Alex Numeris

@YouTube @YouTubeCreators get your shit together

@BitcoinCom this is insane @TeamYouTube wake up

YouTube deleted our channel for being "harmful and dangerous." Our content since 2015: #Bitcoin education. Wallet tutorials. Objective news. YouTube's content: crypto scam ads running 24/7 with zero moderation. Appeal rejected. No strikes. No explanation. Just an algorithm that can't tell a 10-year-old company from an actual scam. @TeamYouTube — can we get a human, or do we need to buy an ad first?

@TylerDurden @MikeSilagadze @ether_fi Yea untill they close it - I used it and recommended it to lots of ppl / untill they closed my account and asked a bunch of paperwork - thx @MikeSilagadze @ether_fi / beware expect the same outcome in the end

I can’t speak highly enough about @MikeSilagadze and his team at @ether_fi. They just onboarded me privately. I’ve been unbanked for 10 years. I bounce between cards and/or localbitcoins. Finally found a final DeFi solution that offers me everything + business account.

@TheBTCTherapist Use this bitcoin time machine crypto.st/prices/bitcoin…

“So you bought Bitcoin at $69,000 in 2021.” “Yes, Dave.” “And then you bought it again at $126,000.” “Yes, Dave.” “And price is $69,000 again in 2026.” “Yes, Dave.” “And you’re still buying it.” “That is correct Dave.”

@AlexT60391 Hi @RadaMateescu can you take a look at this see if this legit

Salut fac si eu public o parte din aventura mea in lumea Crypto din ultimii aproximativ 3 ani. Am participat in presale la un proiect romanesc cu suma de 250.000$ nu mi-a bagat nimeni mana in buzunar a fost decizia mea, dar de aici incepe povestea pe care vreau sa o aduc in evidenta dupa aceasta investitie am inceput sa conversez cu domnul Cristian Mateescu ( acest guru al crypto laudat si ridicat in slavi ) care facea si el parte din proiect care ma convins sa mai investesc inca 100.000$ in acest proiect(nu este acesta problema pe care vreau sa o expun) la un moment dat cadem de comun accord sa ii ofer 100.000$ lui personal pe care sa il tranzactioneze discutiile si conditiile raman urmatoarele. Sa nu ii cer detalii despre balanta la scurt timp , convenim amandoi ca la 2 luni sa imi expuna balanta Sa tranzactioneze 50% spot si 50% futures din suma totala I-am cerut sa facem un cont comun pentru tranzactionare , a spus ca ii este greu sa puna ordine pe 2 conturi(inca o greseala grava din partea mea ca am acceptat) Revin dupa aproximativ 3-4 luni intreb si eu ca omu ce se intampla s-au ocolit raspunsurile imi spune ca in Decembrie imi va da balanta ca a facut MICI greseli si ca va reveni, banii au fost trimis in Aprilie!! Dupa aproximativ un an jumatate imi spune ca de fapt a pierdut banii, ii cer dovezi pe care le “primesc” dupa inca un an jumatate in care imi arata o pierdere intinsa pe cateva luni de 149.000$ la care spune ca nu a pierdut decat banii mei , ci si banii lui incercand sa imi recupereze mie banii. Pe langa aceste investitii intotdeauna mi-a oferit proiecte in privat cu coduri de referal unde am investit iarasi peste 50.000$ in noduri in 3 proiecte unde el avea anumite beneficii ( proiecte care 2 din 3 nici nu mai exista ) Dupa acesti 3 ani am incercat sa rezolv problema aceasta cu el amiabil si mi-a spus ca el trece printr-o perioada grea si ca eu cerandui socoteala despre toate astea mi-a spus asta. “In incheiere, chiar m-ai ajutat sa constientizez cat de rau este sa stau in lumea asta, asa ca am decis de sambata ca usor, usor voi iesi de tot din crypto si pentru asta iti multumesc ca ai pus cuiul in cosciugul acestei perioade nefaste din viata mea” Nu am scris acest mesaj sa fac rau cuiva doar ca vreau ca acest fenomen sa nu se raspandeasca si va rog daca alte persoane sunt in aceasi situatie sa ma contacteze. Aceste dezvaluiri vor continua acesta a fost un mesaj scris la repezeala si neanalizat dar vor urma si alte dezvaluiri! Mesaje si promisiuni de milioane de euro atrase in proiecte doar ca sa te mai stoarca de mii de euro, si cum urma sa ma faca sa investesc si in proiectul lui personal dupa ce aceasta “prietenie” ma costat sute de mii de dolari, nu stiu cine ,cui a vrut sa bata cuiul in costiugul celuilalt. @CryptoBTCSniper @cryptoaceyt @cryptoro @Mr_Crypto5 @CryptoAici @realdanielnita @flaviusmg89 @MIhaiDanielWeb3 @iBlockRo Imi cer scuze celor taguiti

Cryptocurrencies are not designed for humans, but for AI agents

@zachxbt @andreibratucu @WheresBroox @AxiomExchange

@andreibratucu @WheresBroox @AxiomExchange says the account hyping up $25 rewards

1/ Meet @WheresBroox (Broox Bauer), one of the multiple @AxiomExchange employees allegedly abusing the lack of access controls for internal tools to lookup sensitive user details to insider trade by tracking private wallet activity since early 2025.

