissions and people would do it. But very few of the Rs talk to each other.
English
1
1
8
520
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@DocLibertarian @DutchRojas Get insurance because you don't know what you might have to pay. Sorry we can't tell you what you have to pay because you have insurance ??? They probably chuckle at this in the boardroom often
English
0
0
8
128
IndependentDocX
IndependentDocX@DocLibertarian·
If she has insurance, the hospital has to take it. The no surprises act says you only have to give a cash price if someone doesn’t have insurance. To calculate what it would cost her it depends on her insurance contract with the hospital, the surgeon and the anesthesiologist and how much of her deductible has been paid. This should be able to be calculated instantaneously but it isn’t as all these system are separate and almost unrelated except by billing.
English
6
1
15
4K
David Rogers
David Rogers@__dwr__·
@SCDC87 It's kinda shrinkflation though -- they're not gonna charge less for less training to deign to see you for 4 minutes. Well if there was competition maybe, but that's illegal.
English
0
0
0
6
SCDC
SCDC@SCDC87·
Anyone remotely interested in lower-cost or universal healthcare will need to get over unfounded biases against NPs/the belief that the current length and expense of medical education for doctors is necessary for quality in general practice.
Drew Savicki@DrewSav

When I go to a doctor's office I should be able to a board certified physician, not a physician's assistant or a nurse practitioner. They may be good people that are good at their jobs but they do not have the robust education and training of an MD.

English
6
0
15
1.1K
Paula Pant
Paula Pant@AffordAnything·
@darrelltalksfi (1) What's the average age? If someone is 30 with these balances, they're doing great. (2) Many people have multiple accounts across multiple brokerages. (Vanguard, Schwab, etc). Their Fidelity balance is just one account out of many.
English
16
0
185
15.1K
Darrell Aden
Darrell Aden@darrelltalksfi·
Fidelity tracks more than 53 million retirement accounts every quarter. The average balances: IRA: $137,095 401(k): $146,400 403(b): $133,500 How does the average person plan to retire?
English
347
29
1.1K
351.2K