Andy McPartlin

104 posts

Andy McPartlin banner
Andy McPartlin

Andy McPartlin

@ajmcpartlin

Radiation Oncologist @pmcancercentre

Toronto Katılım Eylül 2012
168 Takip Edilen164 Takipçiler
Andy McPartlin
Andy McPartlin@ajmcpartlin·
@VickersBiostats @ahmederaky No post sx lymphoedema in 1500 patients is unusual. Post RT tox data would be informative as a fu if available. There’s a lack of high level data in this space, thanks for publishing.
English
0
0
0
39
Andrew Vickers
Andrew Vickers@VickersBiostats·
@ajmcpartlin @ahmederaky err... there was a trial. There as no lymphedema in the trial. But feel free to give an estimate of the increase in risk with lymphedema and its relative harm vs. mets and i'll run the meta-analysis.
English
2
0
0
91
Ahmed Eraky
Ahmed Eraky@ahmederaky·
Defining utility as net metastases avoided and weighting metastasis 2,000× worse than lymphocele virtually guarantees PLND “wins” under almost any nonzero assumed benefit. That’s a value structure driving the result—not neutral inference.
Karim Touijer@TouijerKarim

in J Urol this month a decision analysis of PLND during RP Take home message: benefits of PLND outweigh risk for most patients. auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU… @VickersBiostats @UrologyMSK #prostatecancer @Uroweb @AmerUrological

English
6
1
6
4.2K
Andy McPartlin
Andy McPartlin@ajmcpartlin·
@VickersBiostats @ahmederaky Interesting idea. Major side effect patients would worry about is chronic significant lymphedema of the lower limb. Risk raised ++ by extended PLND and salvage RT. What value vs single met cured by sbrt. Conclusion seems overstated. Need trial ideally.
English
1
0
1
80
Andrew Vickers
Andrew Vickers@VickersBiostats·
@ahmederaky Yes, that is the whole point of decision analysis. You have the evidence you have, but a patient is coming in tomorrow and you have to decide PLND or not. That is why a key parameter is the subjective probability PLND is of value. Do give me yours and I'll rerun the analysis.
English
1
0
0
155
Andy McPartlin retweetledi
ASTRO
ASTRO@ASTRO_org·
New in the #RedJournal: Phase 2 single-arm trial of SBRT for patients with oligoprogressive breast, genitourinary and gastrointestinal cancers: by 1 yr, ~1/2 of patients could maintain their current line of systemic therapy and ~1/3 had no progression. tinyurl.com/glicksmanrj
ASTRO tweet media
English
1
18
39
4.5K
C. Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD
C. Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD@CJTsaiMDPhD·
🚨📢Happening now - HN oral abstracts #ASCO24‼️ PRACTICE CHANGING trial of hypoxia directed major radiation de-escalation as definitive treatment for HPV+OPC by @imrtlee @MSK_RadOnc @MSKCancerCenter, showing that 30Gy+Chemo is sufficient for cure, with > 500 pts treated so far. 🗣️Why should everyone be treated to 70Gy with large elective dose/volume ⁉️ Radiation does not have to be toxic in many selected patients based on hypoxia status. @xrtGenomics @imrtlee @seanmmcbride @YaoCMKL @yaoyu_md @Esanzgarcia @DrMLChua @KaramLab @Dealmakertech @DanielMaMD @ScottBratman @JJCaudell @safaviaa @HenryParkMD @ajuloorimd @henson_md @RobertFerrisMD @ezrahahn @Dr_AliHosni @lucmorrisnyc @DavidSherMD @LChen_MD
C. Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD tweet mediaC. Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD tweet mediaC. Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD tweet mediaC. Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD tweet media
English
10
76
169
24.8K
James Bates
James Bates@JamesBatesMD·
More H+N action at @ESTRO_RT #ESTRO24 - reduced elective nodal dose (43 Gy @ 1.26 Gy/fx vs 50 Gy @ 1.47 Gy/fx) is safe with equivalent risk of recurrence in elective nodes
James Bates tweet media
English
6
18
33
10.2K
Andy McPartlin
Andy McPartlin@ajmcpartlin·
@DavidSherMD Love the concept. GTV-CTV-PTV accounts for various uncertainties (clinician/imaging/ planning/set up etc) that vary between cases and centres. TROG 0202 LRC lower at smaller centers. Tighter margins may accentuate this. RTQA crucial.
English
0
0
1
58
David Sher
David Sher@DavidSherMD·
Fantastic idea! The reduction in normal tissue receiving higher dose is markedly reduced with a 0 mm CTV70 margin. Some centers (many?) already have this policy. The more data published on lack of marginal failure, the better. Endpoints for DAHANCA 41?
Chr Rønn Hansen@christian_roenn

The results from the #DAHANCA study on correlation between GTV-CTV margin and risk of local recurrence. @Ruta51463637 showed that margin does not seem to influence the risk 🤔 and presented the idea of the next DAHNCA 41 trial. 0 vs 5 mm margin 💪🇩🇰 #ICHNO24

English
3
6
33
5.2K
Ezra Hahn
Ezra Hahn@ezrahahn·
@CJTsaiMDPhD @ajmcpartlin @Dr_AliHosni @ScottBratman Agreed. Time to move on ENI dose. And with more data emerging soon time to move on ENI volume (lots of separate discussions on this point). For some volumes low dose works because it probably doesn't need treatment at all.
English
2
0
10
250
Mark Storey
Mark Storey@ProtonStorey·
@5_utr @gminniti2012 Yep, exactly - at 12 months even PFS curves meet. But think - in the interim you got to go to the doctor's office more and have more treatments and labs etc. And then the graphic - at least have the radiation hit the head region.
English
1
0
4
150
David Sher
David Sher@DavidSherMD·
@JoaquinJCabrera In my opinion, it is a game-changer for CBCT-based ART. It's not a perfect solution when there is motion, but I am very impressed and excited to see studies coming out using this technology.
English
1
0
3
193
Simona Gaito
Simona Gaito@simona_gaito·
🎄Busy holiday season for me as I get ready to take on my new role as a ClinOnc Consultant @royalmarsdenNHS. My special thanks to everyone who has supported me throughout this journey,offering a space to discuss career aspirations and challenges #whereishoskin#profananya #nburnet
Simona Gaito tweet media
English
17
3
66
8.4K
Panos Kyzas
Panos Kyzas@PKyzas·
I am humbled and honoured to share that I will be starting as a visiting Professor in OMFS H&N Surgery at Edge Hill University from August 2023
English
8
0
43
5.1K
James Bates
James Bates@JamesBatesMD·
Medulla dose matters in dysphasia risk in oropharyngeal cancer treatment - from Eliana Vasquez Osorio #ESTRO23
James Bates tweet media
Vienna, Austria 🇦🇹 English
5
7
25
4.1K