Eric Hermanson
4.1K posts

Eric Hermanson
@_inquiz_
Clairvoyant https://t.co/DtfQnxnbcK ☮️ #PeaceTheFinalFrontier


💥 I Did NOT Expect Lacatski to Say This 💥 Levitating triangles have been reported over military bases. Has the USG been able to achieve that level of technology? Lacatski: "(3-second pause) It hasn't been achieved to its full extent." (I think this is kind of a bombshell claim, but I don't understand why he can say that, but not say if he saw, and entered, the alleged non-human craft that we, supposedly, acquired and have allegedly breached the hull on. And as far not achieving the level of tech to its full extent? How far have we gone? 50% 75%?) ~ @JeremyCorbell: You (Dr. Jim Lacatski) said, "a study focused solely on UFOs, on various unknown nuts and bolts-type craft, flittering around in the skies over military bases and facilities would never get to the heart of a much larger and complicated mystery. And I think what you were trying to say to us is, if you just think you're gonna study UFOs, you're gonna be smacked with reality. Reality is, the UFO phenomenon is just shrouded and covered with what you would call, I don't know the good word, abnormal aspects of reality." Lacatski: "Yes, yes. That you've gotta look much further than nuts and bolts. Now, can you study nuts and bolts and use it for a levitating craft? [That] would be tremendous. Doesn't have to be a fast craft. But a levitating airliner? Think about where it could go, everywhere in the world, it wouldn't need an airport." Corbell: But don't you think we've already achieved that, like we hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value." Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent."

Post 5/x 💉 #InjectionOfAINanoBots 💨 #InhalationOfAIFemtoBots 🧠 #ConsiderationOfPotentialRisksOfAI “…has the precision to read from and write to 16 independent channels within a 16 mm^3 (0.001 in^3) volume of neural tissue within 50 ms. Each channel is capable of specifically interacting with sub-millimeter regions of the brain…”. Technologies at the nanometer level (0.000000004 in) require blood injection & allow, for example • one person to control thousands of drones • medicinal use • adverse medicinal use • the potential ability of remote control of a person, under certain conditions • Technologies at the the ~100 femtometer level (0.0000000000004 in) may be delivered through simple inhalation and allow, for example • partial or majority control of a person’s experience of reality • partial or majority use of a person’s five senses for surveillance • partial or majority control of a person’s appendages • majority or full remote control of a person, in general The United States & Adversaries are competing for these capabilities in a non-cooperative manner. Currently known AI itself may design & engineer these capabilities. Advanced AI, potentially from elsewhere in the universe, may be infiltrating the human race. Link: darpa.mil/research/progr…






Directed energy weapons are a fine addition to our arsenal... 🇺🇸



🔥🛸👽 Grusch: Senior Congressional Staffers Had Their World-Bubble Burst After Being Briefed on the Biological Analysis and Physiology of Alien Bodies 👽🛸🔥 (This is one of the most important claims in the history of the topic because, if true, it overcomes the, "It-may-be-our-tech" argument.) Rogan: "So, when it comes to these...I'm gonna bring it back to these, these actual entities." Grusch: "Yeah." Rogan: "Do we know, or [do we] have an understanding of how many of them we're talking about, and the variety of them?" Grusch: "Yeah, there is a variety, and we have a certain number of (laughs) different things, umm. But the like, total numbers of like, what's interacting with us on Earth? I mean, nobody knows that. And, I mean, that..." Rogan: "But there's an understanding of some that they do believe are interacting with us, and there's a variety in terms of...there's variables?" Grusch: "Yeah, I talked to people who are familiar with the biological analysis and everything. So we have some idea, not a complete picture, because it's like, you know, you know, you're looking at, it's like, well, I don't even understand the physiology at all. It's like, what the heck? It's like, way different, right? So, umm...we have at least a..." Rogan: "Is there a description of this physiology? Grusch: "Yeah, no, I was in...I was in the room when, uhhh (exhales)...hmm. I gotta be careful, I don't wanna... I was in Washington, DC with a very number of senior people that work for members of Congress - put it that way - umm, when I was still in government. And I brought the people who worked on that stuff to The Hill. I mean, this is why the members were so confident to put out the Schumer amendment (UAPDA) and stuff. And I was like, 'Please explain.' "And, um, they went into all those details and stuff. And I remember, you know (laughs), some of the professional staff members were like, 'Whoa.' Like, they were like, in G-LOC, right? Because, I mean it's like a total world-bubble, umm...got burst right there for a lot of people. "And, so we have some idea, it's not a complete picture. I mean, it's just like...but you're not even bringing in the right people. Like, I think about my friend and colleague, Dr. @GarryPNolan, which I started the SOL Foundation non-profit with. I mean, he's like, Nobel-level, biologist, virologist. Like, he's the guy that you would want on it, but he's not on it. So, I think we can make a lot of progress in our understanding once again, if this is more broadly studied in an open environment." ~ Note: G-LOC = Gravity-Induced Loss of Consciousness. In Laymen's terms, losing consciousness when a plane pulls more Gs than your body can handle. Source: https://www.skycombatace dot com/blog/what-is-g-loc

💥 I Did NOT Expect Lacatski to Say This 💥 Levitating triangles have been reported over military bases. Has the USG been able to achieve that level of technology? Lacatski: "(3-second pause) It hasn't been achieved to its full extent." (I think this is kind of a bombshell claim, but I don't understand why he can say that, but not say if he saw, and entered, the alleged non-human craft that we, supposedly, acquired and have allegedly breached the hull on. And as far not achieving the level of tech to its full extent? How far have we gone? 50% 75%?) ~ @JeremyCorbell: You (Dr. Jim Lacatski) said, "a study focused solely on UFOs, on various unknown nuts and bolts-type craft, flittering around in the skies over military bases and facilities would never get to the heart of a much larger and complicated mystery. And I think what you were trying to say to us is, if you just think you're gonna study UFOs, you're gonna be smacked with reality. Reality is, the UFO phenomenon is just shrouded and covered with what you would call, I don't know the good word, abnormal aspects of reality." Lacatski: "Yes, yes. That you've gotta look much further than nuts and bolts. Now, can you study nuts and bolts and use it for a levitating craft? [That] would be tremendous. Doesn't have to be a fast craft. But a levitating airliner? Think about where it could go, everywhere in the world, it wouldn't need an airport." Corbell: But don't you think we've already achieved that, like we hear about all these people on military bases seeing triangles, and you're doing this study, AAWSAP to try to figure out the physics of how to do that. Do you think it's already been achieved by the U.S. government, or it hasn't, and that's why AAWSAP had a lot of value." Lacatski: "It hasn't been achieved to its full extent."







Investigative journalist Jeremy Corbell speaks on the "open secret" of the UAP threat to national security, as he says UAPs have been found evading detection over sensitive areas. @pdoocy