@zachxbt @WheresBroox @AxiomExchange Thank your for your service Zach

@zachxbt @KPeruggi but it's art , on-chain

@KPeruggi I stated profitable

Gotta be NFT marketplace right?

@CryptoKaleo NEVER BEEN MORE BULLISH

Another one. I’ll continue to share posts like this. These are the type of headlines you see at generational bottoms when fear is palpable.

@cryptomanran NEVER BEEN MORE BULLISH

For the first time in 12 years, I’m questioning Bitcoin’s thesis. It’s not the drawdown that concerns me; it’s how Bitcoin responded when markets genuinely moved into risk and uncertainty. $BTC evolved from “peer-to-peer cash” into “digital gold.” We fought for ETF approval. We fought for institutional access. We wanted it inside the system. Now it is. There is nothing to fight for anymore. So when tariffs, currency tension, and fiscal instability hit, this was the moment Bitcoin was supposed to behave like a store of value. Instead, capital ran to gold. Institutions had access. There were no barriers left. That’s the uncomfortable part. If it’s not used as cash, and it didn’t meaningfully absorb the stress bid, then what exactly is the narrative? Retail participation is near multi-year lows. Early evangelists have largely exited. Even aggressive weekly buyers can’t generate sustained momentum. That doesn’t mean Bitcoin dies. But it does mean the thesis isn’t unquestioned anymore. What’s interesting is I’m worried about Bitcoin, not crypto. Because the next wave isn’t ideological. AI agents won’t use banks. They won’t use credit cards. They’ll need instant, programmable settlement rails. That’s crypto. In my new video, I unpack why I think Bitcoin failed this cycle’s defining test and what is likely to happen next. [link in comments]

@coinbureau NEVER BEEN MORE BULLISH

⚠️ALERT: CryptoQuant Bitcoin’s Bull-Bear Market Cycle Indicator just hit its LOWEST point since the FTX collapse.

@blockchain youtube.com/watch?v=ox__f7…

@alexnumeris gm can never be cancelled

gmgmgmgmgmgmgmgm

@Darkfost_Coc @cryptoquant_com @HeyGen make this a video

📊 The Sharpe ratio has just entered a particularly interesting zone, one that has historically aligned with the final phases of bear markets. This is not a signal that the bear market is over, but rather that we are approaching a point where the risk to reward profile is becoming extreme. In practical terms, the risk associated with investing in BTC remains high relative to the returns recently observed. 📉 The ratio is still deteriorating, showing that BTC’s performance is not yet attractive compared to the risk being taken. But this type of dynamic is precisely what tends to appear near market turning zones. We are gradually approaching an area where this trend has historically reversed. The Sharpe ratio should almost be used in a contrarian way. It is a metric that reflects the consequences of market evolution, not a cause. In other words, it highlights that recent returns on BTC have been poor and continue to be so. As a result, many investors are under water or under pressure, which often corresponds to phases where long term opportunities begin to emerge. From here, two main approaches can be considered. ➡️ The first is to start building exposure gradually, step by step, as the ratio moves closer to zones historically associated with lower risk. ➡️ The second is to wait for the Sharpe ratio to clearly improve before increasing exposure. It is important to stay realistic about timing. ⚠️ This phase may last several more months, and BTC could continue correcting before a true reversal takes place. The signal is structurally constructive, but it needs time to develop. There is no rush.

@indexsy Localrank

REPEAT AFTER ME 2026 is the year of the LISTICLE I have a method for getting brands into 100s of 3rd party listicles. The same one I used to get LocalRank to #1 on ChatGPT for "best local rank tracker" Comment "LOCALRANK" + bookmark this post and I'll DM it to you (must be following)

