AfroNRX

Thank you for all the sacrifices father. We wouldn’t have been here without you 🙏

Bukayo Saka YOU ARE A PREMIER LEAGUE WINNER FOR THE ARSENAL

Arsenal fans realising they are finally free of the annual 2nd place memes

@WestHam_Central Three years we have been waiting to come back to this

WATCH: Declan Rice’s first and last ever trophy won as a professional player.

Arsenal celebrating like they’ve won the league

25/26 Champions

6 minutes

@jondutoit I think the issue is some brothers ending up defending polytheism.

Dr. Heiser helped bring us back to a proper, Biblical understanding of the spiritual hierarchy and rebellion taking place in the unseen realm. Everyone loves quoting Ephesians 6 ("for we do not war against flesh and blood, etc.") but then they push back when someone explicates the only worldview in which that verse makes sense. We are in the middle of Disclosure now. Elements of the unseen are becoming (deceptively) seen. The pagan theosophists call this the "externalization of the hierarchy." Heiser's (and several others') work in returning towards Scriptural cosmology is becoming ESSENTIAL. Those who reject it are at greater risk of being swept up by the deceptions currently taking shape.

Arsenal. It’s 86 mins 1-0

@GunsAndRosariez None of them tell us the source of their information, but since they are multiple disparate sources, the probability the claim is true goes up. I can however be confident their source is not the Western Roman Magisterium as they pre-date ot.

@ansAZ14 Oh so they were there when it was written?

A pagan nation has never been converted to Protestantism. They only go after other Christians.

@writeontheedg3 To which my reply was Yahweh is Elohim not an elohim. "Elohim" meaning "God" not elohim meaning "gods "or "judges" or "angels". You have multiple definitions for Elohim determining how to translate it.

@ansAZ14 I feel like you may want to re-read my post. I never said they were the same as YHVH. I said they were gods that were created by YHVH, but YHVH is an elohim. Of course anything created is naturally lower than the one who created it

Since it seems our brother is unaware of the actual theological position of what is called the Deuteronomy World-View, and for clarities sake: All elohim were created by YHVH, YHVH is an elohim. He is the highest among the elohim. There is not one like Him in all creation. There are other elohim (gods) - they are sometimes called “Sons of God” - rarely the term is sometimes referring to a human ruler - but by and large this is a term used for a wide grouping of other sub-groups of entities within the Creation of YHVH. AKA, the God of gods. Please see PS 82, Duet 32, and Duet 10 for clarification: “For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, the mighty, and the awesome God, who is not partial and takes no bribe.“ As Heiser always said: YHVH is an elohim but no other elohim is like YHVH And on a personal note: to say that understanding scripture’s context, anthropologically, makes you “stupid” seems like a strange argument if determinism is true. Since I was born this way and had no say in the matter. /sarc

@GunsAndRosariez No, those are written testimonies from different sources. Multiple attestation from independet operators.

@ansAZ14 So oral tradition?

@GunsAndRosariez Attestation from: Papias of Hierapolis ; Irenaeus; Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Origen, Jerome. attribution on the p45 fragment. No other attributions on the text.

@ansAZ14 How do you know Mark wrote it?

@GunsAndRosariez But the Bible didn't come from "Oral Traditions": God breathed; Paul wrote; Peter wrote; Mark wrote etc. The bible has never been a controled text. and we can point to specific points in history certain ideas gained prominence in the W.Roman Magisterium and why.

@ansAZ14 Well. Considering the Bible came from those oral traditions, I’d say it’s pretty spot on. Or do you think the Bible was written immediately after Christ ascended into heaven?

@GunsAndRosariez The issue is not with the earliest Christians, the issue is with the Western Roman Magisterium placing their traditions on the same level as the word of God; and falsely claiming their institutions are God's institutions.

@ansAZ14 Please indicate from the writings of the earliest Christian’s where the Roman Magisterium veered from the teaching of Christ and the Apostles.

@blurrycreatures Heiser proposed a theory and a cosmology; and proposed an account of the significance of certain actions of Jesus if Jesus was responding to Jewish myths. Christians did already accept the so called gods are demons in some cases, idols in others; and that angels are real etc

Heiser ONLY helped Christians understand the complexity of higher beings the Bible overtly talks about. Modern people don’t get it. The “gods” are real (sometimes linked to angels or territorial spirits etc) but they are ALWAYS inferior, created, & accountable to Yahweh. 🤦🏼‍♂️

@AxadJimco How are you getting a cardinality of 2 Beings from A single being that has at least two centers of identity?

If IP deletes this tweet in the next coming days just keep this screenshot He is literally arguing for 2 GODS He completely blundered the math. 2+2=4 and 3+1 are two separate equations that happen to equal 4. If you apply this to theology, you're arguing for two separate gods who happen to share a title (Tritheism).

@29Havertz43802 Nah, I want to breathe easy, and the boys to focus on Budapest. Better we go to Palace as champions and give the main guys a rest to focus on PSG.

I’m an Arsenal fan, but I don’t want us winning the league tonight through Man City vs Bournemouth at the Vitality 😅 It wouldn’t feel fully earned. I’m hoping City win 0-3, then we beat Crystal Palace ourselves to be crowned. That would feel far more special. Thoughts?

@_InTheFilth Be honest. Satan was being deceptive. He was not interpreting scripture. Jesus responds with the right scripture for the context. Hence "Scripture integrates scripture". Alternatively, God's word determines what God means.

"Protestant scholar" > Scripture interprets scripture. > The devil was the first to interpret privately.