Akshat Singhal

7K posts

Akshat Singhal banner
Akshat Singhal

Akshat Singhal

@akshat_one

Cule|IITG'23

Noida, India Katılım Mayıs 2019
227 Takip Edilen95 Takipçiler
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Ankur Singh
Ankur Singh@AnkurSingh·
Reality of Yogendra Yadav Before Elections: - Mamata has successfully manged SIR - SIR has no impact on Bengal Elections - SIR won't change result - No anti-incumbancy against Mamata After Results: - Mamata lost only because of SIR
English
381
2.8K
6.4K
186.6K
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Ajay Rotti
Ajay Rotti@ajayrotti·
WB anti incumbency not enough for BJP to win since BJP is weak in WB. But TN anti incumbency was enough for TVK to win since TVK was very strong in TN and has been so for 50 years. 😂😂😂
Prashant Bhushan@pbhushan1

While the results of the TN & Kerala elections are a result of anti incumbency, the results of Bengal cannot be explained by this alone. The BJP was weak there & has succeeded only due to the combined might of the ECI, the Central govt & their resources being deployed for the BJP

English
11
471
2.4K
35.1K
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Ajay Rotti
Ajay Rotti@ajayrotti·
Kerala seems to have had the best elections. Every single EVM good. TN had fair elections. WB looks bad. Assam looks terrible. Same ECI. Different performance.
English
10
186
1.8K
29.6K
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Vijay
Vijay@centerofright·
All WB problems of last 50+ years will be shown finally from day one of BJP govt
English
45
1.5K
9.4K
113.3K
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Anand Ranganathan
Anand Ranganathan@ARanganathan72·
DMK has been eradicated.
Anand Ranganathan tweet media
English
1K
17.8K
86.1K
1.3M
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
S. Rajiv Krishna
S. Rajiv Krishna@RajivKrishnaS·
With all due respect to Revanth Anna (whom I admire personally a lot), I don’t understand the logic. Let’s assume India was only 2 States - UP with 80 & Kerala with 20. Total 100. To form Govt for India as a whole one needs 51 seats (51% of India’s 100 Seats & 64% of UP’s 80 Seats). Now if both increase by 50% each - UP becomes 120 & Kerala becomes 30. Total 150. To form Govt for India as a whole one needs 76 Seats (51% of India’s new total of 150 Seats & still 64% of UP’s new 120 Seats). The same geographic area which earlier had the 51 seats now has 76 seats - same land and same people. So it’s actually the Percent which matters, not the actual number. #Delimitation @IndiaToday @sardesairajdeep @revanth_anumula @BJP4India @INCIndia @JaiTDP @ncbn @naralokesh
Dr. Girija Shetkar@GirijaShetkar

Kerala has 20 Seats, UP has 80, A gap of 60. Increase both by 50% and it becomes 30 vs 120, The gap widens to 90. In politics, it’s not Percentages, it’s numbers that decide power. - CM Revanth Reddy Garu.

English
62
76
644
100.8K
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Aditya Saha
Aditya Saha@Adityakrsaha·
There is a reason Virat has shifted to London so that he can live a normal family life which everyone has dreamed of, with their kids. Spending time with them not just in the home but by also dropping them to school or playing with them in parks, etc. This surely isn't possible in India, given his stature and fanbase + how people behave in this country after seeing any celebrity outside.
Virat Kohli Fan Club@Trend_VKohli

Virat Kohli with Akaay at London Streets 🥰❤️

English
39
95
2.8K
222.9K
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Narendra Modi
Narendra Modi@narendramodi·
India’s cricketing talent shines! Proud of our U-19 team for bringing home the World Cup. The team has played very well through the tournament, showcasing exceptional skill. This win will inspire several young sportspersons too. Best wishes to the players for their upcoming endeavours.
English
1.9K
11.4K
124.8K
12.9M
Akshat Singhal retweetledi
Sanjeev Bikhchandani
Very well written @deepigoyal Every word is true. It beggars belief that a Champagne Socialist who married a film star and had a designer wedding in Udaipur and a first wedding anniversary in Maldives has the audacity to then shed crocodile tears around alleged exploitation of gig workers. Aam Aadmi my foot
Deepinder Goyal@deepigoyal

Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while. For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt. The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale. Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general. This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less. We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal. Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”). And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility. Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income. And then what happens? The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated. The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door. Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.

English
321
1.5K
7.3K
727.6K
Air India Express
Air India Express@AirIndiaX·
@akshat_one Hi Akshat! We apologise for the changes in your flight schedule, please DM us your booking details so we can further assist.
English
1
0
0
32
Akshat Singhal
Akshat Singhal@akshat_one·
@AirIndiaX my parents to flight from Indore to Sharjah has been preponed by more than an hour. They had booked a connecting flight from Delhi to Sharjah via Indore, however this preponement of Indore to Sharjah leg means very little time for them to change the aircrafts.
English
2
0
0
56
Air India
Air India@airindia·
@akshat_one Dear Mr. Singhal, we hear you and would request you to please share the booking details with us via DM. We'll look into it.
English
1
0
0
40