Adturb retweetledi
Adturb
2.3K posts


Will #Starmer carry out his threat to call a general election if there is a leadership challenge?

English

@AnitaWales4 @benonwine I’m sorry to say but that attitude has, in part, led us to where we are now.
Vote for who YOU want.
And as has already been pointed out, it’s unlikely to split the vote, if anything it should increase turnout.
English

@benonwine Voting for Restore will split the right wing vote. Remember Sarah Pochin won her seat by a mere 6 votes.
Voting for Restore at this juncture only helps the left. It's a vote for more of the same. No question.
English

@BurnsideWasTosh You never know, she might abolish stamp duty to cover her backside 😂
English

I am not sure that being an illiterate teenage granny tax evader without a maths GCSE should be First Lord of the Treasury.
Some might call me a snob, but I really do think we need to stop this mawkish background lionisatio it demeans those from a similar background who arent slags, worked hard and havent received every penny from the State for their whole life.
English

@dshensmith @ReemAmirIbrahim I sadly think they’re fully aware of the impact and consequences. It’s almost as if you’ll own nothing and be happy….
English

@ReemAmirIbrahim 100%
So many landlords will now just give up. They're blind to the obvious reality this will cause.
English

Nearly £50bn has been wiped from the value of Britain’s rental market. Landlords are fleeing.
The Renters Rights Act is an awful piece of legislation that will hurt renters.
Angela Rayner@AngelaRayner
From TODAY, renters like @molly_hartill will benefit from the Renters Rights Act. ✅ Right to request a pet ✅ Ban on Section 21 No Fault Evictions ✅ End to rental bidding wars The difference Labour makes 🌹
English

@ZubyMusic I’d heard they were developing WMDs?
JOKING- BEFOE ANYONE GETS EXCITED
English

What are the implications of this?
🇦🇪 HGS@Sajwani
Today the UAE 🇦🇪 officially leaves OPEC … it’s a new world ! Never bet against the UAE
English

@Artemisfornow @JuliaHB1 Glad to see that UK taxes are spent recruiting the best and brightest!
English

@TheNorfolkLion No different to usual. You aim for the least-worst.
Never have I been in a position to vote for the best. Currently Reform are Tory 2.0 and they’re the least worst IMO
English
Adturb retweetledi

@GigaBasedDad It’s harder to convince someone they’ve been fooled than to fool them in the first place.
English

@malachimaxeyusa Not sure why she’s got a large pair of cable croppers in her car… got to be a question in itself?
English
Adturb retweetledi

Rupert’s GB News interview with Jacob Rees-Mogg…
As you all know, Rupert has been banned from GB News for many months on Farage’s instruction.
So we were pleasantly surprised when Jacob asked Rupert on his show (pre-recorded).
What follows is not Jacob’s fault…
It was agreed that the interview would go out entirely unedited. A shorter clip went on on Jacob’s show, then the ‘full’ interview would be put online. We were told. Jacob said so on his show, too...
A longer clip did go online, but it was not the full interview…
We suspected this may happen, so our team recorded his interview.
We have the full recording.
A segment was cut out, replaced by a VPN ad. The only ad in the whole video… What did the segment cover?
Jacob asking Rupert about what happened regarding Reform’s attempt to put him in prison.
Jacob raised how Rupert’s guns were seized. How his home was raided by armed police late on a Friday night as a direct result of the Reform allegations.
Rupert explained, following Jacob’s questioning, that Farage had admitted their attempt to incriminate Rupert and imprison him on false allegations was entirely because he disagreed with Rupert’s position of deporting foreign child rapists - he said so publicly at a Reform press conference. Farage said it was ‘brutal’, but it had to be done.
Rupert’s position is that foreign rapists and their accomplices should be removed - one the British people agree with.
This was all cut from the interview, despite an agreement it would go out unedited.
Rupert has spoken with Jacob about this, and the clip removal was not his decision - it is not Jacob’s fault.
But why would GB News not want their viewers to at least hear both sides of the story?
Farage, of course, is a shareholder in GB News - it is essentially his channel.
Other GB News presenters have stated publicly that they will have Rupert on their show live and unedited and then gone cold and ignored him - Alex Armstrong, and Patrick Christys as two examples. There are others too...
If GB News won’t welcome free, open and honest debate on its live shows - then honestly, what is the point of the channel?
They have blamed the elections for not having Rupert on - that is totally false and debunked by media law experts. There was a ban before any elections, and there continues to be a ban now. Of course news channels can have politicians on. To suggest otherwise is ludicrous.
Rupert is happy to go on GB News on two conditions - it is live and unedited.
The continued censorship of Restore Britain is unacceptable.
English



