@gothburz @raven_0604 This is beautiful

I am the lead engineer at ai.com. We had $78 million to work with. $70 million went to the domain. $8 million went to the Super Bowl ad.  I got the rest. "The rest" was $500 and a Cloudflare free tier. This ratio -- 156,000 to 1, marketing to engineering -- is not a bug. It is the business model of the entire artificial intelligence industry in 2026. You do not need a product. You need a name. Preferably two letters. Preferably letters that made investors lose bladder control in 2024. I built the website in a weekend. I didn't build it, actually. I described it to OpenClaw (previosely Moltbook), (previously, reviously Clawdbot) and the AI built it. We are, after all, an AI company. Using AI to build the website felt appropriate. The AI charged us nothing. We are charging users $20 a month. This is called "margin." We have a free tier and a paid tier. The free tier gives you access to a product that doesn't exist. The paid tier gives you access to the same product that doesn't exist, but with more input tokens. No one has asked "input tokens for what." This is the kind of question that delays launches. Nobody checked if it worked. Nobody checked if it scaled. Nobody checked if it did anything at all. We were too busy approving the logo. The logo is a planet with a ring around it. Someone said it looked like the old Saturn car logo. Saturn went bankrupt in 2010. But the logo was free and our design budget went to the domain, so here we are, orbiting a dead brand at $70 million per revolution. Our product is an "autonomous AI agent" that "organizes work, sends messages, and executes actions across apps." Which actions. Which apps. At what cost. In the AI industry, these are called "implementation details." Implementation details are beneath us. We are a vision company. The vision cost $70 million. The implementation cost $500. The gap between the two is where shareholder value lives. Our press release promises the agent will "trade stocks, automate workflows, and update your online dating profile." We are building artificial general intelligence so it can fix your Hinge bio. This is on the roadmap. The roadmap is longer than the codebase. Our marketing says you can create an AI agent in 60 seconds. This is technically true. You type a username. You click "generate." You receive a loading spinner. Sixty seconds. What you do not receive is an AI agent. But the experience of waiting for one is, I'm told, "the product." Our press release describes a "decentralized network of billions of agents." We used the word "decentralized" because our CEO comes from crypto. In crypto, "decentralized" means "we haven't decided how it works yet." We have not changed the definition. This is not unique to us. OpenAI has raised $40 billion. Their product loses money on every user. Anthropic has raised $15 billion. Their stated goal is to build something they believe might destroy humanity, and investors are fighting to give them more. Microsoft has committed $80 billion to AI infrastructure this year. Their Copilot product tells people to put glue on pizza. The entire industry is a $300 billion screensaver with a loading spinner. We fit right in. Our CEO is the Crypto.com guy. He previously spent $700 million to rename a basketball arena and hired Matt Damon to tell America "fortune favors the brave" six months before crypto lost 70% of its value. He paid for our domain in cryptocurrency. I am told this was "tax efficient." I have learned not to ask follow-up questions about things that are "tax efficient." He is now pivoting from crypto to AI. In the industry, we don't call this "pivoting." We call it "convergence." Convergence means the last bubble popped so you inflate the next one using the same PowerPoint deck with different nouns. The Super Bowl ad ran during the fourth quarter. Thirty seconds. It told 130 million Americans to visit our website. The ad was thirty seconds. That's $266,666 per second. Each second of airtime cost more than our entire engineering budget. Second fourteen showed the logo. Second fourteen cost more than the website. They did visit. All of them, apparently, at once. The website went down. "Prepared for scale, but not for THIS," our CEO tweeted, adding three fire emojis. The fire emojis were load-bearing. They were doing more work than our infrastructure. The entire site was hosted on Cloudflare's basic tier, which is designed for food blogs and wedding photographers, not for absorbing the combined curiosity of a nation told to visit a two-letter domain during the biggest television event on earth. But the crash was, in a way, perfect. It is the most honest thing the AI industry has produced. A $78 million promise that, when 130 million people showed up to collect, returned a loading spinner and the words "please refresh and try again." Every AI company should adopt this as their mission statement. The previous owner of ai.com was OpenAI. They used it to redirect to ChatGPT -- a product that exists, built by thousands of engineers who were paid more than $500, running on billions of dollars of compute. We bought the domain from them to redirect to a page that asks you to pick a username. OpenAI also ran a Super Bowl ad this year. They sold us the domain, then bought ad time in the same broadcast to promote the product they used to host on it. We are now competing with the company that built the thing we may or may not be reselling. During the same commercial break. On the same channel. For the same audience. The AI industry is a snake eating its own tail, except the tail cost $70 million and the snake can't stay online. That's the product. A username. For an AI agent that doesn't exist yet. On a website that couldn't survive its own launch. Sold by a crypto CEO during a crypto winter. Wearing the logo of a bankrupt car company. Twenty-three percent of Super Bowl ads this year were AI companies. That's 15 out of 66. In 2000, it was dot-coms. Pets.com ran a Super Bowl ad. They went bankrupt nine months later. Their sock puppet mascot outlived the company. I'm not saying history repeats. I'm saying it rhymes, and the rhyme scheme is expensive. But none of that matters. What matters is the domain. Two letters. Seventy million dollars. The most expensive thing we own is our name. The least expensive thing we own is everything the name is supposed to represent. In the AI industry, this is called "brand-first development." In every other industry, it's called something else. Anyway, we're hiring. Backend engineers preferred. Budget: whatever's left.

@janbtc @bryan_johnson a.co/d/01seFyQC Be aware of maintenance

@alexnumeris @bryan_johnson Do you have a link?

.@bryan_johnson what water bottle do you use when not at home? I’m finding it impossible to find a bottle that doesn’t include any plastic / silicon (in the lid) and doesn’t leak. I realized my titanium bottle has plastic on the lid lol. Does it really matter? Thinking about making a proper bottle honestly.

@PeterLBrandt @BlakeBriese @JrCrocilla Well played sir

@BlakeBriese @JrCrocilla Since 2016. I have now called the 2017, 2021 and 2025 tops == the 2025 top to within two days Add to that the 2011 and 2026 tops in Silver And now the 2026 top in stocks And you?????

Hey crypto followers $BTC The nature of the decline in Bitcoin (now 8 days of lower lows and highs) has all the finger prints of campaign selling, not retail liquidation Seen this before hundreds of times over the decades Never know when of course this pattern ends Note to trolls - red lines are just discussion points so put away your screen capture tool