Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Julian Shergill
123 posts

Julian Shergill
@_julian2k
building https://t.co/k57CXItPge
SF Katılım Mayıs 2021
365 Takip Edilen120 Takipçiler

@ay_ushr yeah pretty likely that 80% of saas eventually moves to usage tbh
English

@_julian2k A bit of both tbh
The decoupling of usage from seats means that we’re seeing more usage pricing models as a whole
The rising token costs make credits (instead of eg, messages) a good fit because costs can be so large and unpredictable
English

as someone who sells usage-billing infra i would love per-seat pricing to be dead
but it's still the better model assuming two things are true together:
1. product value scales with humans getting access
2. cost per user is roughly consistent
AI makes the second part hard, but keeping seat pricing is much easier imo if your product allows for it. eg @SlackHQ @linear @cursor_ai work super well

English

@Celesteamadon What if feeling high-status and wanted is the outcome many people subconsciously sign up for?
English

@_CallMeMacy 1. They spend time & focus to build something not core to their business/product
2. It's not a one-off action. Sb will have to maintain & debug the vibe-coded CRM
3. CRM costs are negligible for venture-backed companies, so what's really the upside?
English

@annarmonaco @paradigmai congrats on the launch, love using paradigm!
English

Today we’re launching the newest version of @paradigmai
When we started Paradigm, the goal was never to tack AI onto existing spreadsheets. It was to build a new type of interface that does the work for you.
Now we’re pushing that vision much further.
Workflows turn Paradigm into a system that runs research processes for you.
Connect your CRM, existing spreadsheets, Slack, email, and internal data, and let Paradigm continuously run the research workflows your team already does.
Same intuitive interface. But now a system of action.
If you tried Paradigm before, try it again.
Manual research is now a competitive liability.
English
Julian Shergill retweetledi

@moeamaya @_julian2k Yeah I think Needle is the only contender who's even trying right now from what I've seen.
English

exactly what we're building at needle.
there's no way fast-moving teams will manually log into a separate interface to move candidates around!
the ATS should come to you in slack, send you dossiers before interviews, and source candidates in the background.
if users have to "learn to use“ your ATS, it's already failed.
Nan Yu@thenanyu
Who’s making an AI-first ATS out there
English

@javbuitrago exactly the stage we're building for. would love to get your feedback!
English

A ton of early stage startups I know have the same problem. They need an ATS. They pick Ashby. Then they realize it's built for a stage they haven't reached yet. So what do they do? They open Notion and build half the process there. Ashby + Notion shouldn't be a standard startup recruiting stack. Ashby should build a different version of its product for startups. Something designed from the ground up for a team of 5 to 35. Founders would pay for that tomorrow.
English

nobody wants another interface.
the best products work where you do.
most hiring coordination today happens in slack.
needle is the only ATS that lets you edit candidates, pull interview notes and send mails straight from slack.
needle.so
English

@_julian2k nice animations, i like it!
you could consider making the next button have dynamic text, or experiment with different placing
English

@ay_ushr called me out right as I was adding one to our new onboarding flow lmao
English
Julian Shergill retweetledi
Julian Shergill retweetledi

Conversely, ruin talent density; ruin your startup.
Chris Hladczuk@chrishlad
Talent density solves all startup problems.
English













