Alex Epstein

32.9K posts

Alex Epstein banner
Alex Epstein

Alex Epstein

@AlexEpstein

Philosopher and energy expert https://t.co/3C8ZHMib9K https://t.co/TFX9BS9SDW https://t.co/y6g2aYdZ7T https://t.co/QuURw2LXo5

Laguna Beach, CA Katılım Nisan 2009
546 Takip Edilen221.7K Takipçiler
Alex Epstein retweetledi
The Rational Animal 🤔
The Rational Animal 🤔@theobjectivist·
Bernie Sanders and AOC want to "slow down" AI. Translation: two people who have never built anything want to control the people who are building everything. Fortunately, nobody seems to care what Bernie thinks about AI. And for good reason. AI is already working for everyone. Right now, a first-generation college student is using it to learn calculus. A small business owner is using it to write contracts she could never afford a lawyer for. A developer is building in hours what used to take weeks. A farmer is optimizing yields. A nurse is researching treatment options in seconds instead of hours. AI is the most democratizing technology since the printing press and it was built entirely by the private sector. No government program created it. No committee approved it. No senator funded it. Free minds pursuing rational self-interest built it, and it is making every person who touches it more capable, more productive, and more independent. That is exactly why Bernie wants to slow it down. Independent, capable, productive individuals do not need Bernie Sanders.
Bernie Sanders@BernieSanders

I enjoyed my chat with Hank Green. Three years ago, AI leaders, including Elon Musk, warned we were moving too fast and even called for a pause. Nobody listened. @AOC and I are saying the same thing: slow it down and make sure AI works for people — not just billionaires.

English
7
16
75
4.8K
Alex Epstein retweetledi
The Rational Animal 🤔
The Rational Animal 🤔@theobjectivist·
The average American today lives better than John D. Rockefeller did in 1926. That is not an exaggeration. It is a fact. Rockefeller could not fly across the country in five hours. You can for $200. He could not video call his family from another continent. You do it for free. He had no antibiotics, no MRI, no air conditioning in July. He could not carry every book ever written in his pocket. You are reading this on a device that does all of that and more. Americans throw away 30-40% of their food. Not because they are wasteful, but because food is so abundant that waste is affordable. Your car has climate control, navigation, and safety systems that did not exist at any price a century ago. Your home has heating, cooling, refrigeration, and entertainment that emperors could not have imagined. None of this was voted into existence. None of it was redistributed from the rich. It was created by free minds operating in what remains of a free market. Every comfort you enjoy today is the product of a man who thought, invented, produced, and traded voluntarily. This is what the remnants of capitalism still deliver, even while it is being dismantled. Imagine what a fully free society could build.
English
356
2.4K
11.4K
402.4K
Alex Epstein retweetledi
Kmele 🖐
Kmele 🖐@kmele·
Everyone's the first-something-to-do-something. The first lefty Californian to summit K2. The first person with astigmatism to win a Super Bowl. Victor Glover will be one of only 28 humans ever to journey to the moon. Maybe that’s enough. [the banality of identity “journalism”]
Kmele 🖐 tweet media
English
45
60
829
160.9K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
Too bad solar isn’t a real power source.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@JessePeltan There is more than enough surface area in Japan to power the entire country with solar without infringing on farming or destroying forests

English
53
14
219
42.2K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
👀
Blake Scholl 🛫@bscholl

I'm genuinely excited to see America headed back to the Moon. But Artemis is a moondoggle and shows we haven't learned the deepest lessons of the Apollo era. Remember that Apollo did *not* result in durable progress in space. It marked a literal high point for more than half a century. The cost of space access remained prohibitively high until we had a rebirth of space entrepreneurship. Thank you for showing the way, SpaceX. Apollo was history's greatest tech demo—the Moon landing. This is inspiring—it shows the triumph of ingenuity, science, and reason. But also, Apollo led to half a century of stasis and regression. It was fundamentally uneconomic, contributed to creation of a cost-insensitive space agency and supply base, all more concerned with perpetuating their own existence, more concerned with make-work jobs than accelerating human progress. Now we're going back to the Moon... essentially the same way we did in 1969. Again uneconomically, again with central planning. A disposable rocket, no answer to how we create a self-sustaining lunar economy. Again, we're taking communists approaches in competition with the communists. Communism didn't work for the Russians, and it won't work for America either. The sooner we can be done with this moondoggle, the better. But there is also reason to be optimistic: this time around, there's a nascent, commercially-led vision for the moon. Lunar hotels. Mass drivers. Data centers in space. Helium-3. The commercial programs that gave SpaceX an early assist show a different and better path forward. This is where the better future lies, and this is where America should be focused. America should take the Moon, and we should take it the same way we took the American West. Let's encourage and protect lunar value creation. How about a Homestead Act for the Moon? Most important, let's stop dumping money and more importantly the time of our engineers and scientists on glory projects that will never lead to a better future. It is indeed time for another space race. Last time, we fought communism with communism. This time, let's remember what made America great. This time, let's fight communism with capitalism.

ART
0
1
26
6K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
I’ve cut back dramatically on public speaking since I now have very young children, but I really wanted to speak at this June event in New Orleans held by the Ayn Rand Institute. Check it out!
Ayn Rand Institute@AynRandInst

Over the last two centuries, America’s businessmen have liberated all of us economically, creating unprecedented wealth and opportunity. But tragically, businessmen themselves have often become increasingly shackled politically. At OCON 2026, @AlexEpstein will share how he has succeeded in helping businessmen in the energy industry reverse that trend—by giving them a moral appreciation of their work and by giving politicians a blueprint for championing and implementing pro-freedom energy policies. He will draw lessons that can be applied to the liberation of all of America’s producers. Register today » hubs.la/Q044GKg20

English
0
4
40
4.8K
Alex Epstein retweetledi
Graham Radler
Graham Radler@GrahamRadler·
@AlexEpstein Preaching the truth @AlexEpstein . The renewables industry + state sponsored (monopoly) electric utilities are responsible for the rising costs of power in the US. Our country should not lose one of its most important competitive advantages, low cost electric power
English
2
9
31
3K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
Tell your Senator not to subsidize electric monopolies at your expense Electric monopolies love building electric transmission lines, whether they are needed or not, because the government requires consumers to pay for them—meaning a guaranteed profit. That’s why we need transmission policies that only require consumer payment for efficient transmission lines that lower our electric bills and increase the supply of reliable electricity. Unfortunately, several Senators have proposed a transmission subsidy bill that will enrich monopoly utilities and subsidize developers of unreliable wind and solar projects at the expense of consumers. The transmission subsidy proposal: • Makes it easy for the government to force consumers to pay for wasteful long-distance transmission lines that mostly serve unreliable wind and solar projects. • Makes it easy for the government to force consumers to pay for wasteful medium- and short-distance transmission lines. • Forces all Americans in all states to pay for wasteful lines that only some states want. Transmission reform is a great topic for the Senate to pick up, but it needs to: • Fix the laws that most delay permitting today—such as NEPA, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the National Historic Preservation Act—so that efficient transmission lines and other crucial projects can be permitted and built quickly. • Create affordability protections for consumers, including: closing monopoly-enriching loopholes, imposing higher standards for requiring consumer payment, and adopting fairer ways of spreading the costs around.
English
6
27
105
6.1K
Alex Epstein retweetledi
Blake Scholl 🛫
Blake Scholl 🛫@bscholl·
BREAKING: The bipartisan Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act (SAMA) just passed the House UNANIMOUSLY and is headed to the Senate. Supersonic flight isn't red or blue. It's Red, White, and Blue. 🇺🇸✈️💪
English
89
209
3.1K
195.9K
Alex Epstein retweetledi
Congressman Josh Brecheen
Congressman Josh Brecheen@RepBrecheen·
Thank you, @AlexEpstein! Your help during reconciliation was ABSOLUTELY critical to our success! It is amazing news that the US has since tripled its development schedule for dependable fossil fuel generation now that wind and solar subsidies will fully phase out for new projects by 2027.
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein

x.com/i/article/2033…

English
0
15
84
6.3K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
If you treat intermittent solar and wind as if they were reliable generators, they can appear cheaper than natural gas. If you recognize that intermittent solar and wind are fuel savers for reliable generators, not themselves reliable generators, it becomes clear that trying to power a modern society with them is prohibitively expensive. It would require so much expensive storage and so much overbuilding that the cost would be on the order of 10 to 20x higher than natural gas!
Alex@alex_avoigt

To all who still don't get why renewable energy generation beats oil & gas hands down:

English
115
155
713
36.4K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
Elon claims that energy abundance can be achieved with only solar plus battery storage. This is just not true, not today and not for the forseeable future. Even just supplying global electricity demand (around 20% of energy) with solar and storage would cost more than world GDP, because the amount of storage required to compensate for solar's intermittency is gargantuan. And some totally critical non-electricity energy has no near-term electric replacements (e.g., aviation, ocean shipping, industrial heat for cement and steelmaking, and more).
Tesla Owners Silicon Valley@teslaownersSV

Elon Musk: The vast majority of intelligent people still miss this — sustainable abundance for humanity is completely achievable on Earth. “There is a straightforward roadmap to a fully sustainable energy future for our planet. It doesn’t mean wrecking natural habitats. It doesn’t mean embracing austerity, shutting off the lights, or freezing in the dark. In fact, we could sustainably support a civilization far larger than today’s — well beyond 8 billion people. I’m continually surprised that so few recognize this obvious path. Most of the sharpest minds I talk to still don’t see it. They assume a sustainable energy future either doesn’t exist, can’t handle our current population, or demands drastic sacrifices. None of that is accurate.”

English
162
93
448
30.9K
Alex Epstein
Alex Epstein@AlexEpstein·
The same anti-fossil-fuel politicians who spent the last decade sabotaging our electricity supply are now saying we should sabotage demand through a data center moratorium. How about instead we abandon anti-fossil-fuel policies so supply can meet demand and we can be prosperous?
Alex Epstein tweet media
English
10
27
121
3.9K
Alex Epstein retweetledi
John Stossel
John Stossel@JohnStossel·
We’re told we must STOP burning fossil fuels. That would hurt poor people most. “Billions ... will not become wealthy if they don’t have low-cost reliable energy," energy specialist @AlexEpstein points out. “That’s going to require more fossil fuels, not less.”
English
26
193
1K
30.2K